CIRCLE WITH A DOT

@SRAZKVT @dillo Extensions like that could also act as a boundary for configuration in the browser. If some extension has some security or privacy implications, you can turn off the whole extension.

@dillo Maybe different extensions to the markup could be supported via different plugins in the browsers.

@dillo I could even imagine that XML namespaces could come in handy to define a core grammar and allow for extendability, without changing the core every week. Maybe that's a terrible idea, and we would end up with each website coming with a list of extensions the browser needs to support. On the other hand, can't be worse than what we have now. Could be nice if the browser would just ignore extensions it doesn't support and that then has to be considered when implementing a website.

@dillo

> So it would need to be reviewed if HTML/XML is a suitable format for simple parsing.

I haven't implemented a browser, yet, but my initial reaction to this is that XML comes with schemas, which would be very useful for enforcing a grammar. The tools already exist. Don't throw out the baby... etc.