Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Please, please stop supporting gen AI companies.

Please, please stop supporting gen AI companies.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
26 Posts 22 Posters 35 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchangeH hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchange

    Phew, that spun people up on BlueSky

    raven667@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
    raven667@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
    raven667@hachyderm.io
    wrote last edited by
    #21

    @hacks4pancakes and the smug "military targeters would probably have made the same mistake" makes me think of Chief Wright (Stonekettle Station) who did targeting during the first Gulf War and talked about sleepless nights double-checking intelligence to make sure they didn't kill civilians, and called off attacks when they couldn't be sure, who would have been personally devastated if they learned a missile they launched had killed school-kids. The military structure at the time allowed him to care about such things, but Secretary Kegseth doesn't seem to care or have a soul as far as I can tell.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchangeH hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchange

      @mndflayr I drink and I know something

      Link Preview Image
      akaasjager@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
      akaasjager@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
      akaasjager@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #22

      @hacks4pancakes I don’t, and that probably has brought me in the permanent state that Terry Pratchett once called “knurd”. -5/10 can’t recommend

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org

        @wendynather @hacks4pancakes seconded

        kims@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
        kims@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
        kims@mas.to
        wrote last edited by
        #23

        @neurovagrant @wendynather @hacks4pancakes
        Me three

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchangeH hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchange

          Phew, that spun people up on BlueSky

          dzwiedziu@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
          dzwiedziu@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
          dzwiedziu@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #24

          @hacks4pancakes
          I wish that would be an energy source…

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchangeH hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchange

            Phew, that spun people up on BlueSky

            970uts1d3@defcon.social9 This user is from outside of this forum
            970uts1d3@defcon.social9 This user is from outside of this forum
            970uts1d3@defcon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #25

            @hacks4pancakes on the other side of things, does it provide them less liability if Claude makes the targets? Or more? Possibly shifts liabilities away from admin to AI devs. I mean it shouldn't but I can see them arguing that. Administration's love scapegoats.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ariaflame@masto.aiA This user is from outside of this forum
              ariaflame@masto.aiA This user is from outside of this forum
              ariaflame@masto.ai
              wrote last edited by
              #26

              @jwi @hacks4pancakes Both are bad. One for giving bad information, the other for using it without checking it.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              • Login

              • Login or register to search.
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • World
              • Users
              • Groups