CIRCLE WITH A DOT

Sofia (19MtF), all-around nerd. Information Systems student at UFSM.
Ally to MAPs[1], anti-c fundamentalists[2] are antis and should be treated as such.
Youthlib advocate (yes, the above is a nonnegotiable part of that).
Occasional regressor?

100% sub/bottom, bi but straight leaning, taken 🥰

1. Contact stance details:
In current society, minor-adult relationships should involve consideration of the potential harms antis may cause if they occur, but they are still possible to do safely, and the possible harm caused by conforming to antis instead should also be considered. However, unwanted interventions are strictly immoral, due to actively contributing to iatrogenic harm.
In an ideal society, if a moral age of consent should exist (a legal one should not, since even in cases where it may be a problem, criminalization just makes the problem worse) at all (unsure, requires more consideration), it should be no higher than ~8, and there should be case by case exceptions under that.
Age gaps are not relevant if the younger person is old enough to begin with.

2. Defined as someone who believes child-adult sex is inherently (i.e., regardless of the sociocultural/legal context) wrong, or engages in any kind of unwanted intervention against it (as those are part of the problem).

XMR: 84vPpH21mmWSmnPwveqYWkVNs3zcaoQoyXsWpUfMD7E267GfL2psYjGX9KAGUXv3ABhBCCahf5pSB4ATWypUHMxi2GcBdrq