Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
othernetworks
40 Posts 30 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • publius@mastodon.sdf.orgP publius@mastodon.sdf.org

    @loriemerson

    How far back do you have to go, to find a time when many people would have agreed that slavery fell in the category of "family and community relationships", and was even among the most important? Technological innovation disrupted that, by separating the processing of chemical energy into mechanical work from the human body. I for one have no desire to go back.

    #atomicpowertothepeople

    dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
    dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
    dalias@hachyderm.io
    wrote last edited by
    #18

    @publius Slavery was recognized at the time it was practiced as an abomination by all decent people.

    History classes just teach the awful people of their times as though they were the only ones whose opinions counted.

    alexandermars@mastodon.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • earthshine@masto.hackers.townE earthshine@masto.hackers.town

      @loriemerson Yes 100% to all of this. Though I'm not entirely sure what they mean by "some form of solar energy" in that context... it sounds like they mean generally renewable or naturally abundant in the local environment?

      admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.comA This user is from outside of this forum
      admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.comA This user is from outside of this forum
      admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com
      wrote last edited by
      #19

      @earthshine @loriemerson Yeah, powered by burning wood or vegetation, or a combustion engine running pure ethanol..maybe even incinerating mountains of bioplastics... 🙂

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

        finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

        Link Preview Image
        ai6yr@m.ai6yr.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
        ai6yr@m.ai6yr.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
        ai6yr@m.ai6yr.org
        wrote last edited by
        #20

        @loriemerson This is a great list!!

        dogfox@kpop.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • ai6yr@m.ai6yr.orgA ai6yr@m.ai6yr.org

          @loriemerson This is a great list!!

          dogfox@kpop.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
          dogfox@kpop.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
          dogfox@kpop.social
          wrote last edited by
          #21

          Wendell Berry rocks.

          @ai6yr @loriemerson

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

            finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

            Link Preview Image
            libroraptor@mastodon.nzL This user is from outside of this forum
            libroraptor@mastodon.nzL This user is from outside of this forum
            libroraptor@mastodon.nz
            wrote last edited by
            #22

            @loriemerson I'm not keen on rule 2: often the current tool's problems include being too small to operate well.

            isocat@tiggi.esI 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • dalias@hachyderm.ioD dalias@hachyderm.io

              @publius Slavery was recognized at the time it was practiced as an abomination by all decent people.

              History classes just teach the awful people of their times as though they were the only ones whose opinions counted.

              alexandermars@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
              alexandermars@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
              alexandermars@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #23

              @dalias that's just a sad little troll, making a pathetic attempt to shit on someone else's post.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

                finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

                Link Preview Image
                isocat@tiggi.esI This user is from outside of this forum
                isocat@tiggi.esI This user is from outside of this forum
                isocat@tiggi.es
                wrote last edited by
                #24

                @loriemerson Nothing about durability. Point 6 only gets partway there.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • libroraptor@mastodon.nzL libroraptor@mastodon.nz

                  @loriemerson I'm not keen on rule 2: often the current tool's problems include being too small to operate well.

                  isocat@tiggi.esI This user is from outside of this forum
                  isocat@tiggi.esI This user is from outside of this forum
                  isocat@tiggi.es
                  wrote last edited by
                  #25

                  @libroraptor @loriemerson Yeah, smaller isn't necessarily better.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • aakoskin@bitwoods.duckdns.orgA aakoskin@bitwoods.duckdns.org

                    @loriemerson 10. Never post an image/screenshot if you can type the same in plain text.

                    itsjennotgoblin@goblin.campI This user is from outside of this forum
                    itsjennotgoblin@goblin.campI This user is from outside of this forum
                    itsjennotgoblin@goblin.camp
                    wrote last edited by
                    #26

                    @aakoskin @loriemerson the text is in the image description you numpty.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

                      finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

                      Link Preview Image
                      nicksilkey@hachyderm.ioN This user is from outside of this forum
                      nicksilkey@hachyderm.ioN This user is from outside of this forum
                      nicksilkey@hachyderm.io
                      wrote last edited by
                      #27

                      @loriemerson amazing - I tracked down the source. Thanks for this! 🙇‍♀️✌️💙

                      Why I Am Not Going to Buy a Computer
                      Wendell Berry
                      New England Review and Bread Loaf Quarterly
                      Vol. 10, No. 1 (Autumn, 1987), pp. 112-113 (2 pages)
                      Published By: Middlebury College Publications

                      Link Preview Image
                      JSTOR: Access Check

                      JSTOR is a digital library of academic journals, books, and primary sources.

                      favicon

                      (www.jstor.org)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

                        finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

                        Link Preview Image
                        scottytrees@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                        scottytrees@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                        scottytrees@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #28

                        @loriemerson yeah that’s a fantasy list that doesn’t exist anymore lol

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

                          finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

                          Link Preview Image
                          perhaps391@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                          perhaps391@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                          perhaps391@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #29

                          @loriemerson wow, current vibe-coded software tools fail almost every one of these standards.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

                            finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

                            Link Preview Image
                            nickrauchen@c.imN This user is from outside of this forum
                            nickrauchen@c.imN This user is from outside of this forum
                            nickrauchen@c.im
                            wrote last edited by
                            #30

                            @loriemerson

                            I like to go to original sources, so here's a link via @Kottke.org...

                            https://classes.matthewjbrown.net/teaching-files/philtech/berry-computer.pdf

                            Link Preview Image
                            Nine Rules for Evaluating New Technology

                            In 1987, Wendell Berry wrote an essay called Why I Am Not Going to Buy a Computer. In it, he outlined his standards for adopting new technology in his work

                            favicon

                            kottke.org (kottke.org)

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • aakoskin@bitwoods.duckdns.orgA aakoskin@bitwoods.duckdns.org

                              @loriemerson 10. Never post an image/screenshot if you can type the same in plain text.

                              nickrauchen@c.imN This user is from outside of this forum
                              nickrauchen@c.imN This user is from outside of this forum
                              nickrauchen@c.im
                              wrote last edited by
                              #31

                              @aakoskin @loriemerson

                              "Never post an image/screenshot if you can type the same in plain text."

                              For a simple list like the above. I agree.

                              I suspect that there is a "plain text penalty" for words/ideas without imagery in social media, but I'm not up on the trends, rules, or research in that domain.

                              lxskllr@mastodon.worldL 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • nickrauchen@c.imN nickrauchen@c.im

                                @aakoskin @loriemerson

                                "Never post an image/screenshot if you can type the same in plain text."

                                For a simple list like the above. I agree.

                                I suspect that there is a "plain text penalty" for words/ideas without imagery in social media, but I'm not up on the trends, rules, or research in that domain.

                                lxskllr@mastodon.worldL This user is from outside of this forum
                                lxskllr@mastodon.worldL This user is from outside of this forum
                                lxskllr@mastodon.world
                                wrote last edited by
                                #32

                                @nickrauchen @aakoskin @loriemerson

                                Might run out of characters. Default mastodon limit is 500. I've done text images to get around the limit.

                                loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL nickrauchen@c.imN 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • lxskllr@mastodon.worldL lxskllr@mastodon.world

                                  @nickrauchen @aakoskin @loriemerson

                                  Might run out of characters. Default mastodon limit is 500. I've done text images to get around the limit.

                                  loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  loriemerson@post.lurk.org
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #33

                                  @lxskllr @nickrauchen @aakoskin I am having trouble wrapping my head why the format of my post is worth anyone commenting on - the text is in the image. it's not elegant but I wanted to give a screenshot of the exact text I was reading from Harper's. surely there are more important things to discuss here, and in general, than policing precisely how people post

                                  nickrauchen@c.imN 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • lxskllr@mastodon.worldL lxskllr@mastodon.world

                                    @nickrauchen @aakoskin @loriemerson

                                    Might run out of characters. Default mastodon limit is 500. I've done text images to get around the limit.

                                    nickrauchen@c.imN This user is from outside of this forum
                                    nickrauchen@c.imN This user is from outside of this forum
                                    nickrauchen@c.im
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #34

                                    @lxskllr @aakoskin @loriemerson

                                    I think the char limit varies on #Mastodon depending on server, client, etc.

                                    Something textual that is "long form" can be threaded, yes?

                                    lxskllr@mastodon.worldL 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • nickrauchen@c.imN nickrauchen@c.im

                                      @lxskllr @aakoskin @loriemerson

                                      I think the char limit varies on #Mastodon depending on server, client, etc.

                                      Something textual that is "long form" can be threaded, yes?

                                      lxskllr@mastodon.worldL This user is from outside of this forum
                                      lxskllr@mastodon.worldL This user is from outside of this forum
                                      lxskllr@mastodon.world
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #35

                                      @nickrauchen @aakoskin @loriemerson

                                      It can, but threaded posts are kind of annoying imo. Sometimes it's better to have everything in one view.

                                      I say that someone who does a minimum of one threaded post every day :^D

                                      nickrauchen@c.imN 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

                                        @lxskllr @nickrauchen @aakoskin I am having trouble wrapping my head why the format of my post is worth anyone commenting on - the text is in the image. it's not elegant but I wanted to give a screenshot of the exact text I was reading from Harper's. surely there are more important things to discuss here, and in general, than policing precisely how people post

                                        nickrauchen@c.imN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        nickrauchen@c.imN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        nickrauchen@c.im
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #36

                                        @loriemerson @lxskllr @aakoskin

                                        Speaking as a reader of your post, I'd rather have the text than a picture of the text. In this case I think all/most of the content was in the alt text, which is good but may be hidden for some (depends on the UI).

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • lxskllr@mastodon.worldL lxskllr@mastodon.world

                                          @nickrauchen @aakoskin @loriemerson

                                          It can, but threaded posts are kind of annoying imo. Sometimes it's better to have everything in one view.

                                          I say that someone who does a minimum of one threaded post every day :^D

                                          nickrauchen@c.imN This user is from outside of this forum
                                          nickrauchen@c.imN This user is from outside of this forum
                                          nickrauchen@c.im
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #37

                                          @lxskllr @aakoskin @loriemerson

                                          Threading in #Mastodon is pretty clunky I agree. I can't remember much about it, but in old-school #twitter there was an obvious "Continue" or "Next" button for threading. The server I'm currently on has a much larger char limit so it has not been an issue. The main reason I thread anything is for topics like travel logs that unfold over time.

                                          Then there's just being kind to your readers... keep things simple, short, and concise. An ideal I am sometimes not able to achieve even with good intentions. 🙂

                                          lxskllr@mastodon.worldL 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups