Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. NYC: Big fire (4th alarm now) across a church and several multi-unit residential buildings at 12th St and 27th Ave in Astoria.

NYC: Big fire (4th alarm now) across a church and several multi-unit residential buildings at 12th St and 27th Ave in Astoria.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
44 Posts 26 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

    The problem with always dispatching the nearest available fire house is that if there's a large fire somewhere, there won't be nearby available firefighters to respond to *other* fires nearby, requiring the initial response to come from far away.

    So they don't always send the nearest available. Instead, they skip over some of them, to ensure maintaining availability near large incidents.

    But figuring who best to send next quickly becomes pretty complicated, with multiple contingencies.

    5/

    mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
    mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
    mattblaze@federate.social
    wrote last edited by
    #11

    So, instead of requiring the dispatcher to figure this out on the fly (which would be impossibly difficult to do well when multiple fires are going on, especially before computers), they figure out the response order for each box in advance.

    Each box has a "box card" listing the first due, second alarm, third alarm, and so on responses. Each alarm increment is a contingent of several engine and truck companies. The box card is used to decide who to send when additional alarms are called.

    6/

    mattblaze@federate.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

      The problem with always dispatching the nearest available fire house is that if there's a large fire somewhere, there won't be nearby available firefighters to respond to *other* fires nearby, requiring the initial response to come from far away.

      So they don't always send the nearest available. Instead, they skip over some of them, to ensure maintaining availability near large incidents.

      But figuring who best to send next quickly becomes pretty complicated, with multiple contingencies.

      5/

      darkuncle@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
      darkuncle@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
      darkuncle@infosec.exchange
      wrote last edited by
      #12

      @mattblaze this feels like there's some kind of maths optimization problem here with a theorem to be proved

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

        So, instead of requiring the dispatcher to figure this out on the fly (which would be impossibly difficult to do well when multiple fires are going on, especially before computers), they figure out the response order for each box in advance.

        Each box has a "box card" listing the first due, second alarm, third alarm, and so on responses. Each alarm increment is a contingent of several engine and truck companies. The box card is used to decide who to send when additional alarms are called.

        6/

        mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
        mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
        mattblaze@federate.social
        wrote last edited by
        #13

        The box card ordering ensures that there remains some available coverage spread throughout the city when there are large incidents going on. They pre-calculate up to a fifth alarm (at which point there are over 35 engines and trucks operating at the incident). After that, more units can be called in, but the dispatchers have to figure it out on their own.

        (9/11 was a fifth alarm, but had many more fire companies than that called in).

        7/

        mattblaze@federate.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

          The box card ordering ensures that there remains some available coverage spread throughout the city when there are large incidents going on. They pre-calculate up to a fifth alarm (at which point there are over 35 engines and trucks operating at the incident). After that, more units can be called in, but the dispatchers have to figure it out on their own.

          (9/11 was a fifth alarm, but had many more fire companies than that called in).

          7/

          mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
          mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
          mattblaze@federate.social
          wrote last edited by
          #14

          Anyway, it's a very interesting and complex real-time systems optimization problem, with lives at stake. And it was solved with 19th century technology, with the basic principles unchanged to this day.

          8/8

          felcryn@mastodon.socialF stephenrees@mas.toS tehstu@hachyderm.ioT uep@timeloop.cafeU mattblaze@federate.socialM 10 Replies Last reply
          0
          • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

            Anyway, it's a very interesting and complex real-time systems optimization problem, with lives at stake. And it was solved with 19th century technology, with the basic principles unchanged to this day.

            8/8

            felcryn@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
            felcryn@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
            felcryn@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #15

            @mattblaze Thanks!

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

              Anyway, it's a very interesting and complex real-time systems optimization problem, with lives at stake. And it was solved with 19th century technology, with the basic principles unchanged to this day.

              8/8

              stephenrees@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
              stephenrees@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
              stephenrees@mas.to
              wrote last edited by
              #16

              @mattblaze

              typo "unhanged" should be "unchanged"

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                Anyway, it's a very interesting and complex real-time systems optimization problem, with lives at stake. And it was solved with 19th century technology, with the basic principles unchanged to this day.

                8/8

                tehstu@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
                tehstu@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
                tehstu@hachyderm.io
                wrote last edited by
                #17

                @mattblaze Fascinating, didn't know any of that. Do you know if it is an approach specific to NYC, or something large cities tend to adopt?

                mattblaze@federate.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • tehstu@hachyderm.ioT tehstu@hachyderm.io

                  @mattblaze Fascinating, didn't know any of that. Do you know if it is an approach specific to NYC, or something large cities tend to adopt?

                  mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mattblaze@federate.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #18

                  @tehstu NYC has always been on the leading edge of this, but other dense cities generally do something similar.

                  darcmoughty@infosec.exchangeD 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                    Anyway, it's a very interesting and complex real-time systems optimization problem, with lives at stake. And it was solved with 19th century technology, with the basic principles unchanged to this day.

                    8/8

                    uep@timeloop.cafeU This user is from outside of this forum
                    uep@timeloop.cafeU This user is from outside of this forum
                    uep@timeloop.cafe
                    wrote last edited by
                    #19

                    @mattblaze small clarification aside: I assume 'companies' here is a term meaning something similar to 'crew' or 'team', rather than implying some kind of privatised outsourced structure?

                    mattblaze@federate.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • uep@timeloop.cafeU uep@timeloop.cafe

                      @mattblaze small clarification aside: I assume 'companies' here is a term meaning something similar to 'crew' or 'team', rather than implying some kind of privatised outsourced structure?

                      mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mattblaze@federate.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #20

                      @uep Today yes, but it has its roots from the time when there wasn't a single unified fire department in the city.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                        The box technology has changed (most surviving ones can do voice communication now), and many of the physical alarm boxes have disappeared, but every location is still associated with a box, which, even if the box isn't there, determines which firehouses are "first due".

                        When you call 911 today, the fire dispatcher first figures out the box number associated with the location and sends the first due engines and trucks for that box.

                        3/

                        becomethewaifu@tech.lgbtB This user is from outside of this forum
                        becomethewaifu@tech.lgbtB This user is from outside of this forum
                        becomethewaifu@tech.lgbt
                        wrote last edited by
                        #21

                        @mattblaze Boston's fire boxes are very much still around, and although the backend systems have been computerized for quite a while now, the boxes themselves are still very much a wind-up telegraph inside. As a nice feature, the wiring is entirely independent of the phone and electrical systems, so should there be a major systems outage in one area, the boxes still work. They actually did work last time 911 went down state-wide and someone pulled one out of desperation. Thankfully the news reported on that, and it was promoted enough for people to actually read it and learn those are still actively maintained and monitored...

                        The fire museum has one of their oldest computers, as well as a disconnected box for people to pull and look inside of. (Well, it's connected to the computer behind it, but not to the actual fire system)

                        And yes, they still have the manual telegraph key in the box. AFAIK it's only really used for testing stuff these days?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                          Anyway, it's a very interesting and complex real-time systems optimization problem, with lives at stake. And it was solved with 19th century technology, with the basic principles unchanged to this day.

                          8/8

                          mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mattblaze@federate.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #22

                          Some terminology: There are two basic kinds of firefighting vehicles: "Engines", which carry hoses and pump water, and "trucks", which have telescoping ladders. Each is crewed by 4 or 5 firefighters. Engines are chiefly responsible for putting out the fire, while trucks are chiefly responsible for rescuing people (and getting access to high floors). In NYC, a "battalion" has a chief that supervises (generally) two engines and one truck

                          Each additional alarm adds roughly 4 engines and 2 trucks.

                          msbellows@c.imM elithebearded@fed.qaz.redE mattblaze@federate.socialM demize@unstable.systemsD gilester45@twit.socialG 6 Replies Last reply
                          1
                          0
                          • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                            The problem with always dispatching the nearest available fire house is that if there's a large fire somewhere, there won't be nearby available firefighters to respond to *other* fires nearby, requiring the initial response to come from far away.

                            So they don't always send the nearest available. Instead, they skip over some of them, to ensure maintaining availability near large incidents.

                            But figuring who best to send next quickly becomes pretty complicated, with multiple contingencies.

                            5/

                            dougfir@m.ai6yr.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                            dougfir@m.ai6yr.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                            dougfir@m.ai6yr.org
                            wrote last edited by
                            #23

                            @mattblaze
                            CalFire generally sends the closest units, then has further away units move up to cover empty stations. But California is still not as densely populated as NYC.
                            With all the mutual aid agreements in place, the cover units will frequently be from another agency.

                            mattblaze@federate.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • dougfir@m.ai6yr.orgD dougfir@m.ai6yr.org

                              @mattblaze
                              CalFire generally sends the closest units, then has further away units move up to cover empty stations. But California is still not as densely populated as NYC.
                              With all the mutual aid agreements in place, the cover units will frequently be from another agency.

                              mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mattblaze@federate.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #24

                              @Dougfir Yeah, this system works in large dense cities (LA and SF, maybe).

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                                Some terminology: There are two basic kinds of firefighting vehicles: "Engines", which carry hoses and pump water, and "trucks", which have telescoping ladders. Each is crewed by 4 or 5 firefighters. Engines are chiefly responsible for putting out the fire, while trucks are chiefly responsible for rescuing people (and getting access to high floors). In NYC, a "battalion" has a chief that supervises (generally) two engines and one truck

                                Each additional alarm adds roughly 4 engines and 2 trucks.

                                msbellows@c.imM This user is from outside of this forum
                                msbellows@c.imM This user is from outside of this forum
                                msbellows@c.im
                                wrote last edited by
                                #25

                                @mattblaze This is absolutely fascinating and I'm grateful to you for sharing it. Thank you.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                                  Anyway, it's a very interesting and complex real-time systems optimization problem, with lives at stake. And it was solved with 19th century technology, with the basic principles unchanged to this day.

                                  8/8

                                  ted@social.foolish.computerT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ted@social.foolish.computerT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ted@social.foolish.computer
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #26

                                  @mattblaze Super cool. Thanks for sharing!

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                                    NYC: Big fire (4th alarm now) across a church and several multi-unit residential buildings at 12th St and 27th Ave in Astoria.

                                    log@mastodon.sdf.orgL This user is from outside of this forum
                                    log@mastodon.sdf.orgL This user is from outside of this forum
                                    log@mastodon.sdf.org
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #27

                                    @mattblaze My obsession with nominative determinism makes this thread 100x more fun.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                                      Anyway, it's a very interesting and complex real-time systems optimization problem, with lives at stake. And it was solved with 19th century technology, with the basic principles unchanged to this day.

                                      8/8

                                      curtosis@lingo.lolC This user is from outside of this forum
                                      curtosis@lingo.lolC This user is from outside of this forum
                                      curtosis@lingo.lol
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #28

                                      @mattblaze It really is fascinating! I went down this rabbit hole learning about my large suburban FD (Montgomery County MD) and the pre-planning and training is *very* detailed. For each apparatus, once they’re told “you’re the second due” each person (defined by seat) already knows exactly what their initial assignment will be on arrival.

                                      Obviously, very dynamic thereafter. But as they say, plans are useless, but planning is essential.

                                      Nerdsniped. 🙂

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • ve2uwy@mastodon.radioV ve2uwy@mastodon.radio

                                        @mattblaze

                                        mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mattblaze@federate.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mattblaze@federate.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #29

                                        @VE2UWY I have that book, somewhere!

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • mattblaze@federate.socialM mattblaze@federate.social

                                          Some terminology: There are two basic kinds of firefighting vehicles: "Engines", which carry hoses and pump water, and "trucks", which have telescoping ladders. Each is crewed by 4 or 5 firefighters. Engines are chiefly responsible for putting out the fire, while trucks are chiefly responsible for rescuing people (and getting access to high floors). In NYC, a "battalion" has a chief that supervises (generally) two engines and one truck

                                          Each additional alarm adds roughly 4 engines and 2 trucks.

                                          elithebearded@fed.qaz.redE This user is from outside of this forum
                                          elithebearded@fed.qaz.redE This user is from outside of this forum
                                          elithebearded@fed.qaz.red
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #30

                                          @mattblaze

                                          I grew up in NYC but only knew part of that. Telegraph and not-nearest for second order responders: yes. Predetermined second order responders and "battalions": no.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          • System shared this topic
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups