Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. By now you've all probably heard about the latest shenanigans from Google and their love for in-browser AI features (if you don't, this is the story: https://www.theverge.com/tech/924933/google-chrome-4gb-gemini-nano-ai-features).

By now you've all probably heard about the latest shenanigans from Google and their love for in-browser AI features (if you don't, this is the story: https://www.theverge.com/tech/924933/google-chrome-4gb-gemini-nano-ai-features).

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
137 Posts 64 Posters 459 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • kranzkrone@quasselkopf.deK kranzkrone@quasselkopf.de

    @Vivaldi
    Thank you again, for the steady development Vivaldi for the user and definitely not for some shady invasive corporate greed. 😉

    (I added some hashtags for better visibility in the Fediverse you may had forgotten, feel free to use them.)

    #Ai #Browser #Chrome #Chromium #Code #Dislike #Features #Google #Gemini #Shenanigans #Trend #Vivaldi
    @wraith

    vivaldi@social.vivaldi.netV This user is from outside of this forum
    vivaldi@social.vivaldi.netV This user is from outside of this forum
    vivaldi@social.vivaldi.net
    wrote last edited by
    #120

    @kranzkrone thank you❤️ we'll always be focused on the user!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • vivaldi@social.vivaldi.netV vivaldi@social.vivaldi.net

      @Rataunderground Linux DEB is available on our download page, both 64 bit and ARM64. There is also an available flatpak, which is maintained by one of our employees (altough it's not an official build)

      rataunderground@neopaquita.esR This user is from outside of this forum
      rataunderground@neopaquita.esR This user is from outside of this forum
      rataunderground@neopaquita.es
      wrote last edited by
      #121

      @Vivaldi thanks! The last time I checked was only snap

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • alcojor_comic@neopaquita.esA alcojor_comic@neopaquita.es

        @lazza

        You DO have choice. You can choose not to install Vivaldi. Software inherits its philosophy from the people who develop it. If they don't want AI, it's logical that they won't put it in their browser.

        What's not very logical is asking a browser that's all about privacy to add pieces of software that are totally anti-privacy.

        @benroyce @Vivaldi

        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
        benroyce@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #122

        @alcojor_comic @lazza @Vivaldi

        there's a mystery with this account

        like you, i pushed back on this lazza account as well. soon after, it was suspended

        you're reacting to a cache of this account's comments on your server, it no longer exists

        if you go to its homepage on mastodon.social, you will see that the four year old account has been wiped out

        alcojor_comic@neopaquita.esA 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

          @alcojor_comic @lazza @Vivaldi

          there's a mystery with this account

          like you, i pushed back on this lazza account as well. soon after, it was suspended

          you're reacting to a cache of this account's comments on your server, it no longer exists

          if you go to its homepage on mastodon.social, you will see that the four year old account has been wiped out

          alcojor_comic@neopaquita.esA This user is from outside of this forum
          alcojor_comic@neopaquita.esA This user is from outside of this forum
          alcojor_comic@neopaquita.es
          wrote last edited by
          #123

          @benroyce

          @Vivaldi I think it was a troll and got banned.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • pteryx@dice.campP pteryx@dice.camp

            @Vivaldi
            Do you strip out any of the "AI" code, to make sure it's nonfunctional and can't be re-enabled by some malicious hacker, or to you just make it "off by default", pat yourselves on the back, and consider your job done?

            I am interested in a browser that *removes* "AI", as opposed to merely "disabling" it.

            techienotnetie@social.vivaldi.netT This user is from outside of this forum
            techienotnetie@social.vivaldi.netT This user is from outside of this forum
            techienotnetie@social.vivaldi.net
            wrote last edited by
            #124

            @pteryx @Vivaldi
            We add ifdefs and additionally disable building of files and remove build target dependencies so that the Gemini/Glic code is not compiled into the browser. Other parts are disabled in various ways at run time.

            Actually deleting code is too much work, not just when removing it, but every time we update the code base we would have to re-delete the files or the code all over again whenever upstream changes a single character in the deleted code. (And it already takes a week, or longer, to do those update in Git). Deleting it over and over again would make it far more likely that we would sometimes make mistakes, and accidentally leave parts in. It is more reliable to do it the way we do it.

            Additionally. what we have disabled compile-time (Gemini/Glic) is just about the only part we can remove that way. I recently tried to remove more of the code around, rather than disable it runtime, and it turned out that what I had to patch didn't just include the proverbial Kitchen sink, it included a bathtub the size of the Pacific Ocean.

            Incidentally, since you mentioned a hacker re-enabling things; if you have a hacker on your system who is able to edit executable files, then they could just add their own AI, or replace the browser with their own. No browser can prevent that, no matter what they do.

            pteryx@dice.campP 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • vivaldi@social.vivaldi.netV vivaldi@social.vivaldi.net

              By now you've all probably heard about the latest shenanigans from Google and their love for in-browser AI features (if you don't, this is the story: https://www.theverge.com/tech/924933/google-chrome-4gb-gemini-nano-ai-features).

              Our team has been inspecting the Chromium code and disabling stuff from the very first version of Vivaldi (we have some posts about this in our blog, such as https://vivaldi.com/blog/news/alert-no-google-topics-in-vivaldi/ or https://vivaldi.com/blog/no-google-vivaldi-users-will-not-get-floced/).

              We've also been very outspoken about our dislike of the built-in AI trend in the browser industry, but in case there's still any doubts: yes, we disable all Gemini-related features, and we've been doing it for a while.

              1div0@mastodon.social1 This user is from outside of this forum
              1div0@mastodon.social1 This user is from outside of this forum
              1div0@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #125

              @Vivaldi Loved Opera back in time_t now - ¼ century. Then contributed to moz://lla cut the recompilation time_t from 2 hours to 40 minutes by the one liner adding compiler cache. P1$$€D 0ff by https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=460703
              https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=reporter:peter.kovar@gmail.com

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • techienotnetie@social.vivaldi.netT techienotnetie@social.vivaldi.net

                @pteryx @Vivaldi
                We add ifdefs and additionally disable building of files and remove build target dependencies so that the Gemini/Glic code is not compiled into the browser. Other parts are disabled in various ways at run time.

                Actually deleting code is too much work, not just when removing it, but every time we update the code base we would have to re-delete the files or the code all over again whenever upstream changes a single character in the deleted code. (And it already takes a week, or longer, to do those update in Git). Deleting it over and over again would make it far more likely that we would sometimes make mistakes, and accidentally leave parts in. It is more reliable to do it the way we do it.

                Additionally. what we have disabled compile-time (Gemini/Glic) is just about the only part we can remove that way. I recently tried to remove more of the code around, rather than disable it runtime, and it turned out that what I had to patch didn't just include the proverbial Kitchen sink, it included a bathtub the size of the Pacific Ocean.

                Incidentally, since you mentioned a hacker re-enabling things; if you have a hacker on your system who is able to edit executable files, then they could just add their own AI, or replace the browser with their own. No browser can prevent that, no matter what they do.

                pteryx@dice.campP This user is from outside of this forum
                pteryx@dice.campP This user is from outside of this forum
                pteryx@dice.camp
                wrote last edited by
                #126

                @TechieNotNetie @Vivaldi
                Thank you for clearing that up. I have definitely seen other browser fork projects, when they say they "disabled AI", mean by this that they simply made the default of a toggle in the preferences "off" instead of "on".

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • vivaldi@social.vivaldi.netV vivaldi@social.vivaldi.net

                  By now you've all probably heard about the latest shenanigans from Google and their love for in-browser AI features (if you don't, this is the story: https://www.theverge.com/tech/924933/google-chrome-4gb-gemini-nano-ai-features).

                  Our team has been inspecting the Chromium code and disabling stuff from the very first version of Vivaldi (we have some posts about this in our blog, such as https://vivaldi.com/blog/news/alert-no-google-topics-in-vivaldi/ or https://vivaldi.com/blog/no-google-vivaldi-users-will-not-get-floced/).

                  We've also been very outspoken about our dislike of the built-in AI trend in the browser industry, but in case there's still any doubts: yes, we disable all Gemini-related features, and we've been doing it for a while.

                  zephyrparax@floofy.techZ This user is from outside of this forum
                  zephyrparax@floofy.techZ This user is from outside of this forum
                  zephyrparax@floofy.tech
                  wrote last edited by
                  #127

                  @Vivaldi so this is why my 2014 laptop cries in pain when I start chromium

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • rootbrian@mastodon.socialR rootbrian@mastodon.social

                    @Vivaldi At least firefox is up-front about and gives you the option to outright disable it all at will.
                    The only one thing I keep enabled, is the website translation - that's it (doesn't rely on google).

                    kimcrawley@zeroes.caK This user is from outside of this forum
                    kimcrawley@zeroes.caK This user is from outside of this forum
                    kimcrawley@zeroes.ca
                    wrote last edited by
                    #128

                    @rootbrian @Vivaldi

                    You believe in the "killswitch"?! 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣

                    rootbrian@mastodon.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • vivaldi@social.vivaldi.netV vivaldi@social.vivaldi.net

                      By now you've all probably heard about the latest shenanigans from Google and their love for in-browser AI features (if you don't, this is the story: https://www.theverge.com/tech/924933/google-chrome-4gb-gemini-nano-ai-features).

                      Our team has been inspecting the Chromium code and disabling stuff from the very first version of Vivaldi (we have some posts about this in our blog, such as https://vivaldi.com/blog/news/alert-no-google-topics-in-vivaldi/ or https://vivaldi.com/blog/no-google-vivaldi-users-will-not-get-floced/).

                      We've also been very outspoken about our dislike of the built-in AI trend in the browser industry, but in case there's still any doubts: yes, we disable all Gemini-related features, and we've been doing it for a while.

                      thelastofhisname@beige.partyT This user is from outside of this forum
                      thelastofhisname@beige.partyT This user is from outside of this forum
                      thelastofhisname@beige.party
                      wrote last edited by
                      #129

                      @Vivaldi And this is why Vivaldi is my browser of choice.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                        @AlexTheStampede

                        That's crazy

                        I understand like bigotry but I didn't think the mods had such a line on AI

                        But I don't know. Maybe sealioning directly at Vivaldi crossed a line. The mods may react to big account complaints or just trolling such accounts on their own

                        Really bizarre

                        hadeur@metalhead.clubH This user is from outside of this forum
                        hadeur@metalhead.clubH This user is from outside of this forum
                        hadeur@metalhead.club
                        wrote last edited by
                        #130

                        @benroyce @AlexTheStampede FYI (I was curious.. I wonder if it was a one of his posts somewhere in this thread) https://bsky.app/profile/lazza.bsky.social/post/3ml77cpr7wk2g

                        benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • hadeur@metalhead.clubH hadeur@metalhead.club

                          @benroyce @AlexTheStampede FYI (I was curious.. I wonder if it was a one of his posts somewhere in this thread) https://bsky.app/profile/lazza.bsky.social/post/3ml77cpr7wk2g

                          benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                          benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                          benroyce@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #131

                          @Hadeur @AlexTheStampede

                          interesting!

                          now i'm really curious about what really happened

                          i want to speculate but we can't see his history

                          i wrote "I understand like bigotry but I didn't think the mods had such a line on AI"

                          because the subject matter higher in the thread is not directly related to bigotry. but then it seems bigotry really is the issue!

                          hadeur@metalhead.clubH 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                            @Hadeur @AlexTheStampede

                            interesting!

                            now i'm really curious about what really happened

                            i want to speculate but we can't see his history

                            i wrote "I understand like bigotry but I didn't think the mods had such a line on AI"

                            because the subject matter higher in the thread is not directly related to bigotry. but then it seems bigotry really is the issue!

                            hadeur@metalhead.clubH This user is from outside of this forum
                            hadeur@metalhead.clubH This user is from outside of this forum
                            hadeur@metalhead.club
                            wrote last edited by
                            #132

                            @benroyce @AlexTheStampede I glanced over his profile the other day and his posts looked fine to me.

                            If it was about the post in this comment section (as far as i remember it fits his description), while it was an awkward comparison, it's a pretty stupid reason to ban him, in my view. That's also why I'm curious..

                            benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • hadeur@metalhead.clubH hadeur@metalhead.club

                              @benroyce @AlexTheStampede I glanced over his profile the other day and his posts looked fine to me.

                              If it was about the post in this comment section (as far as i remember it fits his description), while it was an awkward comparison, it's a pretty stupid reason to ban him, in my view. That's also why I'm curious..

                              benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                              benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                              benroyce@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #133

                              @Hadeur @AlexTheStampede

                              interesting. i have no recollection of a post here with "migrants and LGBT people" as lazza mentions. which makes sense, they blocked me. is the comment still in your cache?

                              sometimes the mod team freezes an account and asks them to edit their comment. some do. some get angry and don't

                              so not a ban per se

                              it could be mod overreach. or it could be reasonable in this light (not a ban, just an ask to edit)

                              but i don't know what they said so i can't say

                              alexthestampede@maly.ioA 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                                @Hadeur @AlexTheStampede

                                interesting. i have no recollection of a post here with "migrants and LGBT people" as lazza mentions. which makes sense, they blocked me. is the comment still in your cache?

                                sometimes the mod team freezes an account and asks them to edit their comment. some do. some get angry and don't

                                so not a ban per se

                                it could be mod overreach. or it could be reasonable in this light (not a ban, just an ask to edit)

                                but i don't know what they said so i can't say

                                alexthestampede@maly.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
                                alexthestampede@maly.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
                                alexthestampede@maly.io
                                wrote last edited by
                                #134

                                @benroyce @Hadeur oh wow, that’s… context! When I checked all I could see was harmless stuff, worst of it seeming just not being against AI. Then again, if something was there, it might’ve been deleted prior to the ban and I could’ve missed it.

                                benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • alexthestampede@maly.ioA alexthestampede@maly.io

                                  @benroyce @Hadeur oh wow, that’s… context! When I checked all I could see was harmless stuff, worst of it seeming just not being against AI. Then again, if something was there, it might’ve been deleted prior to the ban and I could’ve missed it.

                                  benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  benroyce@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #135

                                  @AlexTheStampede @Hadeur

                                  always some drama!

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • kimcrawley@zeroes.caK kimcrawley@zeroes.ca

                                    @rootbrian @Vivaldi

                                    You believe in the "killswitch"?! 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣

                                    rootbrian@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    rootbrian@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    rootbrian@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #136

                                    @kimcrawley @Vivaldi It's handy!

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • kyu3a@social.vivaldi.netK kyu3a@social.vivaldi.net

                                      @thibaultmol @Vivaldi I agree. That’s why I use Startpage.com as my default search engine, but sometimes I just have to use Google. Whenever that happens, this AI summary pops up, and it always gets on my nerves. 😓

                                      burek@metalhead.clubB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      burek@metalhead.clubB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      burek@metalhead.club
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #137

                                      @kyu3a
                                      https://cyberinsider.com/startpage-system1-privacy-one-group/
                                      @thibaultmol @Vivaldi

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • World
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups