This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.
@gabrielesvelto mentally some of the billionaires seem to be teenagers, so it could have same effect
-
R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
-
This post did not contain any content.
@gabrielesvelto we could have stopped at “banning billionaires” on the second image
-
@gabrielesvelto we could have stopped at “banning billionaires” on the second image
@adrien @gabrielesvelto It would definitely solve a lot of these problems.
-
R revengeday@corteximplant.com shared this topic
-
This post did not contain any content.
@gabrielesvelto eh, not possible. The company would just be owned by a branch of a shell company that is a sister company to some hedge fund managers lemonade stand.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Even better:
banning #bigtechs from owning social media.Social media developed by bigtechs is the real problem.
-
This post did not contain any content.
@gabrielesvelto I think we should do both
-
@gabrielesvelto eh, not possible. The company would just be owned by a branch of a shell company that is a sister company to some hedge fund managers lemonade stand.
@txtechnician @gabrielesvelto Unless it were a non-profit, a co-op, a crown corporation, etc.
-
@gabrielesvelto we could have stopped at “banning billionaires” on the second image
@adrien @gabrielesvelto yep. That’s my manifesto.
-
This post did not contain any content.
@gabrielesvelto I’d love to see everyone delete their meta, x and google accounts on the same day. #FuckMeta #fuckbigtech #FuckBillionaires oh the wonderful panic that would ensue as the tech industry goes into meltdown when they realise that they are not in control. .. Sadly, just a dream.
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
@FromTheFourthPlanet@mas.to @gabrielesvelto@mas.to Imagine that meme with a poorly photoshopped "beheading" on top of the word "banning"
-
@FromTheFourthPlanet@mas.to @gabrielesvelto@mas.to Imagine that meme with a poorly photoshopped "beheading" on top of the word "banning"
@gwenthefops @gabrielesvelto
My image editing skills are not that good 🥲 -
@gwenthefops @gabrielesvelto
My image editing skills are not that good 🥲@FromTheFourthPlanet@mas.to @gabrielesvelto@mas.to neither are mine, which is why I hoped imagination would be enough
-
@FromTheFourthPlanet@mas.to @gabrielesvelto@mas.to neither are mine, which is why I hoped imagination would be enough
@gwenthefops @gabrielesvelto
It is enough. Imagination is awesome. -
@gabrielesvelto we could have stopped at “banning billionaires” on the second image
@adrien very true
-
This post did not contain any content.
@gabrielesvelto banning social media? I'm listening
-
@txtechnician @gabrielesvelto Unless it were a non-profit, a co-op, a crown corporation, etc.
@Space_Burger_Steve @txtechnician @gabrielesvelto
What a weird concept, social media owned by a non profit. I don't think it could scale.
What if instead of one social media site, someone were to make a protocol where a bunch of smaller ones that are a reasonable size to be run by a nonprofit or co op can talk to each other as if they were one big network?
-
@Space_Burger_Steve @txtechnician @gabrielesvelto
What a weird concept, social media owned by a non profit. I don't think it could scale.
What if instead of one social media site, someone were to make a protocol where a bunch of smaller ones that are a reasonable size to be run by a nonprofit or co op can talk to each other as if they were one big network?
@gbargoud @Space_Burger_Steve @gabrielesvelto
Been done already, it's called email bro.
-
@gabrielesvelto we could have stopped at “banning billionaires” on the second image
@adrien @gabrielesvelto here was me about to wade in and suggest we cut the 'social' but missing the bigger picture
