Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. ArXiv announces a ban on AI content and the responses are hilarious.

ArXiv announces a ban on AI content and the responses are hilarious.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
69 Posts 49 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • docpop@mastodon.socialD docpop@mastodon.social

    ArXiv announces a ban on AI content and the responses are hilarious.

    > You expect us to actually read the papers we cite?!

    yes, lol!

    Link Preview Image
    ArXiv to Ban Researchers for a Year if They Submit AI Slop

    The change comes as arXiv and others struggle to manage an influx of AI-generated materials masquerading as rigorous science.

    favicon

    404 Media (www.404media.co)

    onnob@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
    onnob@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
    onnob@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #56

    @docpop jesus, you have to check everything AI writes. Citations or otherwise. And it can be a great help in finding sources, but you have to check everything. By hand. And brain. Yes, all of it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • docpop@mastodon.socialD docpop@mastodon.social

      ArXiv announces a ban on AI content and the responses are hilarious.

      > You expect us to actually read the papers we cite?!

      yes, lol!

      Link Preview Image
      ArXiv to Ban Researchers for a Year if They Submit AI Slop

      The change comes as arXiv and others struggle to manage an influx of AI-generated materials masquerading as rigorous science.

      favicon

      404 Media (www.404media.co)

      zjb@mastodon.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
      zjb@mastodon.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
      zjb@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #57

      哈哈,这个反应也太真实了。学术圈其实很多人都在偷偷用AI写论文,现在arXiv一禁估计要炸锅了。

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ftranschel@norden.socialF ftranschel@norden.social

        @heafnerj @docpop As in "only highschoolers can reasonably be expected to do this"? 🤣

        (scnr)

        heafnerj@mstdn.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
        heafnerj@mstdn.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
        heafnerj@mstdn.social
        wrote last edited by
        #58

        @ftranschel @docpop Had to look up scnr then it made sense. 😬

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • heafnerj@mstdn.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
          heafnerj@mstdn.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
          heafnerj@mstdn.social
          wrote last edited by
          #59

          @Darkphoenix @docpop There are sometimes physics errors in physics textbooks too.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • docpop@mastodon.socialD docpop@mastodon.social

            ArXiv announces a ban on AI content and the responses are hilarious.

            > You expect us to actually read the papers we cite?!

            yes, lol!

            Link Preview Image
            ArXiv to Ban Researchers for a Year if They Submit AI Slop

            The change comes as arXiv and others struggle to manage an influx of AI-generated materials masquerading as rigorous science.

            favicon

            404 Media (www.404media.co)

            theorangetheme@en.osm.townT This user is from outside of this forum
            theorangetheme@en.osm.townT This user is from outside of this forum
            theorangetheme@en.osm.town
            wrote last edited by
            #60

            @docpop I can't tell if AI made people stupid or if it just made pre-existing stupid people louder and more obnoxious.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • docpop@mastodon.socialD docpop@mastodon.social

              ArXiv announces a ban on AI content and the responses are hilarious.

              > You expect us to actually read the papers we cite?!

              yes, lol!

              Link Preview Image
              ArXiv to Ban Researchers for a Year if They Submit AI Slop

              The change comes as arXiv and others struggle to manage an influx of AI-generated materials masquerading as rigorous science.

              favicon

              404 Media (www.404media.co)

              adipoeserpursch@troet.cafeA This user is from outside of this forum
              adipoeserpursch@troet.cafeA This user is from outside of this forum
              adipoeserpursch@troet.cafe
              wrote last edited by
              #61

              @docpop 🤦🏾‍♂

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • jamesmarshall@sfba.socialJ jamesmarshall@sfba.social

                @docpop from his profile, Miller has a PhD from U. Chicago, a JD from Stanford, and is a professor at Smith College. 😕 I think this reflects badly on every one of those-- what is research from these places actually worth, if fake citations are common there?

                He and his defenders are basically saying "everyone does it, and you're naive to complain." If it's true that everyone does it, that reflects badly on modern academia as a whole.

                Any academic researchers want to chime in here?

                cuchaz@gladtech.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                cuchaz@gladtech.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                cuchaz@gladtech.social
                wrote last edited by
                #62

                @jamesmarshall @docpop no, we don't make up fake citations. But also sadly, not every co-author checks every citation. We rely on trusting our co-authors to not commit academic fraud.

                I'm very in favor of verifiable academic fraud leading to (impermanent) bans from preprint servers. If your co-authors are committing fraud and you find out by getting banned from a preprint server, that sucks, but it's a great signal to stop trusting that co-author. Nature will heal.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • docpop@mastodon.socialD docpop@mastodon.social

                  ArXiv announces a ban on AI content and the responses are hilarious.

                  > You expect us to actually read the papers we cite?!

                  yes, lol!

                  Link Preview Image
                  ArXiv to Ban Researchers for a Year if They Submit AI Slop

                  The change comes as arXiv and others struggle to manage an influx of AI-generated materials masquerading as rigorous science.

                  favicon

                  404 Media (www.404media.co)

                  gimulnautti@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
                  gimulnautti@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
                  gimulnautti@mastodon.green
                  wrote last edited by
                  #63

                  @docpop In a civilised age James Miller would go down in history as the fool of the year. Now he’s just a another hustlebro competing other hustlebros trying to get rich off abuse.. Of systems that literally hold our civilisation together.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • docpop@mastodon.socialD docpop@mastodon.social

                    ArXiv announces a ban on AI content and the responses are hilarious.

                    > You expect us to actually read the papers we cite?!

                    yes, lol!

                    Link Preview Image
                    ArXiv to Ban Researchers for a Year if They Submit AI Slop

                    The change comes as arXiv and others struggle to manage an influx of AI-generated materials masquerading as rigorous science.

                    favicon

                    404 Media (www.404media.co)

                    F This user is from outside of this forum
                    F This user is from outside of this forum
                    frutigeraero00@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #64

                    @docpop "So... We have to actually use our brains? 😭"

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • damonhd@mastodon.socialD damonhd@mastodon.social

                      @FediThing @unchartedworlds @docpop The bar to be one is maybe not as high as it should be? (That's how I hope to sneak in as one. maybe!)

                      illuminatus@mstdn.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                      illuminatus@mstdn.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                      illuminatus@mstdn.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #65

                      @DamonHD @FediThing @unchartedworlds @docpop There are universities and colleges and then there are "universities" and "colleges". Have you read about "Trump university"?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • docpop@mastodon.socialD docpop@mastodon.social

                        ArXiv announces a ban on AI content and the responses are hilarious.

                        > You expect us to actually read the papers we cite?!

                        yes, lol!

                        Link Preview Image
                        ArXiv to Ban Researchers for a Year if They Submit AI Slop

                        The change comes as arXiv and others struggle to manage an influx of AI-generated materials masquerading as rigorous science.

                        favicon

                        404 Media (www.404media.co)

                        emmecola@fediscience.orgE This user is from outside of this forum
                        emmecola@fediscience.orgE This user is from outside of this forum
                        emmecola@fediscience.org
                        wrote last edited by
                        #66

                        @docpop I think people tend to overestimate the percentage of scientists who actually read, in full, the papers they cite. This isn't about AI, it has always been like that! 🤷🏻

                        Link Preview Image
                        Read before you cite!

                        Abstract page for arXiv paper cond-mat/0212043: Read before you cite!

                        favicon

                        arXiv.org (arxiv.org)

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • jamesmarshall@sfba.socialJ jamesmarshall@sfba.social

                          @a_cubed @docpop thanks for your comment, very informative. I assume your academic society publisher is international? I'm wondering if this is a US problem.

                          a_cubed@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                          a_cubed@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                          a_cubed@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #67

                          @jamesmarshall @docpop
                          The ACM, US-based but international, particularly in terms of authors, and events with refereed proceedings.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • a_cubed@mastodon.socialA a_cubed@mastodon.social

                            @jamesmarshall @docpop
                            He's wrong. Not everyone does it. He's trying an argumentum ad populum. I'm on the publication ethics committee of a major Comp Sci academic society publisher and we would redact papers with multiple non-existent citations and ban the authors from submitting to our publications for at least a year.
                            You submit it as your work, you stand byit as valid. Jointly and severally, although we sometimes go easy on student joint authors with faculty (faculty should know better).

                            a_cubed@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                            a_cubed@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                            a_cubed@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #68

                            @jamesmarshall @docpop @a_cubed
                            That should be retract, not redact.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • docpop@mastodon.socialD docpop@mastodon.social

                              ArXiv announces a ban on AI content and the responses are hilarious.

                              > You expect us to actually read the papers we cite?!

                              yes, lol!

                              Link Preview Image
                              ArXiv to Ban Researchers for a Year if They Submit AI Slop

                              The change comes as arXiv and others struggle to manage an influx of AI-generated materials masquerading as rigorous science.

                              favicon

                              404 Media (www.404media.co)

                              svelmoe@hachyderm.ioS This user is from outside of this forum
                              svelmoe@hachyderm.ioS This user is from outside of this forum
                              svelmoe@hachyderm.io
                              wrote last edited by
                              #69

                              @docpop That perfectly underlines one of my main concerns; well outside ecological, ethical, brain rot, unemployment .....okay - a single small concern of mine.

                              People get lazy and stop checking the product of auto-complete and just ship it thus slop feeds slop.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • World
                              • Users
                              • Groups