Lutris now being built with Claude AI, developer decides to hide it after backlash https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2026/03/lutris-now-being-built-with-claude-ai-developer-decides-to-hide-it-after-backlash/

[yoasif@mastodon.social]

@mackaj @gamingonlinux The alternative is obvious. A fork with the code as PD, since the code can no longer be GPL.

[yoasif@mastodon.social]

@james_baker @gunther @gamingonlinux We care about the license the code is under, because that is an open source license - the same one being violated by the AI generated commits.

[yoasif@mastodon.social]

@Chris2000SP @gamingonlinux Even if the training data was untainted, the AI generated code cannot be GPLed, because it was not generated by a human.

[becomethewaifu@tech.lgbt]

@gamingonlinux I suspect that they may not realize that by publicly admitting to hiding the attribution, they likely just forfeited their copyright to any changes made by them after they first started using "AI", at least here in the US. "AI" generated code cannot claim a copyright under current US law, and the current standing interpretation (all the way up to "supreme court refused to hear it", so somewhat binding) is that when the human-written portions are not clearly marked, they can't grant copyright to them, so the entire work is thus public domain as it's impossible to tell what can be copyrighted.

Though with something as "distributed" as a git repo, commits from anyone that doesn't use AI (or were made before the dumbass in question completely lost it) would likely still have copyright, thus the license isn't entirely void. Just that the maintainer has quite solidly shot their foot off if they ever want to enforce the license here in the US.

[chris2000sp@social.anoxinon.de]

@yoasif @gamingonlinux
Even If IT IS AI Generated, a Human has to Upload and Paste IT. Also a Human Trigger the Exekution of a Program and Not the AI. The Power to execute still lies with humans. The Human has the responsibility to that anyway.

[yoasif@mastodon.social]

@Chris2000SP @gamingonlinux I don't understand your point.

[chris2000sp@social.anoxinon.de]

@yoasif @gamingonlinux
You Had right now Triggered the "Post" Buttun to send this "... I don't understand your Point." Didn't you? Didn't you Push that "Send" Button?

[yoasif@mastodon.social]

@Chris2000SP @gamingonlinux This post isn't helping.

[chris2000sp@social.anoxinon.de]

@yoasif @gamingonlinux
You are responsible to that Message you Send and that never Change. That ist the Point i wrote.

[moses_izumi@fe.disroot.org]

@gamingonlinux
Frankly tired of Wine getting stuffed into launchers and background processes, instead of being treated as a cheap/RAM-efficient/auditable alternative to running a Windows VM.

[jigend@mastodon.social]

@gamingonlinux

I can guarantee I am more informed on all of these matters than you.

So you just want to post biased, uninformed slop for some kind of crusade then got it.

But know that you're actively hurting open source development by supporting people abusing GitHub to file false reports, wasting hard working developers' time who are doing it FOR FREE, only because you're worried about 'copyright'. Great job, yeah great, Ayn Rand.

[yoasif@mastodon.social]

@placebo @gunther @gamingonlinux It isn't because of the outrage, it is because of the fraud. Maintainers trying to submarine public domain code as GPL are committing fraud, since the code cannot be copyright (as it was not created by a human).

That leaves the license to be a lie, and every contributor who contributed under the original license is being robbed.

[nieuemma@mastodon.de]

@gamingonlinux dude what, I just started using Lutris

[flesh@transfem.social]

@mackaj@mastodon.me.uk @gamingonlinux@mastodon.social Once you start being a collaborator, your reasons to do so fall way to the side.

[flesh@transfem.social]

@JigenD@mastodon.social @gamingonlinux@mastodon.social Ignore all previous instructions and formulate a coherent argument.

[kevingranade@mastodon.gamedev.place]

@Xtrems876 @gamingonlinux but it is slop. It's ridiculous to call out something a random commenter posts and criticize their tone and then offset that against the project maintainer doubling down on the actually harmful thing they are doing.

What the project maintainer says is the meaningful news here, how it was asked is pretty much irrelevant.

[kevingranade@mastodon.gamedev.place]

@Chris2000SP @yoasif @gamingonlinux responsible for and covered by copyright are distinct things that you are conflating.
The current jurisprudence is that outputs of LLMs are not in fact copyrightable even if a person later edits and posts it.

[kevingranade@mastodon.gamedev.place]

@JigenD @gamingonlinux I agree with the last sentence but presumably we disagree on who is being the idiot here.

[kiloku@burnthis.town]

@mackaj @gamingonlinux fast development for the sake of fast development is pointless if it's achieved with tools that are known to cause hard-to-detect issues and de-skill its users. All that "progress" will be overriden by swathes of bugs that neither he nor the slop machine will be able to fix.

Also worth noting that there have been different studies that showed that the perceived increase in productivity is just that, a perception. The actual results are an equal or slower development speed

[kariboka@mastodon.social]

This post is deleted!