Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I’ve been thinking about this for days.

I’ve been thinking about this for days.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
35 Posts 29 Posters 18 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
    mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
    mhoye@cosocial.ca
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

    (Via @jonathankoren )

    sellout@mastodon.socialS dan@discuss.systemsD adardis@mstdn.socialA groxx@hachyderm.ioG ollicle@mastodon.socialO 22 Replies Last reply
    2
    0
    • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

      I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

      (Via @jonathankoren )

      sellout@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      sellout@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      sellout@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @mhoye @jonathankoren And no false positives!

      mhoye@cosocial.caM 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • sellout@mastodon.socialS sellout@mastodon.social

        @mhoye @jonathankoren And no false positives!

        mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
        mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
        mhoye@cosocial.ca
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @sellout @jonathankoren right!?

        ryencode@mstdn.caR 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

          I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

          (Via @jonathankoren )

          dan@discuss.systemsD This user is from outside of this forum
          dan@discuss.systemsD This user is from outside of this forum
          dan@discuss.systems
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @mhoye @jonathankoren wow, so much more efficient than the state-of-the-art algorithm: asking a LLM whether x is prime

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

            @sellout @jonathankoren right!?

            ryencode@mstdn.caR This user is from outside of this forum
            ryencode@mstdn.caR This user is from outside of this forum
            ryencode@mstdn.ca
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @mhoye @sellout @jonathankoren
            It's accuracy asymptotically approaches 100%
            That's amazing!
            Slight cavities about using it for cryptographic purposes or around smallish numbers.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

              I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

              (Via @jonathankoren )

              adardis@mstdn.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
              adardis@mstdn.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
              adardis@mstdn.social
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              @jonathankoren @mhoye they’re all good algorithms, Brent

              jonathankoren@sfba.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • adardis@mstdn.socialA adardis@mstdn.social

                @jonathankoren @mhoye they’re all good algorithms, Brent

                jonathankoren@sfba.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jonathankoren@sfba.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jonathankoren@sfba.social
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                @adardis @mhoye there are no bad algorithms. There are only bad use cases.

                eirias@mefi.socialE drwho@masto.hackers.townD mschomm@bonn.socialM 3 Replies Last reply
                1
                0
                • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                  I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                  (Via @jonathankoren )

                  groxx@hachyderm.ioG This user is from outside of this forum
                  groxx@hachyderm.ioG This user is from outside of this forum
                  groxx@hachyderm.io
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  @mhoye @jonathankoren it's branchless too, and easily parallelized onto a GPU to speed it up

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                    I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                    (Via @jonathankoren )

                    ollicle@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                    ollicle@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                    ollicle@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    @mhoye @jonathankoren @daedalus I hope the crypto crew catch wind of this. Has potential to save a lot of electricity

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • jonathankoren@sfba.socialJ jonathankoren@sfba.social

                      @adardis @mhoye there are no bad algorithms. There are only bad use cases.

                      eirias@mefi.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                      eirias@mefi.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                      eirias@mefi.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      @jonathankoren @adardis @mhoye this is like that weather aphorism, isn't it

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                        I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                        (Via @jonathankoren )

                        mdreid@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mdreid@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mdreid@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #11

                        @mhoye @jonathankoren @rmondello Surprising fact: exactly the same algorithm works even better for many other problems: perfect numbers, powers of two, busy beaver, etc.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                          I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                          (Via @jonathankoren )

                          tbortels@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
                          tbortels@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
                          tbortels@infosec.exchange
                          wrote last edited by
                          #12

                          @jonathankoren @mhoye

                          The problem is its inaccuracy for smaller input sets involving low-digit-count numbers.

                          Trivially fixed by hardcoding the results for 3-digit and lower input. Ship it!

                          jonathankoren@sfba.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          0
                          • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                          • jonathankoren@sfba.socialJ jonathankoren@sfba.social

                            @adardis @mhoye there are no bad algorithms. There are only bad use cases.

                            drwho@masto.hackers.townD This user is from outside of this forum
                            drwho@masto.hackers.townD This user is from outside of this forum
                            drwho@masto.hackers.town
                            wrote last edited by
                            #13

                            @jonathankoren @adardis @mhoye Can I quote you on that?

                            mhoye@cosocial.caM jonathankoren@sfba.socialJ 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • drwho@masto.hackers.townD drwho@masto.hackers.town

                              @jonathankoren @adardis @mhoye Can I quote you on that?

                              mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mhoye@cosocial.ca
                              wrote last edited by
                              #14

                              @drwho @jonathankoren @adardis It's such a good line.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                                I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                                (Via @jonathankoren )

                                cubeos@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                                cubeos@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                                cubeos@hachyderm.io
                                wrote last edited by
                                #15

                                @mhoye @jonathankoren It also provides the script for a math party trick: "Tell me any 100 digit number and I will tell you if it's prime!'

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • drwho@masto.hackers.townD drwho@masto.hackers.town

                                  @jonathankoren @adardis @mhoye Can I quote you on that?

                                  jonathankoren@sfba.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  jonathankoren@sfba.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  jonathankoren@sfba.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #16

                                  @drwho @adardis @mhoye why would I care?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
                                  • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                                    I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                                    (Via @jonathankoren )

                                    gkrnours@mastodon.gamedev.placeG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    gkrnours@mastodon.gamedev.placeG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    gkrnours@mastodon.gamedev.place
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #17

                                    @mhoye @jonathankoren are you sure about the more reliable the larger input? Prime number are weird

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                                      I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                                      (Via @jonathankoren )

                                      et@mastodon.bayernE This user is from outside of this forum
                                      et@mastodon.bayernE This user is from outside of this forum
                                      et@mastodon.bayern
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #18

                                      @mhoye @i0null @jonathankoren How can I unsee this?

                                      i0null@infosec.exchangeI 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                                        I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                                        (Via @jonathankoren )

                                        finestructure@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                        finestructure@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                        finestructure@mastodon.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #19

                                        @mhoye @jonathankoren It might be sentient

                                        mhoye@cosocial.caM 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • et@mastodon.bayernE et@mastodon.bayern

                                          @mhoye @i0null @jonathankoren How can I unsee this?

                                          i0null@infosec.exchangeI This user is from outside of this forum
                                          i0null@infosec.exchangeI This user is from outside of this forum
                                          i0null@infosec.exchange
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #20

                                          @et @mhoye @jonathankoren
                                          bool mark_as_unread() {
                                          return true;
                                          }

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups