Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. 677: I Accept the Battery Costhttps://atp.fm/677

677: I Accept the Battery Costhttps://atp.fm/677

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
103 Posts 43 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • siracusa@mastodon.socialS siracusa@mastodon.social

    @marcoshuerta I agree with all of this! Uber is a similar recent example: "Lose money until we've destroyed enough of the existing market that we can start charging higher prices and customers have nowhere left to turn."

    The relative timing of the bubble-pop (or even more mild "consolidation") vs. the rate at which these tools improve and we learn how to use them well will probably make a big difference in how this goes.

    marcoshuerta@vmst.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
    marcoshuerta@vmst.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
    marcoshuerta@vmst.io
    wrote last edited by
    #83

    @siracusa Claude Code like products are one of the most token-intensive applications since massive chunks of code (and essays) are being sent into the context window over and over. That makes profitability even harder - Anthropic started charging Cursor more and Cursor had to raise prices. (and both still lose money!)

    davidanson@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • atpfm@mastodon.socialA atpfm@mastodon.social

      677: I Accept the Battery Cost
      https://atp.fm/677

      If you really don’t like AI, we have some bad news for you.

      peteo@mas.toP This user is from outside of this forum
      peteo@mas.toP This user is from outside of this forum
      peteo@mas.to
      wrote last edited by
      #84

      @atpfm https://music.apple.com/us/album/basic-being-basic/1791184860?i=1791184865

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • atpfm@mastodon.socialA atpfm@mastodon.social

        677: I Accept the Battery Cost
        https://atp.fm/677

        If you really don’t like AI, we have some bad news for you.

        intarga@hachyderm.ioI This user is from outside of this forum
        intarga@hachyderm.ioI This user is from outside of this forum
        intarga@hachyderm.io
        wrote last edited by
        #85

        @atpfm "We don't have a choice. This is here. This is happening. It's happening with or without us…You can be a part of it or you can fall behind…You kinda have to get on board."

        @marcoarment making an excellent defense of Tim Cook getting on the Trump train

        joshhunt@hachyderm.ioJ 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • intarga@hachyderm.ioI intarga@hachyderm.io

          @atpfm "We don't have a choice. This is here. This is happening. It's happening with or without us…You can be a part of it or you can fall behind…You kinda have to get on board."

          @marcoarment making an excellent defense of Tim Cook getting on the Trump train

          joshhunt@hachyderm.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
          joshhunt@hachyderm.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
          joshhunt@hachyderm.io
          wrote last edited by
          #86

          @intarga This is the same defence everyone's always said, and was rebutted by John mentioning that everyone can make their own decision that aligns with their morals and values.

          The argument has always been that people do not agree with Tim Cook's morals.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • atpfm@mastodon.socialA atpfm@mastodon.social

            677: I Accept the Battery Cost
            https://atp.fm/677

            If you really don’t like AI, we have some bad news for you.

            joshhunt@hachyderm.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
            joshhunt@hachyderm.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
            joshhunt@hachyderm.io
            wrote last edited by
            #87

            @atpfm Its important to note that (I don't think) XCode isn't integrating with Claude Code, just Claude. They're using Claude's LLM, but not the agent-coding-loop infra that exists in Claude Code.

            this makes me believe that using Claude Code will still be 'smarter', more useful, and more modern than whatever Apple builds into XCode.

            joshhunt@hachyderm.ioJ siracusa@mastodon.socialS 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • joshhunt@hachyderm.ioJ joshhunt@hachyderm.io

              @atpfm Its important to note that (I don't think) XCode isn't integrating with Claude Code, just Claude. They're using Claude's LLM, but not the agent-coding-loop infra that exists in Claude Code.

              this makes me believe that using Claude Code will still be 'smarter', more useful, and more modern than whatever Apple builds into XCode.

              joshhunt@hachyderm.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
              joshhunt@hachyderm.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
              joshhunt@hachyderm.io
              wrote last edited by
              #88

              Of course, the benefit will be that it'll have better GUI and integration with XCode itself.

              I switch between Github Copilot and Claude Code in VS Code because I greatly prefer Copilot's IDE integration, but find Claude Code to be smarter, despite both using the same LLM models.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • niekvdpas@hachyderm.ioN niekvdpas@hachyderm.io

                @secundus
                I would be interested in references if you have them. I’ve been having a hell of a time finding numbers on this stuff.

                secundus@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                secundus@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                secundus@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #89

                @niekvdpas As far as is known, AI companies do not publish detailed data, so there are more or less plausible guesstimates. Andy Masley (see link) has written several solid articles on the topic. Granted, he is just another person on the internet, but I find his argument reasonably convincing. This is not about specific numbers, but about a rough estimate of the order of magnitude of LLM energy consumption and how that compares to overall personal energy use

                Link Preview Image
                Using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment - a cheat sheet

                The numbers clearly show this is a pointless distraction for the climate movement

                favicon

                (andymasley.substack.com)

                secundus@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • secundus@mastodon.socialS secundus@mastodon.social

                  @niekvdpas As far as is known, AI companies do not publish detailed data, so there are more or less plausible guesstimates. Andy Masley (see link) has written several solid articles on the topic. Granted, he is just another person on the internet, but I find his argument reasonably convincing. This is not about specific numbers, but about a rough estimate of the order of magnitude of LLM energy consumption and how that compares to overall personal energy use

                  Link Preview Image
                  Using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment - a cheat sheet

                  The numbers clearly show this is a pointless distraction for the climate movement

                  favicon

                  (andymasley.substack.com)

                  secundus@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  secundus@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  secundus@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #90

                  @niekvdpas To give an even vaguer answer. A fairly limited LLM can be run reasonably well on my four-year-old laptop. A much more capable model can be run on a machine, such as a Mac Studio. This does consume energy, but not very much. Especially given that typical LLM use does not imply sustained full-load operation.

                  Compared to these examples, optimized hardware or software, scale, better utilization, etc. will be more efficient.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • joshhunt@hachyderm.ioJ joshhunt@hachyderm.io

                    @atpfm Its important to note that (I don't think) XCode isn't integrating with Claude Code, just Claude. They're using Claude's LLM, but not the agent-coding-loop infra that exists in Claude Code.

                    this makes me believe that using Claude Code will still be 'smarter', more useful, and more modern than whatever Apple builds into XCode.

                    siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    siracusa@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #91

                    @joshhunt Are you sure? I see two possible choices for Claude integration in Xcode ("Claude Agent" and "Claude"), and I'm not sure what they mean.

                    joshhunt@hachyderm.ioJ 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • siracusa@mastodon.socialS siracusa@mastodon.social

                      @joshhunt Are you sure? I see two possible choices for Claude integration in Xcode ("Claude Agent" and "Claude"), and I'm not sure what they mean.

                      joshhunt@hachyderm.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      joshhunt@hachyderm.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      joshhunt@hachyderm.io
                      wrote last edited by
                      #92

                      @siracusa hmm no, I’m not sure at all. I’m not sure why they would have the distinction between the two, but I think it’s telling they never refer to it as Claude Code.

                      joshhunt@hachyderm.ioJ 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • joshhunt@hachyderm.ioJ joshhunt@hachyderm.io

                        @siracusa hmm no, I’m not sure at all. I’m not sure why they would have the distinction between the two, but I think it’s telling they never refer to it as Claude Code.

                        joshhunt@hachyderm.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        joshhunt@hachyderm.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        joshhunt@hachyderm.io
                        wrote last edited by
                        #93

                        @siracusa https://www.anthropic.com/news/apple-xcode-claude-agent-sdk

                        "Xcode 26.3 introduces a native integration with the Claude Agent SDK, the same underlying harness that powers Claude Code. Developers get the full power of Claude Code directly in Xcode"

                        "Developers using Claude Code can integrate with Xcode over MCP and capture visual Previews without leaving the CLI."

                        Link Preview Image
                        Agent SDK overview

                        Build production AI agents with Claude Code as a library

                        favicon

                        Claude API Docs (platform.claude.com)

                        "The Claude Code SDK has been renamed to the Claude Agent SDK"

                        huh!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • atpfm@mastodon.socialA atpfm@mastodon.social

                          677: I Accept the Battery Cost
                          https://atp.fm/677

                          If you really don’t like AI, we have some bad news for you.

                          benmattison@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                          benmattison@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                          benmattison@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #94

                          @atpfm Re the aftershow: this Yale working paper suggests that Elon's politics have cost Tesla more than 1 million sales: https://www.nber.org/papers/w34413

                          ahltorp@mastodon.nuA 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • atpfm@mastodon.socialA atpfm@mastodon.social

                            677: I Accept the Battery Cost
                            https://atp.fm/677

                            If you really don’t like AI, we have some bad news for you.

                            eugenekim@mastodon.worldE This user is from outside of this forum
                            eugenekim@mastodon.worldE This user is from outside of this forum
                            eugenekim@mastodon.world
                            wrote last edited by
                            #95

                            @atpfm I heard your thoughts about Apple’s AI pin recording meetings and instantly thought of corporate IT. No way in hell are they allowing that without enterprise control and we all know how well Apple does enterprise tools. Just see all the consent messages from Zoom and Teams for recording to follow recording laws. And without the workplace use case, it seems that tech companies want and need the pin more than users do, just one more avenue to slop up data.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • atpfm@mastodon.socialA atpfm@mastodon.social

                              677: I Accept the Battery Cost
                              https://atp.fm/677

                              If you really don’t like AI, we have some bad news for you.

                              ifix@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                              ifix@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                              ifix@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #96

                              @atpfm I guess you've already seen this... https://eletric-vehicles.com/waymo/waymo-exec-admits-remote-operators-in-philippines-help-guide-us-robotaxis/

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • techremarker@mastodon.socialT techremarker@mastodon.social

                                @atpfm Waze interface while the tiles are dated, as more Applely notably in CarPlay where most will interact with it. Google interface is still very much Android. So I still find myself jumping between the three. Hopefully eventually all traffic incidents from Waze show up in Google, and the UI gets a bit more refined, then could see myself using that fully even if far less enjoyable than Apple Maps, the other benefits would probably make it worth it.

                                techremarker@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                techremarker@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                techremarker@mastodon.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #97

                                @atpfm Also went back and forth between Chrome and Safari over the years as hate filling out a long form only for it to fail in Safari and have to start all over. Disabling content blockers went things break or ordering helps a lot but often things still didn’t work. Eventually discovered turning off additional advanced privacy features in Safari settings has made the vast majority of sites work like chrome. But now losing out on privacy as can’t disable that on just select sites.

                                techremarker@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • techremarker@mastodon.socialT techremarker@mastodon.social

                                  @atpfm Also went back and forth between Chrome and Safari over the years as hate filling out a long form only for it to fail in Safari and have to start all over. Disabling content blockers went things break or ordering helps a lot but often things still didn’t work. Eventually discovered turning off additional advanced privacy features in Safari settings has made the vast majority of sites work like chrome. But now losing out on privacy as can’t disable that on just select sites.

                                  techremarker@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  techremarker@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  techremarker@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #98

                                  @atpfm and still the occasional time might need chrome if doing an advanced web app like Figma. Have noticed for long time safari was slower loading where second or so loading before anything shows unlike chrome that was instant. Finally did digging and discovered it was 1Blocker. With that off the sites load instantly and workbench test tools show Safari even faster than chrome. It makes sense having to block things before loading page would slow it down. So switched to off by default.

                                  techremarker@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • techremarker@mastodon.socialT techremarker@mastodon.social

                                    @atpfm and still the occasional time might need chrome if doing an advanced web app like Figma. Have noticed for long time safari was slower loading where second or so loading before anything shows unlike chrome that was instant. Finally did digging and discovered it was 1Blocker. With that off the sites load instantly and workbench test tools show Safari even faster than chrome. It makes sense having to block things before loading page would slow it down. So switched to off by default.

                                    techremarker@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    techremarker@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    techremarker@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #99

                                    @atpfm and turn on for select ad heavy sites like new sites and working great now. With Chrome you get text 2fa autofill but most sites you don’t get native Apple Pay even though technically sites can now add support. So it’s a hassle. No mobile sync is major. Chromes adblockers are very limited. It’s ugly if prefer apples design language. Chromes web inspector less pretty but much better. And you don’t get captchas all the time and many more extensions. But still Safari here for now.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • ahltorp@mastodon.nuA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ahltorp@mastodon.nuA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ahltorp@mastodon.nu
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #100

                                      @cgWerks @vmachiel @siracusa On the contrary, reducing energy use is crucial.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • benmattison@mastodon.socialB benmattison@mastodon.social

                                        @atpfm Re the aftershow: this Yale working paper suggests that Elon's politics have cost Tesla more than 1 million sales: https://www.nber.org/papers/w34413

                                        ahltorp@mastodon.nuA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        ahltorp@mastodon.nuA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        ahltorp@mastodon.nu
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #101

                                        @benmattison @atpfm We’ve also known for at least 12 years that Elon was a fraudster when he started pushing Hyperloop to distract from trains, so this whole ”he was different ten years ago” is a bit tiresome.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • marcoshuerta@vmst.ioM marcoshuerta@vmst.io

                                          @siracusa Claude Code like products are one of the most token-intensive applications since massive chunks of code (and essays) are being sent into the context window over and over. That makes profitability even harder - Anthropic started charging Cursor more and Cursor had to raise prices. (and both still lose money!)

                                          davidanson@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          davidanson@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          davidanson@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #102

                                          @marcoshuerta @siracusa I’m glad to see someone raising this point. 🙂 It feels like everyone is having the conversation based on CURRENT pricing instead of the much higher pricing that seems necessary to break even. The point about Uber’s strategy is good, but misses important things: Uber is a viable end to end solution in a way that AI is not (even zealots acknowledge huge gaps) and Uber does not have overwhelming *ongoing* infrastructure costs for regular hardware upgrades and model updates.

                                          marcoshuerta@vmst.ioM 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups