Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Been thinking about this: https://bsky.app/profile/jay.bsky.team/post/3micpg7z2h22g

Been thinking about this: https://bsky.app/profile/jay.bsky.team/post/3micpg7z2h22g

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
76 Posts 55 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

    Been thinking about this: https://bsky.app/profile/jay.bsky.team/post/3micpg7z2h22g

    > we also dislike AI slop. this is why we’re using AI to generate code, not content.

    It's a philosophical distinction but one I feel like I don't get. Maybe it's because I like livecoding, etc, and see code itself as a form of art. Is AI code *not* slop in a way that feed content is?

    And will vibecoded apps with Attie be likely to insert AIgen content?

    cwebber@social.coopC This user is from outside of this forum
    cwebber@social.coopC This user is from outside of this forum
    cwebber@social.coop
    wrote last edited by
    #2

    I think game developers especially (and I do game dev sometimes, sometimes even for work) tend to perceive code and art as interrelated and intertwined things. I find it unlikely that they can be easily separated.

    I suppose some may see form vs function, but I personally see form *as* function.

    mistergibson@turtleisland.socialM krazov@mstdn.socialK faraiwe@mstdn.socialF alice@gts.void.dogA wordshaper@weatherishappening.networkW 12 Replies Last reply
    0
    • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

      I think game developers especially (and I do game dev sometimes, sometimes even for work) tend to perceive code and art as interrelated and intertwined things. I find it unlikely that they can be easily separated.

      I suppose some may see form vs function, but I personally see form *as* function.

      mistergibson@turtleisland.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
      mistergibson@turtleisland.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
      mistergibson@turtleisland.social
      wrote last edited by
      #3

      @cwebber I call my code "My Art" naming it "Logical Sculpture". https://github.com/mistergibson/

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

        I think game developers especially (and I do game dev sometimes, sometimes even for work) tend to perceive code and art as interrelated and intertwined things. I find it unlikely that they can be easily separated.

        I suppose some may see form vs function, but I personally see form *as* function.

        krazov@mstdn.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
        krazov@mstdn.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
        krazov@mstdn.social
        wrote last edited by
        #4

        @cwebber Only someone who didn't work — like, really work — with code can say that code is not art.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

          I think game developers especially (and I do game dev sometimes, sometimes even for work) tend to perceive code and art as interrelated and intertwined things. I find it unlikely that they can be easily separated.

          I suppose some may see form vs function, but I personally see form *as* function.

          faraiwe@mstdn.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
          faraiwe@mstdn.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
          faraiwe@mstdn.social
          wrote last edited by
          #5

          @cwebber but, but... Avalokiteśvara *assured * us that form is emptiness, and emptiness is form.

          Gate, gate, paragate, paraśamgate, bodhi svaha......

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

            I think game developers especially (and I do game dev sometimes, sometimes even for work) tend to perceive code and art as interrelated and intertwined things. I find it unlikely that they can be easily separated.

            I suppose some may see form vs function, but I personally see form *as* function.

            alice@gts.void.dogA This user is from outside of this forum
            alice@gts.void.dogA This user is from outside of this forum
            alice@gts.void.dog
            wrote last edited by
            #6

            @cwebber i really dont see how one can have any respect for and actual understanding of the craft and still think of code as some neutral and vacuous means to an end. like every path to a solution, every way of thinking about a problem, every line of code, would not be carefully chosen and fully infused by what its writer meant to do

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

              I think game developers especially (and I do game dev sometimes, sometimes even for work) tend to perceive code and art as interrelated and intertwined things. I find it unlikely that they can be easily separated.

              I suppose some may see form vs function, but I personally see form *as* function.

              wordshaper@weatherishappening.networkW This user is from outside of this forum
              wordshaper@weatherishappening.networkW This user is from outside of this forum
              wordshaper@weatherishappening.network
              wrote last edited by
              #7

              @cwebber Yeah, code *is* content for so many things. Things like the cel shader that the recent Zelda games use is code but 100% also content/art, and if the LLM generated a different shader the game would have a different look. So much of this kind of code is involved in games or art programming, where tiny tweaks to the code create different looks/sounds/actions. It's all part of the Art.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                Been thinking about this: https://bsky.app/profile/jay.bsky.team/post/3micpg7z2h22g

                > we also dislike AI slop. this is why we’re using AI to generate code, not content.

                It's a philosophical distinction but one I feel like I don't get. Maybe it's because I like livecoding, etc, and see code itself as a form of art. Is AI code *not* slop in a way that feed content is?

                And will vibecoded apps with Attie be likely to insert AIgen content?

                siph@meemu.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                siph@meemu.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                siph@meemu.org
                wrote last edited by
                #8

                @cwebber I've got the feeling that some pro-AI folks recently have started to try to make their pill easier to swallow by denouncing "AI slop" and acting like the stuff they do is somehow "AI not-slop it's actually useful we swear". Seen that at DuckDuckGo and Kagi and even Microsoft now

                targrus@mast.targrus.orgT anne_delong@musician.socialA 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                  Been thinking about this: https://bsky.app/profile/jay.bsky.team/post/3micpg7z2h22g

                  > we also dislike AI slop. this is why we’re using AI to generate code, not content.

                  It's a philosophical distinction but one I feel like I don't get. Maybe it's because I like livecoding, etc, and see code itself as a form of art. Is AI code *not* slop in a way that feed content is?

                  And will vibecoded apps with Attie be likely to insert AIgen content?

                  tshirtman@mas.toT This user is from outside of this forum
                  tshirtman@mas.toT This user is from outside of this forum
                  tshirtman@mas.to
                  wrote last edited by
                  #9

                  @cwebber imho everything we do can be art if we want it to be, doesn't mean it is in the absolute, for anyone doing it or enjoying the result, but it can be.

                  i like writting code i'm proud of, and i did a lot of that, but if i want good enough code fit for a purpose, i find llms to be able to do that now, with serious supervision for important things, much less so for throwaway code.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                    I think game developers especially (and I do game dev sometimes, sometimes even for work) tend to perceive code and art as interrelated and intertwined things. I find it unlikely that they can be easily separated.

                    I suppose some may see form vs function, but I personally see form *as* function.

                    j_bertolotti@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    j_bertolotti@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    j_bertolotti@mathstodon.xyz
                    wrote last edited by
                    #10

                    @cwebber I am not a game developer (not a developer at all), and I am 100% positive that AI generated code IS slop.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                      Been thinking about this: https://bsky.app/profile/jay.bsky.team/post/3micpg7z2h22g

                      > we also dislike AI slop. this is why we’re using AI to generate code, not content.

                      It's a philosophical distinction but one I feel like I don't get. Maybe it's because I like livecoding, etc, and see code itself as a form of art. Is AI code *not* slop in a way that feed content is?

                      And will vibecoded apps with Attie be likely to insert AIgen content?

                      sleet01@fosstodon.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                      sleet01@fosstodon.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                      sleet01@fosstodon.org
                      wrote last edited by
                      #11

                      @cwebber I would argue that it's worse, in fact.
                      - Bad AI art slop is generally static: the processing has been done, it just sits there and looks bad.
                      - Bad vibe-coded slop is dynamic: it consumes memory, power, and cycles while it's being awful, and that consumption may be unbounded.
                      - Most people have some innate aesthetic sense and can judge bad AI art slop without a lot of training (although training probably helps)
                      - Vibe code looks like good code 'cuz LLMs copy structure well, but isn't.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • siph@meemu.orgS siph@meemu.org

                        @cwebber I've got the feeling that some pro-AI folks recently have started to try to make their pill easier to swallow by denouncing "AI slop" and acting like the stuff they do is somehow "AI not-slop it's actually useful we swear". Seen that at DuckDuckGo and Kagi and even Microsoft now

                        targrus@mast.targrus.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                        targrus@mast.targrus.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                        targrus@mast.targrus.org
                        wrote last edited by
                        #12

                        @Siph @cwebber as if code can't be slop.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                          Been thinking about this: https://bsky.app/profile/jay.bsky.team/post/3micpg7z2h22g

                          > we also dislike AI slop. this is why we’re using AI to generate code, not content.

                          It's a philosophical distinction but one I feel like I don't get. Maybe it's because I like livecoding, etc, and see code itself as a form of art. Is AI code *not* slop in a way that feed content is?

                          And will vibecoded apps with Attie be likely to insert AIgen content?

                          aparrish@friend.campA This user is from outside of this forum
                          aparrish@friend.campA This user is from outside of this forum
                          aparrish@friend.camp
                          wrote last edited by
                          #13

                          @cwebber i can only read that statement as an outrageous troll. or at least i hope it's an outrageous troll, because otherwise it's the most misguided thing i've ever read about AI and programming. "we also dislike AI slop. which is why we use AI to generate choreography, not dancing" "which is why we use AI to generate sheet music, not musical performance" "which is why we use AI to generate blueprints, not buildings" "which is why we use AI to generate plots, not novels" etc

                          aparrish@friend.campA mcc@mastodon.socialM 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                            Been thinking about this: https://bsky.app/profile/jay.bsky.team/post/3micpg7z2h22g

                            > we also dislike AI slop. this is why we’re using AI to generate code, not content.

                            It's a philosophical distinction but one I feel like I don't get. Maybe it's because I like livecoding, etc, and see code itself as a form of art. Is AI code *not* slop in a way that feed content is?

                            And will vibecoded apps with Attie be likely to insert AIgen content?

                            eniko@mastodon.gamedev.placeE This user is from outside of this forum
                            eniko@mastodon.gamedev.placeE This user is from outside of this forum
                            eniko@mastodon.gamedev.place
                            wrote last edited by
                            #14

                            @cwebber AI code is definitely slop

                            eramdam@social.erambert.meE rysiek@mstdn.socialR 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                              Been thinking about this: https://bsky.app/profile/jay.bsky.team/post/3micpg7z2h22g

                              > we also dislike AI slop. this is why we’re using AI to generate code, not content.

                              It's a philosophical distinction but one I feel like I don't get. Maybe it's because I like livecoding, etc, and see code itself as a form of art. Is AI code *not* slop in a way that feed content is?

                              And will vibecoded apps with Attie be likely to insert AIgen content?

                              dvshkn@social.treehouse.systemsD This user is from outside of this forum
                              dvshkn@social.treehouse.systemsD This user is from outside of this forum
                              dvshkn@social.treehouse.systems
                              wrote last edited by
                              #15

                              @cwebber For my own stuff I find code as art to be a spectrum, with different projects falling at different points on the line. It correlates heavily with the extent to which I feel like using LLMs for that project or not.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                                Been thinking about this: https://bsky.app/profile/jay.bsky.team/post/3micpg7z2h22g

                                > we also dislike AI slop. this is why we’re using AI to generate code, not content.

                                It's a philosophical distinction but one I feel like I don't get. Maybe it's because I like livecoding, etc, and see code itself as a form of art. Is AI code *not* slop in a way that feed content is?

                                And will vibecoded apps with Attie be likely to insert AIgen content?

                                ainmosni@social.ainmosni.euA This user is from outside of this forum
                                ainmosni@social.ainmosni.euA This user is from outside of this forum
                                ainmosni@social.ainmosni.eu
                                wrote last edited by
                                #16

                                @cwebber I consider AI code definitely as slop, the sloppiness just shows itself in different ways. It shows in being inefficient, in having subtle, weird, illogical bugs, in having obvious security holes.

                                Also, I hate that he's using the word "content" when he means any form of art.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                                  I think game developers especially (and I do game dev sometimes, sometimes even for work) tend to perceive code and art as interrelated and intertwined things. I find it unlikely that they can be easily separated.

                                  I suppose some may see form vs function, but I personally see form *as* function.

                                  mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mttaggart@infosec.exchange
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #17

                                  @cwebber Paul's reply here has been living in my head.

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  Paul Frazee (@pfrazee.com)

                                  As I said elsewhere I am basically radicalized about this. We fight now for personal computing and personal agency or we lose another decade to closed clouds We push now for an open internet and open models. Nobody is going to hand it to us because they’re nice

                                  favicon

                                  Bluesky Social (bsky.app)

                                  I fundamentally can't understand this position. Pinning all your hopes for free and open computing on "open models," a thing that doesn't meaningfully exist, is so confusing to me.

                                  But this does appear to be dogma for them.

                                  cwebber@social.coopC wordshaper@weatherishappening.networkW cygnathreadbare@retro.pizzaC fay@lingo.lolF ehashman@cloudisland.nzE 6 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • eniko@mastodon.gamedev.placeE eniko@mastodon.gamedev.place

                                    @cwebber AI code is definitely slop

                                    eramdam@social.erambert.meE This user is from outside of this forum
                                    eramdam@social.erambert.meE This user is from outside of this forum
                                    eramdam@social.erambert.me
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #18

                                    @eniko @cwebber the jankiness of Bluesky as a website in the past few months after the dev team has admitted to be fully vibecoding the thing definitely makes that argument lol

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • eniko@mastodon.gamedev.placeE eniko@mastodon.gamedev.place

                                      @cwebber AI code is definitely slop

                                      rysiek@mstdn.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      rysiek@mstdn.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      rysiek@mstdn.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #19

                                      @eniko @cwebber yeah, +1 on that.

                                      To me "slop" is about the (low) quality of it, the throw-awayness of it. Not the form.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • aparrish@friend.campA aparrish@friend.camp

                                        @cwebber i can only read that statement as an outrageous troll. or at least i hope it's an outrageous troll, because otherwise it's the most misguided thing i've ever read about AI and programming. "we also dislike AI slop. which is why we use AI to generate choreography, not dancing" "which is why we use AI to generate sheet music, not musical performance" "which is why we use AI to generate blueprints, not buildings" "which is why we use AI to generate plots, not novels" etc

                                        aparrish@friend.campA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        aparrish@friend.campA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        aparrish@friend.camp
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #20

                                        @cwebber the existence and grossness of AI slop is a *direct outcome* of choices made in the code that trains and does inference from AI models! the code *determines* the content! you'd think someone who has worked in social media and has thought for five seconds about the consequences of (e.g.) "algorithmic curation" would have a clue about this

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                                          Been thinking about this: https://bsky.app/profile/jay.bsky.team/post/3micpg7z2h22g

                                          > we also dislike AI slop. this is why we’re using AI to generate code, not content.

                                          It's a philosophical distinction but one I feel like I don't get. Maybe it's because I like livecoding, etc, and see code itself as a form of art. Is AI code *not* slop in a way that feed content is?

                                          And will vibecoded apps with Attie be likely to insert AIgen content?

                                          swetland@chaos.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          swetland@chaos.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          swetland@chaos.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #21

                                          @cwebber One can argue whether code can be art (I'm in the "yes" camp on this one), but doing the job well and building clean, understandable, maintainable software, even if it's not art, pays off. Building it on piles of slop... well, not so much.

                                          I fell like if you're taking so little pride in your work and care for your craft that you outsource it to the garbage machine, maybe you should find a different calling.

                                          I guess it's creating job opportunities for people to fix your mess someday.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups