Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Remember 100 years ago when radiation was new and exciting and poorly understood, and companies were putting radiation into everything?

Remember 100 years ago when radiation was new and exciting and poorly understood, and companies were putting radiation into everything?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
69 Posts 55 Posters 53 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • cammerman@mstdn.socialC cammerman@mstdn.social

    Remember 100 years ago when radiation was new and exciting and poorly understood, and companies were putting radiation into everything?

    Thankfully we learned our lesson and will never make that mistake again.

    oldguycrusty@mastodon.worldO This user is from outside of this forum
    oldguycrusty@mastodon.worldO This user is from outside of this forum
    oldguycrusty@mastodon.world
    wrote last edited by
    #44

    @cammerman

    ..and before that it was cocaine...

    #cocaine in #CocaCola, cough-syrup, etc...
    Yeah it cures everything....

    Way before that it was fire. Burning solves everything ... #heresy, #eternalDamnation, #witches..

    #humankind is basically a six year old with a hammer.. every new thing is a nail for a minute....

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • datenwolf@chaos.socialD datenwolf@chaos.social

      @ZenHeathen @cammerman

      Radium is just but one element on the periodic table, all isotopes of which being highly unstable. There's noting evil nor good about it.

      The things the tech bros name their "creations" after are deliberately constructed as such evils.

      float13@masto.hackers.townF This user is from outside of this forum
      float13@masto.hackers.townF This user is from outside of this forum
      float13@masto.hackers.town
      wrote last edited by
      #45

      @datenwolf @ZenHeathen @cammerman

      Radon "AI" would be more appropriate because it seeps into f*king everything *especially* where it's unwanted...

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • kf7ccc@mastodon.radioK kf7ccc@mastodon.radio

        @cammerman https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Radium_Spray_Insect_Killer_(1909)_(ADVERT_423).jpeg

        me@social.jlamothe.netM This user is from outside of this forum
        me@social.jlamothe.netM This user is from outside of this forum
        me@social.jlamothe.net
        wrote last edited by
        #46

        @kf7ccc @cammerman Guaranteed to kill all insects and vermin.

        ...well, it will do that, yes.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • cammerman@mstdn.socialC cammerman@mstdn.social

          Remember 100 years ago when radiation was new and exciting and poorly understood, and companies were putting radiation into everything?

          Thankfully we learned our lesson and will never make that mistake again.

          uriel@x.keinpfusch.netU This user is from outside of this forum
          uriel@x.keinpfusch.netU This user is from outside of this forum
          uriel@x.keinpfusch.net
          wrote last edited by
          #47

          @cammerman

          we learned our lesson and will never make that mistake again.

          THEY will never do the mistake again. The one who died of cancer, I mean.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • zenheathen@beige.partyZ zenheathen@beige.party

            @cammerman Frankly, given their penchant for naming their companies and products after evil lately, I'm quite surprised there isn't a "Radium AI" out there.

            lukeharby@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
            lukeharby@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
            lukeharby@infosec.exchange
            wrote last edited by
            #48

            @ZenHeathen @cammerman

            They could call tokens Röntgens.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            0
            • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
            • cammerman@mstdn.socialC cammerman@mstdn.social

              Remember 100 years ago when radiation was new and exciting and poorly understood, and companies were putting radiation into everything?

              Thankfully we learned our lesson and will never make that mistake again.

              ann_effes@berlin.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
              ann_effes@berlin.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
              ann_effes@berlin.social
              wrote last edited by
              #49

              @cammerman

              Hahaha!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • cammerman@mstdn.socialC cammerman@mstdn.social

                Remember 100 years ago when radiation was new and exciting and poorly understood, and companies were putting radiation into everything?

                Thankfully we learned our lesson and will never make that mistake again.

                stumpythemutt@social.linux.pizzaS This user is from outside of this forum
                stumpythemutt@social.linux.pizzaS This user is from outside of this forum
                stumpythemutt@social.linux.pizza
                wrote last edited by
                #50

                @cammerman DDT was like that. They used to drive trucks through neighborhoods spraying the stuff and kids would chase it and play in the fog.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • cammerman@mstdn.socialC cammerman@mstdn.social

                  Remember 100 years ago when radiation was new and exciting and poorly understood, and companies were putting radiation into everything?

                  Thankfully we learned our lesson and will never make that mistake again.

                  gkrnours@mastodon.gamedev.placeG This user is from outside of this forum
                  gkrnours@mastodon.gamedev.placeG This user is from outside of this forum
                  gkrnours@mastodon.gamedev.place
                  wrote last edited by
                  #51

                  @cammerman I'm glad we learned fron it right then and didn't put asbetos everywhere

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • lennybacon@infosec.exchangeL lennybacon@infosec.exchange

                    @cammerman

                    mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mycotropic@beige.party
                    wrote last edited by
                    #52

                    @lennybacon @cammerman

                    Do they make those with shoulder harness support straps?
                    #AskingForAFriend

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • cynblogger@sfba.socialC cynblogger@sfba.social

                      @cammerman
                      Thalidomide was a big winner, too.

                      mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mycotropic@beige.party
                      wrote last edited by
                      #53

                      @cynblogger @cammerman

                      It works for multiple myeloma;
                      https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supplements/thalidomide-oral-route/description/drg-20066301

                      Just like Mustard Gas! Works great for multiple myeloma when you use it appropriately*.

                      *Not an endorsement for AI

                      cynblogger@sfba.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • cammerman@mstdn.socialC cammerman@mstdn.social

                        Remember 100 years ago when radiation was new and exciting and poorly understood, and companies were putting radiation into everything?

                        Thankfully we learned our lesson and will never make that mistake again.

                        synlogic4242@social.vivaldi.netS This user is from outside of this forum
                        synlogic4242@social.vivaldi.netS This user is from outside of this forum
                        synlogic4242@social.vivaldi.net
                        wrote last edited by
                        #54

                        @cammerman also asbestos. and cocaine. and laudenum. and lead

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • mycotropic@beige.partyM mycotropic@beige.party

                          @cynblogger @cammerman

                          It works for multiple myeloma;
                          https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supplements/thalidomide-oral-route/description/drg-20066301

                          Just like Mustard Gas! Works great for multiple myeloma when you use it appropriately*.

                          *Not an endorsement for AI

                          cynblogger@sfba.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                          cynblogger@sfba.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                          cynblogger@sfba.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #55

                          @mycotropic @cammerman
                          I know…and for leprosy, too. Doesn’t undo the harm it did before the big “oops!”

                          mycotropic@beige.partyM 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • zenheathen@beige.partyZ zenheathen@beige.party

                            @sillyCoelophysis As I called out the trend of such references, though, it was like putting out bait to attract "well, actually"s. Nobody needs that kind of reply guy.

                            guineu_roja@tech.lgbtG This user is from outside of this forum
                            guineu_roja@tech.lgbtG This user is from outside of this forum
                            guineu_roja@tech.lgbt
                            wrote last edited by
                            #56

                            @ZenHeathen @sillyCoelophysis sorry 😞

                            sillycoelophysis@hachyderm.ioS 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • cynblogger@sfba.socialC cynblogger@sfba.social

                              @mycotropic @cammerman
                              I know…and for leprosy, too. Doesn’t undo the harm it did before the big “oops!”

                              mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mycotropic@beige.party
                              wrote last edited by
                              #57

                              @cynblogger @cammerman

                              I wouldn't call it an "oops", it was a different time when tragic outcomes were how you identified problems with medications unfortunately;

                              "Testing in rodent models failed to establish a median lethal dose and the drug was generally believed to be nontoxic to humans [Lenz, 1988]. In contrast to the extensive testing performed today, in that era formal testing for harmful teratogenic effects was not undertaken. Soon available worldwide, the drug became popular for its anti-emetic effect in pregnant woman suffering with morning sickness. Much of the drug's popularity was due to its wide availability as it was accessible without prescription and also relatively inexpensive."

                              Checking your browser - reCAPTCHA

                              favicon

                              (pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)

                              But it specifically changed the way the FDA does regulation;

                              "A lasting impact of these tragic events has been in the positive change in the drug regulation process. Problems with animal models and inefficiencies in the pharmaceutical agent approval process were rectified by new legislation which revamped the #FDA regulatory process, expanded patient informed consent procedures and called for more transparency from drug manufacturers. "

                              Of course the current administration wants less regulation everywhere so we can anticipate future problems going forward.
                              #Science #Regulatiin

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • mardor@ruhr.socialM mardor@ruhr.social

                                @cammerman At least, they can’t put AI into toothpa… oh, crap!
                                https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020653925035014

                                grodira@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                grodira@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                grodira@mastodon.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #58

                                @mardor @cammerman well, that's not LLM

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • guineu_roja@tech.lgbtG guineu_roja@tech.lgbt

                                  @ZenHeathen @sillyCoelophysis sorry 😞

                                  sillycoelophysis@hachyderm.ioS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  sillycoelophysis@hachyderm.ioS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  sillycoelophysis@hachyderm.io
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #59

                                  @guineu_roja I thought the whole discussion was worthwhile and viewed @ZenHeathen's response as a meta-commentary rather than a complaint against you or anyone else. I do not speak for them, of course, so they may clarify as they please.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • 4censord@unfug.social4 4censord@unfug.social

                                    RE: https://mstdn.social/@cammerman/116590715512176086

                                    @cammerman remeber 50 years ago when asbestos was new and exiting and poorly understood, and companies were putting asbestos into everything?

                                    Thankfully we learned our lesson and will never make that mistake again.

                                    homebrewandhacking@mastodon.ieH This user is from outside of this forum
                                    homebrewandhacking@mastodon.ieH This user is from outside of this forum
                                    homebrewandhacking@mastodon.ie
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #60

                                    @4censord @cammerman

                                    1976?

                                    That's more yer CFC/DDT era (ozone and bird eggs).

                                    A better example might be SUVs aka trucks in a moustache for tax reasons.

                                    Although to be fair to those and asbestos, those did actual useful things and had _unintended_ consequences as opposed to being designed to 'solve the problem of paying wages'.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • cammerman@mstdn.socialC cammerman@mstdn.social

                                      Remember 100 years ago when radiation was new and exciting and poorly understood, and companies were putting radiation into everything?

                                      Thankfully we learned our lesson and will never make that mistake again.

                                      just_tired@mastodon.worldJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      just_tired@mastodon.worldJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      just_tired@mastodon.world
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #61

                                      @cammerman
                                      When dining out, I always ask for my radiation on the side.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • cammerman@mstdn.socialC cammerman@mstdn.social

                                        Remember 100 years ago when radiation was new and exciting and poorly understood, and companies were putting radiation into everything?

                                        Thankfully we learned our lesson and will never make that mistake again.

                                        maol@c.imM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        maol@c.imM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        maol@c.im
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #62

                                        @cammerman this time it's different 🤡

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • lennybacon@infosec.exchangeL lennybacon@infosec.exchange

                                          @cammerman

                                          katzedecimal@kind.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                          katzedecimal@kind.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                          katzedecimal@kind.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #63

                                          @lennybacon
                                          "Nuke Your Nuts!" - the modern spam email campaign, probably 😂
                                          @cammerman

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups