Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. The US Constitution assumes that the three branches of Federal government would fight tooth and nail to hold on to their own powers, not collude with each other like they do today.

The US Constitution assumes that the three branches of Federal government would fight tooth and nail to hold on to their own powers, not collude with each other like they do today.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
14 Posts 7 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • drahardja@sfba.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
    drahardja@sfba.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
    drahardja@sfba.social
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    The US Constitution assumes that the three branches of Federal government would fight tooth and nail to hold on to their own powers, not collude with each other like they do today.

    What the hell do we do with this problem? How could we amend the Constitution to prevent such a thing?

    leslieburns@esq.socialL beachbum@mastodon.sdf.orgB justtoodd@nerdculture.deJ faraiwe@mstdn.socialF femme_mal@mstdn.socialF 6 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • drahardja@sfba.socialD drahardja@sfba.social

      The US Constitution assumes that the three branches of Federal government would fight tooth and nail to hold on to their own powers, not collude with each other like they do today.

      What the hell do we do with this problem? How could we amend the Constitution to prevent such a thing?

      leslieburns@esq.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
      leslieburns@esq.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
      leslieburns@esq.social
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @drahardja Take the money out by requiring all MoC, SCOTUS, and Potus/VP to have blind trusts.

      And hard SHORT term limits (better than age limits--which are inherently ageist of course).

      leslieburns@esq.socialL 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      0
      • drahardja@sfba.socialD drahardja@sfba.social

        The US Constitution assumes that the three branches of Federal government would fight tooth and nail to hold on to their own powers, not collude with each other like they do today.

        What the hell do we do with this problem? How could we amend the Constitution to prevent such a thing?

        beachbum@mastodon.sdf.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
        beachbum@mastodon.sdf.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
        beachbum@mastodon.sdf.org
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @drahardja We have to elect people that take their oath to the Constitution seriously and aren’t willing to abdicate it for a cult leader.

        drahardja@sfba.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • beachbum@mastodon.sdf.orgB beachbum@mastodon.sdf.org

          @drahardja We have to elect people that take their oath to the Constitution seriously and aren’t willing to abdicate it for a cult leader.

          drahardja@sfba.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
          drahardja@sfba.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
          drahardja@sfba.social
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @Beachbum It seems like such an obvious thing, but yet here we are.

          beachbum@mastodon.sdf.orgB 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • leslieburns@esq.socialL leslieburns@esq.social

            @drahardja Take the money out by requiring all MoC, SCOTUS, and Potus/VP to have blind trusts.

            And hard SHORT term limits (better than age limits--which are inherently ageist of course).

            leslieburns@esq.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
            leslieburns@esq.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
            leslieburns@esq.social
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @drahardja Oh, and add an amendment overturning Citizens United and *any* corporate donations.

            leslieburns@esq.socialL 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • drahardja@sfba.socialD drahardja@sfba.social

              The US Constitution assumes that the three branches of Federal government would fight tooth and nail to hold on to their own powers, not collude with each other like they do today.

              What the hell do we do with this problem? How could we amend the Constitution to prevent such a thing?

              justtoodd@nerdculture.deJ This user is from outside of this forum
              justtoodd@nerdculture.deJ This user is from outside of this forum
              justtoodd@nerdculture.de
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              @drahardja Expand the House

              drahardja@sfba.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • justtoodd@nerdculture.deJ justtoodd@nerdculture.de

                @drahardja Expand the House

                drahardja@sfba.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                drahardja@sfba.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                drahardja@sfba.social
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                @JustToOdd I’m not sure how that will help. I would support deleting the Senate though.

                justtoodd@nerdculture.deJ 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • drahardja@sfba.socialD drahardja@sfba.social

                  The US Constitution assumes that the three branches of Federal government would fight tooth and nail to hold on to their own powers, not collude with each other like they do today.

                  What the hell do we do with this problem? How could we amend the Constitution to prevent such a thing?

                  faraiwe@mstdn.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                  faraiwe@mstdn.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                  faraiwe@mstdn.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  @drahardja
                  urgently, overturn Citizens United

                  Then enshrine TERMS and AGE LIMITS for any and every elected or directly vetted public office.

                  Erase presidential pardon powers.

                  It'd be a good start.

                  faraiwe@mstdn.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • drahardja@sfba.socialD drahardja@sfba.social

                    @Beachbum It seems like such an obvious thing, but yet here we are.

                    beachbum@mastodon.sdf.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                    beachbum@mastodon.sdf.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                    beachbum@mastodon.sdf.org
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    @drahardja True that. Not nearly enough of his voters are denouncing his destruction of our constitutional republic either.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • drahardja@sfba.socialD drahardja@sfba.social

                      @JustToOdd I’m not sure how that will help. I would support deleting the Senate though.

                      justtoodd@nerdculture.deJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      justtoodd@nerdculture.deJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      justtoodd@nerdculture.de
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      @drahardja Each rep would be representing fewer people thus having more of an ability to actually represent and be held accountable.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • drahardja@sfba.socialD drahardja@sfba.social

                        The US Constitution assumes that the three branches of Federal government would fight tooth and nail to hold on to their own powers, not collude with each other like they do today.

                        What the hell do we do with this problem? How could we amend the Constitution to prevent such a thing?

                        femme_mal@mstdn.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                        femme_mal@mstdn.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                        femme_mal@mstdn.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #11

                        @drahardja First, do what Rep. John Dingle (RIP) recommended after serving 60 years in the House: get rid of the Senate as it undermines equal representation for every American.

                        Second, apply the Constitution's Article I, Section 2 and ensure there is a representatitve for every 30,000 citizens with at least one per state.

                        Third, limit SCOTUS terms to 20 years or less, publicly fund presidential campaigns and limit federal campaign spending more.

                        Lastly, mandatory US civics education.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • faraiwe@mstdn.socialF faraiwe@mstdn.social

                          @drahardja
                          urgently, overturn Citizens United

                          Then enshrine TERMS and AGE LIMITS for any and every elected or directly vetted public office.

                          Erase presidential pardon powers.

                          It'd be a good start.

                          faraiwe@mstdn.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                          faraiwe@mstdn.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                          faraiwe@mstdn.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #12

                          @drahardja oh, yeah.

                          Make lobbying illegal. Make stock trading illegal for legislators.

                          Establish mandatory financial disclosures, random inspections/audits, mandatory inspection/audit at end of term(s) for every member of Congress, Circuit/Appeals/SCOTUS and Cabinet. Zero exceptions.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • drahardja@sfba.socialD drahardja@sfba.social

                            The US Constitution assumes that the three branches of Federal government would fight tooth and nail to hold on to their own powers, not collude with each other like they do today.

                            What the hell do we do with this problem? How could we amend the Constitution to prevent such a thing?

                            aaron@social.aaroncrocco.comA This user is from outside of this forum
                            aaron@social.aaroncrocco.comA This user is from outside of this forum
                            aaron@social.aaroncrocco.com
                            wrote last edited by
                            #13

                            @drahardja Term limits for congress. All of them.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • leslieburns@esq.socialL leslieburns@esq.social

                              @drahardja Oh, and add an amendment overturning Citizens United and *any* corporate donations.

                              leslieburns@esq.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                              leslieburns@esq.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                              leslieburns@esq.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #14

                              @drahardja Oh and GET RID OF THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE. That one is huge. National election means all the votes count the same not state by state. You have more votes overall, you win.

                              I'd add a mandatory >50% vote getting requirement, so there is a runoff if the first round doesn't produce a majority winner.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • World
                              • Users
                              • Groups