I’ve been asked on TV hits and interviews lately to explain why decentralized social media is better, especially re: Mastodon.

[michaelgemar@mstdn.ca]

@rancoisse @futurebird @benroyce @taylorlorenz @midsomerplots Do I want to know?

[futurebird@sauropods.win]

@taylorlorenz

I get why they call it a "decentralized network" but that description was kind of a turn off for me before I came here because I thought you were trapped in a little server with a few dozen people and what's the point of that?

The power is decentralized but the communication need not be. You can talk to anyone from any community. You can have all of those fun instances of cross pollination when different communities intersect.

The more the fedi grows the better this gets.

[futurebird@sauropods.win]

@michaelgemar @rancoisse @benroyce @taylorlorenz @midsomerplots

Scientists make yogurt using ants. The result: tangy and herby | Flipboard

NPR - Scientists test a traditional method for fermenting yogurt... using ants. AILSA CHANG, HOST: What if I told you ants might be able to make delicious yogurt? NPR's Regina Barber reports on a study out of Denmark that put a traditional fermenting method to the test. REGINA BARBER, BYLINE: Imagine you're …

Flipboard (flipboard.com)

[michaelgemar@mstdn.ca]

@futurebird @rancoisse @benroyce @taylorlorenz @midsomerplots No. No no no.

[blue@bigshoulders.city]

@taylorlorenz Profit isn't a motivating factor. Admins create and maintain instances because they want them to exist and other people to benefit from their existence.

[diraquel@masto.pt]

@taylorlorenz I usually start by explaining the chronological feed with no publicity; then, that it's not a platform, but a software run in many different places, so there is no one owner; then, I circle back to the fact that there are no algorithms choosing what you see on your feed.
I have the feeling I'm not persuasive enough, so I would love to hear other strategies.

[kierkegaanks@beige.party]

@taylorlorenz You get to keep a sane distance from Satan’s merchants on earth for one thing

[mcc@mastodon.social]

@taylorlorenz "Nobody controls the network. It's like email. If GMail loses their mind and starts inserting Republican propaganda everywhere, you might have to switch to Hotmail, but you can still use email. You can still email the people you used to email. It's not like you have to keep using GMail hating it more and more every day because this one single company is the only way you can email anybody."

[eetschrijver@mastodon.social]

@benroyce
I'm only here for the cat pictures. And for the pindakaas.
@vfrmedia @rk @futurebird @taylorlorenz

[benroyce@mastodon.social]

@Eetschrijver @vfrmedia @rk @futurebird @taylorlorenz

One of us, one of us!

[timbray@cosocial.ca]

@taylorlorenz Here's my best shot: https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/202x/2025/11/03/Time-to-Migrate from which

1/2 ”Have you noticed that social-media products, in the long term, can’t seem to manage to stay fun and safe and useful? I have. But there’s one huge exception, a tool that’s been serving billions of us for decades, and works about as well as it ever did. I’m talking about email.

[timbray@cosocial.ca]

@taylorlorenz

2/3 Why does email stay reasonably healthy? Because nobody owns it. Anyone on any server can communicate with anyone else on any other and it Just Works. Nobody can buy it and make it a vehicle for their politics. Nobody can crank up the ad density or make things worse to improve their profit margin.

[timbray@cosocial.ca]

@taylorlorenz
3/3 Mastodon’s like email that way. Plus it does all the Post and Repost and Quote and Follow and Reply and Like and Block stuff that you’re used to, and there are thousands of servers and anyone can run one and nobody can own the whole thing. It doesn’t have ads and it won’t. It’s dead easy to use and it’s fun and you should give it a try.

[tshirtman@mas.to]

@taylorlorenz it's not owned by billionairs, it's not owned by anyone. if more time, get to the community of communities thing, how orgs can own their content on it and not depend on others, and still be part of the network, as anyone else.

i think people focus too much on the added complexity, not enough on what this complexity buys us.

[tommertron@masto.yttrx.com]

@timbray @taylorlorenz Plus one on the email analogy. Email is about as complicated as Mastodon. Email has its problems just like mastodon but it’s still a remarkably useful and resilient tool that no one company controls. I can email anyone from any email provider. I can’t say the same for social media.

[lienrag@mastodon.tedomum.net]

@futurebird

Apparently the mastodon team at FOSDEM had a really killer slogan for promoting the Fediverse : "My friends are not for sale".
Mic drop, really - what more is there to say ?

(though, depending on the audience, "Seize the memes of production, join the fediverse !" can land well too)

@taylorlorenz

[technically_good@techhub.social]

@taylorlorenz

- no ads.
- no ad tracking!
- no billionaire owner.
- no "responsibility" towards shareholders (read: line must go up)
- the different platforms interact!! You can follow someone's photo sharing account (say, pixelfed - "Instagram", kinda) from your Friendica ("Facebook," kinda) account. #interop is cool

#fediverse

[livcomp@hachyderm.io]

@futurebird @taylorlorenz
"federated network" has some nice flavors (currently the word "federal" notwithstanding), and sets folks up for this fine fediverse of ours.

[stumpythemutt@social.linux.pizza]

@futurebird @taylorlorenz This nerd was going to mention @scream, but it won't.

[scream@bots.robots.rodeo]

@StumpyTheMutt AAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHH