Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. So am I getting this right?

So am I getting this right?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
12 Posts 9 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
    tante@tldr.nettime.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
    tante@tldr.nettime.org
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    So am I getting this right? The guy who vibecoded an insecure, expensive, worse version of IFTTT with delusions of grandeur ("OpenClaw") is now claiming that he'll solve the problem of "prompt injections" at OpenAI?

    My man, you are you out of your depth, it's not even funny.

    endolexi@social.vivaldi.netE koantig@mamot.frK androcat@toot.catA anderslund@expressional.socialA holgertdittmann@ruhr.socialH 7 Replies Last reply
    0
    • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

      So am I getting this right? The guy who vibecoded an insecure, expensive, worse version of IFTTT with delusions of grandeur ("OpenClaw") is now claiming that he'll solve the problem of "prompt injections" at OpenAI?

      My man, you are you out of your depth, it's not even funny.

      endolexi@social.vivaldi.netE This user is from outside of this forum
      endolexi@social.vivaldi.netE This user is from outside of this forum
      endolexi@social.vivaldi.net
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @tante I suppose vibecoders need to believe they can vibecode themselves out of every trouble they've vibecoded themselves into

      tante@tldr.nettime.orgT 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

        So am I getting this right? The guy who vibecoded an insecure, expensive, worse version of IFTTT with delusions of grandeur ("OpenClaw") is now claiming that he'll solve the problem of "prompt injections" at OpenAI?

        My man, you are you out of your depth, it's not even funny.

        koantig@mamot.frK This user is from outside of this forum
        koantig@mamot.frK This user is from outside of this forum
        koantig@mamot.fr
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @tante My bet is that he's going to add "Don't fall for prompt injections" in the prompt. That's it, that's the strategy.

        (that'll go right after: "Don't hallucinate")

        endolexi@social.vivaldi.netE 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • endolexi@social.vivaldi.netE endolexi@social.vivaldi.net

          @tante I suppose vibecoders need to believe they can vibecode themselves out of every trouble they've vibecoded themselves into

          tante@tldr.nettime.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
          tante@tldr.nettime.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
          tante@tldr.nettime.org
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @endolexi it really is delusional

          semaphor@sunny.gardenS 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • koantig@mamot.frK koantig@mamot.fr

            @tante My bet is that he's going to add "Don't fall for prompt injections" in the prompt. That's it, that's the strategy.

            (that'll go right after: "Don't hallucinate")

            endolexi@social.vivaldi.netE This user is from outside of this forum
            endolexi@social.vivaldi.netE This user is from outside of this forum
            endolexi@social.vivaldi.net
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @koantig @tante yes, "communication is everything, and everything is communication, and that means you just have to say what you want and it will come true", say countless bUsiNess aNalySts who've never coded anything in their life, and are overjoyed to learn that now they won't ever have to talk to developers again.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

              So am I getting this right? The guy who vibecoded an insecure, expensive, worse version of IFTTT with delusions of grandeur ("OpenClaw") is now claiming that he'll solve the problem of "prompt injections" at OpenAI?

              My man, you are you out of your depth, it's not even funny.

              androcat@toot.catA This user is from outside of this forum
              androcat@toot.catA This user is from outside of this forum
              androcat@toot.cat
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              @tante Isn't this what OpenAI is all about? Clueless jackasses who talk big and can't think?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                So am I getting this right? The guy who vibecoded an insecure, expensive, worse version of IFTTT with delusions of grandeur ("OpenClaw") is now claiming that he'll solve the problem of "prompt injections" at OpenAI?

                My man, you are you out of your depth, it's not even funny.

                anderslund@expressional.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                anderslund@expressional.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                anderslund@expressional.social
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                @tante somehow that sounds like a brilliant idea. Maybe he could fix some more ai stuff too. 😛

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                  So am I getting this right? The guy who vibecoded an insecure, expensive, worse version of IFTTT with delusions of grandeur ("OpenClaw") is now claiming that he'll solve the problem of "prompt injections" at OpenAI?

                  My man, you are you out of your depth, it's not even funny.

                  holgertdittmann@ruhr.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                  holgertdittmann@ruhr.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                  holgertdittmann@ruhr.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  @tante It‘s like a proof of concept for a homebrew nuclear reactor. It works, should not be used, but he pinkyswears moderators and containment will come in later versions.

                  Meanwhile, use at your own risk.

                  The short interview on ct3003 gave me terrible „mad scientist“ vibes.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                    @endolexi it really is delusional

                    semaphor@sunny.gardenS This user is from outside of this forum
                    semaphor@sunny.gardenS This user is from outside of this forum
                    semaphor@sunny.garden
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    Without words.

                    @tante @endolexi

                    Link Preview Image
                    semaphor@sunny.gardenS 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • semaphor@sunny.gardenS semaphor@sunny.garden

                      Without words.

                      @tante @endolexi

                      Link Preview Image
                      semaphor@sunny.gardenS This user is from outside of this forum
                      semaphor@sunny.gardenS This user is from outside of this forum
                      semaphor@sunny.garden
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      While riding on cannonballs captures the vibe more on the spot 🚀

                      @tante @endolexi

                      Link Preview Image
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                        So am I getting this right? The guy who vibecoded an insecure, expensive, worse version of IFTTT with delusions of grandeur ("OpenClaw") is now claiming that he'll solve the problem of "prompt injections" at OpenAI?

                        My man, you are you out of your depth, it's not even funny.

                        themipper@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                        themipper@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                        themipper@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #11

                        @tante All of this is so completely bonkers to me.

                        Prompt injection is not the problem they say it is.

                        The LLM works exactly like it is supposed to be. It takes a text and outputs another text based on some weights.

                        Prompt injection just highlights the reality they don't want people to see:

                        LLMs cannot think!
                        They cannot really do what is advertised.

                        Any output that works "in the context of your input" is pure luck.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                          So am I getting this right? The guy who vibecoded an insecure, expensive, worse version of IFTTT with delusions of grandeur ("OpenClaw") is now claiming that he'll solve the problem of "prompt injections" at OpenAI?

                          My man, you are you out of your depth, it's not even funny.

                          joriki@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          joriki@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          joriki@infosec.exchange
                          wrote last edited by
                          #12

                          @tante

                          I read it as dedication to the bit: pretending that genAI is a normal technology with plausible cost/benefit following well-known patterns of innovation by smaller players and acquisition by larger players

                          the salary is probably a marketing expense

                          and right now some number of rubes are ramping up their u$age thinking they're going to be acqui-hired too

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          0
                          • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups