Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. For fucks sake ...

For fucks sake ...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
14 Posts 11 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • lightfighter@infosec.exchangeL lightfighter@infosec.exchange

    @JessTheUnstill Growing up where I did, guys and dude were used in a gender neutral way. But, I've changed my usage. I've adopted the Southern options of, y'all and all y'all.

    jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jesstheunstill@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #4

    @Lightfighter I mean I know most people still don't use guys out of malice or something. But it still is uck to do it to a group of trans women

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ jesstheunstill@infosec.exchange

      For fucks sake ... "Guys" is not a gender neutral term ...

      genehack@dementedandsadbut.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
      genehack@dementedandsadbut.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
      genehack@dementedandsadbut.social
      wrote last edited by
      #5

      @JessTheUnstill I retrained myself out of this in, like, 2019, and I’m still hearing it, and it GRATES

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ jesstheunstill@infosec.exchange

        For fucks sake ... "Guys" is not a gender neutral term ...

        katharta@quietzero.netK This user is from outside of this forum
        katharta@quietzero.netK This user is from outside of this forum
        katharta@quietzero.net
        wrote last edited by
        #6

        @JessTheUnstill I'm a dude, she's a dude, we're all dudes.

        jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • katharta@quietzero.netK katharta@quietzero.net

          @JessTheUnstill I'm a dude, she's a dude, we're all dudes.

          jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jesstheunstill@infosec.exchange
          wrote last edited by
          #7

          @katharta Ummm .... No.

          twodarek@hachyderm.ioT 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ jesstheunstill@infosec.exchange

            For fucks sake ... "Guys" is not a gender neutral term ...

            uxmark@cosocial.caU This user is from outside of this forum
            uxmark@cosocial.caU This user is from outside of this forum
            uxmark@cosocial.ca
            wrote last edited by
            #8

            @JessTheUnstill It literally took me a couple of years to remove it from my vocabulary following a lifetime of use. But I managed it. I usually use folks now (despite its use by an awful conservative politician here in Ontario, Canada).

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ jesstheunstill@infosec.exchange

              For fucks sake ... "Guys" is not a gender neutral term ...

              breathoflife@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
              breathoflife@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
              breathoflife@infosec.exchange
              wrote last edited by
              #9

              @JessTheUnstill

              could "gen" be a they/them gender neutral equivalent of "guy" and "gal"?

              it starts with "g", has a vowel in the middle, and the "n" flows neatly from the "e", just like in "guy" and "gal"...

              jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ jesstheunstill@infosec.exchange

                For fucks sake ... "Guys" is not a gender neutral term ...

                pawv@tech.lgbtP This user is from outside of this forum
                pawv@tech.lgbtP This user is from outside of this forum
                pawv@tech.lgbt
                wrote last edited by
                #10

                @JessTheUnstill Agreed. So invalidating to suggest otherwise. 😖

                Tangentially, I'm not a fan of "dolls" either.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ jesstheunstill@infosec.exchange

                  @katharta Ummm .... No.

                  twodarek@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
                  twodarek@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
                  twodarek@hachyderm.io
                  wrote last edited by
                  #11

                  I've very specifically stopped using "dude" around any women I know to be trans (which has largely caused me to substitute in "y'all" for most conversations anyway) because "dude" could possibly be misread as misgendering them. Social anxiety for the win?

                  @JessTheUnstill @katharta

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ jesstheunstill@infosec.exchange

                    For fucks sake ... "Guys" is not a gender neutral term ...

                    timo_micro@scicomm.xyzT This user is from outside of this forum
                    timo_micro@scicomm.xyzT This user is from outside of this forum
                    timo_micro@scicomm.xyz
                    wrote last edited by
                    #12

                    @JessTheUnstill It's not the most scientifically robust dataset, but in the inclusive language course at work we ask "do you feel included when someone says Hey Guys?" We normally get at least 15 or 20% of people responding that they don't feel included. We also included other examples and talking points but this is the one that sticks, or at least that's what people fill out when asked "what will you do differently in future?" There is hope

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • centretowner@urbanists.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                      centretowner@urbanists.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                      centretowner@urbanists.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #13

                      @Tooden @JessTheUnstill perhaps in some contexts, but not as a direct replacement for "you guys"; "you people" has negative connotations, especially if those being addressed are in a noticeably different group from the speaker.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • breathoflife@infosec.exchangeB breathoflife@infosec.exchange

                        @JessTheUnstill

                        could "gen" be a they/them gender neutral equivalent of "guy" and "gal"?

                        it starts with "g", has a vowel in the middle, and the "n" flows neatly from the "e", just like in "guy" and "gal"...

                        jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jesstheunstill@infosec.exchange
                        wrote last edited by
                        #14

                        @breathOfLife I mean you can try and make it happen, but gen and men are going to be easily confused, and calling women what they hear as "men" is going to be even more irritating.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups