Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. 677: I Accept the Battery Costhttps://atp.fm/677

677: I Accept the Battery Costhttps://atp.fm/677

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
103 Posts 43 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • techremarker@mastodon.socialT techremarker@mastodon.social

    @atpfm Google Maps however is much worse than Waze for incident reports, aka for speed traps, items in the road, etc. Over the years the teams merged, and Google Maps in theory got more of that, but when testing both side by side Waze continues to report drastically more in this has always been the biggest benefit of Waze. Apple Maps interface blows both away for an Apple user, but as you noted lacks the data Google has.

    techremarker@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
    techremarker@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
    techremarker@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #46

    @atpfm Waze interface while the tiles are dated, as more Applely notably in CarPlay where most will interact with it. Google interface is still very much Android. So I still find myself jumping between the three. Hopefully eventually all traffic incidents from Waze show up in Google, and the UI gets a bit more refined, then could see myself using that fully even if far less enjoyable than Apple Maps, the other benefits would probably make it worth it.

    secundus@mastodon.socialS techremarker@mastodon.socialT 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • marcoshuerta@vmst.ioM marcoshuerta@vmst.io

      @atpfm I'm not sure we are thinking through the long term impacts of "agentic" AI writing software.

      None of these tools make money: Claude Code loses money at $20/month and $100/month. What happens when they start charging what it takes to show a profit margin?

      I think these tools work when used by otherwise experienced programmers - there's a big risk that it leads to fewer good software engineers and then we have a lot of obtuse machine written code (often written in a language that the writer of claude.md may not know).

      it's all fine for a low stakes dashboard, it seems fraught for production.

      siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      siracusa@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #47

      @marcoshuerta I agree with all of this! Uber is a similar recent example: "Lose money until we've destroyed enough of the existing market that we can start charging higher prices and customers have nowhere left to turn."

      The relative timing of the bubble-pop (or even more mild "consolidation") vs. the rate at which these tools improve and we learn how to use them well will probably make a big difference in how this goes.

      marcoshuerta@vmst.ioM 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • vmachiel@mastodon.nlV vmachiel@mastodon.nl

        @siracusa i do not like the comparison with electricity etc i must say.. those provide huge benefits for everyone. AI uses so much power and stolen material to provide benefits for a relatively small group of the population. Electricity made us all beter and more equal, AI is making it worse.

        siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
        siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
        siracusa@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #48

        @vmachiel I think your opinion of electricity would have been very similar to your opinion of AI had you lived during its dawn! Electricity initially "provided benefits for a relatively small group of the population" while its generation poisoned the air and polluted the water, all of which affected the masses way more than the elites. Oh, and eventually…climate change.

        vmachiel@mastodon.nlV 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • siracusa@mastodon.socialS siracusa@mastodon.social

          @vmachiel I think your opinion of electricity would have been very similar to your opinion of AI had you lived during its dawn! Electricity initially "provided benefits for a relatively small group of the population" while its generation poisoned the air and polluted the water, all of which affected the masses way more than the elites. Oh, and eventually…climate change.

          vmachiel@mastodon.nlV This user is from outside of this forum
          vmachiel@mastodon.nlV This user is from outside of this forum
          vmachiel@mastodon.nl
          wrote last edited by
          #49

          @siracusa but adding AI on top of our current energy needs is just irresponsible. At this point. Even without AI we are damaging the planet beyond repair. We are burning to planet to generate fake narratives.

          Plus we didn’t steal everyone’s stuff to make electricity. And electricity doesn’t lie.

          AI is a curiousity, not a necessity for a decent life like electricity is. You want to use it, but the whole ethical justification is flimsy. And AI is not inevitable

          siracusa@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • vmachiel@mastodon.nlV vmachiel@mastodon.nl

            @siracusa but adding AI on top of our current energy needs is just irresponsible. At this point. Even without AI we are damaging the planet beyond repair. We are burning to planet to generate fake narratives.

            Plus we didn’t steal everyone’s stuff to make electricity. And electricity doesn’t lie.

            AI is a curiousity, not a necessity for a decent life like electricity is. You want to use it, but the whole ethical justification is flimsy. And AI is not inevitable

            siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
            siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
            siracusa@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #50

            @vmachiel Electricity was also initially seen as "a curiosity, not a necessity." It was also not seen by everyone as "inevitable." Hindsight is 20/20.

            As for "stealing," we have many precedents, both good and bad, in this area, from the printing press to player pianos to VCRs to fonts to APIs. Sometimes we come up with a pretty OK system, and sometimes we end up making things worse. But the basic questions of ownership and compensation in the face of new tech is very old and recurring.

            siracusa@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • siracusa@mastodon.socialS siracusa@mastodon.social

              @vmachiel Electricity was also initially seen as "a curiosity, not a necessity." It was also not seen by everyone as "inevitable." Hindsight is 20/20.

              As for "stealing," we have many precedents, both good and bad, in this area, from the printing press to player pianos to VCRs to fonts to APIs. Sometimes we come up with a pretty OK system, and sometimes we end up making things worse. But the basic questions of ownership and compensation in the face of new tech is very old and recurring.

              siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
              siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
              siracusa@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #51

              @vmachiel And as for the environmental impact of AI's energy usage, despite the fact that it is somewhat overblown as a percentage of total human energy use, it surely will be a short-term problem. And I'd argue that crypto mining (a much more clearcut case of harm with little practical use) shows we are not good at dealing with things like this. But advances in *other* tech (renewable energy) does give me some hope.

              vmachiel@mastodon.nlV secundus@mastodon.socialS 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • siracusa@mastodon.socialS siracusa@mastodon.social

                @vmachiel And as for the environmental impact of AI's energy usage, despite the fact that it is somewhat overblown as a percentage of total human energy use, it surely will be a short-term problem. And I'd argue that crypto mining (a much more clearcut case of harm with little practical use) shows we are not good at dealing with things like this. But advances in *other* tech (renewable energy) does give me some hope.

                vmachiel@mastodon.nlV This user is from outside of this forum
                vmachiel@mastodon.nlV This user is from outside of this forum
                vmachiel@mastodon.nl
                wrote last edited by
                #52

                @siracusa I just wish we spend those energy gains on useful stuff, not making fake videos to mislead boomers 🙁

                siracusa@mastodon.socialS secundus@mastodon.socialS 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • vmachiel@mastodon.nlV vmachiel@mastodon.nl

                  @siracusa I just wish we spend those energy gains on useful stuff, not making fake videos to mislead boomers 🙁

                  siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  siracusa@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #53

                  @vmachiel Oh, and as for things stolen for electricity specifically, we stole a ton stuff for the resources used to generate power: people’s land, resources, freedom, and lives!

                  vmachiel@mastodon.nlV 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • siracusa@mastodon.socialS siracusa@mastodon.social

                    @vmachiel Oh, and as for things stolen for electricity specifically, we stole a ton stuff for the resources used to generate power: people’s land, resources, freedom, and lives!

                    vmachiel@mastodon.nlV This user is from outside of this forum
                    vmachiel@mastodon.nlV This user is from outside of this forum
                    vmachiel@mastodon.nl
                    wrote last edited by
                    #54

                    @siracusa all this is true.. and it doesn’t excuse anything about AI imo. Just because it was true for electricity, doesn’t mean we should just plow ahead with AI…

                    siracusa@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • techremarker@mastodon.socialT techremarker@mastodon.social

                      @atpfm Waze interface while the tiles are dated, as more Applely notably in CarPlay where most will interact with it. Google interface is still very much Android. So I still find myself jumping between the three. Hopefully eventually all traffic incidents from Waze show up in Google, and the UI gets a bit more refined, then could see myself using that fully even if far less enjoyable than Apple Maps, the other benefits would probably make it worth it.

                      secundus@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                      secundus@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                      secundus@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #55

                      @TechRemarker @atpfm I’d love for Google Maps to be able to take over the Home Screen the way Apple Maps does. This would be especially helpful for navigation on foot or by bicycle. Aside from a nicer UI and better system integration, that’s probably the only reason I still try Apple Maps from time to time.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • vmachiel@mastodon.nlV vmachiel@mastodon.nl

                        @siracusa all this is true.. and it doesn’t excuse anything about AI imo. Just because it was true for electricity, doesn’t mean we should just plow ahead with AI…

                        siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                        siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                        siracusa@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #56

                        @vmachiel Like electricity, AI will (eventually) live or die based on the ratio of its usefulness to its harm. Crypto mining lives on because it’s useful for crime and blackmail and speculation, but it seems like it will never reach the mass market in the way that, say, smartphones have.

                        I think AI is already more useful than crypto, and it also has a much better use-to-harm ratio. Your opinion depends on your own estimate of those use and harm values.

                        niekvdpas@hachyderm.ioN 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • techremarker@mastodon.socialT techremarker@mastodon.social

                          @atpfm Waze interface while the tiles are dated, as more Applely notably in CarPlay where most will interact with it. Google interface is still very much Android. So I still find myself jumping between the three. Hopefully eventually all traffic incidents from Waze show up in Google, and the UI gets a bit more refined, then could see myself using that fully even if far less enjoyable than Apple Maps, the other benefits would probably make it worth it.

                          secundus@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                          secundus@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                          secundus@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #57

                          @TechRemarker @atpfm That being said, since Google added support for Live Activities and implemented “getting directions without starting navigation,” I think they’ve out-Apple’d Apple in terms of convenience and ease of use for both walking and cycling navigation. Which, admittedly, is probably an edge case for many Americans.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • vmachiel@mastodon.nlV vmachiel@mastodon.nl

                            @siracusa I just wish we spend those energy gains on useful stuff, not making fake videos to mislead boomers 🙁

                            secundus@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                            secundus@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                            secundus@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #58

                            @vmachiel @siracusa AI is already tremendously useful for a large number of people. Yes, there are many concrete and hypothetical drawbacks, but even if none of the promised upsides ever materialize and even if models never improve beyond today’s level – it is still immensely useful. Collapsing all of that into “useless” is simply not true.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • atpfm@mastodon.socialA atpfm@mastodon.social

                              677: I Accept the Battery Cost
                              https://atp.fm/677

                              If you really don’t like AI, we have some bad news for you.

                              pfernandes@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                              pfernandes@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                              pfernandes@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #59

                              @atpfm Not looking good. @marcoarment turning to the dark side. What happened to "Think different”?
                              @Casey having a meltdown against the rest of the world, and we are losing @siracusa to the Borg…

                              marcoarment@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • siracusa@mastodon.socialS siracusa@mastodon.social

                                @vmachiel And as for the environmental impact of AI's energy usage, despite the fact that it is somewhat overblown as a percentage of total human energy use, it surely will be a short-term problem. And I'd argue that crypto mining (a much more clearcut case of harm with little practical use) shows we are not good at dealing with things like this. But advances in *other* tech (renewable energy) does give me some hope.

                                secundus@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                secundus@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                secundus@mastodon.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #60

                                @siracusa @vmachiel Energy usage is also often overstated. Nobody is arguing that AI does not consume energy, or that aggregate demand does not add up. But this has to be evaluated in relation to the use and that it is spread across hundreds of millions of users. When broken down per individual and compared with what a typical Western European or American uses energy for, AI usage is negligible.

                                niekvdpas@hachyderm.ioN 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • pfernandes@mastodon.socialP pfernandes@mastodon.social

                                  @atpfm Not looking good. @marcoarment turning to the dark side. What happened to "Think different”?
                                  @Casey having a meltdown against the rest of the world, and we are losing @siracusa to the Borg…

                                  marcoarment@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  marcoarment@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  marcoarment@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #61

                                  @pfernandes @atpfm @Casey @siracusa I think at this point, reevaluating some non-Apple options after years of using Apple's offerings nearly exclusively IS ”thinking different”.

                                  pfernandes@mastodon.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • marcoarment@mastodon.socialM marcoarment@mastodon.social

                                    @pfernandes @atpfm @Casey @siracusa I think at this point, reevaluating some non-Apple options after years of using Apple's offerings nearly exclusively IS ”thinking different”.

                                    pfernandes@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    pfernandes@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    pfernandes@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #62

                                    @marcoarment @atpfm @Casey @siracusa

                                    Very strong, the dark side it is…

                                    Chrome has 70% market share 😬

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • lordsplodge@brettspiel.spaceL lordsplodge@brettspiel.space

                                      @atpfm The bad news about so-called AI (and LLMs aren’t really AI) is already known. From the real bad things like pollution of people’s air, and loss of water, through job loses, stolen data, right down to pure greed causing the RAM apocalypse.

                                      It can write some code or can hallucinate some plausible answers doesn’t counter the damage done.

                                      usbtypesteve@infosec.exchangeU This user is from outside of this forum
                                      usbtypesteve@infosec.exchangeU This user is from outside of this forum
                                      usbtypesteve@infosec.exchange
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #63

                                      @lordsplodge @atpfm Honestly same. We're about to enter the world's first water crisis due to AI. To use it is completely amoral, and to encourage it is just....disappointing. We should be moving away from AI and treating it like the fad that it is, relegated to the likes of NFTs and crypto. Nobody should be embracing it. Not to mention it severely impacts intelligence and mental health. We've already seen people literally stop working due to a Claude code outage - you really want everyone to get dumber due to AI? Go ahead I guess...

                                      siracusa@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • usbtypesteve@infosec.exchangeU usbtypesteve@infosec.exchange

                                        @lordsplodge @atpfm Honestly same. We're about to enter the world's first water crisis due to AI. To use it is completely amoral, and to encourage it is just....disappointing. We should be moving away from AI and treating it like the fad that it is, relegated to the likes of NFTs and crypto. Nobody should be embracing it. Not to mention it severely impacts intelligence and mental health. We've already seen people literally stop working due to a Claude code outage - you really want everyone to get dumber due to AI? Go ahead I guess...

                                        siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        siracusa@mastodon.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #64

                                        @USBTypeSTeve Estimating AI water usage is not straightforward https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_c6MWk7PQc But if/when we do enter a "water crisis" (really the "world's first"?) I'm currently inclined to blame climate change (and politics) rather than AI.

                                        jramskov@helvede.netJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • atpfm@mastodon.socialA atpfm@mastodon.social

                                          677: I Accept the Battery Cost
                                          https://atp.fm/677

                                          If you really don’t like AI, we have some bad news for you.

                                          mtz_federico@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          mtz_federico@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          mtz_federico@hachyderm.io
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #65

                                          @atpfm The argument that because Celsius has decimal units it already lost is not bery good, come on. Pretty much nobody uses decimal units when measuring air temperature because it doesn’t make sense. We cannot feel the difference and it is going to be different in another side of the same room anyway. The thermostats that let you set half units are likely converting to Fahrenheit.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups