CIRCLE WITH A DOT

@llamasoft_ox "Technically" you slept on a pillow, just was still attacked to the sheep from where it would come from.

@fdroidorg @eighthave What exactly are the plans of Google for backtrack the openess of their system? It is what made it widespread.
Once you set a strategy for a product, is hard alter the course successfully.

@Sonikku If you put aside the misuses and wrongdoings of big tech that are the issue, than the tech itself, manage to condense this kind of stuff in so little space is an truly amazing feat.

@rl_dane @darth I think one reason BSD don't get much attention is right about this mindset, and the impression that a chunk devs don't really like it very much.
Surely not the people in Red Hat.

There isn't much heat for desktop BSD branches as far I see, beside because rarely succeded, and in part because "desktop" became synonymous of "linux mess", things that is very far from what BSD try to stay.

I cannot blame the feeling. Some decisions in the linux space makes me facepalm.

@rl_dane @darth Seriously, I think there is a different mindset between the two.
BSD flavours spin Unix in some ways, but they want stay Unix.
Linux is an Unix variant more "for accident", than by intention. There isn't strong emphasis in the Linux world to stick around Unix. I have impression that some distros even dislike it.
In place you end with countless clashing ideas how "is supposed to work better". It has its high and end, one is reinvent the wheel even where isn't useful at all.

@rl_dane @darth Linux is like love making the life difficult for everybody, and sometimes I have impressions because their devs just want do something quirky...!

@zzt @rootwyrm I from some time I fear Linux is going to get eaten from inside by all these corporate interests.
Having Red Hat that dictates what is supposed "standard" was something that had to rose red flags much earlier.

Maybe is time to keep warm a copy of AmigaOS in case everything goes to South badly in the coming years...

@itsfoss In the worst case, I think some BSD flavours are still supporting it in a way or another; at least nominally NetBSD has it as minimal requirement.
NetBSD even support Amiga48k...!

NetBSD/i386 Supported Hardware

(www.netbsd.org)