As an autistic woman, who experienced SA herself and as an intersectional feminist, I reject the trope that most men are monsters, that men are inherently bad and women inherently good.
-
As an autistic woman, who experienced SA herself and as an intersectional feminist, I reject the trope that most men are monsters, that men are inherently bad and women inherently good. This approach is the opposite of helpful, it’s highly problematic for all genders and leads to the terf, fascist, religious extremism pipeline.
It’s not the gender, that corrupts people, it’s power.
For that reason, Feminism and Anarchism are strongly intertwined. Because we are not talking about physical power here. If you can train a huge dog, that could kill you with a bite, not to touch his food until you allow him to do so, we as a society can teach men not to rape a woman during her sleep.
The problem is, that we don’t do that. Living in patriarchy means, that a poor black girl has to take more responsibility and is held more accountable than a rich white man.
Patriarchy limits men’s possibilities for personal growth, it makes most of them become weak cowards, who exploit women and are easy to control. That is why oppressors created this system in the first place. This is what intersectional feminists mean, when they say, that men suffer under patriarchy too.
It also means, that not all women are safe for other women. As a marginalized, autistic woman, I might feel safer with an autistic man, than with an allistic woman. Not only because internalized misogyny is a thing, but because patriarchy is a hierarchical system, that gives some women power over others, it makes them compliant.
For me personally it means that despite all the bullshit men did to me, women were the ones, who deeply traumatized me over and over again. It means, that I will choose the people I trust not based on their gender, but based on their ability for critical thinking, personal growth and the power structures inside and outside of my relationship with them.
-
As an autistic woman, who experienced SA herself and as an intersectional feminist, I reject the trope that most men are monsters, that men are inherently bad and women inherently good. This approach is the opposite of helpful, it’s highly problematic for all genders and leads to the terf, fascist, religious extremism pipeline.
It’s not the gender, that corrupts people, it’s power.
For that reason, Feminism and Anarchism are strongly intertwined. Because we are not talking about physical power here. If you can train a huge dog, that could kill you with a bite, not to touch his food until you allow him to do so, we as a society can teach men not to rape a woman during her sleep.
The problem is, that we don’t do that. Living in patriarchy means, that a poor black girl has to take more responsibility and is held more accountable than a rich white man.
Patriarchy limits men’s possibilities for personal growth, it makes most of them become weak cowards, who exploit women and are easy to control. That is why oppressors created this system in the first place. This is what intersectional feminists mean, when they say, that men suffer under patriarchy too.
It also means, that not all women are safe for other women. As a marginalized, autistic woman, I might feel safer with an autistic man, than with an allistic woman. Not only because internalized misogyny is a thing, but because patriarchy is a hierarchical system, that gives some women power over others, it makes them compliant.
For me personally it means that despite all the bullshit men did to me, women were the ones, who deeply traumatized me over and over again. It means, that I will choose the people I trust not based on their gender, but based on their ability for critical thinking, personal growth and the power structures inside and outside of my relationship with them.
This is immense. I've never looked at the issue quite like this. I've long advocated that the world would be a different place if women had the power. But sadly, the women who got to the top have needed to behave like men to get there. The establishment only admits those who look like them and act like them.
-
As an autistic woman, who experienced SA herself and as an intersectional feminist, I reject the trope that most men are monsters, that men are inherently bad and women inherently good. This approach is the opposite of helpful, it’s highly problematic for all genders and leads to the terf, fascist, religious extremism pipeline.
It’s not the gender, that corrupts people, it’s power.
For that reason, Feminism and Anarchism are strongly intertwined. Because we are not talking about physical power here. If you can train a huge dog, that could kill you with a bite, not to touch his food until you allow him to do so, we as a society can teach men not to rape a woman during her sleep.
The problem is, that we don’t do that. Living in patriarchy means, that a poor black girl has to take more responsibility and is held more accountable than a rich white man.
Patriarchy limits men’s possibilities for personal growth, it makes most of them become weak cowards, who exploit women and are easy to control. That is why oppressors created this system in the first place. This is what intersectional feminists mean, when they say, that men suffer under patriarchy too.
It also means, that not all women are safe for other women. As a marginalized, autistic woman, I might feel safer with an autistic man, than with an allistic woman. Not only because internalized misogyny is a thing, but because patriarchy is a hierarchical system, that gives some women power over others, it makes them compliant.
For me personally it means that despite all the bullshit men did to me, women were the ones, who deeply traumatized me over and over again. It means, that I will choose the people I trust not based on their gender, but based on their ability for critical thinking, personal growth and the power structures inside and outside of my relationship with them.
@KaCi Pardon my ignorance, but what is "SA"?
-
@KaCi Pardon my ignorance, but what is "SA"?
@Bebef
Sexual Assault -
@Bebef
Sexual Assault@KaCi Thanks for the explanation 🫶
-
As an autistic woman, who experienced SA herself and as an intersectional feminist, I reject the trope that most men are monsters, that men are inherently bad and women inherently good. This approach is the opposite of helpful, it’s highly problematic for all genders and leads to the terf, fascist, religious extremism pipeline.
It’s not the gender, that corrupts people, it’s power.
For that reason, Feminism and Anarchism are strongly intertwined. Because we are not talking about physical power here. If you can train a huge dog, that could kill you with a bite, not to touch his food until you allow him to do so, we as a society can teach men not to rape a woman during her sleep.
The problem is, that we don’t do that. Living in patriarchy means, that a poor black girl has to take more responsibility and is held more accountable than a rich white man.
Patriarchy limits men’s possibilities for personal growth, it makes most of them become weak cowards, who exploit women and are easy to control. That is why oppressors created this system in the first place. This is what intersectional feminists mean, when they say, that men suffer under patriarchy too.
It also means, that not all women are safe for other women. As a marginalized, autistic woman, I might feel safer with an autistic man, than with an allistic woman. Not only because internalized misogyny is a thing, but because patriarchy is a hierarchical system, that gives some women power over others, it makes them compliant.
For me personally it means that despite all the bullshit men did to me, women were the ones, who deeply traumatized me over and over again. It means, that I will choose the people I trust not based on their gender, but based on their ability for critical thinking, personal growth and the power structures inside and outside of my relationship with them.
@KaCi
My last job was in a predominantly male environment. The problems I had with males were as expected. The damage done by a few of the women (I trusted) was more hurtful because I was not prepared for that. -
@Tamtam
Yes, this is such an important aspect, that is very helpful for the understanding of the topic and my inner work. Thank you. -
@KaCi
My last job was in a predominantly male environment. The problems I had with males were as expected. The damage done by a few of the women (I trusted) was more hurtful because I was not prepared for that.@autoperipatetikos
I made similar experiences in my work environment. While I got along perfectly fine with the (probably all autistic) men in my project team and my male boss, the men and women from the managing board were horrible to all of us. But experiencing the misogynistic treatment from the women was much more difficult for me to process, because I didn’t expect it and was not able to understand it during that time. It felt deeply unfair. -
This is immense. I've never looked at the issue quite like this. I've long advocated that the world would be a different place if women had the power. But sadly, the women who got to the top have needed to behave like men to get there. The establishment only admits those who look like them and act like them.
@DziadekMick @KaCi Black people have been calling out this power dynamic for a long time. More often than not it's a white woman who calls the cops on them, which can be very dangerous. Women also have their place in the hierarchy, and they abuse power just like everybody else. Reducing it all to gender is a simplistic approach that leads nowhere, it's really about power.
-
@Tamtam @autoperipatetikos
Exactly. This is why I mentioned the critical thinking skills and ability for personal growth in my post. We all have to do the work of understanding and deconstructing the cultural programming. -
@KaCi
My last job was in a predominantly male environment. The problems I had with males were as expected. The damage done by a few of the women (I trusted) was more hurtful because I was not prepared for that.@autoperipatetikos @KaCi Unfortunately, one strategy to survive in such an environment is being "holier than the Pope". Women in male-dominated environments will frequently turn on other women, foreigners in environments dominated by natives will talk about how bad emigration is, Jews will happily accept a token position in an antisemitic environment by "criticizing Israel" and so on...
-
@DziadekMick @KaCi Black people have been calling out this power dynamic for a long time. More often than not it's a white woman who calls the cops on them, which can be very dangerous. Women also have their place in the hierarchy, and they abuse power just like everybody else. Reducing it all to gender is a simplistic approach that leads nowhere, it's really about power.
@Newstrujew @DziadekMick
Exactly. The perspectives of black women were extremly helpful and necessary for my understanding of intersectionality and my own feelings and experiences. -
@Newstrujew @DziadekMick
Exactly. The perspectives of black women were extremly helpful and necessary for my understanding of intersectionality and my own feelings and experiences.@KaCi @Newstrujew @DziadekMick But in general, its very important to realise that all of these discourses on group-based discriminations are generalisations and hugely context dependent. Whats true in one context isnt necessarily true in another, and there are a lot of aspects to social dynamics so reducing anything to one or a few axis of power without aknowledging that this is only a generalisation can do harm.
-
@KaCi @Newstrujew @DziadekMick But in general, its very important to realise that all of these discourses on group-based discriminations are generalisations and hugely context dependent. Whats true in one context isnt necessarily true in another, and there are a lot of aspects to social dynamics so reducing anything to one or a few axis of power without aknowledging that this is only a generalisation can do harm.
@KaCi @Newstrujew @DziadekMick Pretty much all talking points about concrete constellations of group-based discrimination can be abused, i've seen the fact that there is a racist dynamic of white women accusing black men of sexual violence used to defend a black cis man repeatedly sexually harassing two white trans women. I have seen the fact that there is a transmisogynist dynamic of people accusing trans women of
-
sexual violence used to defend a perpetrator of sexual violence who was also a trans woman. I think i remember the black woman who coined the use of the term "Karen" later disavowed its use since she percieved it as being used as a cover for misogyny by others.
None of this is in disagreement with OP, i just want to warn people of moving from uncritically believing in one generalisation to believing in another. And that these discourses themselves can be
weaponised, so you really have to keep thinking and not overuse templates.
-
@KaCi @Newstrujew @DziadekMick Pretty much all talking points about concrete constellations of group-based discrimination can be abused, i've seen the fact that there is a racist dynamic of white women accusing black men of sexual violence used to defend a black cis man repeatedly sexually harassing two white trans women. I have seen the fact that there is a transmisogynist dynamic of people accusing trans women of
sexual violence used to defend a perpetrator of sexual violence who was also a trans woman. I think i remember the black woman who coined the use of the term "Karen" later disavowed its use since she percieved it as being used as a cover for misogyny by others.
None of this is in disagreement with OP, i just want to warn people of moving from uncritically believing in one generalisation to believing in another. And that these discourses themselves can be
-
weaponised, so you really have to keep thinking and not overuse templates.
Also, being marginalised and being a good person isnt linked. You can be marginalised and generally act shitty, and you can act shitty and still be marginalised.
-
As an autistic woman, who experienced SA herself and as an intersectional feminist, I reject the trope that most men are monsters, that men are inherently bad and women inherently good. This approach is the opposite of helpful, it’s highly problematic for all genders and leads to the terf, fascist, religious extremism pipeline.
It’s not the gender, that corrupts people, it’s power.
For that reason, Feminism and Anarchism are strongly intertwined. Because we are not talking about physical power here. If you can train a huge dog, that could kill you with a bite, not to touch his food until you allow him to do so, we as a society can teach men not to rape a woman during her sleep.
The problem is, that we don’t do that. Living in patriarchy means, that a poor black girl has to take more responsibility and is held more accountable than a rich white man.
Patriarchy limits men’s possibilities for personal growth, it makes most of them become weak cowards, who exploit women and are easy to control. That is why oppressors created this system in the first place. This is what intersectional feminists mean, when they say, that men suffer under patriarchy too.
It also means, that not all women are safe for other women. As a marginalized, autistic woman, I might feel safer with an autistic man, than with an allistic woman. Not only because internalized misogyny is a thing, but because patriarchy is a hierarchical system, that gives some women power over others, it makes them compliant.
For me personally it means that despite all the bullshit men did to me, women were the ones, who deeply traumatized me over and over again. It means, that I will choose the people I trust not based on their gender, but based on their ability for critical thinking, personal growth and the power structures inside and outside of my relationship with them.
@KaCi This is a refreshing take, especially as a man. I've seen from the inside how easily I could have done things, how close I came at various times to monstrous acts against vulnerable people, mostly female.
I can't honestly say why I didn't overstep the line, so it's hard to say why others do. There are many possible explanations.
You've articulated what I once tried but was not received for obvious reasons.
-
@Tamtam
I'm not sure about that. One of the problems is how to understand abusen and recognise trauma. Men's abuse trends to be physical and therefore apparent. Women's tends to be emotional, and sometimes very hard to recognise particularly when the person affected is their child because the child cannot recognise it as abuse and is dependent for survival on the mother. -
@KaCi Thanks for the explanation 🫶
