Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Please, please stop supporting gen AI companies.

Please, please stop supporting gen AI companies.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
26 Posts 22 Posters 35 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mndflayr@metalhead.clubM mndflayr@metalhead.club

    @hacks4pancakes

    Congrats for the second post in that screen shot, I think the point you made there is not stated often enough.

    I really hate how LLM took over the general term "AI", that has been used in CS research for dozens of different approaches.

    hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
    hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
    hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #15

    @mndflayr I drink and I know something

    Link Preview Image
    E akaasjager@mastodon.socialA 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • momo@social.linux.pizzaM momo@social.linux.pizza

      @hacks4pancakes
      I wonder if that decision to use AI in targetting was based on "Yes, use AI, it's perfect and can't do mistakes!!" or rather "We know that AI makes wrong decisions and combining this with live ammunition costs innocent lives. But it's not our civilians who get blown up, so we don't care. Acceptable is good enough!"-Irresponsibity.

      Or in simple terms: Are they ignorantly stupid or just cruel?

      maccruiskeen@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
      maccruiskeen@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
      maccruiskeen@social.linux.pizza
      wrote last edited by
      #16

      @momo @hacks4pancakes The leadership is swayed by the AI $$$. And they're too stupid to conider anything else. At work we've been testing a Claude-based system to remediate mssing alt-text in ebooks, and the results would not make me confident you could use it for targeting. In fact, the opposite of that.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • momo@social.linux.pizzaM momo@social.linux.pizza

        @hacks4pancakes
        I wonder if that decision to use AI in targetting was based on "Yes, use AI, it's perfect and can't do mistakes!!" or rather "We know that AI makes wrong decisions and combining this with live ammunition costs innocent lives. But it's not our civilians who get blown up, so we don't care. Acceptable is good enough!"-Irresponsibity.

        Or in simple terms: Are they ignorantly stupid or just cruel?

        lily_and_frog@mastodon.artL This user is from outside of this forum
        lily_and_frog@mastodon.artL This user is from outside of this forum
        lily_and_frog@mastodon.art
        wrote last edited by
        #17

        @momo @hacks4pancakes

        Third option:
        They're cruel and murderous on purpose (Israel is committing genocide in Gaza and the US supports it after all) and initially planned to use AI as plausible denial for PR reasons, but don't because it doesn't make it look any better. Worse, in fact.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchangeH hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchange

          @mndflayr I drink and I know something

          Link Preview Image
          E This user is from outside of this forum
          E This user is from outside of this forum
          elltee@mastodon.cloud
          wrote last edited by
          #18

          @hacks4pancakes
          Its the opposite for me. I drink and I stop knowing things. 😋

          @mndflayr

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchangeH hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchange

            Phew, that spun people up on BlueSky

            cosmicktrigger@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
            cosmicktrigger@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
            cosmicktrigger@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #19

            @hacks4pancakes

            To be fair, it's really easy to spin people up on Bluesky.

            I don't know of any truly left-leaning people who support AI.

            cosmicktrigger@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • cosmicktrigger@mastodon.socialC cosmicktrigger@mastodon.social

              @hacks4pancakes

              To be fair, it's really easy to spin people up on Bluesky.

              I don't know of any truly left-leaning people who support AI.

              cosmicktrigger@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
              cosmicktrigger@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
              cosmicktrigger@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #20

              @hacks4pancakes

              We just need to give better training to the LLMs and make them wear body cams

              Link Preview Image
              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              0
              • hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchangeH hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchange

                Phew, that spun people up on BlueSky

                raven667@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
                raven667@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
                raven667@hachyderm.io
                wrote last edited by
                #21

                @hacks4pancakes and the smug "military targeters would probably have made the same mistake" makes me think of Chief Wright (Stonekettle Station) who did targeting during the first Gulf War and talked about sleepless nights double-checking intelligence to make sure they didn't kill civilians, and called off attacks when they couldn't be sure, who would have been personally devastated if they learned a missile they launched had killed school-kids. The military structure at the time allowed him to care about such things, but Secretary Kegseth doesn't seem to care or have a soul as far as I can tell.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchangeH hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchange

                  @mndflayr I drink and I know something

                  Link Preview Image
                  akaasjager@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                  akaasjager@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                  akaasjager@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #22

                  @hacks4pancakes I don’t, and that probably has brought me in the permanent state that Terry Pratchett once called “knurd”. -5/10 can’t recommend

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • neurovagrant@masto.deoan.orgN neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org

                    @wendynather @hacks4pancakes seconded

                    kims@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
                    kims@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
                    kims@mas.to
                    wrote last edited by
                    #23

                    @neurovagrant @wendynather @hacks4pancakes
                    Me three

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchangeH hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchange

                      Phew, that spun people up on BlueSky

                      dzwiedziu@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                      dzwiedziu@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                      dzwiedziu@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #24

                      @hacks4pancakes
                      I wish that would be an energy source…

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchangeH hacks4pancakes@infosec.exchange

                        Phew, that spun people up on BlueSky

                        970uts1d3@defcon.social9 This user is from outside of this forum
                        970uts1d3@defcon.social9 This user is from outside of this forum
                        970uts1d3@defcon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #25

                        @hacks4pancakes on the other side of things, does it provide them less liability if Claude makes the targets? Or more? Possibly shifts liabilities away from admin to AI devs. I mean it shouldn't but I can see them arguing that. Administration's love scapegoats.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • ariaflame@masto.aiA This user is from outside of this forum
                          ariaflame@masto.aiA This user is from outside of this forum
                          ariaflame@masto.ai
                          wrote last edited by
                          #26

                          @jwi @hacks4pancakes Both are bad. One for giving bad information, the other for using it without checking it.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups