Let's remind everyone what a safe internet actually means.

[poindex76@social.vivaldi.net]

@Tutanota
I’ve been using unique 20-char random passwords for at least five years. Occasionally, I’ve run into a site where the limit is lower, and then I’ve thought a bit about whether I really need an account at such a poorly coded site. Nope!

[xela@troet.cafe]

@Chris2000SP sure, totally agree, moderation needs tools. But humans must have "the last say".
Anyway, why I mentioned moderation here was, because it's not mentioned at all in the info graphic for a safer web - and I think, it should be there. @Tutanota

[chris2000sp@social.anoxinon.de]

@xela @Tutanota
of course humans must have the last say! I will not tolerate a Moderation that force overblocking.

[gokushrm@mastodon.social]

@Tutanota we will ditch smart phones and services. Time to use dump keypad phones just for calls and msgs.. Lest flick these stupid companies together..

[chris2000sp@social.anoxinon.de]

@GOKUSHRM @Tutanota
How about a real Linux Phone instead of using a phone that is from last millennium? True Linux Phones does not have that Problems i also perceive on "Normal Smartphones"

[eregloch@mastodon.coffee]

@TCatInReality
There is no ownership of internet. There is ownership on internet.
The left column is for safety on internet protecting against abuse by systems on internet under any ownership.
@Tutanota

[bill_halcyon1@mastodon.social]

@Tutanota

[drewtowler@mas.to]

@Tutanota You keep using the word safer. I do not think it means what you think it means.

[ralph@hear-me.social]

@Tutanota

#alttext

A safer internet IS MADE BY
Encryption
Privacy
Open source

A safer internet is NOT MADE BY
Age verification
Scanning communication
Tracking & data collection

#SAFERINTERNETDAY

[chris2000sp@social.anoxinon.de]

@drewtowler @Tutanota

Please get some more context if you want to discus that topic because such comments are not helping if your sentences are to vage.

[soderling@dresden.network]

@gonun13 @Tutanota Correct, it is only mutual exclusive to privacy.

[gonun13@mastodon.social]

@soderling No, it is not. Any digital service could query a digital gov ID just for age verification (yes/no signed key) and nothing else is stored in either side. A government audit can run on all users just to make sure they have those signed keys WITHOUT knowing who they are.

[rbuzz@mastodon.social]

@Tutanota why age verification is not safe? Internet should be 35+ only. Because it destroys brain tissues with cat pictures.

[chris2000sp@social.anoxinon.de]

@rbuzz @Tutanota
because it is not make it clear what behave is good or bad. It is really not a all making safer thing than you will think of. It would be force to get more victims because of tabu that topic that has to be discus. Tabu this topics what will be unsafe for minors will get more victims and yes i mean also NSFW Content because that Content will get to people no matter what you will do. The other way around you have to guard minors actively not inactively like that verify stuff.

[pictor@ohai.social]

@SuperDicq @Tutanota no. NOT free. Secure software is funded software that can afford to invest in a secure platform.

[chris2000sp@social.anoxinon.de]

@rbuzz @Tutanota

That cat pics your mentioning is because you are referencing Plattforms with Algorithms suggestions and this is made to force your behave to stick to that platform as much time as possible. That is a Dark Pattern and has to be banned from all Plattforms no matter if it is for adults or not. That Algorithms are the worst no matter which Plattform your metioning that using that and no matter if it is SFW or NSFW.

[strigga_@mastodon.social]

@Tutanota the left column does not protect minors from AI Fake content, porn and violence. This is just the wrong sharepic for the conext

[gonun13@mastodon.social]

@aubrey @soderling They can save it, it's pointless, it's just a valid age verification token. The critical point is the authentication system that by law and governance, would be made in a way where you only authorise an age verification not sharing private data with the digital service OR logging on the government side what site you're trying to use. There are more technical steps available for privacy like key pairs, blockchain, owning your data I would prefer first but it is possible.

[aubrey@nullgender.com]

@gonun13 @soderling Well, then the government gives me a token for something. First, they know I requested a token at this time (which is also a privacy problem, but not that big). I give that token to the site I want to use, that is okay still. But then the government asks the site owner to give them all the users with all their tokens. Now the government can match the users with real people based on the tokens they gave out.

[tcmuffin@toot.wales]

@Tutanota

I've been using KeePassXC for years and my default password length is 32 characters comprising A-Z, a-z, 0-9, and special characters...