Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. 1/7 BREAKING: A US court has just sided with fossil fuel pipeline giant Energy Transfer and ordered Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US to pay them US$ 345 million.

1/7 BREAKING: A US court has just sided with fossil fuel pipeline giant Energy Transfer and ordered Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US to pay them US$ 345 million.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
23 Posts 16 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • greenpeace@mastodon.socialG greenpeace@mastodon.social

    4/7
    US$ 345 million.

    That’s what Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US have been ordered to pay.

    It’s the biggest damage award ever imposed on Greenpeace organisations. It’s meant to shut the movement up.

    ariarhythmic@ohai.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
    ariarhythmic@ohai.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
    ariarhythmic@ohai.social
    wrote last edited by
    #13

    @greenpeace Refuse to pay, don't incorporate in the US anymore.

    A self-respecting progressive movement should not treat those deranged fascists seriously.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • greenpeace@mastodon.socialG greenpeace@mastodon.social

      1/7
      BREAKING: A US court has just sided with fossil fuel pipeline giant Energy Transfer and ordered Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US to pay them US$ 345 million.

      This is a billionaire-backed attack on the right to protest. A thread ⤵️🧵

      ulfr@hachyderm.ioU This user is from outside of this forum
      ulfr@hachyderm.ioU This user is from outside of this forum
      ulfr@hachyderm.io
      wrote last edited by
      #14

      @greenpeace Pay nothing, declare bankruptcy, regroup, repeat? It works for the Worms of Wall Street

      derjoshder@bonn.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • greenpeace@mastodon.socialG greenpeace@mastodon.social

        1/7
        BREAKING: A US court has just sided with fossil fuel pipeline giant Energy Transfer and ordered Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US to pay them US$ 345 million.

        This is a billionaire-backed attack on the right to protest. A thread ⤵️🧵

        ponygirl@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
        ponygirl@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
        ponygirl@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #15

        @greenpeace Don't give them a cent.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • greenpeace@mastodon.socialG greenpeace@mastodon.social

          1/7
          BREAKING: A US court has just sided with fossil fuel pipeline giant Energy Transfer and ordered Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US to pay them US$ 345 million.

          This is a billionaire-backed attack on the right to protest. A thread ⤵️🧵

          chu@climatejustice.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
          chu@climatejustice.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
          chu@climatejustice.social
          wrote last edited by
          #16

          @greenpeace

          Transfer all assets out of the US. An appeals depends on a fair judicial system. They don't have anything close to that.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • greenpeace@mastodon.socialG greenpeace@mastodon.social

            1/7
            BREAKING: A US court has just sided with fossil fuel pipeline giant Energy Transfer and ordered Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US to pay them US$ 345 million.

            This is a billionaire-backed attack on the right to protest. A thread ⤵️🧵

            boud@framapiaf.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
            boud@framapiaf.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
            boud@framapiaf.org
            wrote last edited by
            #17

            @greenpeace

            URLs [1][2].

            Sounds a bit like the McLibel case [3], which was against a tiny handful of activists whose group was called #LondonGreenpeace [4], completely unrelated to Greenpeace International. The final result was formally a half-win half-loss for #McDonalds, but effectively a huge reputation loss for McDonalds, whose ability to crush dissent was greatly weakened.

            [1] https://www.greenpeace.org/international/press-release/81840/greenpeace-organisations-appeal-345-million-north-dakota-court-judgment-energy-transfers-intimidation-lawsuit

            [2] https://allaboutlawyer.com/energy-transfer-vs-greenpeace-345m-judgment-full-case-explained

            [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McLibel_case

            [4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Greenpeace

            gbargoud@masto.nycG eco-g@stroud.socialE 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • meznor@mstdn.socialM meznor@mstdn.social

              @stux @greenpeace

              reduce (or eliminate) - white nationalism/nazis, capitalism, “free market” economics

              reuse - technological/medical knowledge & advancements, “we the people” part of the constitution (maybe some other parts, it wasn’t a totally bad document)

              recycle (upcycle) - protest spirit, resistance culture, free speech, to create a new, liberal & democratic constitution that makes reparations for slavery (the first sin - edit: +indigenous genocide), corruption, crimes against humanity

              cainmark@mstdn.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
              cainmark@mstdn.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
              cainmark@mstdn.social
              wrote last edited by
              #18

              @Meznor @stux @greenpeace

              I'm an American who fully supports what you just wrote.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • boud@framapiaf.orgB boud@framapiaf.org

                @greenpeace

                URLs [1][2].

                Sounds a bit like the McLibel case [3], which was against a tiny handful of activists whose group was called #LondonGreenpeace [4], completely unrelated to Greenpeace International. The final result was formally a half-win half-loss for #McDonalds, but effectively a huge reputation loss for McDonalds, whose ability to crush dissent was greatly weakened.

                [1] https://www.greenpeace.org/international/press-release/81840/greenpeace-organisations-appeal-345-million-north-dakota-court-judgment-energy-transfers-intimidation-lawsuit

                [2] https://allaboutlawyer.com/energy-transfer-vs-greenpeace-345m-judgment-full-case-explained

                [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McLibel_case

                [4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Greenpeace

                gbargoud@masto.nycG This user is from outside of this forum
                gbargoud@masto.nycG This user is from outside of this forum
                gbargoud@masto.nyc
                wrote last edited by
                #19

                @boud @greenpeace

                > McDonald's said the pair could criticise McDonald's privately to friends but must cease talking to the media or distributing leaflets. Steel and Morris wrote a letter in response saying they would agree to the terms if McDonald's ceased advertising its products and instead only recommended the restaurant privately to friends.

                This is pretty funny

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • greenpeace@mastodon.socialG greenpeace@mastodon.social

                  1/7
                  BREAKING: A US court has just sided with fossil fuel pipeline giant Energy Transfer and ordered Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US to pay them US$ 345 million.

                  This is a billionaire-backed attack on the right to protest. A thread ⤵️🧵

                  scaletheory@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  scaletheory@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  scaletheory@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #20

                  @greenpeace

                  Civil fraud unpunished
                  Treason unpunished
                  Election interference unpunished
                  Time to storm DC with 1M armed removing the menace' to society, world including the pedo oligarchy clan.

                  Link Preview Image
                  scaletheory@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • scaletheory@mastodon.socialS scaletheory@mastodon.social

                    @greenpeace

                    Civil fraud unpunished
                    Treason unpunished
                    Election interference unpunished
                    Time to storm DC with 1M armed removing the menace' to society, world including the pedo oligarchy clan.

                    Link Preview Image
                    scaletheory@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    scaletheory@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    scaletheory@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #21

                    @greenpeace

                    ITS OUR RIGHT TO STOP THE DECEPTIVE DESTRUCTIVE MENACE' TO SOCIETY

                    Not calling for violence, just storm them letting them know we don't stand for injustice.

                    Link Preview Image
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • boud@framapiaf.orgB boud@framapiaf.org

                      @greenpeace

                      URLs [1][2].

                      Sounds a bit like the McLibel case [3], which was against a tiny handful of activists whose group was called #LondonGreenpeace [4], completely unrelated to Greenpeace International. The final result was formally a half-win half-loss for #McDonalds, but effectively a huge reputation loss for McDonalds, whose ability to crush dissent was greatly weakened.

                      [1] https://www.greenpeace.org/international/press-release/81840/greenpeace-organisations-appeal-345-million-north-dakota-court-judgment-energy-transfers-intimidation-lawsuit

                      [2] https://allaboutlawyer.com/energy-transfer-vs-greenpeace-345m-judgment-full-case-explained

                      [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McLibel_case

                      [4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Greenpeace

                      eco-g@stroud.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                      eco-g@stroud.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                      eco-g@stroud.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #22

                      @boud@framapiaf.org Peak Starmer. @greenpeace@mastodon.social

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • ulfr@hachyderm.ioU ulfr@hachyderm.io

                        @greenpeace Pay nothing, declare bankruptcy, regroup, repeat? It works for the Worms of Wall Street

                        derjoshder@bonn.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                        derjoshder@bonn.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                        derjoshder@bonn.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #23

                        @ulfr @greenpeace
                        That is exactly what I thought!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups