A
@orhun @ratatui_rs My usual sarcasm aside, I've been messing with this one and I think I would actively recommend **AGAINST** using it or promoting it.
This is AI slop with a note of danger. The OP building it doesn't understand the Git reflog very well and isn't competent to notice when the AI generated code and documentation doesn't match. The UI and most of the actions are reasonable enough, but with easy recovery of states it also make it easy to LOOSE states.
@mrmasterkeyboard This is not a win.
@Elizafox @GrapheneOS The use of tweaker in the US specifically for software modification (as opposed to hadware overclockers or general modders) predates its popularity as a reference to drug users ... although it certainly has that connotation now you can still find “tweak tool” references in software today.
@justine Yes the forker in this case and most of the adopters are impetuous reactionaries with no clear or shared vision. I have my own beefs with anything “AI” (not intelligent) but refusing to cherry pick a two line patch that was obviously correct is no way to start a project, and even Neovim had the sense to not scrap Vimscript while they worked on actually better APIs.
