Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. For fucks sake ...

For fucks sake ...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
14 Posts 11 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ jesstheunstill@infosec.exchange

    For fucks sake ... "Guys" is not a gender neutral term ...

    cordiallychloe@tech.lgbtC This user is from outside of this forum
    cordiallychloe@tech.lgbtC This user is from outside of this forum
    cordiallychloe@tech.lgbt
    wrote last edited by
    #2

    @JessTheUnstill Someone went on a whole rant on the LGBT subreddit the other day about how queer people need to stop being misogynistic but started it with "guys." And I immediately called them out and got dogpiled by a few people for "picking the wrong hill to die on" before the tide turned and they all got called out.

    People have this deeply-held belief around that nonsense and I hate it so much.

    Because you're 110% correct: "guys" isn't gender neutral.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ jesstheunstill@infosec.exchange

      For fucks sake ... "Guys" is not a gender neutral term ...

      lightfighter@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
      lightfighter@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
      lightfighter@infosec.exchange
      wrote last edited by
      #3

      @JessTheUnstill Growing up where I did, guys and dude were used in a gender neutral way. But, I've changed my usage. I've adopted the Southern options of, y'all and all y'all.

      jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      0
      • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
      • lightfighter@infosec.exchangeL lightfighter@infosec.exchange

        @JessTheUnstill Growing up where I did, guys and dude were used in a gender neutral way. But, I've changed my usage. I've adopted the Southern options of, y'all and all y'all.

        jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jesstheunstill@infosec.exchange
        wrote last edited by
        #4

        @Lightfighter I mean I know most people still don't use guys out of malice or something. But it still is uck to do it to a group of trans women

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ jesstheunstill@infosec.exchange

          For fucks sake ... "Guys" is not a gender neutral term ...

          genehack@dementedandsadbut.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
          genehack@dementedandsadbut.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
          genehack@dementedandsadbut.social
          wrote last edited by
          #5

          @JessTheUnstill I retrained myself out of this in, like, 2019, and I’m still hearing it, and it GRATES

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ jesstheunstill@infosec.exchange

            For fucks sake ... "Guys" is not a gender neutral term ...

            katharta@quietzero.netK This user is from outside of this forum
            katharta@quietzero.netK This user is from outside of this forum
            katharta@quietzero.net
            wrote last edited by
            #6

            @JessTheUnstill I'm a dude, she's a dude, we're all dudes.

            jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • katharta@quietzero.netK katharta@quietzero.net

              @JessTheUnstill I'm a dude, she's a dude, we're all dudes.

              jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jesstheunstill@infosec.exchange
              wrote last edited by
              #7

              @katharta Ummm .... No.

              twodarek@hachyderm.ioT 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ jesstheunstill@infosec.exchange

                For fucks sake ... "Guys" is not a gender neutral term ...

                uxmark@cosocial.caU This user is from outside of this forum
                uxmark@cosocial.caU This user is from outside of this forum
                uxmark@cosocial.ca
                wrote last edited by
                #8

                @JessTheUnstill It literally took me a couple of years to remove it from my vocabulary following a lifetime of use. But I managed it. I usually use folks now (despite its use by an awful conservative politician here in Ontario, Canada).

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ jesstheunstill@infosec.exchange

                  For fucks sake ... "Guys" is not a gender neutral term ...

                  breathoflife@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
                  breathoflife@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
                  breathoflife@infosec.exchange
                  wrote last edited by
                  #9

                  @JessTheUnstill

                  could "gen" be a they/them gender neutral equivalent of "guy" and "gal"?

                  it starts with "g", has a vowel in the middle, and the "n" flows neatly from the "e", just like in "guy" and "gal"...

                  jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ jesstheunstill@infosec.exchange

                    For fucks sake ... "Guys" is not a gender neutral term ...

                    pawv@tech.lgbtP This user is from outside of this forum
                    pawv@tech.lgbtP This user is from outside of this forum
                    pawv@tech.lgbt
                    wrote last edited by
                    #10

                    @JessTheUnstill Agreed. So invalidating to suggest otherwise. 😖

                    Tangentially, I'm not a fan of "dolls" either.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ jesstheunstill@infosec.exchange

                      @katharta Ummm .... No.

                      twodarek@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
                      twodarek@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
                      twodarek@hachyderm.io
                      wrote last edited by
                      #11

                      I've very specifically stopped using "dude" around any women I know to be trans (which has largely caused me to substitute in "y'all" for most conversations anyway) because "dude" could possibly be misread as misgendering them. Social anxiety for the win?

                      @JessTheUnstill @katharta

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ jesstheunstill@infosec.exchange

                        For fucks sake ... "Guys" is not a gender neutral term ...

                        timo_micro@scicomm.xyzT This user is from outside of this forum
                        timo_micro@scicomm.xyzT This user is from outside of this forum
                        timo_micro@scicomm.xyz
                        wrote last edited by
                        #12

                        @JessTheUnstill It's not the most scientifically robust dataset, but in the inclusive language course at work we ask "do you feel included when someone says Hey Guys?" We normally get at least 15 or 20% of people responding that they don't feel included. We also included other examples and talking points but this is the one that sticks, or at least that's what people fill out when asked "what will you do differently in future?" There is hope

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • centretowner@urbanists.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                          centretowner@urbanists.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                          centretowner@urbanists.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #13

                          @Tooden @JessTheUnstill perhaps in some contexts, but not as a direct replacement for "you guys"; "you people" has negative connotations, especially if those being addressed are in a noticeably different group from the speaker.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • breathoflife@infosec.exchangeB breathoflife@infosec.exchange

                            @JessTheUnstill

                            could "gen" be a they/them gender neutral equivalent of "guy" and "gal"?

                            it starts with "g", has a vowel in the middle, and the "n" flows neatly from the "e", just like in "guy" and "gal"...

                            jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            jesstheunstill@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            jesstheunstill@infosec.exchange
                            wrote last edited by
                            #14

                            @breathOfLife I mean you can try and make it happen, but gen and men are going to be easily confused, and calling women what they hear as "men" is going to be even more irritating.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups