Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Most major #media and #socialMedia in the #USA is now right wing controlled

Most major #media and #socialMedia in the #USA is now right wing controlled

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
mediasocialmediausatechbromagyar
180 Posts 36 Posters 4 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
    benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
    benroyce@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #107

    @Tofu_Golem @mason @mistergibson

    the only choice in the world is harm reduction or greater harm

    sitting things out and thus helping greater harm win is you being an idiot, or you being a troll trying to help MAGA win

    mason@partychickens.netM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      benroyce@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #108

      @PttP @mistergibson @mason

      so we vote for harm reduction

      because not voting means we are helping greater harm win

      asprinkleofsage@mastodon.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

        @wjmaggos @Eetschrijver @mistergibson

        well our purposes overlap then because the current problem in the usa is the plutocrat-bigot political axis

        bigots vote for plutocrats because plutocrats promise to be abusive to groups bigots hate, and they don't care about plutocrats robbing them

        and plutocrats control media and social media and feed bigots cheer to fire them up to vote

        and here you are, arguing to let bigots on the fediverse?

        hell fucking no. never going to happen

        wjmaggos@liberal.cityW This user is from outside of this forum
        wjmaggos@liberal.cityW This user is from outside of this forum
        wjmaggos@liberal.city
        wrote last edited by
        #109

        @benroyce @Eetschrijver @mistergibson

        the bigots exist IRL. they have websites. ugh.

        afaict you think that bigots here would make us like X. even though we don't have an algo.

        what I think would happen is you'd just also get to follow people who aren't here cause the no bigot policy excludes lots of normie non lefties which includes their followers so they say why bother. but we'd also be surprised by support from people we follow for moderate policies. and see rightwing opposition to war.

        benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • wjmaggos@liberal.cityW wjmaggos@liberal.city

          @benroyce @Eetschrijver @mistergibson

          the bigots exist IRL. they have websites. ugh.

          afaict you think that bigots here would make us like X. even though we don't have an algo.

          what I think would happen is you'd just also get to follow people who aren't here cause the no bigot policy excludes lots of normie non lefties which includes their followers so they say why bother. but we'd also be surprised by support from people we follow for moderate policies. and see rightwing opposition to war.

          benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
          benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
          benroyce@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #110

          @wjmaggos @Eetschrijver @mistergibson

          if someone says something bigoted, they are nuked from the fediverse

          everything else you say, about normies, right wingers, moderates, non lefties, conservatives, etc: unaffected

          unless by your insistence on confusing "nuke bigot accounts" with "nuke conservative accounts" time after time after time that you are tacitly admitting much if not most of conservatism is in fact bigotry

          wjmaggos@liberal.cityW 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

            @wjmaggos @Eetschrijver @mistergibson

            if someone says something bigoted, they are nuked from the fediverse

            everything else you say, about normies, right wingers, moderates, non lefties, conservatives, etc: unaffected

            unless by your insistence on confusing "nuke bigot accounts" with "nuke conservative accounts" time after time after time that you are tacitly admitting much if not most of conservatism is in fact bigotry

            wjmaggos@liberal.cityW This user is from outside of this forum
            wjmaggos@liberal.cityW This user is from outside of this forum
            wjmaggos@liberal.city
            wrote last edited by
            #111

            @benroyce @Eetschrijver @mistergibson

            I'm arguing you don't control that distinction. that we don't see users who are non left but also not bigoted on fedi today and the prevalent norm here you're defending (while saying you're not) is a big part of that.

            your distinction is a theory that doesn't operate here. and it couldn't because tomorrow somebody you thought was just conservative will say they support Trump etc.

            a better line is us vs harassers. no need to hunt through old posts...

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • wjmaggos@liberal.cityW This user is from outside of this forum
              wjmaggos@liberal.cityW This user is from outside of this forum
              wjmaggos@liberal.city
              wrote last edited by
              #112

              @benroyce @Eetschrijver @mistergibson

              I asked you what you thought the point of this place was and told you I think it has revolutionary potential to deal with money in our culture and civics. but that would require the masses be here. the too strict norm most embrace here prevents that. so I argue against it and hope that eventually, people agree. others then argue for it too. same with any argument about how things should change and what I think is possible if it does. reasoned persuasion.

              benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • wjmaggos@liberal.cityW wjmaggos@liberal.city

                @benroyce @Eetschrijver @mistergibson

                I asked you what you thought the point of this place was and told you I think it has revolutionary potential to deal with money in our culture and civics. but that would require the masses be here. the too strict norm most embrace here prevents that. so I argue against it and hope that eventually, people agree. others then argue for it too. same with any argument about how things should change and what I think is possible if it does. reasoned persuasion.

                benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                benroyce@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #113

                @wjmaggos @Eetschrijver @mistergibson

                bigots are currently opposing revolutionary potential because they support Fox News lies fed to them by plutocrats. the symbiosis of bigots getting sadism, and plutocrats getting money, keeps that system going

                do you also argue for plutocrats to be here?

                because you're not going to get anything revolutionary with bigoted morons or malicious plutocrats

                so any argument for either to be here is to me nothing but idiocy

                wjmaggos@liberal.cityW 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • chemoelectric@masto.aiC This user is from outside of this forum
                  chemoelectric@masto.aiC This user is from outside of this forum
                  chemoelectric@masto.ai
                  wrote last edited by
                  #114

                  @benroyce @blotosmetek @Eetschrijver @mistergibson

                  My retort would be ‘That’s not a question, it’s a buzzkill.’

                  But then I have just been reading from Pirkei Avot: “Shammai used to say: make your [study of the] Torah a fixed practice; speak little, but do much; and receive all men with a pleasant countenance.” https://www.sefaria.org/Pirkei_Avot.1.15?lang=bi&with=all&lang2=en

                  benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • chemoelectric@masto.aiC chemoelectric@masto.ai

                    @benroyce @blotosmetek @Eetschrijver @mistergibson

                    My retort would be ‘That’s not a question, it’s a buzzkill.’

                    But then I have just been reading from Pirkei Avot: “Shammai used to say: make your [study of the] Torah a fixed practice; speak little, but do much; and receive all men with a pleasant countenance.” https://www.sefaria.org/Pirkei_Avot.1.15?lang=bi&with=all&lang2=en

                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                    benroyce@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #115

                    @chemoelectric @blotosmetek @Eetschrijver @mistergibson

                    "speak little, but do much"

                    i would settle for

                    "speak at least coherently, and do the bare minimum"

                    because that's the measure we're currently failing on

                    chemoelectric@masto.aiC 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                      @wjmaggos @Eetschrijver @mistergibson

                      bigots are currently opposing revolutionary potential because they support Fox News lies fed to them by plutocrats. the symbiosis of bigots getting sadism, and plutocrats getting money, keeps that system going

                      do you also argue for plutocrats to be here?

                      because you're not going to get anything revolutionary with bigoted morons or malicious plutocrats

                      so any argument for either to be here is to me nothing but idiocy

                      wjmaggos@liberal.cityW This user is from outside of this forum
                      wjmaggos@liberal.cityW This user is from outside of this forum
                      wjmaggos@liberal.city
                      wrote last edited by
                      #116

                      @benroyce @Eetschrijver @mistergibson

                      everybody being here or anywhere doesn't mean the bad people have power to fuck with us. that's the whole point of decentralization and no algos/ads or democratic government and enforcing laws.

                      the goal is to get them playing on our fair field, not the one they own. where we don't let the plutocrats have more power or let the bigots abuse anyone. but it has to be fair like that. today fedi is saying hang here till we decide you have bad ideas. then bye.

                      benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • wjmaggos@liberal.cityW wjmaggos@liberal.city

                        @benroyce @Eetschrijver @mistergibson

                        everybody being here or anywhere doesn't mean the bad people have power to fuck with us. that's the whole point of decentralization and no algos/ads or democratic government and enforcing laws.

                        the goal is to get them playing on our fair field, not the one they own. where we don't let the plutocrats have more power or let the bigots abuse anyone. but it has to be fair like that. today fedi is saying hang here till we decide you have bad ideas. then bye.

                        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                        benroyce@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #117

                        @wjmaggos @Eetschrijver @mistergibson

                        i agree we should grow the fediverse

                        and we should have more normies here

                        but there is a baseline of behavior:

                        no. bigotry.

                        you disagree?

                        that's fine. i do not fucking care. if you think your rationale is so superior, then you federate on that rationale, and you enjoy yourself and i look forward to the WilliamMaggosVerse being a stunning success

                        and i really mean that. no sarcasm. it's fine

                        but:

                        no. bigotry. *here*

                        accept that or fuck off

                        wjmaggos@liberal.cityW 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                          @wjmaggos @Eetschrijver @mistergibson

                          i agree we should grow the fediverse

                          and we should have more normies here

                          but there is a baseline of behavior:

                          no. bigotry.

                          you disagree?

                          that's fine. i do not fucking care. if you think your rationale is so superior, then you federate on that rationale, and you enjoy yourself and i look forward to the WilliamMaggosVerse being a stunning success

                          and i really mean that. no sarcasm. it's fine

                          but:

                          no. bigotry. *here*

                          accept that or fuck off

                          wjmaggos@liberal.cityW This user is from outside of this forum
                          wjmaggos@liberal.cityW This user is from outside of this forum
                          wjmaggos@liberal.city
                          wrote last edited by
                          #118

                          @benroyce @Eetschrijver @mistergibson

                          right and you can have democracy where people keep not voting in primaries.

                          or we'll both keep making our cases. and maybe the fedi will change in ways you don't like but I do. maybe you'll change your mind.

                          benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • wjmaggos@liberal.cityW wjmaggos@liberal.city

                            @benroyce @Eetschrijver @mistergibson

                            right and you can have democracy where people keep not voting in primaries.

                            or we'll both keep making our cases. and maybe the fedi will change in ways you don't like but I do. maybe you'll change your mind.

                            benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                            benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                            benroyce@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #119

                            @wjmaggos @Eetschrijver @mistergibson

                            😂 😂 😂

                            you're honestly comparing voting in the primaries with letting bigots on the fediverse?

                            this is a real comparison you want to make and you think it is a coherent and valid comparison?

                            people participating in society, and hatebags ripping society apart?

                            you think you're going to make that comparison william and do anything other than make yourself out to be deeply cringe?

                            wjmaggos@liberal.cityW 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                              @wjmaggos @Eetschrijver @mistergibson

                              😂 😂 😂

                              you're honestly comparing voting in the primaries with letting bigots on the fediverse?

                              this is a real comparison you want to make and you think it is a coherent and valid comparison?

                              people participating in society, and hatebags ripping society apart?

                              you think you're going to make that comparison william and do anything other than make yourself out to be deeply cringe?

                              wjmaggos@liberal.cityW This user is from outside of this forum
                              wjmaggos@liberal.cityW This user is from outside of this forum
                              wjmaggos@liberal.city
                              wrote last edited by
                              #120

                              @benroyce @Eetschrijver @mistergibson

                              why do you always end your post with an insult?

                              benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • wjmaggos@liberal.cityW wjmaggos@liberal.city

                                @benroyce @Eetschrijver @mistergibson

                                why do you always end your post with an insult?

                                benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                benroyce@mastodon.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #121

                                @wjmaggos @Eetschrijver @mistergibson

                                99% of people wouldn't even engage you on this bullshit "let bigots into the fediverse"

                                i'm not sure if you don't understand how out there you are, or you know but just don't care

                                either way, entertainment and amusement is why i'm here

                                i consider myself a connoisseur of fools trolls and quacks

                                insults will be the price you pay to continue a pointless thread beyond all reason. no coherent cognition can continue to engage your nuttery without going "wtf?"

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                                  @Tofu_Golem @mason @mistergibson

                                  the only choice in the world is harm reduction or greater harm

                                  sitting things out and thus helping greater harm win is you being an idiot, or you being a troll trying to help MAGA win

                                  mason@partychickens.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mason@partychickens.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mason@partychickens.net
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #122

                                  @benroyce @Tofu_Golem @mistergibson If harm reduction requires genocide, then no. That's a trap to get people to support people who shouldn't be in power.

                                  benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • mason@partychickens.netM mason@partychickens.net

                                    @benroyce @Tofu_Golem @mistergibson If harm reduction requires genocide, then no. That's a trap to get people to support people who shouldn't be in power.

                                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    benroyce@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #123

                                    @mason @Tofu_Golem @mistergibson

                                    mason: gaza is experiencing a genocide. so that is what you must deal with. all you are really is saying is "i don't want to deal with reality"

                                    well, you need to deal with it. make the choice for harm reduction

                                    if someone has thrown up all over themselves are you helping them by saying "i ain't dealing with that" and walking away?

                                    maybe you don't feel a need to help them

                                    then, according to this analogy, you are saying you don't care about improving the world

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • eetschrijver@mastodon.socialE eetschrijver@mastodon.social

                                      @benroyce
                                      We should note that Péter Magyar is far from a Mr. Perfect. For one, he's a staunch conservative who embraces several of Orbán's ideas and program points. However, he's not corrupt, he's not pro-Russian, he's not an autocrat. The Hungarian people know you don't get from hell to heaven in a day and that the first step in getting away from hell is to vote AGAINST hell and FOR whoever is NOT hell. That's precisely what they did, and what America DIDN'T do in November 2024.
                                      @mistergibson

                                      anniebuddy@thecanadian.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      anniebuddy@thecanadian.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      anniebuddy@thecanadian.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #124

                                      @Eetschrijver @benroyce @mistergibson

                                      This is so true. If you want perfection, you're on the wrong planet.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • bluedot@left-bank.netB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        bluedot@left-bank.netB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        bluedot@left-bank.net
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #125

                                        @ElizabethEiler @mastodonmigration @benroyce

                                        Right. It's not enough to put the fascists in prison, it's got to be impossible for this disaster to be repeated.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                                          @chemoelectric @blotosmetek @Eetschrijver @mistergibson

                                          "speak little, but do much"

                                          i would settle for

                                          "speak at least coherently, and do the bare minimum"

                                          because that's the measure we're currently failing on

                                          chemoelectric@masto.aiC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          chemoelectric@masto.aiC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          chemoelectric@masto.ai
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #126

                                          @benroyce @blotosmetek @Eetschrijver @mistergibson

                                          I grok. If you follow my stuff more closely than anyone actually does, you know that coherence is precisely what I desire to receive and do not generally obtain unless I construct it for myself, if I can manage it.

                                          (And I am running out of time and no one will listen. I suppose this is what William Blake felt like. Whatever the heck he was trying to say. 🙂 )

                                          chemoelectric@masto.aiC 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups