@GrapheneOS may be worthwhile to publish both their fact-checker's questions and your responses somewhere.
People will be able to draw their own conclusions by contrasting info available to their editors vs. things they omitted from the final text.
P
paulnatsuo@scholar.social
@paulnatsuo@scholar.social
Posts
-
WIRED has gone ahead with publishing an extraordinarily inaccurate article about GrapheneOS. -
“The failures are the curriculum.@electricarchaeo I tripped up on “Bob's weekly updates to his supervisor were indistinguishable from Alice's.”
There's never been the case for me. With students/junior colleagues, the questions asked by people working through their own learning processes are very different from those who are only trying to prompt an LLM for ‘correct’ slop.