Let's remind everyone what a safe internet actually means.

[yugthebug@mastodon.social]

@Tutanota and moderation for public communities, 4chan isnt exactly safe

[fiore@brain.worm.pink]

@irisnk@dorm.social @Tutanota@mastodon.social yumy ..

[dynom@toot.community]

@Tutanota short slogans are nice for marketing.

The Internet is not safer for victims of harassment, when the attackers enjoy anonymity and no accountability because of it.

Platforms can't abide by laws, if they can't figure out if their users are legally (of age) visiting.

Brevity isn't winning any arguments.

[guillotine_jones@beige.party]

@Tutanota
Safe internet or surveillance internet?
The choice is ours, unless governments take it away.

[abody@mastodon.social]

@Tutanota Does your solution support open standards like POP/IMAP, allowing the end users to encrypt/decrypt/verify their messages EXTERNALLY? If it does not, please stop using the word "safe" and the name of your product in the same sentence.

[Guest]

@Tutanota
Thats why i switch from Twitter to this

[chris2000sp@social.anoxinon.de]

@xela @Tutanota

Yes that is very important but you have to get supported by Sorting and showing important content that has to be moderated. So you have to use as Mod some tools to sort that content and Moderate that content in a propper way. Floods of Content could be worse to handle if it is too much for one Person. So you have to get Tools to Rank the Worst Post to the Top and less worse to the bottom if you handle really lots of Content. That is possible to get and will help to Mod Content.

[chris2000sp@social.anoxinon.de]

@dynom @Tutanota

this laws you are referencing are the problem of unsafe acting on that harassment and victims you are referencing to. This laws will get it worse on victims because of stigmata on that topic. You have to reform that law before you could get victims safer. You have to get safer NSFW stuff before you kick out the really bad stuff. To ban everything that does not suit you is double standard.

[poindex76@social.vivaldi.net]

@Tutanota
I’ve been using unique 20-char random passwords for at least five years. Occasionally, I’ve run into a site where the limit is lower, and then I’ve thought a bit about whether I really need an account at such a poorly coded site. Nope!

[xela@troet.cafe]

@Chris2000SP sure, totally agree, moderation needs tools. But humans must have "the last say".
Anyway, why I mentioned moderation here was, because it's not mentioned at all in the info graphic for a safer web - and I think, it should be there. @Tutanota

[chris2000sp@social.anoxinon.de]

@xela @Tutanota
of course humans must have the last say! I will not tolerate a Moderation that force overblocking.

[gokushrm@mastodon.social]

@Tutanota we will ditch smart phones and services. Time to use dump keypad phones just for calls and msgs.. Lest flick these stupid companies together..

[chris2000sp@social.anoxinon.de]

@GOKUSHRM @Tutanota
How about a real Linux Phone instead of using a phone that is from last millennium? True Linux Phones does not have that Problems i also perceive on "Normal Smartphones"

[eregloch@mastodon.coffee]

@TCatInReality
There is no ownership of internet. There is ownership on internet.
The left column is for safety on internet protecting against abuse by systems on internet under any ownership.
@Tutanota

[bill_halcyon1@mastodon.social]

@Tutanota

[drewtowler@mas.to]

@Tutanota You keep using the word safer. I do not think it means what you think it means.

[ralph@hear-me.social]

@Tutanota

#alttext

A safer internet IS MADE BY
Encryption
Privacy
Open source

A safer internet is NOT MADE BY
Age verification
Scanning communication
Tracking & data collection

#SAFERINTERNETDAY

[chris2000sp@social.anoxinon.de]

@drewtowler @Tutanota

Please get some more context if you want to discus that topic because such comments are not helping if your sentences are to vage.

[soderling@dresden.network]

@gonun13 @Tutanota Correct, it is only mutual exclusive to privacy.

[gonun13@mastodon.social]

@soderling No, it is not. Any digital service could query a digital gov ID just for age verification (yes/no signed key) and nothing else is stored in either side. A government audit can run on all users just to make sure they have those signed keys WITHOUT knowing who they are.