1/7 BREAKING: A US court has just sided with fossil fuel pipeline giant Energy Transfer and ordered Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US to pay them US$ 345 million.
-
1/7
BREAKING: A US court has just sided with fossil fuel pipeline giant Energy Transfer and ordered Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US to pay them US$ 345 million.This is a billionaire-backed attack on the right to protest. A thread
️🧵@greenpeace Pay nothing, declare bankruptcy, regroup, repeat? It works for the Worms of Wall Street
-
1/7
BREAKING: A US court has just sided with fossil fuel pipeline giant Energy Transfer and ordered Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US to pay them US$ 345 million.This is a billionaire-backed attack on the right to protest. A thread
️🧵@greenpeace Don't give them a cent.
-
1/7
BREAKING: A US court has just sided with fossil fuel pipeline giant Energy Transfer and ordered Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US to pay them US$ 345 million.This is a billionaire-backed attack on the right to protest. A thread
️🧵Transfer all assets out of the US. An appeals depends on a fair judicial system. They don't have anything close to that.
-
1/7
BREAKING: A US court has just sided with fossil fuel pipeline giant Energy Transfer and ordered Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US to pay them US$ 345 million.This is a billionaire-backed attack on the right to protest. A thread
️🧵URLs [1][2].
Sounds a bit like the McLibel case [3], which was against a tiny handful of activists whose group was called #LondonGreenpeace [4], completely unrelated to Greenpeace International. The final result was formally a half-win half-loss for #McDonalds, but effectively a huge reputation loss for McDonalds, whose ability to crush dissent was greatly weakened.
[2] https://allaboutlawyer.com/energy-transfer-vs-greenpeace-345m-judgment-full-case-explained
-
reduce (or eliminate) - white nationalism/nazis, capitalism, “free market” economics
reuse - technological/medical knowledge & advancements, “we the people” part of the constitution (maybe some other parts, it wasn’t a totally bad document)
recycle (upcycle) - protest spirit, resistance culture, free speech, to create a new, liberal & democratic constitution that makes reparations for slavery (the first sin - edit: +indigenous genocide), corruption, crimes against humanity
I'm an American who fully supports what you just wrote.
-
URLs [1][2].
Sounds a bit like the McLibel case [3], which was against a tiny handful of activists whose group was called #LondonGreenpeace [4], completely unrelated to Greenpeace International. The final result was formally a half-win half-loss for #McDonalds, but effectively a huge reputation loss for McDonalds, whose ability to crush dissent was greatly weakened.
[2] https://allaboutlawyer.com/energy-transfer-vs-greenpeace-345m-judgment-full-case-explained
> McDonald's said the pair could criticise McDonald's privately to friends but must cease talking to the media or distributing leaflets. Steel and Morris wrote a letter in response saying they would agree to the terms if McDonald's ceased advertising its products and instead only recommended the restaurant privately to friends.
This is pretty funny
-
1/7
BREAKING: A US court has just sided with fossil fuel pipeline giant Energy Transfer and ordered Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US to pay them US$ 345 million.This is a billionaire-backed attack on the right to protest. A thread
️🧵Civil fraud unpunished
Treason unpunished
Election interference unpunished
Time to storm DC with 1M armed removing the menace' to society, world including the pedo oligarchy clan.
-
Civil fraud unpunished
Treason unpunished
Election interference unpunished
Time to storm DC with 1M armed removing the menace' to society, world including the pedo oligarchy clan.ITS OUR RIGHT TO STOP THE DECEPTIVE DESTRUCTIVE MENACE' TO SOCIETY
Not calling for violence, just storm them letting them know we don't stand for injustice.
-
URLs [1][2].
Sounds a bit like the McLibel case [3], which was against a tiny handful of activists whose group was called #LondonGreenpeace [4], completely unrelated to Greenpeace International. The final result was formally a half-win half-loss for #McDonalds, but effectively a huge reputation loss for McDonalds, whose ability to crush dissent was greatly weakened.
[2] https://allaboutlawyer.com/energy-transfer-vs-greenpeace-345m-judgment-full-case-explained
@boud@framapiaf.org Peak Starmer. @greenpeace@mastodon.social
-
@greenpeace Pay nothing, declare bankruptcy, regroup, repeat? It works for the Worms of Wall Street
@ulfr @greenpeace
That is exactly what I thought!
