Ah, the #copyfail clickbait posts are coming.
-
The TL;DR of #CopyFail in my opinion: Due to an unusual (I personally think irresponsible) disclosure, we sysadmins are now dealing with having to push out an immediate mitigation until the updated kernel packages become available. I am trying to help in a pragmatic way. This too will pass, but it also shows that running Linux servers comes with responsibilities to protect your machines and users.
4/4
@jwildeboer Thank you for this!
One question, if I understand that correctly it's a local privilege escalation, right?
So assuming there's no RCE present elsewhere, and I'm the only account on the system, I can relax about CopyFail? -
@jwildeboer I'm confused somewhat by how distros didn't pick it up, looks like some don't have representatives on the kernel list?
-
@jwildeboer Thank you for this!
One question, if I understand that correctly it's a local privilege escalation, right?
So assuming there's no RCE present elsewhere, and I'm the only account on the system, I can relax about CopyFail?@blindcoder Yes, it needs local user access. But that could also be tunnelled through an exploitable Wordpress install or other PHP etc stuff. SELinux might already help in that case, but my general rule would be: If the machine is exposed to the internet, deploy the mitigation. For machines that are not open to the internet, like homelabs etc it is an acceptable risk to wait for the updated kernel packages.
-
@jwildeboer Thank you for this!
One question, if I understand that correctly it's a local privilege escalation, right?
So assuming there's no RCE present elsewhere, and I'm the only account on the system, I can relax about CopyFail?@blindcoder @jwildeboer That's my understanding as well, but if an intruder somehow manages to run shell or custom app you might be in trouble
-
@jwildeboer Thank you for this!
One question, if I understand that correctly it's a local privilege escalation, right?
So assuming there's no RCE present elsewhere, and I'm the only account on the system, I can relax about CopyFail?@blindcoder @jwildeboer
It appears so.As long as by "system" you mean hardware and not a container (e.g. docker).
-
@jwildeboer I'm confused somewhat by how distros didn't pick it up, looks like some don't have representatives on the kernel list?
@larsmb Could be. I guess the topic is a bit more complex. Some distros have `algif_aead` as module, so you can do the big hammer approach and `rmmod` it, other distros have `algif_aead` compiled into the kernel, so you need a more surgical approach, like the one I described. The surgical approach however has the advantage of working for both setups.
-
The TL;DR of #CopyFail in my opinion: Due to an unusual (I personally think irresponsible) disclosure, we sysadmins are now dealing with having to push out an immediate mitigation until the updated kernel packages become available. I am trying to help in a pragmatic way. This too will pass, but it also shows that running Linux servers comes with responsibilities to protect your machines and users.
4/4
@jwildeboer
Tbf whilst It's not great, its AT LEAST not remotely exploitable. Problematic if your workload runs untrusted stuff from external sources directly, absolutely. But likewise not quite as sky is falling as some have seemed to make it out to be. -
The TL;DR of #CopyFail in my opinion: Due to an unusual (I personally think irresponsible) disclosure, we sysadmins are now dealing with having to push out an immediate mitigation until the updated kernel packages become available. I am trying to help in a pragmatic way. This too will pass, but it also shows that running Linux servers comes with responsibilities to protect your machines and users.
4/4
ADDENDUM: Now also a blog post at https://jan.wildeboer.net/2026/05/PSA-CopyFail-CVE-2026-31431/
-
ADDENDUM: Now also a blog post at https://jan.wildeboer.net/2026/05/PSA-CopyFail-CVE-2026-31431/
@jwildeboer Nice! Btw wiki page is up: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copy_Fail
-
Ah, the #copyfail clickbait posts are coming. Here’s my contribution. On your Linux machine add
initcall_blacklist=algif_aead_init
to your kernel boot commandline (typically in grub). Reboot. You are now safe until the updated kernel packages become available. For distributions with the `grubby` command this is done as root with
# grubby --update-kernel=ALL --args="initcall_blacklist=algif_aead_init"
This mitigation comes courtesy of Red Hat. Our engineers keep you safe
1/4
This post is deleted! -
This post is deleted!
@Larvitz Edit: removed unhelpful cheap joke. I'm sorry. Will try harder to resist next time.
@jwildeboer -
Ah, the #copyfail clickbait posts are coming. Here’s my contribution. On your Linux machine add
initcall_blacklist=algif_aead_init
to your kernel boot commandline (typically in grub). Reboot. You are now safe until the updated kernel packages become available. For distributions with the `grubby` command this is done as root with
# grubby --update-kernel=ALL --args="initcall_blacklist=algif_aead_init"
This mitigation comes courtesy of Red Hat. Our engineers keep you safe
1/4
@jwildeboer since android runs with the linux kernel, is android also affected?
-
@Larvitz Edit: removed unhelpful cheap joke. I'm sorry. Will try harder to resist next time.
@jwildeboer -
@jwildeboer I'm sorry. You're right. Should have posted the cheap joke in my own feed.
@Larvitz -
@jwildeboer since android runs with the linux kernel, is android also affected?
@Sorro I don't know. Depends if `algif_aead` is compiled into the kernel or loaded as module, if it is present at all in Android kernels. If somebody has checked, please do reply.
-
Ah, the #copyfail clickbait posts are coming. Here’s my contribution. On your Linux machine add
initcall_blacklist=algif_aead_init
to your kernel boot commandline (typically in grub). Reboot. You are now safe until the updated kernel packages become available. For distributions with the `grubby` command this is done as root with
# grubby --update-kernel=ALL --args="initcall_blacklist=algif_aead_init"
This mitigation comes courtesy of Red Hat. Our engineers keep you safe
1/4
@jwildeboer what about those who cannot be downtimed to reboot?
-
@echopapa @larsmb @jwildeboer alma (yay the new centos model
) https://almalinux.org/blog/2026-05-01-cve-2026-31431-copy-fail/ -
Ah, the #copyfail clickbait posts are coming. Here’s my contribution. On your Linux machine add
initcall_blacklist=algif_aead_init
to your kernel boot commandline (typically in grub). Reboot. You are now safe until the updated kernel packages become available. For distributions with the `grubby` command this is done as root with
# grubby --update-kernel=ALL --args="initcall_blacklist=algif_aead_init"
This mitigation comes courtesy of Red Hat. Our engineers keep you safe
1/4
@jwildeboer
There's a special place in hell for security researchers who obfuscate their proof-of-concept exploit code. -
@jwildeboer since android runs with the linux kernel, is android also affected?
Are there any users on your Android phone who might take advantage of #copyfail ?
For single-user systems there is no problem, because it's not a remote exploit.
-
R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
-
@jwildeboer @flxtr Deleted it. Sorry, could not help myself and thought "Galgenhumor" could help make this serious topic a bit more relaxed.
