Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. A new hearing of Palestine Action activists (acquitted of burglery charges in Feb) is on bogus "terrorism” charges.

A new hearing of Palestine Action activists (acquitted of burglery charges in Feb) is on bogus "terrorism” charges.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
ukpoluspoleupolpalestineactionnews
23 Posts 13 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • heinragas@mublog.nlH heinragas@mublog.nl

    @DrALJONES Wait, how can you be charged for things you have already been acquitted of? Shouldn't that be impossible?

    krans@mastodon.me.ukK This user is from outside of this forum
    krans@mastodon.me.ukK This user is from outside of this forum
    krans@mastodon.me.uk
    wrote last edited by
    #6

    @heinragas I believe they're being tried on different charges. I think in the original trial there were also charges on which the jury was unable to reach a verdict, which are also applicable for retrial

    @DrALJONES

    draljones@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • krans@mastodon.me.ukK krans@mastodon.me.uk

      @heinragas I believe they're being tried on different charges. I think in the original trial there were also charges on which the jury was unable to reach a verdict, which are also applicable for retrial

      @DrALJONES

      draljones@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
      draljones@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
      draljones@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #7

      @krans

      Yes, terrorism charges.

      I think I read that, at the time of the break-in, the desired laws weren't yet in place. Don't quote me.

      @heinragas

      foxcj@mastodon.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • draljones@mastodon.socialD draljones@mastodon.social

        A new hearing of Palestine Action activists (acquitted of burglery charges in Feb) is on bogus "terrorism” charges.

        "This is what a stitch-up looks like," says UK MP Zarah Sultana.

        She "invoked parliamentary privilege to reveal [what] the British public was officially forbidden from knowing."

        The jury will not be told that "if convicted, they & 18 others will be sentenced as terrorists."

        See UK Hansard 14 Apr and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkzxhQU6QIM

        #UKPol #USPol #EUPol #palestineAction #news .

        nibor4000@social.vivaldi.netN This user is from outside of this forum
        nibor4000@social.vivaldi.netN This user is from outside of this forum
        nibor4000@social.vivaldi.net
        wrote last edited by
        #8

        @DrALJONES
        I still think breaking a policewoman's spine with a big hammer is wrong and something you should be punished for

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • draljones@mastodon.socialD draljones@mastodon.social

          A new hearing of Palestine Action activists (acquitted of burglery charges in Feb) is on bogus "terrorism” charges.

          "This is what a stitch-up looks like," says UK MP Zarah Sultana.

          She "invoked parliamentary privilege to reveal [what] the British public was officially forbidden from knowing."

          The jury will not be told that "if convicted, they & 18 others will be sentenced as terrorists."

          See UK Hansard 14 Apr and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkzxhQU6QIM

          #UKPol #USPol #EUPol #palestineAction #news .

          richrarobi@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
          richrarobi@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
          richrarobi@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #9

          @DrALJONES

          I don't know how others feel about this, but I am getting extremely ANGRY that the #British #ukgovernment is FLOUTING the rule of law to hide their own #corruption

          I am proud of the #nanarchists who have shown themselves to be braver than I am.

          I am also totally dissatisfied with British #justice that appears to have been corrupted in the Elbit case.

          It appears that evidence was FABRICATED

          #starmer should be ASHAMED

          draljones@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • richrarobi@mastodon.socialR richrarobi@mastodon.social

            @DrALJONES

            I don't know how others feel about this, but I am getting extremely ANGRY that the #British #ukgovernment is FLOUTING the rule of law to hide their own #corruption

            I am proud of the #nanarchists who have shown themselves to be braver than I am.

            I am also totally dissatisfied with British #justice that appears to have been corrupted in the Elbit case.

            It appears that evidence was FABRICATED

            #starmer should be ASHAMED

            draljones@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
            draljones@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
            draljones@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #10

            @RichRARobi

            The term really took off after 9/11. Had you forgotten Blair? That's when the label "terrorism" became the standard (& invincible) way of criminalising dissent.

            david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • draljones@mastodon.socialD draljones@mastodon.social

              @RichRARobi

              The term really took off after 9/11. Had you forgotten Blair? That's when the label "terrorism" became the standard (& invincible) way of criminalising dissent.

              david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
              david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
              david_chisnall@infosec.exchange
              wrote last edited by
              #11

              @DrALJONES @RichRARobi

              As far as I know, the earliest example of this in the UK was about a hundred years earlier, when the government labelled suffragettes as terrorists.

              draljones@mastodon.socialD highlandlawyer@mastodon.socialH 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

                @DrALJONES @RichRARobi

                As far as I know, the earliest example of this in the UK was about a hundred years earlier, when the government labelled suffragettes as terrorists.

                draljones@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                draljones@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                draljones@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #12

                @david_chisnall

                Oh, interesting. And of course many of their actions were "terrorist" in the standard definition of causing terror in the population. Unlike those of Palestine Action....

                @RichRARobi

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

                  @DrALJONES @RichRARobi

                  As far as I know, the earliest example of this in the UK was about a hundred years earlier, when the government labelled suffragettes as terrorists.

                  highlandlawyer@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                  highlandlawyer@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                  highlandlawyer@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #13

                  @david_chisnall @DrALJONES @RichRARobi
                  They started labelling opponents "terrorists" about the time "seditionists" went out of use.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • jupiter@mastodon.gamedev.placeJ jupiter@mastodon.gamedev.place

                    @DrALJONES someone should tell the jury

                    chemicaleyeguy@mstdn.scienceC This user is from outside of this forum
                    chemicaleyeguy@mstdn.scienceC This user is from outside of this forum
                    chemicaleyeguy@mstdn.science
                    wrote last edited by
                    #14

                    @jupiter @DrALJONES If the topic of #JuryNullification comes up in the course of polite conversation with potential or current jurists, no it didn’t. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nullification

                    #UKpol #USpol #EUpol #PalestineAction

                    Stop 🛑 the #FelonsCrusade in the #MiddleEast.

                    jupiter@mastodon.gamedev.placeJ 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • chemicaleyeguy@mstdn.scienceC chemicaleyeguy@mstdn.science

                      @jupiter @DrALJONES If the topic of #JuryNullification comes up in the course of polite conversation with potential or current jurists, no it didn’t. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nullification

                      #UKpol #USpol #EUpol #PalestineAction

                      Stop 🛑 the #FelonsCrusade in the #MiddleEast.

                      jupiter@mastodon.gamedev.placeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jupiter@mastodon.gamedev.placeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jupiter@mastodon.gamedev.place
                      wrote last edited by
                      #15

                      @ChemicalEyeGuy @DrALJONES what came up?

                      chemicaleyeguy@mstdn.scienceC 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • draljones@mastodon.socialD draljones@mastodon.social

                        A new hearing of Palestine Action activists (acquitted of burglery charges in Feb) is on bogus "terrorism” charges.

                        "This is what a stitch-up looks like," says UK MP Zarah Sultana.

                        She "invoked parliamentary privilege to reveal [what] the British public was officially forbidden from knowing."

                        The jury will not be told that "if convicted, they & 18 others will be sentenced as terrorists."

                        See UK Hansard 14 Apr and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkzxhQU6QIM

                        #UKPol #USPol #EUPol #palestineAction #news .

                        R This user is from outside of this forum
                        R This user is from outside of this forum
                        roger_w_@fosstodon.org
                        wrote last edited by
                        #16

                        @DrALJONES And?
                        Lets be clear, just because the BBC don't understand the difference, HAMAS ARE TERRORISTS, the PLO were TERRORISTS.

                        At the very least, GBH , criminal damage should be dealt with, but this spineless government is unable to defend our shores, let alone keep terrorists OUT OF THE UK.

                        No amount of digital anything will solve this, only prompt action to deport anybody committing crimes against this country. Terrorists don't deserve human rights when committing atrocities.

                        policestateuk@mastodon.me.ukP oneinterestingfact@mastodon.ieO 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • jupiter@mastodon.gamedev.placeJ jupiter@mastodon.gamedev.place

                          @ChemicalEyeGuy @DrALJONES what came up?

                          chemicaleyeguy@mstdn.scienceC This user is from outside of this forum
                          chemicaleyeguy@mstdn.scienceC This user is from outside of this forum
                          chemicaleyeguy@mstdn.science
                          wrote last edited by
                          #17

                          @jupiter @DrALJONES Anniversary of his death. Noted among “On this day…” articles.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • R roger_w_@fosstodon.org

                            @DrALJONES And?
                            Lets be clear, just because the BBC don't understand the difference, HAMAS ARE TERRORISTS, the PLO were TERRORISTS.

                            At the very least, GBH , criminal damage should be dealt with, but this spineless government is unable to defend our shores, let alone keep terrorists OUT OF THE UK.

                            No amount of digital anything will solve this, only prompt action to deport anybody committing crimes against this country. Terrorists don't deserve human rights when committing atrocities.

                            policestateuk@mastodon.me.ukP This user is from outside of this forum
                            policestateuk@mastodon.me.ukP This user is from outside of this forum
                            policestateuk@mastodon.me.uk
                            wrote last edited by
                            #18

                            @roger_w_ You seem to have quite thoroughly demonstrated that you have absolutely no idea what you're commenting on here.

                            The story is not about Hamas or the PLO. In fact, it's not about middle-east politics at all - it's about UK politics, and the right to protest.

                            R 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • R roger_w_@fosstodon.org

                              @DrALJONES And?
                              Lets be clear, just because the BBC don't understand the difference, HAMAS ARE TERRORISTS, the PLO were TERRORISTS.

                              At the very least, GBH , criminal damage should be dealt with, but this spineless government is unable to defend our shores, let alone keep terrorists OUT OF THE UK.

                              No amount of digital anything will solve this, only prompt action to deport anybody committing crimes against this country. Terrorists don't deserve human rights when committing atrocities.

                              oneinterestingfact@mastodon.ieO This user is from outside of this forum
                              oneinterestingfact@mastodon.ieO This user is from outside of this forum
                              oneinterestingfact@mastodon.ie
                              wrote last edited by
                              #19

                              @roger_w_ @DrALJONES

                              Let's see - any other examples? A few organisations come to mind: Irgun, Hagganah, Lehi, Herut

                              And then there are the individuals: Avraham Stern, Menachem Begin, Yitzhak Shamir for example.

                              Fun fact: Lehi's weekly newsletter was titled Hamaas.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • draljones@mastodon.socialD draljones@mastodon.social

                                @krans

                                Yes, terrorism charges.

                                I think I read that, at the time of the break-in, the desired laws weren't yet in place. Don't quote me.

                                @heinragas

                                foxcj@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                foxcj@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                foxcj@mastodon.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #20

                                @DrALJONES @krans @heinragas
                                AIUI they are *not* formally being charged with terrorism charges, *but* the judge has been given discretion to sentence them as terrorist-related offenses if found guilty, with long prison terms. This is a new power granted to judges. The jury is not being told this, nor will they hear the defendants' defence. And no doubt the unedited evidence, which appears to paint a different picture of events, will be withheld, again. There's something very rotten here.

                                draljones@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • foxcj@mastodon.socialF foxcj@mastodon.social

                                  @DrALJONES @krans @heinragas
                                  AIUI they are *not* formally being charged with terrorism charges, *but* the judge has been given discretion to sentence them as terrorist-related offenses if found guilty, with long prison terms. This is a new power granted to judges. The jury is not being told this, nor will they hear the defendants' defence. And no doubt the unedited evidence, which appears to paint a different picture of events, will be withheld, again. There's something very rotten here.

                                  draljones@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  draljones@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  draljones@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #21

                                  @foxcj

                                  Much appreciated, Chris. Do you happen to have a source I can use?

                                  @krans @heinragas @strangetown .

                                  "AIUI they are *not* formally being charged with terrorism charges, *but* the judge has been given discretion to sentence them as terrorist-related offenses if found guilty..

                                  "This is a new power granted to judges. The jury is not being told this, nor will they hear the defendants' defence. And no doubt the unedited evidence..will be withheld again. There's something very rotten here.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • policestateuk@mastodon.me.ukP policestateuk@mastodon.me.uk

                                    @roger_w_ You seem to have quite thoroughly demonstrated that you have absolutely no idea what you're commenting on here.

                                    The story is not about Hamas or the PLO. In fact, it's not about middle-east politics at all - it's about UK politics, and the right to protest.

                                    R This user is from outside of this forum
                                    R This user is from outside of this forum
                                    roger_w_@fosstodon.org
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #22

                                    @PoliceStateUK ah well, we all have a right to protest, and still have mostly free speech, what we don't have is the right to impose our views on other people and infringe on their rights in the execution of a protest - and that goes for you too.

                                    You have every right to express your view, I just don't happen to agree with it.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • draljones@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      draljones@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      draljones@mastodon.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #23

                                      @peterbrown

                                      There were several original charges. The first trial was for burglary. This one's for criminal damage. The dodgy bit is keeping the terrorism aspect secret. So the jury won't know the defendants can be sentenced as "terrorists" and the UK press is banned from publishing that fact.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • World
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups