Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. i've heard a few times that "waymos will make streets safer" so i went and looked up sf's traffic fatality statistics and they're pretty much identical

i've heard a few times that "waymos will make streets safer" so i went and looked up sf's traffic fatality statistics and they're pretty much identical

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
68 Posts 43 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • flyingmana@phpc.socialF flyingmana@phpc.social

    @tef translations are alreaddy getting notable worse by this. Its in some cases clearly visible there is nonhuman involved anymore.

    tef@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
    tef@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
    tef@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #32

    @Flyingmana this is why i said mostly and also talked about negative consequences

    albeit without elaborating them

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • tef@mastodon.socialT tef@mastodon.social

      the simple answer is that none of the good futures we imagine happen by accident. and none of the people with power can be trusted to make better things happen

      and now i'm asking myself if medieval peasants looked at the clock in the bell tower and told each other

      "in the future, we'll have a weekend off, as they'll be able to see how long and hard we've worked"

      klara@drupal.communityK This user is from outside of this forum
      klara@drupal.communityK This user is from outside of this forum
      klara@drupal.community
      wrote last edited by
      #33

      @tef if I read the accounts right, people were not friendly towards the idea of going from time boss to time slave. From "I'll produce exactly how much I need in my own time" to "thou shalt go on working till the bell tolls, and after the second bell, all lights out"

      tef@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • klara@drupal.communityK klara@drupal.community

        @tef if I read the accounts right, people were not friendly towards the idea of going from time boss to time slave. From "I'll produce exactly how much I need in my own time" to "thou shalt go on working till the bell tolls, and after the second bell, all lights out"

        tef@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
        tef@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
        tef@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #34

        @Klara see also wat tyler i guess

        klara@drupal.communityK 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • tef@mastodon.socialT tef@mastodon.social

          the worst bit? i still like machine learning, i still think stochastic approaches can have benefits

          but if i wrote software that pushed vulnerable teenagers to suicide, or enabled people to sexually harass strangers with pornographic forgeries

          i would take a step back from the keyboard and ask my good buddy hans, "are we the baddies"

          or at least, i hope i'd ask those hard questions

          janamarie@mystical.gardenJ This user is from outside of this forum
          janamarie@mystical.gardenJ This user is from outside of this forum
          janamarie@mystical.garden
          wrote last edited by
          #35

          @tef I think the first part is one of the things that makes me extra angry. Much of what is now called "AI" is not exactly new or novel, we have used machine learning and generally stochastic approaches for ages, and it's great. I have applications where I can specifically activate a machine learning approach and it makes sense. But the lens of capitalism has 'forced' the companies to now slap a butthole next to the label, add a buzzword-adjective like "deep" and make it an "AI"-feature to compete. This sucks, I want to be happy using good software, not feel shame, leave us alone, fuck off with your capitalism

          radicalabacus@hachyderm.ioR 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • tef@mastodon.socialT tef@mastodon.social

            sure enough machine translation has reasonably proven itself as a mostly public good, albeit at the expense of the translation industry

            so i am aware that good things can come with bad prices, but i haven't really seen much good and i am seeing a lot of bad things

            it literally breaks my heart that the public web now sits behind a proof of work system, forcing strangers to mine coins to buy access to webpages

            because a bunch of tech companies are desperate for an poison-free training set

            iaveiga@app.wafrn.netI This user is from outside of this forum
            iaveiga@app.wafrn.netI This user is from outside of this forum
            iaveiga@app.wafrn.net
            wrote last edited by
            #36

            @tef@mastodon.social

            Machine translation is not even close to being decent in most (if not all) fields and language combinations. It is a useful tool for understanding the idea behind some text in another language, but mostly for personal (I'd say "irrelevant") cases. Any more than that and it's pretty obvious that professional translators are still needed. In technical fields, companies would have to trust a computer to translate things faithfully without making them liable to possible legal issues, for example. In more creative fields, the machine translated texts are lacking and do not transmit the intent of the original. Languages are not tools, they are culture and, thus, a machine won't be able to properly translate something. So, even in a field where "AI" has already "won", it's not that useful.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • gisgeek@floss.socialG gisgeek@floss.social

              @tef unfortunately, the original Big Web Dream began to die with the advent of mobile-first and social media. Now its death is only accelerating. Read @timbl's book about that.

              mro@digitalcourage.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
              mro@digitalcourage.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
              mro@digitalcourage.social
              wrote last edited by
              #37

              Hi @gisgeek @tef,
              #platforms. And they owe a lot to #sunsetting #Google #Reader.

              gisgeek@floss.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
              • tef@mastodon.socialT tef@mastodon.social

                we're destroying the open web

                we're burning down the closest thing i've ever seen in my life to the library of alexandria

                and people are explaining to me how warm it keeps their hands, and maybe, in the future, the ashes will contain the secrets of the universe

                tudbut@social.tudbut.deT This user is from outside of this forum
                tudbut@social.tudbut.deT This user is from outside of this forum
                tudbut@social.tudbut.de
                wrote last edited by
                #38

                @tef@mastodon.social i apologize for just jumping in here but i want to back up just how literal this destruction is. despite me using an ai blocker, my server is now at a constant 50%+ cpu usage, most of which coming from caddy and thus being unavoidable for me unless i write my own reverse proxy too (not too unlikely i suppose, but either way).

                i am now experiencing up to 300-something requests per second that are confirmed to be coming from llm scrapers, usually hovering around 185 with regular spikes to 250. that means an average of 16 million requests per day. this translates to over 99.7% of requests to my sites coming from scrapers.

                davidgerard@circumstances.runD 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • tef@mastodon.socialT tef@mastodon.social

                  i've heard a few times that "waymos will make streets safer" so i went and looked up sf's traffic fatality statistics and they're pretty much identical

                  i mean, there is a slight increase over the last two years but there's sufficient variance to avoid suggesting a trend

                  as i understand it, waymos tend to take people off busses and other forms of transit, rather than out of their own cars

                  so i'm doubtful it will lower deaths on the road, just the number of busses

                  jeffmcneill@hachyderm.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  jeffmcneill@hachyderm.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  jeffmcneill@hachyderm.io
                  wrote last edited by
                  #39

                  @tef

                  This study has a lot of data and finds Waymo's safer for certain kinds of crashes...

                  Link Preview Image
                  ScienceDirect

                  favicon

                  (www.sciencedirect.com)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • tudbut@social.tudbut.deT tudbut@social.tudbut.de

                    @tef@mastodon.social i apologize for just jumping in here but i want to back up just how literal this destruction is. despite me using an ai blocker, my server is now at a constant 50%+ cpu usage, most of which coming from caddy and thus being unavoidable for me unless i write my own reverse proxy too (not too unlikely i suppose, but either way).

                    i am now experiencing up to 300-something requests per second that are confirmed to be coming from llm scrapers, usually hovering around 185 with regular spikes to 250. that means an average of 16 million requests per day. this translates to over 99.7% of requests to my sites coming from scrapers.

                    davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                    davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                    davidgerard@circumstances.run
                    wrote last edited by
                    #40

                    @tudbut @tef i don't even look at my iocaine logs any more and rely on people who can't get in contacting me

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • tef@mastodon.socialT tef@mastodon.social

                      i've heard a few times that "waymos will make streets safer" so i went and looked up sf's traffic fatality statistics and they're pretty much identical

                      i mean, there is a slight increase over the last two years but there's sufficient variance to avoid suggesting a trend

                      as i understand it, waymos tend to take people off busses and other forms of transit, rather than out of their own cars

                      so i'm doubtful it will lower deaths on the road, just the number of busses

                      zverik@en.osm.townZ This user is from outside of this forum
                      zverik@en.osm.townZ This user is from outside of this forum
                      zverik@en.osm.town
                      wrote last edited by
                      #41

                      @tef Funny how it's exactly the same as with Uber years ago. Which was marketed as a solution for private cars, but in fact was replacing public transit:

                      Link Preview Image
                      Uber and Lyft are undermining public transit, a new study shows - 48 hills

                      UC Davis researchers demonstrate that rideshares don't wean people off cars; they get people off buses and trains.

                      favicon

                      48 hills (48hills.org)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • tef@mastodon.socialT tef@mastodon.social

                        the worst bit? i still like machine learning, i still think stochastic approaches can have benefits

                        but if i wrote software that pushed vulnerable teenagers to suicide, or enabled people to sexually harass strangers with pornographic forgeries

                        i would take a step back from the keyboard and ask my good buddy hans, "are we the baddies"

                        or at least, i hope i'd ask those hard questions

                        interpipes@thx.ggI This user is from outside of this forum
                        interpipes@thx.ggI This user is from outside of this forum
                        interpipes@thx.gg
                        wrote last edited by
                        #42

                        @tef @bert_hubert BUT THE MONEY / FIRST MOVER ADVANTAGE / BEING THE PERSON WHO OWNS ALL OF THE LABOUR IN THE WORLD etc

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • tef@mastodon.socialT tef@mastodon.social

                          i don't want to be all "you are not immune to propaganda" but a lot of these arguments prey on optimism and hope that technology can lift people up

                          but when you start to examine the rhetoric, like "what if <imaginary circumstance where the tools are useful>"

                          or "bad thing? that's a lack of training and dicipline"

                          it just feels like gun logic in a new outfit

                          europlus@social.europlus.zoneE This user is from outside of this forum
                          europlus@social.europlus.zoneE This user is from outside of this forum
                          europlus@social.europlus.zone
                          wrote last edited by
                          #43

                          @tef @davidgerard “The only way to stop a bad guy with an AI is a good guy with an AI.”—Doctorow, possibly

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • janamarie@mystical.gardenJ janamarie@mystical.garden

                            @tef I think the first part is one of the things that makes me extra angry. Much of what is now called "AI" is not exactly new or novel, we have used machine learning and generally stochastic approaches for ages, and it's great. I have applications where I can specifically activate a machine learning approach and it makes sense. But the lens of capitalism has 'forced' the companies to now slap a butthole next to the label, add a buzzword-adjective like "deep" and make it an "AI"-feature to compete. This sucks, I want to be happy using good software, not feel shame, leave us alone, fuck off with your capitalism

                            radicalabacus@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
                            radicalabacus@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
                            radicalabacus@hachyderm.io
                            wrote last edited by
                            #44

                            @janamarie @tef yeah, I hate the way these people vandalize language. I grew up as a cyberpunk fan excited by AI, robotics, space exploration and cryptography. Now I have to constantly append "but not like that" every time I talk about things that interest me. I guess I'm lucky I was never deeply interested in quantum physics. If they inflate a guitar or bicycle bubble next I'm going to lose it

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • tef@mastodon.socialT tef@mastodon.social

                              @Klara see also wat tyler i guess

                              klara@drupal.communityK This user is from outside of this forum
                              klara@drupal.communityK This user is from outside of this forum
                              klara@drupal.community
                              wrote last edited by
                              #45

                              @tef I wasn’t thinking about peasants, but about the protest/fights between craft guilds and whoever installed the clocks and control system.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • tef@mastodon.socialT tef@mastodon.social

                                i've heard a few times that "waymos will make streets safer" so i went and looked up sf's traffic fatality statistics and they're pretty much identical

                                i mean, there is a slight increase over the last two years but there's sufficient variance to avoid suggesting a trend

                                as i understand it, waymos tend to take people off busses and other forms of transit, rather than out of their own cars

                                so i'm doubtful it will lower deaths on the road, just the number of busses

                                starkrg@myside-yourside.netS This user is from outside of this forum
                                starkrg@myside-yourside.netS This user is from outside of this forum
                                starkrg@myside-yourside.net
                                wrote last edited by
                                #46

                                @tef Self-driving cars, have the *potential* to be safer, but only as part of a holistic change to the way we approach transportation and urban planning as a society that would include decreasing the need and desire for individual conveyances in the first place. Most of the rest of that change kinda has to happen *first* before self-driving cars will actually be able to provide any benefit.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • tef@mastodon.socialT tef@mastodon.social

                                  we're destroying the open web

                                  we're burning down the closest thing i've ever seen in my life to the library of alexandria

                                  and people are explaining to me how warm it keeps their hands, and maybe, in the future, the ashes will contain the secrets of the universe

                                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                                  bakachu@infosec.exchange
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #47

                                  @tef i do wonder if this is intentional, now that the internet has been fully scraped it doesn't need to exist any more and in fact must not because it can't be monetized/controlled like an llm service can be

                                  i despair

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • tef@mastodon.socialT tef@mastodon.social

                                    it feels like a lot of the arguments i hear boil down to "what if none of the bad things were happening right now, and instead, good things happened instead"

                                    and sure, if that were true, things would be good

                                    but, well, all of the bad things are happening already and none of the good things are any closer to appearing

                                    and i'm just not confident "wait and see if everything reverses course" is a sensible way to evaluate the impact of new technologies

                                    raganwald@social.bau-ha.usR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    raganwald@social.bau-ha.usR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    raganwald@social.bau-ha.us
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #48

                                    @tef What if the temperature of the water starts going back down again, magically? Then you frogs who jumped out are going to look pretty foolish!

                                    Did I say water and frogs? What if climate change fixes itself magically? Why don't we wait and see?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • tef@mastodon.socialT tef@mastodon.social

                                      i've heard a few times that "waymos will make streets safer" so i went and looked up sf's traffic fatality statistics and they're pretty much identical

                                      i mean, there is a slight increase over the last two years but there's sufficient variance to avoid suggesting a trend

                                      as i understand it, waymos tend to take people off busses and other forms of transit, rather than out of their own cars

                                      so i'm doubtful it will lower deaths on the road, just the number of busses

                                      raganwald@social.bau-ha.usR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      raganwald@social.bau-ha.usR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      raganwald@social.bau-ha.us
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #49

                                      @tef Does anybody believe that in private investor pitches, Elon Musk tells people that RoboTaxis will mean that nobody needs to buy a Tesla? No!

                                      He tells investors that the market for RoboTaxis are all the municipal transit lines everywhere, and that while Waymo may look like competition, they're actually frenemies dismantling public transit.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • vfig@mastodon.gamedev.placeV vfig@mastodon.gamedev.place

                                        @EndlessMason @tef "The origin point for nearly all of those 'you work harder than a medieval peasant' memes and articles is Juliet Schor’s The Overworked American (1993). The argument has been debunked quite a few times…" — https://acoup.blog/2025/09/05/collections-life-work-death-and-the-peasant-part-ivb-working-days/

                                        endlessmason@hachyderm.ioE This user is from outside of this forum
                                        endlessmason@hachyderm.ioE This user is from outside of this forum
                                        endlessmason@hachyderm.io
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #50

                                        @vfig @tef
                                        So they even had "you got time to lean? You got time to clean." back then too? Interesting.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • tef@mastodon.socialT tef@mastodon.social

                                          we're destroying the open web

                                          we're burning down the closest thing i've ever seen in my life to the library of alexandria

                                          and people are explaining to me how warm it keeps their hands, and maybe, in the future, the ashes will contain the secrets of the universe

                                          lightfighter@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                                          lightfighter@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                                          lightfighter@infosec.exchange
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #51

                                          @tef I think we are more likely to be destroyed by a Vogon construction crew.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups