Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. NYC: Big fire (4th alarm now) across a church and several multi-unit residential buildings at 12th St and 27th Ave in Astoria.

NYC: Big fire (4th alarm now) across a church and several multi-unit residential buildings at 12th St and 27th Ave in Astoria.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
44 Posts 26 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

    NYC: Big fire (4th alarm now) across a church and several multi-unit residential buildings at 12th St and 27th Ave in Astoria.

    mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
    mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
    mattblaze@federate.social
    wrote last edited by
    #3

    Several firefighters injured after a collapse in the church. Now a fifth alarm (the maximum pre-determined response).

    The FDNY "alarm" system addresses an interesting and difficult optimization problem in dispatching additional firefighters to large incidents. And it's largely unchanged from the 19th century. It's really quite clever.

    Some background:

    uep@timeloop.cafeU mattblaze@federate.socialM dziadekmick@mstdn.socialD 3 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

      Several firefighters injured after a collapse in the church. Now a fifth alarm (the maximum pre-determined response).

      The FDNY "alarm" system addresses an interesting and difficult optimization problem in dispatching additional firefighters to large incidents. And it's largely unchanged from the 19th century. It's really quite clever.

      Some background:

      uep@timeloop.cafeU This user is from outside of this forum
      uep@timeloop.cafeU This user is from outside of this forum
      uep@timeloop.cafe
      wrote last edited by
      #4

      @mattblaze ooh, good, I've wondered about this term and now I will learn more

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

        Several firefighters injured after a collapse in the church. Now a fifth alarm (the maximum pre-determined response).

        The FDNY "alarm" system addresses an interesting and difficult optimization problem in dispatching additional firefighters to large incidents. And it's largely unchanged from the 19th century. It's really quite clever.

        Some background:

        mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
        mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
        mattblaze@federate.social
        wrote last edited by
        #5

        The FDNY assigns every location in the city to its nearest fire alarm box, which are (or were) every block or two apart throughout the city. If someone pulled the alarm box, the nearest available firehouse would respond.

        (Until surprisingly recently this was done with a spring-loaded telegraph encoded in the box that would ring bells in a particular pattern in each firehouse identifying the box and which engines and trucks should respond).

        2/

        mattblaze@federate.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

          The FDNY assigns every location in the city to its nearest fire alarm box, which are (or were) every block or two apart throughout the city. If someone pulled the alarm box, the nearest available firehouse would respond.

          (Until surprisingly recently this was done with a spring-loaded telegraph encoded in the box that would ring bells in a particular pattern in each firehouse identifying the box and which engines and trucks should respond).

          2/

          mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
          mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
          mattblaze@federate.social
          wrote last edited by
          #6

          The box technology has changed (most surviving ones can do voice communication now), and many of the physical alarm boxes have disappeared, but every location is still associated with a box, which, even if the box isn't there, determines which firehouses are "first due".

          When you call 911 today, the fire dispatcher first figures out the box number associated with the location and sends the first due engines and trucks for that box.

          3/

          mattblaze@federate.socialM becomethewaifu@tech.lgbtB 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • ve2uwy@mastodon.radioV ve2uwy@mastodon.radio

            @mattblaze

            5th alarm now w/2 extra tower ladders.

            Queens Box 7509 for those of you with a tapper circuit at home.

            ve2uwy@mastodon.radioV This user is from outside of this forum
            ve2uwy@mastodon.radioV This user is from outside of this forum
            ve2uwy@mastodon.radio
            wrote last edited by
            #7

            @mattblaze

            mattblaze@federate.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

              The box technology has changed (most surviving ones can do voice communication now), and many of the physical alarm boxes have disappeared, but every location is still associated with a box, which, even if the box isn't there, determines which firehouses are "first due".

              When you call 911 today, the fire dispatcher first figures out the box number associated with the location and sends the first due engines and trucks for that box.

              3/

              mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
              mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
              mattblaze@federate.social
              wrote last edited by
              #8

              The first due units are pre-determined, but are almost always the nearest firehouses, which makes sense to minimize response time.

              But what happens when the fire is large enough to require more firefighters than the first due?

              The fire chief on the scene can call for additional units (originally by tapping a telegraph key inside the box), but who should come?

              You might think it should be the NEXT nearest firehouses, expanding outward as more and more are required. But that's a bad idea.

              4/

              jlin@fosstodon.orgJ mattblaze@federate.socialM 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                The first due units are pre-determined, but are almost always the nearest firehouses, which makes sense to minimize response time.

                But what happens when the fire is large enough to require more firefighters than the first due?

                The fire chief on the scene can call for additional units (originally by tapping a telegraph key inside the box), but who should come?

                You might think it should be the NEXT nearest firehouses, expanding outward as more and more are required. But that's a bad idea.

                4/

                jlin@fosstodon.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jlin@fosstodon.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jlin@fosstodon.org
                wrote last edited by
                #9

                @mattblaze is it bad because it drains the general ability to respond to other issues in the area?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                  The first due units are pre-determined, but are almost always the nearest firehouses, which makes sense to minimize response time.

                  But what happens when the fire is large enough to require more firefighters than the first due?

                  The fire chief on the scene can call for additional units (originally by tapping a telegraph key inside the box), but who should come?

                  You might think it should be the NEXT nearest firehouses, expanding outward as more and more are required. But that's a bad idea.

                  4/

                  mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mattblaze@federate.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #10

                  The problem with always dispatching the nearest available fire house is that if there's a large fire somewhere, there won't be nearby available firefighters to respond to *other* fires nearby, requiring the initial response to come from far away.

                  So they don't always send the nearest available. Instead, they skip over some of them, to ensure maintaining availability near large incidents.

                  But figuring who best to send next quickly becomes pretty complicated, with multiple contingencies.

                  5/

                  mattblaze@federate.socialM darkuncle@infosec.exchangeD dougfir@m.ai6yr.orgD 3 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                    The problem with always dispatching the nearest available fire house is that if there's a large fire somewhere, there won't be nearby available firefighters to respond to *other* fires nearby, requiring the initial response to come from far away.

                    So they don't always send the nearest available. Instead, they skip over some of them, to ensure maintaining availability near large incidents.

                    But figuring who best to send next quickly becomes pretty complicated, with multiple contingencies.

                    5/

                    mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mattblaze@federate.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #11

                    So, instead of requiring the dispatcher to figure this out on the fly (which would be impossibly difficult to do well when multiple fires are going on, especially before computers), they figure out the response order for each box in advance.

                    Each box has a "box card" listing the first due, second alarm, third alarm, and so on responses. Each alarm increment is a contingent of several engine and truck companies. The box card is used to decide who to send when additional alarms are called.

                    6/

                    mattblaze@federate.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                      The problem with always dispatching the nearest available fire house is that if there's a large fire somewhere, there won't be nearby available firefighters to respond to *other* fires nearby, requiring the initial response to come from far away.

                      So they don't always send the nearest available. Instead, they skip over some of them, to ensure maintaining availability near large incidents.

                      But figuring who best to send next quickly becomes pretty complicated, with multiple contingencies.

                      5/

                      darkuncle@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
                      darkuncle@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
                      darkuncle@infosec.exchange
                      wrote last edited by
                      #12

                      @mattblaze this feels like there's some kind of maths optimization problem here with a theorem to be proved

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                        So, instead of requiring the dispatcher to figure this out on the fly (which would be impossibly difficult to do well when multiple fires are going on, especially before computers), they figure out the response order for each box in advance.

                        Each box has a "box card" listing the first due, second alarm, third alarm, and so on responses. Each alarm increment is a contingent of several engine and truck companies. The box card is used to decide who to send when additional alarms are called.

                        6/

                        mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mattblaze@federate.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #13

                        The box card ordering ensures that there remains some available coverage spread throughout the city when there are large incidents going on. They pre-calculate up to a fifth alarm (at which point there are over 35 engines and trucks operating at the incident). After that, more units can be called in, but the dispatchers have to figure it out on their own.

                        (9/11 was a fifth alarm, but had many more fire companies than that called in).

                        7/

                        mattblaze@federate.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                          The box card ordering ensures that there remains some available coverage spread throughout the city when there are large incidents going on. They pre-calculate up to a fifth alarm (at which point there are over 35 engines and trucks operating at the incident). After that, more units can be called in, but the dispatchers have to figure it out on their own.

                          (9/11 was a fifth alarm, but had many more fire companies than that called in).

                          7/

                          mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mattblaze@federate.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #14

                          Anyway, it's a very interesting and complex real-time systems optimization problem, with lives at stake. And it was solved with 19th century technology, with the basic principles unchanged to this day.

                          8/8

                          felcryn@mastodon.socialF stephenrees@mas.toS tehstu@hachyderm.ioT uep@timeloop.cafeU mattblaze@federate.socialM 10 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                            Anyway, it's a very interesting and complex real-time systems optimization problem, with lives at stake. And it was solved with 19th century technology, with the basic principles unchanged to this day.

                            8/8

                            felcryn@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                            felcryn@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                            felcryn@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #15

                            @mattblaze Thanks!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                              Anyway, it's a very interesting and complex real-time systems optimization problem, with lives at stake. And it was solved with 19th century technology, with the basic principles unchanged to this day.

                              8/8

                              stephenrees@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
                              stephenrees@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
                              stephenrees@mas.to
                              wrote last edited by
                              #16

                              @mattblaze

                              typo "unhanged" should be "unchanged"

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                                Anyway, it's a very interesting and complex real-time systems optimization problem, with lives at stake. And it was solved with 19th century technology, with the basic principles unchanged to this day.

                                8/8

                                tehstu@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
                                tehstu@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
                                tehstu@hachyderm.io
                                wrote last edited by
                                #17

                                @mattblaze Fascinating, didn't know any of that. Do you know if it is an approach specific to NYC, or something large cities tend to adopt?

                                mattblaze@federate.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • tehstu@hachyderm.ioT tehstu@hachyderm.io

                                  @mattblaze Fascinating, didn't know any of that. Do you know if it is an approach specific to NYC, or something large cities tend to adopt?

                                  mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mattblaze@federate.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #18

                                  @tehstu NYC has always been on the leading edge of this, but other dense cities generally do something similar.

                                  darcmoughty@infosec.exchangeD 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                                    Anyway, it's a very interesting and complex real-time systems optimization problem, with lives at stake. And it was solved with 19th century technology, with the basic principles unchanged to this day.

                                    8/8

                                    uep@timeloop.cafeU This user is from outside of this forum
                                    uep@timeloop.cafeU This user is from outside of this forum
                                    uep@timeloop.cafe
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #19

                                    @mattblaze small clarification aside: I assume 'companies' here is a term meaning something similar to 'crew' or 'team', rather than implying some kind of privatised outsourced structure?

                                    mattblaze@federate.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • uep@timeloop.cafeU uep@timeloop.cafe

                                      @mattblaze small clarification aside: I assume 'companies' here is a term meaning something similar to 'crew' or 'team', rather than implying some kind of privatised outsourced structure?

                                      mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      mattblaze@federate.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #20

                                      @uep Today yes, but it has its roots from the time when there wasn't a single unified fire department in the city.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                                        The box technology has changed (most surviving ones can do voice communication now), and many of the physical alarm boxes have disappeared, but every location is still associated with a box, which, even if the box isn't there, determines which firehouses are "first due".

                                        When you call 911 today, the fire dispatcher first figures out the box number associated with the location and sends the first due engines and trucks for that box.

                                        3/

                                        becomethewaifu@tech.lgbtB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        becomethewaifu@tech.lgbtB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        becomethewaifu@tech.lgbt
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #21

                                        @mattblaze Boston's fire boxes are very much still around, and although the backend systems have been computerized for quite a while now, the boxes themselves are still very much a wind-up telegraph inside. As a nice feature, the wiring is entirely independent of the phone and electrical systems, so should there be a major systems outage in one area, the boxes still work. They actually did work last time 911 went down state-wide and someone pulled one out of desperation. Thankfully the news reported on that, and it was promoted enough for people to actually read it and learn those are still actively maintained and monitored...

                                        The fire museum has one of their oldest computers, as well as a disconnected box for people to pull and look inside of. (Well, it's connected to the computer behind it, but not to the actual fire system)

                                        And yes, they still have the manual telegraph key in the box. AFAIK it's only really used for testing stuff these days?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                                          Anyway, it's a very interesting and complex real-time systems optimization problem, with lives at stake. And it was solved with 19th century technology, with the basic principles unchanged to this day.

                                          8/8

                                          mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          mattblaze@federate.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #22

                                          Some terminology: There are two basic kinds of firefighting vehicles: "Engines", which carry hoses and pump water, and "trucks", which have telescoping ladders. Each is crewed by 4 or 5 firefighters. Engines are chiefly responsible for putting out the fire, while trucks are chiefly responsible for rescuing people (and getting access to high floors). In NYC, a "battalion" has a chief that supervises (generally) two engines and one truck

                                          Each additional alarm adds roughly 4 engines and 2 trucks.

                                          msbellows@c.imM elithebearded@fed.qaz.redE mattblaze@federate.socialM demize@unstable.systemsD gilester45@twit.socialG 6 Replies Last reply
                                          1
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups