I’ve been asked on TV hits and interviews lately to explain why decentralized social media is better, especially re: Mastodon.

[robotistry@mstdn.ca]

@WolvericCatkin @weezmgk I crashed just after I found out my instance was shutting down, and by the time I was well enough to come back it was gone and I couldn't migrate anything. Thanks, #LongCovid.

[lori@cambrian.social]

@benroyce @davew And the most alt-text-encouraging culture in cyberspace.

[lori@cambrian.social]

@taylorlorenz @ben Certainly non-adversarial data export was a distant memory before I found the fediverse.

[robotistry@mstdn.ca]

@taylorlorenz

Twitter was like being stuck on a cable news panel of people shouting at each other. Every interaction was fraught and involved people obsessed with correcting or reinforcing each other's opinions.

Mastodon is like a coffee break at a conference. Like walking through a constant stream of interesting conversations that I can drift in and out of without fuss or pressure.

I don't have to surf an emotional high as I scroll. People here read posts all the way through and engage intellectually and emotionally instead of only emotionally.

And I curate my timeline, so I can manage how much emotional exhaustion I'm willing to incur and I mostly don't get random crap that infuriates me or is designed to upset me.

There are still microbloggers, and there are moderation problems, but Mastodon doesn't track "influence" so I don't get many influencers in my feed.

It's restful.

[lori@cambrian.social]

@_elena @Tamtam @n_dimension @taylorlorenz C44 appears to be #ytdlp compatible and therefore works for me. It's on my playlist for tonite.

[leavex@mastodon.social]

The Fediverse, and Mastodon in particular, showcases what social media can be when designed for democratic dialogue rather than profit.
It’s open source, so its rules and algorithms are transparent and accountable.
No single company owns it, so no billionaire can unilaterally shape speech.
It’s also interoperable, meaning people can move freely instead of being trapped in walled gardens.
Because it doesn't depend on outrage for ad revenue, it fosters healthier, more civil conversations.
#LeaveX

[htaggert@mstdn.social]

@taylorlorenz for me- I enjoy posting without anyone trying to monetize me or my data

[tamtam@mastodon.de]

@taylorlorenz it's not trying to steer society towards fascism, All the algorithmic social media chucks far right content at you now, The algorithms have been tweeked to prefer it. They also block searches for "democrats" for instance . Or "Trump dementia". The CEOs have adopted the strategie to bring up fascist regimes so they will not be regulated. Also: Trump has people on the board of meta now.
Open source is our only chance at keeping a democratic society.

[tamtam@mastodon.de]

@n_dimension @taylorlorenz @_elena by the way, how do I find a peertube instance, that would host my channel and has better hosting than this example, we just saw?
Is it possible to make a living off of peertube? does anyone know anyone who does is? Like offering services on patreon and solely getting their audience from the fediverse, never posting on YT??

[tamtam@mastodon.de]

@lori @_elena @n_dimension @taylorlorenz can you make your post accesible for non tech -me?

[nan@mastodon.green]

@taylorlorenz the most persuasive description I have heard is that, if you're not getting the support or moderation you need, you can just move without having to leave all your followers behind.

In that way it's more like phone providers or ISP in that because everything's connected but independent, you're not stuck with whoever you started with.

[zekovski@pouet.chapril.org]

@taylorlorenz
The network is built so it can't be controlled by one single entity.
Therefore this entity cannot impose a unique censorship to everyone.

[philpetree@mastodon.social]

@cholling @taylorlorenz User Agent Strings which id crawlers such as GPTBot.

[cholling@bytes.programming.dev]

@philpetree @taylorlorenz And can never be faked?

[lori@cambrian.social]

@Tamtam @taylorlorenz If it's not o̶p̶e̶n̶ ̶s̶o̶u̶r̶c̶e̶ free software it's a simulacrum and a panopticon.

[steve_lindsay@fediscience.org]

@taylorlorenz I'm no expert but I think the main advantage is that the fediverse is not designed to milk its users for profit.

[danbrotherston@types.pl]

@taylorlorenz Ultimately, you're not going to get everyone on board, no matter how you describe it. There are simply people, for whom a strongman authoritarian is the preferred form of governance (they believe it'll always be their strongman of course). These people will never prefer a distributed system.

But that's not such a helpful answer, hopefully there are good arguments for reading the remainder (majority) of people who prefer democratic governance and distributed power.

[philpetree@mastodon.social]

@cholling @taylorlorenz and no problem can ever be solved and no solution is ever complete... Dude, your schtick is as old as time. Find another target.

[abosio@fosstodon.org]

@taylorlorenz My main reason is no tech bro can buy it and even if my instance goes bad I can easily relocate to another.

[etam@im-in.space]

@taylorlorenz
1) The goal of any company is to make money. Baking bread or providing digital platforms are different means of achieveing it. They all have a product and customers. In case of twitter or facebook, the customers are advertisers and the product is time users spend on their platforms. So in order to maximize their profits, they use algorithms, that maximize the users engagement. It doesn't matter if it's more funny cat videos or more fake news and extremist propaganda, whatever gets you engaged, will get amplified. The fediverse does not do that.