Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I’m working on an AI policy for my org that allows us to opt out of AI note taking and prohibits AI in our comms/storytelling.

I’m working on an AI policy for my org that allows us to opt out of AI note taking and prohibits AI in our comms/storytelling.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
42 Posts 24 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • seachanger@alaskan.socialS seachanger@alaskan.social

    I’m working on an AI policy for my org that allows us to opt out of AI note taking and prohibits AI in our comms/storytelling. here is my list of reasons for the policy, but my board is asking me to cite sources. Can you help me with any good references you would cite for any of these? (Or an edit or restatement where I’ve gotten it wrong or inaccurate?)

    *if you want to argue about why I shouldn’t have this policy kindly crawl into a hole in the ground and cover yourself with soil

    edcates@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
    edcates@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
    edcates@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #22

    @seachanger #6. Which links to the Standford report it discusses.

    favicon

    (www.kiteworks.com)

    Anecdotally, even though Kagi Translate has instructions to not divulge its prompt with anyone, people are easily able to get it to do so by asking it to create or show the output of programs that do exactly that.

    I can dig up those examples if you want.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

      @seachanger @sarae

      Also, not sure what you mean by sources people might know of, but ... our book is a source!

      seachanger@alaskan.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      seachanger@alaskan.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      seachanger@alaskan.social
      wrote last edited by
      #23

      @emilymbender
      Thank you! I just thought people might reference recent stories or reports that back the specific points I was making. I am also adding your book and a few others from https://monetdiaz.com/books-critical-AI.html

      @sarae

      johannab@cosocial.caJ 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • arod@social.coopA arod@social.coop

        @seachanger this is a great resource, I think you will find some sources here: https://libguides.amherst.edu/genAI/ethics

        seachanger@alaskan.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
        seachanger@alaskan.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
        seachanger@alaskan.social
        wrote last edited by
        #24

        @arod oh wow yes that is what I was looking for

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • seachanger@alaskan.socialS seachanger@alaskan.social

          I’m working on an AI policy for my org that allows us to opt out of AI note taking and prohibits AI in our comms/storytelling. here is my list of reasons for the policy, but my board is asking me to cite sources. Can you help me with any good references you would cite for any of these? (Or an edit or restatement where I’ve gotten it wrong or inaccurate?)

          *if you want to argue about why I shouldn’t have this policy kindly crawl into a hole in the ground and cover yourself with soil

          imbl@social.treehouse.systemsI This user is from outside of this forum
          imbl@social.treehouse.systemsI This user is from outside of this forum
          imbl@social.treehouse.systems
          wrote last edited by
          #25

          @seachanger here are a couple of links on ai's role in digital colonialism in africa and south america in case that's helpful!

          https://www.ictworks.org/african-digital-colonialism/ (a synopsis of https://www.ictworks.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/African-Digital-Colonialism.pdf)
          https://peopledaily.digital/insights/the-hidden-cost-of-ai-africas-invisible-workforce-and-digital-servitude (ironically uses an ai generated stock image as the article header)
          https://www.technologyreview.com/supertopic/ai-colonialism-supertopic/ (keeps trying to sell me ai books lol)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • seachanger@alaskan.socialS seachanger@alaskan.social

            @emilymbender
            Thank you! I just thought people might reference recent stories or reports that back the specific points I was making. I am also adding your book and a few others from https://monetdiaz.com/books-critical-AI.html

            @sarae

            johannab@cosocial.caJ This user is from outside of this forum
            johannab@cosocial.caJ This user is from outside of this forum
            johannab@cosocial.ca
            wrote last edited by
            #26

            @seachanger @emilymbender @sarae

            Not quite at my fingertips right now and I'll go have a look, but the consulting firm Deloitte is a "case study as a dire warning", as is Air Canada - both were held to be liable and had to reimburse clients for letting AI fuckups into their official products or communications.

            johannab@cosocial.caJ 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • johannab@cosocial.caJ johannab@cosocial.ca

              @seachanger @emilymbender @sarae

              Not quite at my fingertips right now and I'll go have a look, but the consulting firm Deloitte is a "case study as a dire warning", as is Air Canada - both were held to be liable and had to reimburse clients for letting AI fuckups into their official products or communications.

              johannab@cosocial.caJ This user is from outside of this forum
              johannab@cosocial.caJ This user is from outside of this forum
              johannab@cosocial.ca
              wrote last edited by
              #27

              @seachanger @emilymbender @sarae

              Boards are usually much more receptive to "well, this is a risk that could get your own ass handed to you in court, minus any cash you had in your back pocket" than they are to "this is a highly problematic tool that is deceptively easy to misuse badly" because everyone thinks everyone else who got in trouble was just not as smart as they are.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • johannab@cosocial.caJ johannab@cosocial.ca

                @seachanger @emilymbender @sarae

                Not quite at my fingertips right now and I'll go have a look, but the consulting firm Deloitte is a "case study as a dire warning", as is Air Canada - both were held to be liable and had to reimburse clients for letting AI fuckups into their official products or communications.

                johannab@cosocial.caJ This user is from outside of this forum
                johannab@cosocial.caJ This user is from outside of this forum
                johannab@cosocial.ca
                wrote last edited by
                #28

                @seachanger

                not too tough to find, even:

                Link Preview Image
                Deloitte to pay money back to Albanese government after using AI in $440,000 report

                Partial refund to be issued after several errors were found in a report into a department’s compliance framework

                favicon

                the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)

                Link Preview Image
                How can I mislead you? Air Canada found liable for chatbot's bad advice on bereavement rates | CBC News

                Air Canada has been ordered to pay compensation to a grieving grandchild who claimed they were misled into purchasing full-price flight tickets by an ill-informed chatbot.

                favicon

                CBC (www.cbc.ca)

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • seachanger@alaskan.socialS seachanger@alaskan.social

                  I’m working on an AI policy for my org that allows us to opt out of AI note taking and prohibits AI in our comms/storytelling. here is my list of reasons for the policy, but my board is asking me to cite sources. Can you help me with any good references you would cite for any of these? (Or an edit or restatement where I’ve gotten it wrong or inaccurate?)

                  *if you want to argue about why I shouldn’t have this policy kindly crawl into a hole in the ground and cover yourself with soil

                  integerdisarray@lethallava.landI This user is from outside of this forum
                  integerdisarray@lethallava.landI This user is from outside of this forum
                  integerdisarray@lethallava.land
                  wrote last edited by
                  #29

                  @seachanger@alaskan.social Here's one potential reason: a recent meta-analysis concluded that the general public is terrified of AI and has near-zero trust in AI products https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cb.70144?af=R

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • darby3@zirk.usD darby3@zirk.us

                    @seachanger I probably do here but would need to do some cross referencing I can’t do at the moment

                    Link Preview Image
                    AI Sucks, Actually

                    that's it, that's the thesis

                    favicon

                    (ai-sucks-actually.fyi)

                    seachanger@alaskan.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    seachanger@alaskan.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    seachanger@alaskan.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #30

                    @darby3 thank you! nice work!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • cafechatnoir@mastodon.socialC cafechatnoir@mastodon.social

                      @seachanger

                      MIT recently released a study on the long term cognitive effects of AI use. (Spoiler: they're not good effects.)

                      Link Preview Image
                      MIT Study Finds Artificial Intelligence Use Reprograms the Brain, Leading to Cognitive Decline - Science, Public Health Policy and the Law

                      By Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

                      favicon

                      Science, Public Health Policy and the Law (publichealthpolicyjournal.com)

                      coriopsicologia@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                      coriopsicologia@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                      coriopsicologia@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #31

                      @cafechatnoir @seachanger
                      This report from our collective @tunubesecamirio is plenty of reference for the point 3

                      Link Preview Image
                      Informe sobre los centros de datos de Aragón- El precio de las nubes – Tu Nube Seca Mi Río

                      favicon

                      (tunubesecamirio.com)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • seachanger@alaskan.socialS seachanger@alaskan.social

                        I’m working on an AI policy for my org that allows us to opt out of AI note taking and prohibits AI in our comms/storytelling. here is my list of reasons for the policy, but my board is asking me to cite sources. Can you help me with any good references you would cite for any of these? (Or an edit or restatement where I’ve gotten it wrong or inaccurate?)

                        *if you want to argue about why I shouldn’t have this policy kindly crawl into a hole in the ground and cover yourself with soil

                        tootbrute@fedi.arkadi.oneT This user is from outside of this forum
                        tootbrute@fedi.arkadi.oneT This user is from outside of this forum
                        tootbrute@fedi.arkadi.one
                        wrote last edited by
                        #32

                        @seachanger don't they have an "AI IS GOING GREAT" website?

                        Link Preview Image
                        Web3 is Going Just Great

                        A timeline recording only some of the many disasters happening in crypto, decentralized finance, NFTs, and other blockchain-based projects.

                        favicon

                        (www.web3isgoinggreat.com)

                        like they had for crypto shit.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • arod@social.coopA arod@social.coop

                          @seachanger this is a great resource, I think you will find some sources here: https://libguides.amherst.edu/genAI/ethics

                          tootbrute@fedi.arkadi.oneT This user is from outside of this forum
                          tootbrute@fedi.arkadi.oneT This user is from outside of this forum
                          tootbrute@fedi.arkadi.one
                          wrote last edited by
                          #33

                          @arod @seachanger great list of the reasons to not use AI.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • seachanger@alaskan.socialS seachanger@alaskan.social

                            I’m working on an AI policy for my org that allows us to opt out of AI note taking and prohibits AI in our comms/storytelling. here is my list of reasons for the policy, but my board is asking me to cite sources. Can you help me with any good references you would cite for any of these? (Or an edit or restatement where I’ve gotten it wrong or inaccurate?)

                            *if you want to argue about why I shouldn’t have this policy kindly crawl into a hole in the ground and cover yourself with soil

                            saorsa@neondystopia.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
                            saorsa@neondystopia.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
                            saorsa@neondystopia.world
                            wrote last edited by
                            #34
                            My policy for AI in programming tends to be applicable in other areas as well.

                            • AI should be used to assist, enhance and not replace existing workflows.
                            • When using AI, be sure to split your workflow into smaller, more manageable chunks.
                            • Proofread then validate the output against other sources before implementing it into your works.

                            This ensures that anything contributed by an AI meets the same expectations as a human performing the same task. If you implement the following or some variant of it into your workflow, you'll find that a lot of the common pitfalls with AI can easily be avoided. While the efficacy of AI can never been guaranteed, I find that sticking to those guidelines can help direct the output into something less liable to be derivative.

                            @seachanger@alaskan.social
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            0
                            • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
                            • cafechatnoir@mastodon.socialC cafechatnoir@mastodon.social

                              @seachanger

                              MIT recently released a study on the long term cognitive effects of AI use. (Spoiler: they're not good effects.)

                              Link Preview Image
                              MIT Study Finds Artificial Intelligence Use Reprograms the Brain, Leading to Cognitive Decline - Science, Public Health Policy and the Law

                              By Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

                              favicon

                              Science, Public Health Policy and the Law (publichealthpolicyjournal.com)

                              juandesant@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              juandesant@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              juandesant@mathstodon.xyz
                              wrote last edited by
                              #35

                              @cafechatnoir @seachanger pinging @WeirdWriter, who put in beautiful, powerful words how that experience of “semantic ablation” affected his writer friend. At least, it seems to be recoverable, but at what cost…

                              weirdwriter@caneandable.socialW 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • juandesant@mathstodon.xyzJ juandesant@mathstodon.xyz

                                @cafechatnoir @seachanger pinging @WeirdWriter, who put in beautiful, powerful words how that experience of “semantic ablation” affected his writer friend. At least, it seems to be recoverable, but at what cost…

                                weirdwriter@caneandable.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                weirdwriter@caneandable.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                weirdwriter@caneandable.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #36

                                @juandesant @cafechatnoir @seachanger Yay thank you for tagging! My narrative is at the end. I’ve seen it have a drastically negative psychological consequences for everybody that uses it. Writers, readers, anybody really. I recently had a scenario where a trance friend of mine just quit writing all altogether because, on the one hand everybody was praising her for doing such a fantastic job with prompting the thing when she never used an LLM at all. The truly horrifying thing was, the positive comments were more disturbing because they praised an LLM for creating it when she never touched an LLM in her life. I’m going to write about it, but right now, the emotions are swirling around and I need to calm down after these incidences AnyWho, but if you have not read it yet, the first story is https://sightlessscribbles.com/the-colonization-of-confidence/

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • seachanger@alaskan.socialS seachanger@alaskan.social

                                  I’m working on an AI policy for my org that allows us to opt out of AI note taking and prohibits AI in our comms/storytelling. here is my list of reasons for the policy, but my board is asking me to cite sources. Can you help me with any good references you would cite for any of these? (Or an edit or restatement where I’ve gotten it wrong or inaccurate?)

                                  *if you want to argue about why I shouldn’t have this policy kindly crawl into a hole in the ground and cover yourself with soil

                                  thankfulmachine@oldbytes.spaceT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  thankfulmachine@oldbytes.spaceT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  thankfulmachine@oldbytes.space
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #37

                                  @seachanger https://www.media.mit.edu/projects/your-brain-on-chatgpt/overview/

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • seachanger@alaskan.socialS seachanger@alaskan.social

                                    I’m working on an AI policy for my org that allows us to opt out of AI note taking and prohibits AI in our comms/storytelling. here is my list of reasons for the policy, but my board is asking me to cite sources. Can you help me with any good references you would cite for any of these? (Or an edit or restatement where I’ve gotten it wrong or inaccurate?)

                                    *if you want to argue about why I shouldn’t have this policy kindly crawl into a hole in the ground and cover yourself with soil

                                    thankfulmachine@oldbytes.spaceT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    thankfulmachine@oldbytes.spaceT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    thankfulmachine@oldbytes.space
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #38

                                    @seachanger https://metr.org/blog/2025-07-10-early-2025-ai-experienced-os-dev-study/

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • seachanger@alaskan.socialS seachanger@alaskan.social

                                      I’m working on an AI policy for my org that allows us to opt out of AI note taking and prohibits AI in our comms/storytelling. here is my list of reasons for the policy, but my board is asking me to cite sources. Can you help me with any good references you would cite for any of these? (Or an edit or restatement where I’ve gotten it wrong or inaccurate?)

                                      *if you want to argue about why I shouldn’t have this policy kindly crawl into a hole in the ground and cover yourself with soil

                                      kdwarn@social.coopK This user is from outside of this forum
                                      kdwarn@social.coopK This user is from outside of this forum
                                      kdwarn@social.coop
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #39

                                      @seachanger been collecting news articles here: https://kdwarn.net/programming/links#AI%20Sucks

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • seachanger@alaskan.socialS seachanger@alaskan.social

                                        I’m working on an AI policy for my org that allows us to opt out of AI note taking and prohibits AI in our comms/storytelling. here is my list of reasons for the policy, but my board is asking me to cite sources. Can you help me with any good references you would cite for any of these? (Or an edit or restatement where I’ve gotten it wrong or inaccurate?)

                                        *if you want to argue about why I shouldn’t have this policy kindly crawl into a hole in the ground and cover yourself with soil

                                        girlbandgeek@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                        girlbandgeek@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                        girlbandgeek@mastodon.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #40

                                        @seachanger @janeishly I really like what you're doing here. You may want to add that there is little transparency around the training data. Many models are trained on data that contains harmful biases and prejudices against BIPOC, LGBT+ people, etc. Also may involve exploitation of labor in undeveloped countries to assist with training. Good luck with getting a strong policy approved 👊

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • seachanger@alaskan.socialS seachanger@alaskan.social

                                          I’m working on an AI policy for my org that allows us to opt out of AI note taking and prohibits AI in our comms/storytelling. here is my list of reasons for the policy, but my board is asking me to cite sources. Can you help me with any good references you would cite for any of these? (Or an edit or restatement where I’ve gotten it wrong or inaccurate?)

                                          *if you want to argue about why I shouldn’t have this policy kindly crawl into a hole in the ground and cover yourself with soil

                                          stonsoftware@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          stonsoftware@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          stonsoftware@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #41

                                          @seachanger you miss the bias in training these models

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups