Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. So am I getting this right?

So am I getting this right?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
12 Posts 9 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

    So am I getting this right? The guy who vibecoded an insecure, expensive, worse version of IFTTT with delusions of grandeur ("OpenClaw") is now claiming that he'll solve the problem of "prompt injections" at OpenAI?

    My man, you are you out of your depth, it's not even funny.

    koantig@mamot.frK This user is from outside of this forum
    koantig@mamot.frK This user is from outside of this forum
    koantig@mamot.fr
    wrote last edited by
    #3

    @tante My bet is that he's going to add "Don't fall for prompt injections" in the prompt. That's it, that's the strategy.

    (that'll go right after: "Don't hallucinate")

    endolexi@social.vivaldi.netE 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • endolexi@social.vivaldi.netE endolexi@social.vivaldi.net

      @tante I suppose vibecoders need to believe they can vibecode themselves out of every trouble they've vibecoded themselves into

      tante@tldr.nettime.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
      tante@tldr.nettime.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
      tante@tldr.nettime.org
      wrote last edited by
      #4

      @endolexi it really is delusional

      semaphor@sunny.gardenS 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • koantig@mamot.frK koantig@mamot.fr

        @tante My bet is that he's going to add "Don't fall for prompt injections" in the prompt. That's it, that's the strategy.

        (that'll go right after: "Don't hallucinate")

        endolexi@social.vivaldi.netE This user is from outside of this forum
        endolexi@social.vivaldi.netE This user is from outside of this forum
        endolexi@social.vivaldi.net
        wrote last edited by
        #5

        @koantig @tante yes, "communication is everything, and everything is communication, and that means you just have to say what you want and it will come true", say countless bUsiNess aNalySts who've never coded anything in their life, and are overjoyed to learn that now they won't ever have to talk to developers again.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

          So am I getting this right? The guy who vibecoded an insecure, expensive, worse version of IFTTT with delusions of grandeur ("OpenClaw") is now claiming that he'll solve the problem of "prompt injections" at OpenAI?

          My man, you are you out of your depth, it's not even funny.

          androcat@toot.catA This user is from outside of this forum
          androcat@toot.catA This user is from outside of this forum
          androcat@toot.cat
          wrote last edited by
          #6

          @tante Isn't this what OpenAI is all about? Clueless jackasses who talk big and can't think?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

            So am I getting this right? The guy who vibecoded an insecure, expensive, worse version of IFTTT with delusions of grandeur ("OpenClaw") is now claiming that he'll solve the problem of "prompt injections" at OpenAI?

            My man, you are you out of your depth, it's not even funny.

            anderslund@expressional.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
            anderslund@expressional.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
            anderslund@expressional.social
            wrote last edited by
            #7

            @tante somehow that sounds like a brilliant idea. Maybe he could fix some more ai stuff too. 😛

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

              So am I getting this right? The guy who vibecoded an insecure, expensive, worse version of IFTTT with delusions of grandeur ("OpenClaw") is now claiming that he'll solve the problem of "prompt injections" at OpenAI?

              My man, you are you out of your depth, it's not even funny.

              holgertdittmann@ruhr.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
              holgertdittmann@ruhr.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
              holgertdittmann@ruhr.social
              wrote last edited by
              #8

              @tante It‘s like a proof of concept for a homebrew nuclear reactor. It works, should not be used, but he pinkyswears moderators and containment will come in later versions.

              Meanwhile, use at your own risk.

              The short interview on ct3003 gave me terrible „mad scientist“ vibes.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                @endolexi it really is delusional

                semaphor@sunny.gardenS This user is from outside of this forum
                semaphor@sunny.gardenS This user is from outside of this forum
                semaphor@sunny.garden
                wrote last edited by
                #9

                Without words.

                @tante @endolexi

                Link Preview Image
                semaphor@sunny.gardenS 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • semaphor@sunny.gardenS semaphor@sunny.garden

                  Without words.

                  @tante @endolexi

                  Link Preview Image
                  semaphor@sunny.gardenS This user is from outside of this forum
                  semaphor@sunny.gardenS This user is from outside of this forum
                  semaphor@sunny.garden
                  wrote last edited by
                  #10

                  While riding on cannonballs captures the vibe more on the spot 🚀

                  @tante @endolexi

                  Link Preview Image
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                    So am I getting this right? The guy who vibecoded an insecure, expensive, worse version of IFTTT with delusions of grandeur ("OpenClaw") is now claiming that he'll solve the problem of "prompt injections" at OpenAI?

                    My man, you are you out of your depth, it's not even funny.

                    themipper@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                    themipper@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                    themipper@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #11

                    @tante All of this is so completely bonkers to me.

                    Prompt injection is not the problem they say it is.

                    The LLM works exactly like it is supposed to be. It takes a text and outputs another text based on some weights.

                    Prompt injection just highlights the reality they don't want people to see:

                    LLMs cannot think!
                    They cannot really do what is advertised.

                    Any output that works "in the context of your input" is pure luck.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                      So am I getting this right? The guy who vibecoded an insecure, expensive, worse version of IFTTT with delusions of grandeur ("OpenClaw") is now claiming that he'll solve the problem of "prompt injections" at OpenAI?

                      My man, you are you out of your depth, it's not even funny.

                      joriki@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      joriki@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      joriki@infosec.exchange
                      wrote last edited by
                      #12

                      @tante

                      I read it as dedication to the bit: pretending that genAI is a normal technology with plausible cost/benefit following well-known patterns of innovation by smaller players and acquisition by larger players

                      the salary is probably a marketing expense

                      and right now some number of rubes are ramping up their u$age thinking they're going to be acqui-hired too

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      0
                      • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups