This post did not contain any content.
-
@txtechnician @gabrielesvelto Unless it were a non-profit, a co-op, a crown corporation, etc.
@Space_Burger_Steve @txtechnician @gabrielesvelto
What a weird concept, social media owned by a non profit. I don't think it could scale.
What if instead of one social media site, someone were to make a protocol where a bunch of smaller ones that are a reasonable size to be run by a nonprofit or co op can talk to each other as if they were one big network?
-
@Space_Burger_Steve @txtechnician @gabrielesvelto
What a weird concept, social media owned by a non profit. I don't think it could scale.
What if instead of one social media site, someone were to make a protocol where a bunch of smaller ones that are a reasonable size to be run by a nonprofit or co op can talk to each other as if they were one big network?
@gbargoud @Space_Burger_Steve @gabrielesvelto
Been done already, it's called email bro.
-
@gabrielesvelto we could have stopped at “banning billionaires” on the second image
@adrien @gabrielesvelto here was me about to wade in and suggest we cut the 'social' but missing the bigger picture
-
@gbargoud @Space_Burger_Steve @gabrielesvelto
Been done already, it's called email bro.
@txtechnician @Space_Burger_Steve @gabrielesvelto
Oh I thought that was just for selling boner pills. I'll need to look into it.
-
@FromTheFourthPlanet @gabrielesvelto
What software or app did you use to add that bottom bit?
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.
@gabrielesvelto banning boomers from the whole Internet because they use Meta and ChatGPT
-
@FromTheFourthPlanet @gabrielesvelto
What software or app did you use to add that bottom bit?
@aka_quant_noir @gabrielesvelto
GNU image manipulation program - I scaled the original picture, copied it in the top text box, selected the "from owning social media" part, and painted over it.All artisanal, no AI.
-
@aka_quant_noir @gabrielesvelto
GNU image manipulation program - I scaled the original picture, copied it in the top text box, selected the "from owning social media" part, and painted over it.All artisanal, no AI.
@FromTheFourthPlanet @gabrielesvelto
Thanks, that's at least a program I know I can get, even though I've failed to learn it many times, lol!
-
@FromTheFourthPlanet@mas.to @gabrielesvelto@mas.to Imagine that meme with a poorly photoshopped "beheading" on top of the word "banning"
@gwenthefops @FromTheFourthPlanet @gabrielesvelto Poorly photoshopped it is then
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.
@gabrielesvelto that is so much a better solution.
-
R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
-
This post did not contain any content.
@gabrielesvelto one of those is much easier to do than the other.
-
This post did not contain any content.
@gabrielesvelto We must disobey age segregation and ageism.
-
@gabrielesvelto mentally some of the billionaires seem to be teenagers, so it could have same effect
@tymwol it's a shame we don't have a legal definition for a man-child
-
This post did not contain any content.
@gabrielesvelto what's the point of banning kids from literal children's games, if a 5yo kid wants to use a tablet they would simply ask their parents to bypass the security and use it anyways. These laws are not protecting anyone
-
@gabrielesvelto mentally some of the billionaires seem to be teenagers, so it could have same effect
I beg to disagree here.
Where us oldies settle for the ”rational” (i.e. norm conformist & status quo preserving) option, teenagers and young adults are the ones to stay defending the moral high ground. Think of animal rights, LGBTQ+, fridays for future, and now sober curiosity. All youth movements.
Billionaires are more like infants kicking and screaming for more of everything. Difference is infants eventually become teenagers and young adults.
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Great point.
-
This post did not contain any content.
@gabrielesvelto Let’s do both.
