Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. 677: I Accept the Battery Costhttps://atp.fm/677

677: I Accept the Battery Costhttps://atp.fm/677

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
103 Posts 43 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon@det.socialJ jon@det.social

    @atpfm @caseyliss your snowpocalypse stories seem to suggest that you do in fact care very much about the freezing temperature of water outside, Casey 😉

    caseyliss@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
    caseyliss@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
    caseyliss@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #11

    @jon 🤣🤣

    this is just about the only pro-Celsius argument I’ve heard that wasn’t utter bullshit

    sayrer@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • atpfm@mastodon.socialA atpfm@mastodon.social

      677: I Accept the Battery Cost
      https://atp.fm/677

      If you really don’t like AI, we have some bad news for you.

      mpbarlow@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
      mpbarlow@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
      mpbarlow@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #12

      @atpfm The AI ethics section hurt to listen to.
      The industrial revolution example: that may yet lead to the end of habitability for large parts of our planet. The negative externalities affecting people right now are presumably not affecting you all that much yet. “There are huge downsides yes, but we need it for our work” does not feel like an ethical argument when you are well-respected folks with an audience, and when these companies have done absolutely nothing in good faith. I’m sorry.

      siracusa@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • siracusa@mastodon.socialS siracusa@mastodon.social

        @vmachiel Many people do think about it, including me! And we all should.

        colman@mastodon.ieC This user is from outside of this forum
        colman@mastodon.ieC This user is from outside of this forum
        colman@mastodon.ie
        wrote last edited by
        #13

        @siracusa @vmachiel and yet they (and you) will manage to rationalise using it.

        siracusa@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • bnys@lasersword.clubB This user is from outside of this forum
          bnys@lasersword.clubB This user is from outside of this forum
          bnys@lasersword.club
          wrote last edited by
          #14

          @DanEngler @atpfm

          well on one hand we have a coming financial collapse, mass layoffs, and an ecological disaster cheered on by and enriching the most deranged lunatics in the world.

          but at least llms write fantastic, creative code that saves time and is verifiably more secure, and they don't burn dumpsters of money doing a middling job at most things. seems like everyone is just making a mountain out of a mole hill 🤷

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • atpfm@mastodon.socialA atpfm@mastodon.social

            677: I Accept the Battery Cost
            https://atp.fm/677

            If you really don’t like AI, we have some bad news for you.

            V This user is from outside of this forum
            V This user is from outside of this forum
            v600@mastodon.au
            wrote last edited by
            #15

            @atpfm I propose the following one true conversion system.

            1 mile = 1.5km
            1 lb = 0.5kg (always round down to the nearest significant digit) i.e. both 20 and 21lb = 10kg, 350lb = 170kg
            75f = 25c (minus 25 and divide by 2 - always round down. 80f also = 25c. Minutes 30 for oven temperature)

            avakining@hachyderm.ioA 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mpbarlow@mastodon.socialM mpbarlow@mastodon.social

              @atpfm The AI ethics section hurt to listen to.
              The industrial revolution example: that may yet lead to the end of habitability for large parts of our planet. The negative externalities affecting people right now are presumably not affecting you all that much yet. “There are huge downsides yes, but we need it for our work” does not feel like an ethical argument when you are well-respected folks with an audience, and when these companies have done absolutely nothing in good faith. I’m sorry.

              siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
              siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
              siracusa@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #16

              @mpbarlow I think I made all the points you mentioned regarding the industrial revolution on the show. Presumably you also use electricity, manufactured products, etc., despite climate change and other ongoing negative externalities. There's no ethical consumption under capitalism.

              avakining@hachyderm.ioA mpbarlow@mastodon.socialM freediverx@mastodon.socialF 3 Replies Last reply
              0
              • siracusa@mastodon.socialS siracusa@mastodon.social

                @mpbarlow I think I made all the points you mentioned regarding the industrial revolution on the show. Presumably you also use electricity, manufactured products, etc., despite climate change and other ongoing negative externalities. There's no ethical consumption under capitalism.

                avakining@hachyderm.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
                avakining@hachyderm.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
                avakining@hachyderm.io
                wrote last edited by
                #17

                @siracusa @mpbarlow There’s still less-unethical consumption.

                There’s a reason the order is reduce, *then* reuse, *then* recycle. Not creating demand or wastage when it’s not needed is better than just giving up/in.

                siracusa@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • colman@mastodon.ieC colman@mastodon.ie

                  @siracusa @vmachiel and yet they (and you) will manage to rationalise using it.

                  siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  siracusa@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #18

                  @Colman So will you, and everyone else, eventually—for better AND for worse. (See also: electricity, automobiles, modern agriculture, manufactured goods of all kinds, etc.)

                  colman@mastodon.ieC vmachiel@mastodon.nlV 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • V v600@mastodon.au

                    @atpfm I propose the following one true conversion system.

                    1 mile = 1.5km
                    1 lb = 0.5kg (always round down to the nearest significant digit) i.e. both 20 and 21lb = 10kg, 350lb = 170kg
                    75f = 25c (minus 25 and divide by 2 - always round down. 80f also = 25c. Minutes 30 for oven temperature)

                    avakining@hachyderm.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
                    avakining@hachyderm.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
                    avakining@hachyderm.io
                    wrote last edited by
                    #19

                    @v600 @atpfm I mean for miles to kilometres, you just multiply by the golden ratio (or take the next Fibonacci number, so 5 miles ≈ 8 km; 13 mi ≈ 21 km)

                    V 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • avakining@hachyderm.ioA avakining@hachyderm.io

                      @siracusa @mpbarlow There’s still less-unethical consumption.

                      There’s a reason the order is reduce, *then* reuse, *then* recycle. Not creating demand or wastage when it’s not needed is better than just giving up/in.

                      siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                      siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                      siracusa@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #20

                      @avakining @mpbarlow I'm not giving up!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • siracusa@mastodon.socialS siracusa@mastodon.social

                        @mpbarlow I think I made all the points you mentioned regarding the industrial revolution on the show. Presumably you also use electricity, manufactured products, etc., despite climate change and other ongoing negative externalities. There's no ethical consumption under capitalism.

                        mpbarlow@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mpbarlow@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mpbarlow@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #21

                        @siracusa I do, but I was born a hundred+ years after those things became an essential part of life.

                        AI’s not there yet, and I don’t fancy helping it along the way when the people pushing it have neither a plan nor a care to address the problems they openly talk about causing.

                        I realise I’m being hopelessly naive. I’m just sick of the rich getting richer and the rest of us always having to deal with the fallout.

                        Anyway, I’ll stop now. Thanks for continuing to make my favourite podcast.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                          siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                          siracusa@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #22

                          @jamesnvc @mpbarlow It's barely a choice now, and will be less so as time goes on. (Do you know how many LLMs are active and doing work for you when you use software products and services today? How could you?)

                          Also, "LLMs" are not inherently immoral or evil. Using, say, image generation in Photoshop using an Adobe model trained exclusively on licensed data is very different than, say, creating nonconsensual sexual abuse material with Grok.

                          jamesnvc@social.occasionallycogent.comJ freediverx@mastodon.socialF 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • avakining@hachyderm.ioA avakining@hachyderm.io

                            @v600 @atpfm I mean for miles to kilometres, you just multiply by the golden ratio (or take the next Fibonacci number, so 5 miles ≈ 8 km; 13 mi ≈ 21 km)

                            V This user is from outside of this forum
                            V This user is from outside of this forum
                            v600@mastodon.au
                            wrote last edited by
                            #23

                            @avakining @atpfm I never knew the golden ratio was exactly 1.5 🤯 you learn something new every day

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • atpfm@mastodon.socialA atpfm@mastodon.social

                              677: I Accept the Battery Cost
                              https://atp.fm/677

                              If you really don’t like AI, we have some bad news for you.

                              fds@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                              fds@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                              fds@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #24

                              @atpfm Always her for team fahrenheit. 🌡️

                              It's good to use the browser that works best for you so not shame there. I'm forced to use Chrome at work and I use Safari at home. I would say my experience is largely the opposite.

                              However, I’m using content blockers. Is it a slight cheat removing the problem? Maybe, but I wouldn't call the Chrome experience on an ad heavy website great but even if was, so much of the web is ugly and hard to read with the ads. I just would choose to avoid the web tbh

                              jramskov@helvede.netJ 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • siracusa@mastodon.socialS siracusa@mastodon.social

                                @jamesnvc @mpbarlow It's barely a choice now, and will be less so as time goes on. (Do you know how many LLMs are active and doing work for you when you use software products and services today? How could you?)

                                Also, "LLMs" are not inherently immoral or evil. Using, say, image generation in Photoshop using an Adobe model trained exclusively on licensed data is very different than, say, creating nonconsensual sexual abuse material with Grok.

                                jamesnvc@social.occasionallycogent.comJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                jamesnvc@social.occasionallycogent.comJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                jamesnvc@social.occasionallycogent.com
                                wrote last edited by
                                #25

                                @siracusa @mpbarlow I respectfully disagree, both that it is “barely a choice now”, as well as that believing the choice will decline in the future is a reason to “comply in advance”.

                                I am also not claiming that they are “inherently” immoral, but I’m talking about all the specific instances that are really being used now, which I’d argue largely are.

                                siracusa@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • siracusa@mastodon.socialS siracusa@mastodon.social

                                  @mpbarlow I think I made all the points you mentioned regarding the industrial revolution on the show. Presumably you also use electricity, manufactured products, etc., despite climate change and other ongoing negative externalities. There's no ethical consumption under capitalism.

                                  freediverx@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                  freediverx@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                  freediverx@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #26

                                  @siracusa @mpbarlow

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • siracusa@mastodon.socialS siracusa@mastodon.social

                                    @jamesnvc @mpbarlow It's barely a choice now, and will be less so as time goes on. (Do you know how many LLMs are active and doing work for you when you use software products and services today? How could you?)

                                    Also, "LLMs" are not inherently immoral or evil. Using, say, image generation in Photoshop using an Adobe model trained exclusively on licensed data is very different than, say, creating nonconsensual sexual abuse material with Grok.

                                    freediverx@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    freediverx@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    freediverx@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #27

                                    @siracusa @jamesnvc @mpbarlow
                                    I think for most of us here, when we say we're opposed to “AI” we're not referring to its use where appropriate and useful (e.g. computational photography, etc.) but to the way it's being hyped up to maintain the stock market valuation bubble and to destroy countless jobs that it can't effectively replace—not to mention how it will lead to AI slop destroying the web.

                                    As with industrialization, the main issue is not the tech, but how its benefits are distributed.

                                    siracusa@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • freediverx@mastodon.socialF freediverx@mastodon.social

                                      @siracusa @jamesnvc @mpbarlow
                                      I think for most of us here, when we say we're opposed to “AI” we're not referring to its use where appropriate and useful (e.g. computational photography, etc.) but to the way it's being hyped up to maintain the stock market valuation bubble and to destroy countless jobs that it can't effectively replace—not to mention how it will lead to AI slop destroying the web.

                                      As with industrialization, the main issue is not the tech, but how its benefits are distributed.

                                      siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      siracusa@mastodon.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #28

                                      @freediverx I wouldn’t be so sure you have your finger on the pulse of “most” of anyone. A lot of people object to a lot more than that when it comes to AI!

                                      freediverx@mastodon.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • jamesnvc@social.occasionallycogent.comJ jamesnvc@social.occasionallycogent.com

                                        @siracusa @mpbarlow I respectfully disagree, both that it is “barely a choice now”, as well as that believing the choice will decline in the future is a reason to “comply in advance”.

                                        I am also not claiming that they are “inherently” immoral, but I’m talking about all the specific instances that are really being used now, which I’d argue largely are.

                                        siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        siracusa@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        siracusa@mastodon.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #29

                                        @jamesnvc The only “compliance” required will be your continued use of technology products and services. Even today, there are few tech products and services that are not using ethically dubious LLMs without your knowledge or consent. That’s why I say “barely a choice” today.

                                        niekvdpas@hachyderm.ioN 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • siracusa@mastodon.socialS siracusa@mastodon.social

                                          @freediverx I wouldn’t be so sure you have your finger on the pulse of “most” of anyone. A lot of people object to a lot more than that when it comes to AI!

                                          freediverx@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                          freediverx@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                          freediverx@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #30

                                          @siracusa
                                          Fair enough. Wouldn't be the first time I had mistaken assumptions about how “most" people think, lol.

                                          I can't find it now but I recently saw the perfect meme showing robots inside an apartment building creating music and art while the humans outside were collecting garbage and performing other less desirable jobs.

                                          We were promised The Jetsons but capital had something else in mind.

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups