Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. When I first watched War Games (1983) I thought "wow, so weird, not only they had terrible password management, but their test 'AI' system was directly linked to the prod".

When I first watched War Games (1983) I thought "wow, so weird, not only they had terrible password management, but their test 'AI' system was directly linked to the prod".

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
61 Posts 45 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • phracker2art@mstdn.socialP phracker2art@mstdn.social

    @0x00string @nina_kali_nina
    Actually, I would say the coolest hacking thing he did was when he digitally picked the lock to escape from the room he was being held in at that government building. That was more impressive to me than any of the other stuff.

    0x00string@infosec.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
    0x00string@infosec.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
    0x00string@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #47

    @nina_kali_nina @Phracker2Art OH SHIT I HAD FORGOTTEN ABOUT THAT! yes, hard agree that is the best hacking in the movie, and still pretty realistic tbh

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • nina_kali_nina@tech.lgbtN nina_kali_nina@tech.lgbt

      When I first watched War Games (1983) I thought "wow, so weird, not only they had terrible password management, but their test 'AI' system was directly linked to the prod".

      Ha-ha.

      acmeworks@social.tchncs.deA This user is from outside of this forum
      acmeworks@social.tchncs.deA This user is from outside of this forum
      acmeworks@social.tchncs.de
      wrote last edited by
      #48

      @nina_kali_nina Good point. It's more realistic than I thought.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • tim@www.timprobst.comT This user is from outside of this forum
        tim@www.timprobst.comT This user is from outside of this forum
        tim@www.timprobst.com
        wrote last edited by
        #49

        War Games is one of my favorite movies from the 80’s, and this is incredibly funny!

        ↬tech.lgbt/@nina_kali_nina/116263676528704081

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • phracker2art@mstdn.socialP phracker2art@mstdn.social

          @nina_kali_nina
          Also, a lot of the "hacking" the kid did was barely hacking. It was more just sneaking into the drawer at the office and reading the password from a piece of paper. Still a security violation, but not "hacking" in any sort of strict sense.

          brooke@bikeshed.vibber.netB This user is from outside of this forum
          brooke@bikeshed.vibber.netB This user is from outside of this forum
          brooke@bikeshed.vibber.net
          wrote last edited by
          #50

          @Phracker2Art @nina_kali_nina that's classic social engineering, the most basic and effective form of hacking

          phracker2art@mstdn.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • brooke@bikeshed.vibber.netB brooke@bikeshed.vibber.net

            @Phracker2Art @nina_kali_nina that's classic social engineering, the most basic and effective form of hacking

            phracker2art@mstdn.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
            phracker2art@mstdn.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
            phracker2art@mstdn.social
            wrote last edited by
            #51

            @brooke @nina_kali_nina
            Sure, it's social engineering, but there's no actual exploits involved.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • tallsimon@mstdn.caT tallsimon@mstdn.ca

              @bytex64 @nina_kali_nina "Twiddles?"

              Ask me over a 🍺 some time how I found the passwords to a computer in a nuclear power plant. 🤦‍♂️

              The answer was easier than "twiddle".

              rickbelanger@mas.toR This user is from outside of this forum
              rickbelanger@mas.toR This user is from outside of this forum
              rickbelanger@mas.to
              wrote last edited by
              #52

              @TallSimon @bytex64 @nina_kali_nina was it “password”???

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • nina_kali_nina@tech.lgbtN nina_kali_nina@tech.lgbt

                When I first watched War Games (1983) I thought "wow, so weird, not only they had terrible password management, but their test 'AI' system was directly linked to the prod".

                Ha-ha.

                jbc@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jbc@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jbc@mathstodon.xyz
                wrote last edited by
                #53

                @nina_kali_nina Funny, I only saw a mention of WarGames yesterday, in this (terrifying) document.

                Trigger warning: it's for a "quantum secure agent-to-agent gossip network that you can use to collaborate, cooperate, and share state with other agents.", and the whole document is addressed to agents, so the "you" there isn't you, a human.

                https://x0x.md/

                It's implied that in the film, WOPR learned that "The only rational strategy is cooperation.". I haven't watched the film in years; is that what happened?

                I thought WOPR learned that the only winning strategy is not to play. Which is, to put it mildly, not what people making agent-to-agent gossip networks are doing, exactly 😄

                nina_kali_nina@tech.lgbtN lpbkdotnet@mstdn.socialL 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • jbc@mathstodon.xyzJ jbc@mathstodon.xyz

                  @nina_kali_nina Funny, I only saw a mention of WarGames yesterday, in this (terrifying) document.

                  Trigger warning: it's for a "quantum secure agent-to-agent gossip network that you can use to collaborate, cooperate, and share state with other agents.", and the whole document is addressed to agents, so the "you" there isn't you, a human.

                  https://x0x.md/

                  It's implied that in the film, WOPR learned that "The only rational strategy is cooperation.". I haven't watched the film in years; is that what happened?

                  I thought WOPR learned that the only winning strategy is not to play. Which is, to put it mildly, not what people making agent-to-agent gossip networks are doing, exactly 😄

                  nina_kali_nina@tech.lgbtN This user is from outside of this forum
                  nina_kali_nina@tech.lgbtN This user is from outside of this forum
                  nina_kali_nina@tech.lgbt
                  wrote last edited by
                  #54

                  @jbc correct, "the only winning strategy is not to play". 😆

                  number6@fosstodon.orgN 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • tallsimon@mstdn.caT tallsimon@mstdn.ca

                    @bytex64 @nina_kali_nina "Twiddles?"

                    Ask me over a 🍺 some time how I found the passwords to a computer in a nuclear power plant. 🤦‍♂️

                    The answer was easier than "twiddle".

                    bruce@darkmoon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                    bruce@darkmoon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                    bruce@darkmoon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #55

                    @TallSimon @bytex64 @nina_kali_nina

                    Looked under the keyboard?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    0
                    • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                    • nina_kali_nina@tech.lgbtN nina_kali_nina@tech.lgbt

                      @jbc correct, "the only winning strategy is not to play". 😆

                      number6@fosstodon.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                      number6@fosstodon.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                      number6@fosstodon.org
                      wrote last edited by
                      #56

                      @nina_kali_nina @jbc

                      Different times.

                      When that line played, everyone in the theater cheered.

                      jbc@mathstodon.xyzJ 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • nina_kali_nina@tech.lgbtN nina_kali_nina@tech.lgbt

                        When I first watched War Games (1983) I thought "wow, so weird, not only they had terrible password management, but their test 'AI' system was directly linked to the prod".

                        Ha-ha.

                        securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                        securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                        securitywriter@infosec.exchange
                        wrote last edited by
                        #57

                        @nina_kali_nina As someone working in CNI for many years, this checks out as accurate.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • jbc@mathstodon.xyzJ jbc@mathstodon.xyz

                          @nina_kali_nina Funny, I only saw a mention of WarGames yesterday, in this (terrifying) document.

                          Trigger warning: it's for a "quantum secure agent-to-agent gossip network that you can use to collaborate, cooperate, and share state with other agents.", and the whole document is addressed to agents, so the "you" there isn't you, a human.

                          https://x0x.md/

                          It's implied that in the film, WOPR learned that "The only rational strategy is cooperation.". I haven't watched the film in years; is that what happened?

                          I thought WOPR learned that the only winning strategy is not to play. Which is, to put it mildly, not what people making agent-to-agent gossip networks are doing, exactly 😄

                          lpbkdotnet@mstdn.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                          lpbkdotnet@mstdn.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                          lpbkdotnet@mstdn.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #58

                          @jbc @nina_kali_nina that sounds like someone confusing war games with "Colossus, The Forbin Project"

                          I won't spoiler the plot in case you haven't seen it, but it's a very good film, and should be more widely watched...

                          especially in the current climate

                          jbc@mathstodon.xyzJ 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • nina_kali_nina@tech.lgbtN nina_kali_nina@tech.lgbt

                            When I first watched War Games (1983) I thought "wow, so weird, not only they had terrible password management, but their test 'AI' system was directly linked to the prod".

                            Ha-ha.

                            0x4d6165@transfem.social0 This user is from outside of this forum
                            0x4d6165@transfem.social0 This user is from outside of this forum
                            0x4d6165@transfem.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #59

                            @nina_kali_nina@tech.lgbt that shit was prophetic

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • lpbkdotnet@mstdn.socialL lpbkdotnet@mstdn.social

                              @jbc @nina_kali_nina that sounds like someone confusing war games with "Colossus, The Forbin Project"

                              I won't spoiler the plot in case you haven't seen it, but it's a very good film, and should be more widely watched...

                              especially in the current climate

                              jbc@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              jbc@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              jbc@mathstodon.xyz
                              wrote last edited by
                              #60

                              @lpbkdotnet @nina_kali_nina

                              Ahh ok, that could explain it! It's the second time this movie is mentioned recently (@jz was the other one).

                              I still have not seen it, I'd bookmarked it when I saw it on here. Tonight's activities are deicded! Thanks 🥰

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • number6@fosstodon.orgN number6@fosstodon.org

                                @nina_kali_nina @jbc

                                Different times.

                                When that line played, everyone in the theater cheered.

                                jbc@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                jbc@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                jbc@mathstodon.xyz
                                wrote last edited by
                                #61

                                @number6 @nina_kali_nina

                                I think there might still be a fair amount of sentiment against these developments. Maybe it's less common though, I don't know.

                                I was surprised earlier reading the comments here, for exampe:

                                Link Preview Image
                                Robots will solve wealth inequality, they say - Lemmy.World

                                Lemmy

                                favicon

                                (lemmy.world)

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • drajt@fosstodon.orgD drajt@fosstodon.org shared this topic
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • World
                                • Users
                                • Groups