Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. i just realized id love to have a signed 1 bit type actually.

i just realized id love to have a signed 1 bit type actually.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
29 Posts 7 Posters 95 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M mothcompute@merping.synth.download

    honestly i might try implementing this on zen 2 if i can find an appropriate instruction to override

    chfour@merping.synth.downloadC This user is from outside of this forum
    chfour@merping.synth.downloadC This user is from outside of this forum
    chfour@merping.synth.download
    wrote last edited by
    #8

    @mothcompute like in microcode?

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • chfour@merping.synth.downloadC chfour@merping.synth.download

      @mothcompute like in microcode?

      M This user is from outside of this forum
      M This user is from outside of this forum
      mothcompute@merping.synth.download
      wrote last edited by
      #9

      @chfour yes itll be awesome

      sudo200@layer8.spaceS chfour@merping.synth.downloadC domi@donotsta.reD 3 Replies Last reply
      0
      • M mothcompute@merping.synth.download

        @chfour yes itll be awesome

        sudo200@layer8.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
        sudo200@layer8.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
        sudo200@layer8.space
        wrote last edited by
        #10

        @mothcompute @chfour

        I would really like to know how your ideal ISA would look like.

        M 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M mothcompute@merping.synth.download

          @chfour yes itll be awesome

          chfour@merping.synth.downloadC This user is from outside of this forum
          chfour@merping.synth.downloadC This user is from outside of this forum
          chfour@merping.synth.download
          wrote last edited by
          #11

          @mothcompute thats cool

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M mothcompute@merping.synth.download

            honestly i might try implementing this on zen 2 if i can find an appropriate instruction to override

            sudo200@layer8.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
            sudo200@layer8.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
            sudo200@layer8.space
            wrote last edited by
            #12

            @mothcompute

            Yeah, just casually writing your own microcode.

            I feel inadequate to be around you now tbh.

            M 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • sudo200@layer8.spaceS sudo200@layer8.space

              @mothcompute @chfour

              I would really like to know how your ideal ISA would look like.

              M This user is from outside of this forum
              M This user is from outside of this forum
              mothcompute@merping.synth.download
              wrote last edited by
              #13

              @sudo200 @chfour generally speaking i believe in cisc design principles, so without a doubt variable length, lots of orthogonality, and a lot of compound instructions. but unlike x86 the instruction stream would be self synchronizing, which makes it much easier to decode instructions and fetch and sequence microoperations ahead of execution

              sudo200@layer8.spaceS M 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • M mothcompute@merping.synth.download

                @sudo200 @chfour generally speaking i believe in cisc design principles, so without a doubt variable length, lots of orthogonality, and a lot of compound instructions. but unlike x86 the instruction stream would be self synchronizing, which makes it much easier to decode instructions and fetch and sequence microoperations ahead of execution

                sudo200@layer8.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
                sudo200@layer8.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
                sudo200@layer8.space
                wrote last edited by
                #14

                @mothcompute @chfour

                Interesting. I have a MISC ISA spec (if you can call it that) laying about somewhere, which is basically the exact opposite

                sudo200@layer8.spaceS 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M mothcompute@merping.synth.download

                  @sudo200 @chfour generally speaking i believe in cisc design principles, so without a doubt variable length, lots of orthogonality, and a lot of compound instructions. but unlike x86 the instruction stream would be self synchronizing, which makes it much easier to decode instructions and fetch and sequence microoperations ahead of execution

                  M This user is from outside of this forum
                  M This user is from outside of this forum
                  mothcompute@merping.synth.download
                  wrote last edited by
                  #15

                  @sudo200 @chfour cpus have done predecode for decades now but i think with higher level source machine code and self synchronization that lets you get away with much more intelligent and of course much more parallel reordering, and in ideal cases the ability to do the entire decode step for an instruction page ahead of execution, whereupon you can simply copy them verbatim into the pipeline without actually decoding anything in realtime. the catch is it uses a whole lot of power and die space

                  M 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M mothcompute@merping.synth.download

                    @sudo200 @chfour cpus have done predecode for decades now but i think with higher level source machine code and self synchronization that lets you get away with much more intelligent and of course much more parallel reordering, and in ideal cases the ability to do the entire decode step for an instruction page ahead of execution, whereupon you can simply copy them verbatim into the pipeline without actually decoding anything in realtime. the catch is it uses a whole lot of power and die space

                    M This user is from outside of this forum
                    M This user is from outside of this forum
                    mothcompute@merping.synth.download
                    wrote last edited by
                    #16

                    @sudo200 @chfour i think in many respects cisc machine code is simply ir, so the more symbolic and less literal it is the better chance you get at runtime to optimize it for the underlying silicon, which is really all compilers do

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • sudo200@layer8.spaceS sudo200@layer8.space

                      @mothcompute @chfour

                      Interesting. I have a MISC ISA spec (if you can call it that) laying about somewhere, which is basically the exact opposite

                      sudo200@layer8.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
                      sudo200@layer8.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
                      sudo200@layer8.space
                      wrote last edited by
                      #17

                      @mothcompute @chfour

                      I mean, it is literally designed to be as absolutely minimal and simple as possible, but still

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • sudo200@layer8.spaceS sudo200@layer8.space

                        @mothcompute

                        Yeah, just casually writing your own microcode.

                        I feel inadequate to be around you now tbh.

                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                        mothcompute@merping.synth.download
                        wrote last edited by
                        #18

                        @sudo200 honestly i learned everything i know about amd microcode out of two pdfs and five markdown files; im not sure its that far out of reach if youre interested in learning it

                        sudo200@layer8.spaceS 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • domi@donotsta.reD domi@donotsta.re

                          @mothcompute@merping.synth.download the logical conclusion of IEE754 is 2-bit "float": representing -1, 1, 0 or NaN

                          lilahexe@fedi.lilahexe.topL This user is from outside of this forum
                          lilahexe@fedi.lilahexe.topL This user is from outside of this forum
                          lilahexe@fedi.lilahexe.top
                          wrote last edited by
                          #19

                          @domi @mothcompute this reminds me of the boolean with three states I saw in a production codebase: true, false and undefined

                          M 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • lilahexe@fedi.lilahexe.topL lilahexe@fedi.lilahexe.top

                            @domi @mothcompute this reminds me of the boolean with three states I saw in a production codebase: true, false and undefined

                            M This user is from outside of this forum
                            M This user is from outside of this forum
                            mothcompute@merping.synth.download
                            wrote last edited by
                            #20

                            @LilaHexe @domi ive seen stuff like that before and i always wonder if theyve just never heard of ternary logic or something

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M mothcompute@merping.synth.download

                              @chfour yes itll be awesome

                              domi@donotsta.reD This user is from outside of this forum
                              domi@donotsta.reD This user is from outside of this forum
                              domi@donotsta.re
                              wrote last edited by
                              #21

                              @mothcompute@merping.synth.download @chfour@merping.synth.download this reminds me. my main pc is a 3700X now. and i have a spare 3600 after an upgrade

                              ... you know. maybe i really should look into it. I wonder how much shenanigans could I get away with

                              M 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M mothcompute@merping.synth.download

                                @sudo200 honestly i learned everything i know about amd microcode out of two pdfs and five markdown files; im not sure its that far out of reach if youre interested in learning it

                                sudo200@layer8.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
                                sudo200@layer8.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
                                sudo200@layer8.space
                                wrote last edited by
                                #22

                                @mothcompute

                                That sounds a lot simpler than I expected. Yes, I would be interested in redefining what my CPU does

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • domi@donotsta.reD domi@donotsta.re

                                  @mothcompute@merping.synth.download @chfour@merping.synth.download this reminds me. my main pc is a 3700X now. and i have a spare 3600 after an upgrade

                                  ... you know. maybe i really should look into it. I wonder how much shenanigans could I get away with

                                  M This user is from outside of this forum
                                  M This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mothcompute@merping.synth.download
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #23

                                  @domi @chfour if nothing else its worth it for access to the architectural 'machine segment,' which seems to have unprotected read-write access to not just msrs but also like. cache and various internal state variables and microcode and stuff maybe?

                                  domi@donotsta.reD 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M mothcompute@merping.synth.download

                                    @domi @chfour if nothing else its worth it for access to the architectural 'machine segment,' which seems to have unprotected read-write access to not just msrs but also like. cache and various internal state variables and microcode and stuff maybe?

                                    domi@donotsta.reD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    domi@donotsta.reD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    domi@donotsta.re
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #24

                                    @mothcompute@merping.synth.download @chfour@merping.synth.download you know. i really want to run windows 95 inside the cache. there's enough of it

                                    jn@boopsnoot.deJ M noisytoot@berkeley.edu.plN 3 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • domi@donotsta.reD domi@donotsta.re

                                      @mothcompute@merping.synth.download @chfour@merping.synth.download you know. i really want to run windows 95 inside the cache. there's enough of it

                                      jn@boopsnoot.deJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      jn@boopsnoot.deJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      jn@boopsnoot.de
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #25

                                      @domi @mothcompute @chfour coreboot weekend project /j

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • domi@donotsta.reD domi@donotsta.re

                                        @mothcompute@merping.synth.download @chfour@merping.synth.download you know. i really want to run windows 95 inside the cache. there's enough of it

                                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mothcompute@merping.synth.download
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #26

                                        @domi @chfour i do assume that would be harder just since windows likely assumes (otherwise rightly so) that any page it flushes will be valid targets for an isa or pci dma operation, and so probably doesnt tag such pages explicitly in a way that a cache only system could differentiate automatically

                                        M 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M mothcompute@merping.synth.download

                                          @domi @chfour i do assume that would be harder just since windows likely assumes (otherwise rightly so) that any page it flushes will be valid targets for an isa or pci dma operation, and so probably doesnt tag such pages explicitly in a way that a cache only system could differentiate automatically

                                          M This user is from outside of this forum
                                          M This user is from outside of this forum
                                          mothcompute@merping.synth.download
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #27

                                          @domi @chfour i have no idea about this though ive never looked into it

                                          M 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups