#TIL hashtags in #ActivityPub are diacritic agnostic, so #vélo and #velo are the same :)
-
@richlv yes, this was in the context of me wanting to write HTvélo and Masto offering HTvelo.
Hmmm, I wonder: diacritic... in whose opinion? Anglophones consider Ñ an N with a diacritic. Hispanophones consider Ñ its own distinct letter.
Let me try #español & see what happens
-
Hmmm, I wonder: diacritic... in whose opinion? Anglophones consider Ñ an N with a diacritic. Hispanophones consider Ñ its own distinct letter.
Let me try #español & see what happens
It seems #ActivityPub (or at least #Mastodon ) treats n & ñ the same in hashtags
-
It seems #ActivityPub (or at least #Mastodon ) treats n & ñ the same in hashtags
-
Hmmm, I wonder: diacritic... in whose opinion? Anglophones consider Ñ an N with a diacritic. Hispanophones consider Ñ its own distinct letter.
Let me try #español & see what happens
@klu9 @mdione Diacritic technically is the additional marking.
Often shortened to mean "a character with a diacritic".
Such letters often are considered separate letters on their own (like Latvian āšņūžčēļī etc), but they can still be recognised as "a with a diacritic mark on top of it".As in, yes, agreed, and these concepts are not opposite, they don't contradict one another
-
@klu9 @mdione Diacritic technically is the additional marking.
Often shortened to mean "a character with a diacritic".
Such letters often are considered separate letters on their own (like Latvian āšņūžčēļī etc), but they can still be recognised as "a with a diacritic mark on top of it".As in, yes, agreed, and these concepts are not opposite, they don't contradict one another
Although I've yet to find a computing system that treats J as "just an I with a swash at the bottom".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swash_(typography) -
@klu9 @mdione Diacritic technically is the additional marking.
Often shortened to mean "a character with a diacritic".
Such letters often are considered separate letters on their own (like Latvian āšņūžčēļī etc), but they can still be recognised as "a with a diacritic mark on top of it".As in, yes, agreed, and these concepts are not opposite, they don't contradict one another
-
-
@richlv @klu9 this makes no sense, but:
* ñ is considered a whole Spanish letter, has it's own name and sound.
* á is not, it's even pronounced just like a, but the diacritic changes where you stress the word.
* ch and ll used to be their own letters (and places in the alphabet), but no more. But they have their own sound. They're spelled as c+h and l+l.So the question was whether č is considered another letter o just a c with a ˇ, even if it has it's own sound; same for ā.
-
@richlv @klu9 this makes no sense, but:
* ñ is considered a whole Spanish letter, has it's own name and sound.
* á is not, it's even pronounced just like a, but the diacritic changes where you stress the word.
* ch and ll used to be their own letters (and places in the alphabet), but no more. But they have their own sound. They're spelled as c+h and l+l.So the question was whether č is considered another letter o just a c with a ˇ, even if it has it's own sound; same for ā.
-
-
R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic
