Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. i just realized id love to have a signed 1 bit type actually.

i just realized id love to have a signed 1 bit type actually.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
29 Posts 7 Posters 95 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • sudo200@layer8.spaceS sudo200@layer8.space

    @mothcompute

    Yeah, just casually writing your own microcode.

    I feel inadequate to be around you now tbh.

    M This user is from outside of this forum
    M This user is from outside of this forum
    mothcompute@merping.synth.download
    wrote last edited by
    #18

    @sudo200 honestly i learned everything i know about amd microcode out of two pdfs and five markdown files; im not sure its that far out of reach if youre interested in learning it

    sudo200@layer8.spaceS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • domi@donotsta.reD domi@donotsta.re

      @mothcompute@merping.synth.download the logical conclusion of IEE754 is 2-bit "float": representing -1, 1, 0 or NaN

      lilahexe@fedi.lilahexe.topL This user is from outside of this forum
      lilahexe@fedi.lilahexe.topL This user is from outside of this forum
      lilahexe@fedi.lilahexe.top
      wrote last edited by
      #19

      @domi @mothcompute this reminds me of the boolean with three states I saw in a production codebase: true, false and undefined

      M 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • lilahexe@fedi.lilahexe.topL lilahexe@fedi.lilahexe.top

        @domi @mothcompute this reminds me of the boolean with three states I saw in a production codebase: true, false and undefined

        M This user is from outside of this forum
        M This user is from outside of this forum
        mothcompute@merping.synth.download
        wrote last edited by
        #20

        @LilaHexe @domi ive seen stuff like that before and i always wonder if theyve just never heard of ternary logic or something

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M mothcompute@merping.synth.download

          @chfour yes itll be awesome

          domi@donotsta.reD This user is from outside of this forum
          domi@donotsta.reD This user is from outside of this forum
          domi@donotsta.re
          wrote last edited by
          #21

          @mothcompute@merping.synth.download @chfour@merping.synth.download this reminds me. my main pc is a 3700X now. and i have a spare 3600 after an upgrade

          ... you know. maybe i really should look into it. I wonder how much shenanigans could I get away with

          M 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M mothcompute@merping.synth.download

            @sudo200 honestly i learned everything i know about amd microcode out of two pdfs and five markdown files; im not sure its that far out of reach if youre interested in learning it

            sudo200@layer8.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
            sudo200@layer8.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
            sudo200@layer8.space
            wrote last edited by
            #22

            @mothcompute

            That sounds a lot simpler than I expected. Yes, I would be interested in redefining what my CPU does

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • domi@donotsta.reD domi@donotsta.re

              @mothcompute@merping.synth.download @chfour@merping.synth.download this reminds me. my main pc is a 3700X now. and i have a spare 3600 after an upgrade

              ... you know. maybe i really should look into it. I wonder how much shenanigans could I get away with

              M This user is from outside of this forum
              M This user is from outside of this forum
              mothcompute@merping.synth.download
              wrote last edited by
              #23

              @domi @chfour if nothing else its worth it for access to the architectural 'machine segment,' which seems to have unprotected read-write access to not just msrs but also like. cache and various internal state variables and microcode and stuff maybe?

              domi@donotsta.reD 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M mothcompute@merping.synth.download

                @domi @chfour if nothing else its worth it for access to the architectural 'machine segment,' which seems to have unprotected read-write access to not just msrs but also like. cache and various internal state variables and microcode and stuff maybe?

                domi@donotsta.reD This user is from outside of this forum
                domi@donotsta.reD This user is from outside of this forum
                domi@donotsta.re
                wrote last edited by
                #24

                @mothcompute@merping.synth.download @chfour@merping.synth.download you know. i really want to run windows 95 inside the cache. there's enough of it

                jn@boopsnoot.deJ M noisytoot@berkeley.edu.plN 3 Replies Last reply
                0
                • domi@donotsta.reD domi@donotsta.re

                  @mothcompute@merping.synth.download @chfour@merping.synth.download you know. i really want to run windows 95 inside the cache. there's enough of it

                  jn@boopsnoot.deJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  jn@boopsnoot.deJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  jn@boopsnoot.de
                  wrote last edited by
                  #25

                  @domi @mothcompute @chfour coreboot weekend project /j

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • domi@donotsta.reD domi@donotsta.re

                    @mothcompute@merping.synth.download @chfour@merping.synth.download you know. i really want to run windows 95 inside the cache. there's enough of it

                    M This user is from outside of this forum
                    M This user is from outside of this forum
                    mothcompute@merping.synth.download
                    wrote last edited by
                    #26

                    @domi @chfour i do assume that would be harder just since windows likely assumes (otherwise rightly so) that any page it flushes will be valid targets for an isa or pci dma operation, and so probably doesnt tag such pages explicitly in a way that a cache only system could differentiate automatically

                    M 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M mothcompute@merping.synth.download

                      @domi @chfour i do assume that would be harder just since windows likely assumes (otherwise rightly so) that any page it flushes will be valid targets for an isa or pci dma operation, and so probably doesnt tag such pages explicitly in a way that a cache only system could differentiate automatically

                      M This user is from outside of this forum
                      M This user is from outside of this forum
                      mothcompute@merping.synth.download
                      wrote last edited by
                      #27

                      @domi @chfour i have no idea about this though ive never looked into it

                      M 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M mothcompute@merping.synth.download

                        @domi @chfour i have no idea about this though ive never looked into it

                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                        mothcompute@merping.synth.download
                        wrote last edited by
                        #28

                        @domi @chfour though if you were to do it under svm and simply trap any device accesses that might work...

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • domi@donotsta.reD domi@donotsta.re

                          @mothcompute@merping.synth.download @chfour@merping.synth.download you know. i really want to run windows 95 inside the cache. there's enough of it

                          noisytoot@berkeley.edu.plN This user is from outside of this forum
                          noisytoot@berkeley.edu.plN This user is from outside of this forum
                          noisytoot@berkeley.edu.pl
                          wrote last edited by
                          #29
                          @domi @mothcompute @chfour unfortunately I don't think modern AMD supports cache-as-RAM (PSP does raminit instead)
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          0
                          • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                            R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups