Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. i've heard a few times that "waymos will make streets safer" so i went and looked up sf's traffic fatality statistics and they're pretty much identical

i've heard a few times that "waymos will make streets safer" so i went and looked up sf's traffic fatality statistics and they're pretty much identical

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
68 Posts 43 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mro@digitalcourage.socialM mro@digitalcourage.social

    Hi @gisgeek @tef,
    #platforms. And they owe a lot to #sunsetting #Google #Reader.

    gisgeek@floss.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
    gisgeek@floss.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
    gisgeek@floss.social
    wrote last edited by
    #59

    @mro @tef

    Indubitably, platforms and the cloud were a different world 20 years ago, more sane, before social media and ads everywhere. Another of the worst drifts has been any of the multiple trials to cancel or marginalize Internet standards in favor of proprietary protocols and formats.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • vfig@mastodon.gamedev.placeV vfig@mastodon.gamedev.place

      @EndlessMason @tef "The origin point for nearly all of those 'you work harder than a medieval peasant' memes and articles is Juliet Schor’s The Overworked American (1993). The argument has been debunked quite a few times…" — https://acoup.blog/2025/09/05/collections-life-work-death-and-the-peasant-part-ivb-working-days/

      thesquirrelfish@sfba.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
      thesquirrelfish@sfba.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
      thesquirrelfish@sfba.social
      wrote last edited by
      #60

      @vfig blog seems sus, makes this claim pretty early "pre-modern peasant farmers – a majority of all of the humans who have ever lived," when like farming hasn't been around for the majority of time humans have been around. Also later they make some huge assumptions that most people get weekends & 8 hour days & that's meeting what they call both sustainability and respectability needs.. and like I don't think a lot of people were like "oh yeah I can't wait to be a Roman peasant, the quality of life will be great, conquer me please" so using that as a placeholder for even other people of the era is not great.

      eestileib@tech.lgbtE 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • tef@mastodon.socialT tef@mastodon.social

        i've heard a few times that "waymos will make streets safer" so i went and looked up sf's traffic fatality statistics and they're pretty much identical

        i mean, there is a slight increase over the last two years but there's sufficient variance to avoid suggesting a trend

        as i understand it, waymos tend to take people off busses and other forms of transit, rather than out of their own cars

        so i'm doubtful it will lower deaths on the road, just the number of busses

        jplebreton@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jplebreton@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jplebreton@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #61

        @tef the booster arguments all boil down to "ah see for the real benefits to manifest, we need to eliminate all other forms of transit and subsidize three of the least trustworthy tech companies on the planet, *then* we'll have a transit utopia. in select cities. where it doesn't snow. no pets. etc"

        jplebreton@mastodon.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jplebreton@mastodon.socialJ jplebreton@mastodon.social

          @tef the booster arguments all boil down to "ah see for the real benefits to manifest, we need to eliminate all other forms of transit and subsidize three of the least trustworthy tech companies on the planet, *then* we'll have a transit utopia. in select cities. where it doesn't snow. no pets. etc"

          jplebreton@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jplebreton@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jplebreton@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #62

          @tef "please believe our extremely cooked stats"

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • tef@mastodon.socialT tef@mastodon.social

            it feels like a lot of the arguments i hear boil down to "what if none of the bad things were happening right now, and instead, good things happened instead"

            and sure, if that were true, things would be good

            but, well, all of the bad things are happening already and none of the good things are any closer to appearing

            and i'm just not confident "wait and see if everything reverses course" is a sensible way to evaluate the impact of new technologies

            antopatriarca@mathstodon.xyzA This user is from outside of this forum
            antopatriarca@mathstodon.xyzA This user is from outside of this forum
            antopatriarca@mathstodon.xyz
            wrote last edited by
            #63

            @tef This is particularly important because the people controlling the technology have shown no interest in achieving those good things. Good things rarely happen by change. So putting the emphasis on things that may magically appear is really just wishful thinking or a rethorical device to tell you are blocking some possible progress ignoring the bad already happening.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • matt@proud.socialM matt@proud.social

              @tef The Waymo vehicles mimic human drivers too well: loitering and blocking crosswalks for right on red and tailgating cyclists on the road. Folks will say “gotcha; they’re safe,” but this misses a bigger intangible: these vehicles are a fucking nuisance and clog the road. Being safer than a human while being more plentiful and annoying is not a significant improvement.

              arclight@oldbytes.spaceA This user is from outside of this forum
              arclight@oldbytes.spaceA This user is from outside of this forum
              arclight@oldbytes.space
              wrote last edited by
              #64

              @matt @tef Maybe Waymos mimic human drivers because they fall back to remote human drivers when the algorithm fails: https://www.newsweek.com/waymo-reveals-remote-workers-in-philippines-help-guide-its-driverless-cars-11478439

              Does the driver have a valid license in your jurisdiction? Should they? If they blow past a stopped school bus at full speed, who gets cited? https://www.kxan.com/news/local/austin/ntsb-investigates-additional-incident-between-waymo-austin-isd/

              Start peeling back the PR from any of this tech and it's all casual lawbreaking, denial of consent, and putting the public at risk with no recourse.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • tef@mastodon.socialT tef@mastodon.social

                we're destroying the open web

                we're burning down the closest thing i've ever seen in my life to the library of alexandria

                and people are explaining to me how warm it keeps their hands, and maybe, in the future, the ashes will contain the secrets of the universe

                causticmsngo@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                causticmsngo@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                causticmsngo@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #65

                @tef in pricipal, i agree with you, but in the spirit of “the purpose of a system is what is does”, the so-called "open web" is the very thing that has created so many of these harms.

                surveillance capitalism, pervasive ad-tech, concentration of wealth & power in the hands of billionaire tech bros, abusive social media algorithms, etc.

                i misgivings that preserving the "open web" we have is an unmitigated good.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • thesquirrelfish@sfba.socialT thesquirrelfish@sfba.social

                  @vfig blog seems sus, makes this claim pretty early "pre-modern peasant farmers – a majority of all of the humans who have ever lived," when like farming hasn't been around for the majority of time humans have been around. Also later they make some huge assumptions that most people get weekends & 8 hour days & that's meeting what they call both sustainability and respectability needs.. and like I don't think a lot of people were like "oh yeah I can't wait to be a Roman peasant, the quality of life will be great, conquer me please" so using that as a placeholder for even other people of the era is not great.

                  eestileib@tech.lgbtE This user is from outside of this forum
                  eestileib@tech.lgbtE This user is from outside of this forum
                  eestileib@tech.lgbt
                  wrote last edited by
                  #66

                  @thesquirrelfish @vfig

                  Yeah I ran those articles past a friend who lived in a traditional village in Cameroon for a bit and he said that Bret is really overclaiming the universality there.

                  Devereaux knows his shit about the details of Roman economics and military organization, I have been reading his blog for years, but yeah I'm with you on that criticism.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • tef@mastodon.socialT tef@mastodon.social

                    similarly, i've heard a few times that "we might cure cancer", and sure enough some brute force computation can fold proteins fast

                    but in practice it is more likely these tools will be used to fabricate experimental results, push dietary supplements and other snakeoil cures

                    and more coarsely, ai isn't pouring funding into the CDC, ai isn't reversing the destruction of the FDA, and is more than likely going to be used to justify those things

                    lp0_on_fire@social.linux.pizzaL This user is from outside of this forum
                    lp0_on_fire@social.linux.pizzaL This user is from outside of this forum
                    lp0_on_fire@social.linux.pizza
                    wrote last edited by
                    #67

                    @tef, I can never remember what “CDC” is, other than being something foreign.

                    So I just think of it as the Cult of the Dead Cow, and now you do too.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • rycaut@mastodon.socialR rycaut@mastodon.social

                      @thierna @tef also machine translation is only available between some languages - if you need a language that th machines don’t know it is likely worse than useless.

                      There is also a really dark pattern today where translations are shown before the original language - and it is really easy to not see that it is a translation (not just happening with - also with videos)

                      I hate when gmail or google search translates stuff before showing me the original (and also that multilingual search is bad)

                      thierna@mastodon.greenT This user is from outside of this forum
                      thierna@mastodon.greenT This user is from outside of this forum
                      thierna@mastodon.green
                      wrote last edited by
                      #68

                      @Rycaut I really hate this fake voice, which I have to turn off as I want to hear the original voice of the person in the video.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups