Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. The Engineer Who Tried to Put Age Verification Into Linux

The Engineer Who Tried to Put Age Verification Into Linux

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
92 Posts 50 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • legit_spaghetti@mastodo.neoliber.alL legit_spaghetti@mastodo.neoliber.al

    @mcv @Khrys

    So I don't really see the problem here.

    I do. The problem is that the guy is complying in advance with unjust, abusive, and dangerous laws.

    "Okay, guess I'll add it in" is not the correct response to an unjust legal requirement. The correct response is "Fuck you, make me."

    mcv@friendica.opensocial.spaceM This user is from outside of this forum
    mcv@friendica.opensocial.spaceM This user is from outside of this forum
    mcv@friendica.opensocial.space
    wrote last edited by
    #50

    @Legit_Spaghetti @Khrys

    "Fuck you, make me."


    Sorry, but nobody is making you fill this in. It's an optional field. And there's no verification on it.

    wonka@chaos.socialW legit_spaghetti@mastodo.neoliber.alL 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • rootwyrm@weird.autosR rootwyrm@weird.autos

      @filippo @Khrys @thedarktangent know what would prevent this shit in the first place? If actively supporting fascism had consequences.

      Meet consequences.

      rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
      rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
      rootwyrm@weird.autos
      wrote last edited by
      #51

      @filippo @Khrys @thedarktangent oh, and the company he works for?

      Brags about not doing credit checks before issuing payday loans at usurious rates, and charging a monthly subscription fee on top of it.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mcv@friendica.opensocial.spaceM mcv@friendica.opensocial.space

        @Legit_Spaghetti @Khrys

        "Fuck you, make me."


        Sorry, but nobody is making you fill this in. It's an optional field. And there's no verification on it.

        wonka@chaos.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
        wonka@chaos.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
        wonka@chaos.social
        wrote last edited by
        #52

        Not *yet*.

        @mcv @Khrys @Legit_Spaghetti

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mcv@friendica.opensocial.spaceM mcv@friendica.opensocial.space

          @Legit_Spaghetti @Khrys

          "Fuck you, make me."


          Sorry, but nobody is making you fill this in. It's an optional field. And there's no verification on it.

          legit_spaghetti@mastodo.neoliber.alL This user is from outside of this forum
          legit_spaghetti@mastodo.neoliber.alL This user is from outside of this forum
          legit_spaghetti@mastodo.neoliber.al
          wrote last edited by
          #53

          @mcv @Khrys Imagine if instead of your DOB, the field asked "Are you a Jew?" and it was also optional and didn't have any sort of verification attached to it. Just an innocent question, right? No one's being forced to answer it. Not a problem, right?

          Except anyone who'd spend their time adding such a field to an open-source project in anticipation of an imagined legal requirement should immediately become radioactive in the community, as should anyone defending such an action.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • revk@toot.me.ukR revk@toot.me.uk

            @Khrys Please tell me the age of the "root" user?

            zer0unplanned@friendica.rogueproject.orgZ This user is from outside of this forum
            zer0unplanned@friendica.rogueproject.orgZ This user is from outside of this forum
            zer0unplanned@friendica.rogueproject.org
            wrote last edited by
            #54
            @revk @Khrys
            Link Preview Image
            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • khrys@mamot.frK khrys@mamot.fr

              The Engineer Who Tried to Put Age Verification Into Linux

              Link Preview Image
              The Engineer Who Tried to Put Age Verification Into Linux

              Dylan, useful idiot with commit access, pushed age verification PRs to systemd, Ubuntu & Arch, got 2 Microslop employees to merge it, called it 'hilariously pointless' in the PR itself, then watched Lennart personally block the revert. Unpaid compliance simp.

              favicon

              Sam Bent (www.sambent.com)

              The lasting damage was knowing it could happen at all: that a single contributor with no stated organizational backing could submit compliance infrastructure for surveillance law directly into the software that boots your computer, get it merged by two Microsoft employees, and have the creator of systemd personally block the removal.

              montef@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
              montef@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
              montef@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #55

              @Khrys Further illustrating that systemd is evil and should be destroyed by fire. 😤😡

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • revk@toot.me.ukR revk@toot.me.uk

                @Khrys Please tell me the age of the "root" user?

                montef@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                montef@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                montef@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #56

                @revk @Khrys Born January 1, 1970. Duh.
                🙃🙃🙃😉🤓

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • khrys@mamot.frK khrys@mamot.fr

                  The Engineer Who Tried to Put Age Verification Into Linux

                  Link Preview Image
                  The Engineer Who Tried to Put Age Verification Into Linux

                  Dylan, useful idiot with commit access, pushed age verification PRs to systemd, Ubuntu & Arch, got 2 Microslop employees to merge it, called it 'hilariously pointless' in the PR itself, then watched Lennart personally block the revert. Unpaid compliance simp.

                  favicon

                  Sam Bent (www.sambent.com)

                  The lasting damage was knowing it could happen at all: that a single contributor with no stated organizational backing could submit compliance infrastructure for surveillance law directly into the software that boots your computer, get it merged by two Microsoft employees, and have the creator of systemd personally block the removal.

                  T This user is from outside of this forum
                  T This user is from outside of this forum
                  thetooter@crapulator.duckdns.org
                  wrote last edited by
                  #57
                  @Khrys let's kill this guy with hammers. tbh tbh
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • khrys@mamot.frK khrys@mamot.fr

                    The Engineer Who Tried to Put Age Verification Into Linux

                    Link Preview Image
                    The Engineer Who Tried to Put Age Verification Into Linux

                    Dylan, useful idiot with commit access, pushed age verification PRs to systemd, Ubuntu & Arch, got 2 Microslop employees to merge it, called it 'hilariously pointless' in the PR itself, then watched Lennart personally block the revert. Unpaid compliance simp.

                    favicon

                    Sam Bent (www.sambent.com)

                    The lasting damage was knowing it could happen at all: that a single contributor with no stated organizational backing could submit compliance infrastructure for surveillance law directly into the software that boots your computer, get it merged by two Microsoft employees, and have the creator of systemd personally block the removal.

                    romabysen@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                    romabysen@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                    romabysen@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #58

                    @Khrys this is why Lennart isn't allowed to submit code to the kernel

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • khrys@mamot.frK khrys@mamot.fr

                      The Engineer Who Tried to Put Age Verification Into Linux

                      Link Preview Image
                      The Engineer Who Tried to Put Age Verification Into Linux

                      Dylan, useful idiot with commit access, pushed age verification PRs to systemd, Ubuntu & Arch, got 2 Microslop employees to merge it, called it 'hilariously pointless' in the PR itself, then watched Lennart personally block the revert. Unpaid compliance simp.

                      favicon

                      Sam Bent (www.sambent.com)

                      The lasting damage was knowing it could happen at all: that a single contributor with no stated organizational backing could submit compliance infrastructure for surveillance law directly into the software that boots your computer, get it merged by two Microsoft employees, and have the creator of systemd personally block the removal.

                      7666@comp.lain.la7 This user is from outside of this forum
                      7666@comp.lain.la7 This user is from outside of this forum
                      7666@comp.lain.la
                      wrote last edited by
                      #59
                      @Khrys for someone who uses the phrase "microslop" the whole thing reads like slop
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • khrys@mamot.frK khrys@mamot.fr

                        The Engineer Who Tried to Put Age Verification Into Linux

                        Link Preview Image
                        The Engineer Who Tried to Put Age Verification Into Linux

                        Dylan, useful idiot with commit access, pushed age verification PRs to systemd, Ubuntu & Arch, got 2 Microslop employees to merge it, called it 'hilariously pointless' in the PR itself, then watched Lennart personally block the revert. Unpaid compliance simp.

                        favicon

                        Sam Bent (www.sambent.com)

                        The lasting damage was knowing it could happen at all: that a single contributor with no stated organizational backing could submit compliance infrastructure for surveillance law directly into the software that boots your computer, get it merged by two Microsoft employees, and have the creator of systemd personally block the removal.

                        ultraverified@mastodon.sdf.orgU This user is from outside of this forum
                        ultraverified@mastodon.sdf.orgU This user is from outside of this forum
                        ultraverified@mastodon.sdf.org
                        wrote last edited by
                        #60

                        @Khrys

                        Too old for Linux

                        I think that's a rock opera, isn't it?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • khrys@mamot.frK khrys@mamot.fr

                          The Engineer Who Tried to Put Age Verification Into Linux

                          Link Preview Image
                          The Engineer Who Tried to Put Age Verification Into Linux

                          Dylan, useful idiot with commit access, pushed age verification PRs to systemd, Ubuntu & Arch, got 2 Microslop employees to merge it, called it 'hilariously pointless' in the PR itself, then watched Lennart personally block the revert. Unpaid compliance simp.

                          favicon

                          Sam Bent (www.sambent.com)

                          The lasting damage was knowing it could happen at all: that a single contributor with no stated organizational backing could submit compliance infrastructure for surveillance law directly into the software that boots your computer, get it merged by two Microsoft employees, and have the creator of systemd personally block the removal.

                          ultraverified@mastodon.sdf.orgU This user is from outside of this forum
                          ultraverified@mastodon.sdf.orgU This user is from outside of this forum
                          ultraverified@mastodon.sdf.org
                          wrote last edited by
                          #61

                          @Khrys

                          Also, #fuckedCompany

                          " .... name is Dylan M. Taylor, a Senior DevOps Engineer at Credit Genie, a Khosla Ventures-backed fintech startup in Durham, North Carolina."

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • khrys@mamot.frK khrys@mamot.fr

                            The Engineer Who Tried to Put Age Verification Into Linux

                            Link Preview Image
                            The Engineer Who Tried to Put Age Verification Into Linux

                            Dylan, useful idiot with commit access, pushed age verification PRs to systemd, Ubuntu & Arch, got 2 Microslop employees to merge it, called it 'hilariously pointless' in the PR itself, then watched Lennart personally block the revert. Unpaid compliance simp.

                            favicon

                            Sam Bent (www.sambent.com)

                            The lasting damage was knowing it could happen at all: that a single contributor with no stated organizational backing could submit compliance infrastructure for surveillance law directly into the software that boots your computer, get it merged by two Microsoft employees, and have the creator of systemd personally block the removal.

                            _r@donotsta.re_ This user is from outside of this forum
                            _r@donotsta.re_ This user is from outside of this forum
                            _r@donotsta.re
                            wrote last edited by
                            #62

                            @Khrys@mamot.fr needlessly dramatic for what was an entirely unsurprising development. wake me up if they do anything beyond a glorified text field, something almost all other OSs have had for decades.

                            I mean I agree that the sentiment is bad. but do we need the entire linux community to explode over this? hardly

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • mcv@friendica.opensocial.spaceM mcv@friendica.opensocial.space

                              @Khrys

                              I don't understand what the fuss is about. This is exactly the right way to comply with that law: an optional birth date field. You don't want to have to submit an idea to your OS or implement facial recognition, and you certainly don't want to tie account creation to external services for those things, but now parents can fill in the birth date for their kids, and everybody else can ignore it. This kind of thing needs to be in the hands of parents, not external companies.

                              So I don't really see the problem here.

                              andymoose@fedi.aiga.rocksA This user is from outside of this forum
                              andymoose@fedi.aiga.rocksA This user is from outside of this forum
                              andymoose@fedi.aiga.rocks
                              wrote last edited by
                              #63

                              @mcv @Khrys The problem is that they’ve acquiesced to a poorly thought out and bad faith trial balloon of a law. So now the lawmakers know that it’s game on. The next version of the law will be even more insidious and require actual verification and do who knows what else.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • khrys@mamot.frK khrys@mamot.fr

                                The Engineer Who Tried to Put Age Verification Into Linux

                                Link Preview Image
                                The Engineer Who Tried to Put Age Verification Into Linux

                                Dylan, useful idiot with commit access, pushed age verification PRs to systemd, Ubuntu & Arch, got 2 Microslop employees to merge it, called it 'hilariously pointless' in the PR itself, then watched Lennart personally block the revert. Unpaid compliance simp.

                                favicon

                                Sam Bent (www.sambent.com)

                                The lasting damage was knowing it could happen at all: that a single contributor with no stated organizational backing could submit compliance infrastructure for surveillance law directly into the software that boots your computer, get it merged by two Microsoft employees, and have the creator of systemd personally block the removal.

                                jonathankoren@sfba.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                jonathankoren@sfba.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                jonathankoren@sfba.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #64

                                @Khrys let’s be completely honest here. The choices are:

                                - Non compliance resulting in everyone complaining that your device is “broken”
                                - Non compliance (this option)
                                - Full compliance with outside verification (a horrible option)

                                If a mandated API is made called, then easiest option is just to return “adult” and move on, rather than the millions of people complaining that “it doesn’t work”

                                I really don’t get what the point of this hit piece is.

                                salty@mastodon.nzS 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • jonathankoren@sfba.socialJ jonathankoren@sfba.social

                                  @Khrys let’s be completely honest here. The choices are:

                                  - Non compliance resulting in everyone complaining that your device is “broken”
                                  - Non compliance (this option)
                                  - Full compliance with outside verification (a horrible option)

                                  If a mandated API is made called, then easiest option is just to return “adult” and move on, rather than the millions of people complaining that “it doesn’t work”

                                  I really don’t get what the point of this hit piece is.

                                  salty@mastodon.nzS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  salty@mastodon.nzS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  salty@mastodon.nz
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #65

                                  @jonathankoren @Khrys The point is that you don’t just give away your freedom because it’s easier. You *at least* say ‘fuck you, make me’ first.

                                  There are way more people for who this is NOT law than for who it IS. So much for the land of the free and the home of the brave.

                                  jonathankoren@sfba.socialJ mcv@friendica.opensocial.spaceM 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • salty@mastodon.nzS salty@mastodon.nz

                                    @jonathankoren @Khrys The point is that you don’t just give away your freedom because it’s easier. You *at least* say ‘fuck you, make me’ first.

                                    There are way more people for who this is NOT law than for who it IS. So much for the land of the free and the home of the brave.

                                    jonathankoren@sfba.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    jonathankoren@sfba.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    jonathankoren@sfba.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #66

                                    @Salty @Khrys yeah, he complied too early no doubt, but let’s not pretend that this was actually going to do a damn thing, or even be called anywhere

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • aaribaud@mastodon.artA aaribaud@mastodon.art

                                      @Khrys (disclaimer: IANALAIDEPOOTV)

                                      One remark and one comment:

                                      Remark: the title says "tried to", the article says did -- and Poettering blocked a revert.

                                      Comment: in countries where the GDPR applies, the feature appears contrary to article 5 as overbroad, even probably purposeless *per se* ; maybe also contrary to recent European decisions against generalized citizen data collection, too.

                                      patpro@social.patpro.netP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      patpro@social.patpro.netP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      patpro@social.patpro.net
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #67

                                      @aaribaud
                                      «in countries where the GDPR applies» <- you got this wrong, GDPR applies everywhere as soon as you are an European Union citizen.

                                      Edit: correction «European citizen» -> «European Union citizen»

                                      @Khrys

                                      aaribaud@mastodon.artA 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • patpro@social.patpro.netP patpro@social.patpro.net

                                        @aaribaud
                                        «in countries where the GDPR applies» <- you got this wrong, GDPR applies everywhere as soon as you are an European Union citizen.

                                        Edit: correction «European citizen» -> «European Union citizen»

                                        @Khrys

                                        aaribaud@mastodon.artA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        aaribaud@mastodon.artA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        aaribaud@mastodon.art
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #68

                                        @patpro @Khrys Europe does not include all countries on whole Earth, does it?

                                        osma@mas.toO 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • eobet@oldbytes.spaceE eobet@oldbytes.space

                                          @Khrys is it just me or is the article a bit weird? Weird repetitions, weird (fully animated) graphics and a weird quiz at the end. It smells vaguely like slop, but is it?

                                          multisn8@mastodon.catgirl.cloudM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          multisn8@mastodon.catgirl.cloudM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          multisn8@mastodon.catgirl.cloud
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #69

                                          @eobet @Khrys Based on the rest of the articles on the platform, the ones I've peeked over are written in a similar style: They are technically true, I'm not sure if the framing is known or even intentional. As if somebody fed research into an LLM, seriously proofread the outgoing article and also generated "top facts" as well as the graphics out of it

                                          multisn8@mastodon.catgirl.cloudM 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups