Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. 1/7 BREAKING: A US court has just sided with fossil fuel pipeline giant Energy Transfer and ordered Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US to pay them US$ 345 million.

1/7 BREAKING: A US court has just sided with fossil fuel pipeline giant Energy Transfer and ordered Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US to pay them US$ 345 million.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
23 Posts 16 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • greenpeace@mastodon.socialG greenpeace@mastodon.social

    1/7
    BREAKING: A US court has just sided with fossil fuel pipeline giant Energy Transfer and ordered Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US to pay them US$ 345 million.

    This is a billionaire-backed attack on the right to protest. A thread ⤵️🧵

    stux@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
    stux@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
    stux@mstdn.social
    wrote last edited by
    #11

    @greenpeace The US is the definition of "corruption" in the dictionary

    We really should recycle that country, or what's left of it..

    meznor@mstdn.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • stux@mstdn.socialS stux@mstdn.social

      @greenpeace The US is the definition of "corruption" in the dictionary

      We really should recycle that country, or what's left of it..

      meznor@mstdn.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
      meznor@mstdn.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
      meznor@mstdn.social
      wrote last edited by
      #12

      @stux @greenpeace

      reduce (or eliminate) - white nationalism/nazis, capitalism, “free market” economics

      reuse - technological/medical knowledge & advancements, “we the people” part of the constitution (maybe some other parts, it wasn’t a totally bad document)

      recycle (upcycle) - protest spirit, resistance culture, free speech, to create a new, liberal & democratic constitution that makes reparations for slavery (the first sin - edit: +indigenous genocide), corruption, crimes against humanity

      cainmark@mstdn.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • greenpeace@mastodon.socialG greenpeace@mastodon.social

        4/7
        US$ 345 million.

        That’s what Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US have been ordered to pay.

        It’s the biggest damage award ever imposed on Greenpeace organisations. It’s meant to shut the movement up.

        ariarhythmic@ohai.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
        ariarhythmic@ohai.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
        ariarhythmic@ohai.social
        wrote last edited by
        #13

        @greenpeace Refuse to pay, don't incorporate in the US anymore.

        A self-respecting progressive movement should not treat those deranged fascists seriously.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • greenpeace@mastodon.socialG greenpeace@mastodon.social

          1/7
          BREAKING: A US court has just sided with fossil fuel pipeline giant Energy Transfer and ordered Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US to pay them US$ 345 million.

          This is a billionaire-backed attack on the right to protest. A thread ⤵️🧵

          ulfr@hachyderm.ioU This user is from outside of this forum
          ulfr@hachyderm.ioU This user is from outside of this forum
          ulfr@hachyderm.io
          wrote last edited by
          #14

          @greenpeace Pay nothing, declare bankruptcy, regroup, repeat? It works for the Worms of Wall Street

          derjoshder@bonn.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • greenpeace@mastodon.socialG greenpeace@mastodon.social

            1/7
            BREAKING: A US court has just sided with fossil fuel pipeline giant Energy Transfer and ordered Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US to pay them US$ 345 million.

            This is a billionaire-backed attack on the right to protest. A thread ⤵️🧵

            ponygirl@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
            ponygirl@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
            ponygirl@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #15

            @greenpeace Don't give them a cent.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • greenpeace@mastodon.socialG greenpeace@mastodon.social

              1/7
              BREAKING: A US court has just sided with fossil fuel pipeline giant Energy Transfer and ordered Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US to pay them US$ 345 million.

              This is a billionaire-backed attack on the right to protest. A thread ⤵️🧵

              chu@climatejustice.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
              chu@climatejustice.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
              chu@climatejustice.social
              wrote last edited by
              #16

              @greenpeace

              Transfer all assets out of the US. An appeals depends on a fair judicial system. They don't have anything close to that.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • greenpeace@mastodon.socialG greenpeace@mastodon.social

                1/7
                BREAKING: A US court has just sided with fossil fuel pipeline giant Energy Transfer and ordered Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US to pay them US$ 345 million.

                This is a billionaire-backed attack on the right to protest. A thread ⤵️🧵

                boud@framapiaf.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                boud@framapiaf.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                boud@framapiaf.org
                wrote last edited by
                #17

                @greenpeace

                URLs [1][2].

                Sounds a bit like the McLibel case [3], which was against a tiny handful of activists whose group was called #LondonGreenpeace [4], completely unrelated to Greenpeace International. The final result was formally a half-win half-loss for #McDonalds, but effectively a huge reputation loss for McDonalds, whose ability to crush dissent was greatly weakened.

                [1] https://www.greenpeace.org/international/press-release/81840/greenpeace-organisations-appeal-345-million-north-dakota-court-judgment-energy-transfers-intimidation-lawsuit

                [2] https://allaboutlawyer.com/energy-transfer-vs-greenpeace-345m-judgment-full-case-explained

                [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McLibel_case

                [4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Greenpeace

                gbargoud@masto.nycG eco-g@stroud.socialE 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • meznor@mstdn.socialM meznor@mstdn.social

                  @stux @greenpeace

                  reduce (or eliminate) - white nationalism/nazis, capitalism, “free market” economics

                  reuse - technological/medical knowledge & advancements, “we the people” part of the constitution (maybe some other parts, it wasn’t a totally bad document)

                  recycle (upcycle) - protest spirit, resistance culture, free speech, to create a new, liberal & democratic constitution that makes reparations for slavery (the first sin - edit: +indigenous genocide), corruption, crimes against humanity

                  cainmark@mstdn.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cainmark@mstdn.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cainmark@mstdn.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #18

                  @Meznor @stux @greenpeace

                  I'm an American who fully supports what you just wrote.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • boud@framapiaf.orgB boud@framapiaf.org

                    @greenpeace

                    URLs [1][2].

                    Sounds a bit like the McLibel case [3], which was against a tiny handful of activists whose group was called #LondonGreenpeace [4], completely unrelated to Greenpeace International. The final result was formally a half-win half-loss for #McDonalds, but effectively a huge reputation loss for McDonalds, whose ability to crush dissent was greatly weakened.

                    [1] https://www.greenpeace.org/international/press-release/81840/greenpeace-organisations-appeal-345-million-north-dakota-court-judgment-energy-transfers-intimidation-lawsuit

                    [2] https://allaboutlawyer.com/energy-transfer-vs-greenpeace-345m-judgment-full-case-explained

                    [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McLibel_case

                    [4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Greenpeace

                    gbargoud@masto.nycG This user is from outside of this forum
                    gbargoud@masto.nycG This user is from outside of this forum
                    gbargoud@masto.nyc
                    wrote last edited by
                    #19

                    @boud @greenpeace

                    > McDonald's said the pair could criticise McDonald's privately to friends but must cease talking to the media or distributing leaflets. Steel and Morris wrote a letter in response saying they would agree to the terms if McDonald's ceased advertising its products and instead only recommended the restaurant privately to friends.

                    This is pretty funny

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • greenpeace@mastodon.socialG greenpeace@mastodon.social

                      1/7
                      BREAKING: A US court has just sided with fossil fuel pipeline giant Energy Transfer and ordered Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US to pay them US$ 345 million.

                      This is a billionaire-backed attack on the right to protest. A thread ⤵️🧵

                      scaletheory@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                      scaletheory@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                      scaletheory@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #20

                      @greenpeace

                      Civil fraud unpunished
                      Treason unpunished
                      Election interference unpunished
                      Time to storm DC with 1M armed removing the menace' to society, world including the pedo oligarchy clan.

                      Link Preview Image
                      scaletheory@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • scaletheory@mastodon.socialS scaletheory@mastodon.social

                        @greenpeace

                        Civil fraud unpunished
                        Treason unpunished
                        Election interference unpunished
                        Time to storm DC with 1M armed removing the menace' to society, world including the pedo oligarchy clan.

                        Link Preview Image
                        scaletheory@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                        scaletheory@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                        scaletheory@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #21

                        @greenpeace

                        ITS OUR RIGHT TO STOP THE DECEPTIVE DESTRUCTIVE MENACE' TO SOCIETY

                        Not calling for violence, just storm them letting them know we don't stand for injustice.

                        Link Preview Image
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • boud@framapiaf.orgB boud@framapiaf.org

                          @greenpeace

                          URLs [1][2].

                          Sounds a bit like the McLibel case [3], which was against a tiny handful of activists whose group was called #LondonGreenpeace [4], completely unrelated to Greenpeace International. The final result was formally a half-win half-loss for #McDonalds, but effectively a huge reputation loss for McDonalds, whose ability to crush dissent was greatly weakened.

                          [1] https://www.greenpeace.org/international/press-release/81840/greenpeace-organisations-appeal-345-million-north-dakota-court-judgment-energy-transfers-intimidation-lawsuit

                          [2] https://allaboutlawyer.com/energy-transfer-vs-greenpeace-345m-judgment-full-case-explained

                          [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McLibel_case

                          [4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Greenpeace

                          eco-g@stroud.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                          eco-g@stroud.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                          eco-g@stroud.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #22

                          @boud@framapiaf.org Peak Starmer. @greenpeace@mastodon.social

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • ulfr@hachyderm.ioU ulfr@hachyderm.io

                            @greenpeace Pay nothing, declare bankruptcy, regroup, repeat? It works for the Worms of Wall Street

                            derjoshder@bonn.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                            derjoshder@bonn.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                            derjoshder@bonn.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #23

                            @ulfr @greenpeace
                            That is exactly what I thought!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups