Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture".

Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture".

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
163 Posts 63 Posters 50 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

    Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture". I think his argument is a strawman, doesn't align with his own actions and delegitimizes important political actions we need to make in order to build a better cyberphysical world.

    Link Preview Image
    Acting ethically in an imperfect world

    Life is complicated. Regardless of what your beliefs or politics or ethics are, the way that we set up our society and economy will often force you to act against them: You might not want to fly somewhere but your employer will not accept another mode of transportation, you want to eat vegan but are […]

    favicon

    Smashing Frames (tante.cc)

    simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
    simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
    simonzerafa@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #18

    @tante

    That doesn't seem to be the best idea @pluralistic

    AI and LLM output is 90% bullshit, and most people don't have the time nor the patience to work out which 10% might actually be useful.

    That's completely ignoring the environmental and human impacts of the AI bubble.

    Try buying DDR memory, a GPU or an SSD / HDD at the moment.

    pluralistic@mamot.frP raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR 2 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
    • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

      Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture". I think his argument is a strawman, doesn't align with his own actions and delegitimizes important political actions we need to make in order to build a better cyberphysical world.

      Link Preview Image
      Acting ethically in an imperfect world

      Life is complicated. Regardless of what your beliefs or politics or ethics are, the way that we set up our society and economy will often force you to act against them: You might not want to fly somewhere but your employer will not accept another mode of transportation, you want to eat vegan but are […]

      favicon

      Smashing Frames (tante.cc)

      janet@weirder.earthJ This user is from outside of this forum
      janet@weirder.earthJ This user is from outside of this forum
      janet@weirder.earth
      wrote last edited by
      #19

      @tante “Technology doesn’t need liberation, people do.“ It seems so crystal clear to me.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • tofticles@helvede.netT tofticles@helvede.net

        @tante My point is that LLMs 'try' (and very often fail) to solve the wrong problem.

        Writing all the boilerplate -> should be solved by better frameworks.
        Spell check -> I think this is already invented.
        Summarize long texts -> Executive summaries.
        Produce (verbose) text -> Writing in my view is as much thinking as it is writing - skipping the thinking part is counter-productive.

        perigee@rage.loveP This user is from outside of this forum
        perigee@rage.loveP This user is from outside of this forum
        perigee@rage.love
        wrote last edited by
        #20

        @tofticles @tante @onepict it's a bitter pill to be forced to use a spell checker that until very recently didn't even know how many rs are in "strawberry " (or ls in "blackball").

        onepict@chaos.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS simonzerafa@infosec.exchange

          @tante

          That doesn't seem to be the best idea @pluralistic

          AI and LLM output is 90% bullshit, and most people don't have the time nor the patience to work out which 10% might actually be useful.

          That's completely ignoring the environmental and human impacts of the AI bubble.

          Try buying DDR memory, a GPU or an SSD / HDD at the moment.

          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
          pluralistic@mamot.fr
          wrote last edited by
          #21

          @simonzerafa @tante

          What is the incremental environmental damage created by running an existing LLM locally on your own laptop?

          As to "90% bullshit" - as I wrote, the false positive rate for punctuation errors and typos from Ollama/Llama2 is about 50%, which is substantially better than, say, Google Docs' grammar checker.

          simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR clintruin@mastodon.socialC 3 Replies Last reply
          0
          • herrlorenz@chaos.socialH herrlorenz@chaos.social

            @pluralistic @tante My impression was, Tante meant this specific argument and the way it is structured, and the way it functions. I hold the both of you in high esteem, and I don't have the impression that he'd somehow characterize anything beyond that argument he discusses.

            pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
            pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
            pluralistic@mamot.fr
            wrote last edited by
            #22

            @herrLorenz @tante

            > Cory shows his libertarian leanings here...

            > Many people criticizing LLMs come from a somewhat leftist (in contrast to Cory’s libertarian) background.

            pluralistic@mamot.frP cjpaloma@mstdn.socialC 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

              @herrLorenz @tante

              > Cory shows his libertarian leanings here...

              > Many people criticizing LLMs come from a somewhat leftist (in contrast to Cory’s libertarian) background.

              pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
              pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
              pluralistic@mamot.fr
              wrote last edited by
              #23

              @herrLorenz @tante

              This falls into the "you are entitled to your own opinions, but not your own facts" territory.

              herrlorenz@chaos.socialH 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture". I think his argument is a strawman, doesn't align with his own actions and delegitimizes important political actions we need to make in order to build a better cyberphysical world.

                Link Preview Image
                Acting ethically in an imperfect world

                Life is complicated. Regardless of what your beliefs or politics or ethics are, the way that we set up our society and economy will often force you to act against them: You might not want to fly somewhere but your employer will not accept another mode of transportation, you want to eat vegan but are […]

                favicon

                Smashing Frames (tante.cc)

                perigee@rage.loveP This user is from outside of this forum
                perigee@rage.loveP This user is from outside of this forum
                perigee@rage.love
                wrote last edited by
                #24

                @tante Wow, it's weird to me that Doctorow pipes his own writing through a plagiarism machine.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                  Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture". I think his argument is a strawman, doesn't align with his own actions and delegitimizes important political actions we need to make in order to build a better cyberphysical world.

                  Link Preview Image
                  Acting ethically in an imperfect world

                  Life is complicated. Regardless of what your beliefs or politics or ethics are, the way that we set up our society and economy will often force you to act against them: You might not want to fly somewhere but your employer will not accept another mode of transportation, you want to eat vegan but are […]

                  favicon

                  Smashing Frames (tante.cc)

                  charlesdelavalleepoussin@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                  charlesdelavalleepoussin@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                  charlesdelavalleepoussin@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #25

                  @tante

                  I think you're right on this.

                  Thanks for putting it into words.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • perigee@rage.loveP perigee@rage.love

                    @tofticles @tante @onepict it's a bitter pill to be forced to use a spell checker that until very recently didn't even know how many rs are in "strawberry " (or ls in "blackball").

                    onepict@chaos.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                    onepict@chaos.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                    onepict@chaos.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #26

                    @perigee @tofticles I think @tante captured the difficulties existing and surviving in this world.

                    I'm still disappointed with Doctorow, especially since he felt the need to get his defence in first.

                    His choice of wording there was saddening to me. He outsourced his feelings of guilt and judgement on the rest of us.

                    Whenever I hear or read someone using the term purity anything I feel a mild disappointment. Because I do expect better of our leaders who take the public stage.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                      Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture". I think his argument is a strawman, doesn't align with his own actions and delegitimizes important political actions we need to make in order to build a better cyberphysical world.

                      Link Preview Image
                      Acting ethically in an imperfect world

                      Life is complicated. Regardless of what your beliefs or politics or ethics are, the way that we set up our society and economy will often force you to act against them: You might not want to fly somewhere but your employer will not accept another mode of transportation, you want to eat vegan but are […]

                      favicon

                      Smashing Frames (tante.cc)

                      heymarkreeves@mstdn.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                      heymarkreeves@mstdn.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                      heymarkreeves@mstdn.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #27

                      @tante Thanks for putting this into words. Struck me the same way.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                        @simonzerafa @tante

                        What is the incremental environmental damage created by running an existing LLM locally on your own laptop?

                        As to "90% bullshit" - as I wrote, the false positive rate for punctuation errors and typos from Ollama/Llama2 is about 50%, which is substantially better than, say, Google Docs' grammar checker.

                        simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                        simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                        simonzerafa@infosec.exchange
                        wrote last edited by
                        #28

                        @pluralistic @tante

                        Of course, I am speaking in generalities.

                        Encouraging the use of LLM's is counterproductive in so many ways, as I highlighted.

                        Pop a power meter on that LLM adorned PC and let us all know what the power usage looks like with and without your chosen LLM running on a typical task 🙂

                        That's power that generated somewhere, even if it's with renewable energy.

                        The main issue with LLM's is that they don't encourage critical thinking, in a world which is already suffering from a massive shortage.

                        pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS simonzerafa@infosec.exchange

                          @tante

                          That doesn't seem to be the best idea @pluralistic

                          AI and LLM output is 90% bullshit, and most people don't have the time nor the patience to work out which 10% might actually be useful.

                          That's completely ignoring the environmental and human impacts of the AI bubble.

                          Try buying DDR memory, a GPU or an SSD / HDD at the moment.

                          raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
                          raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
                          raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie
                          wrote last edited by
                          #29

                          @simonzerafa @tante @pluralistic
                          At best 40% junk, but unless you are so expert you don't need it, you can't know which is plausible rubbish.
                          Would you play Russian Roulette every day for hours?

                          pluralistic@mamot.frP simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                            @simonzerafa @tante

                            What is the incremental environmental damage created by running an existing LLM locally on your own laptop?

                            As to "90% bullshit" - as I wrote, the false positive rate for punctuation errors and typos from Ollama/Llama2 is about 50%, which is substantially better than, say, Google Docs' grammar checker.

                            raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
                            raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
                            raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie
                            wrote last edited by
                            #30

                            @pluralistic @simonzerafa @tante
                            But Google Docs anything is rubbish.

                            pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                              Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture". I think his argument is a strawman, doesn't align with his own actions and delegitimizes important political actions we need to make in order to build a better cyberphysical world.

                              Link Preview Image
                              Acting ethically in an imperfect world

                              Life is complicated. Regardless of what your beliefs or politics or ethics are, the way that we set up our society and economy will often force you to act against them: You might not want to fly somewhere but your employer will not accept another mode of transportation, you want to eat vegan but are […]

                              favicon

                              Smashing Frames (tante.cc)

                              vy@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                              vy@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                              vy@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #31

                              @tante Use of the word "neoliberal" in earnest in an essay is an almost infallible sign of nonsense. Certainly it works here.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                pluralistic@mamot.fr
                                wrote last edited by
                                #32

                                @FediThing @tante

                                Which parts of running a model on your own laptop are implicated in "destroying the planet?" How is checking punctuation "stealing labor?" Or, for that matter "giving power over knowledge to LLM owners?"

                                skyfaller@jawns.clubS lupinoarts@mstdn.socialL 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie

                                  @simonzerafa @tante @pluralistic
                                  At best 40% junk, but unless you are so expert you don't need it, you can't know which is plausible rubbish.
                                  Would you play Russian Roulette every day for hours?

                                  pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  pluralistic@mamot.fr
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #33

                                  @raymaccarthy @simonzerafa @tante

                                  Again, what does checking the punctuation on a single essay per day have to do with "play[ing] Russian Roulette every day for hours?"

                                  shiri@foggyminds.comS 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie

                                    @pluralistic @simonzerafa @tante
                                    But Google Docs anything is rubbish.

                                    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    pluralistic@mamot.fr
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #34

                                    @raymaccarthy @simonzerafa @tante

                                    I see. And do you have moral opinions about whether people should use Google Docs? Do you seek out strangers to tell them that it's dangerous to use Google Docs?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • kbm0@mastodon.socialK kbm0@mastodon.social

                                      @tante I still haven't completely unpacked these arguments. To dwell on the gramnar checker thing, I assume that pre-LLM checkers were to some extent developed by building statistical models from a large corpus of existing text. That's not quite the same thing as the mass plagiarism used to build generative AI models. For myself I've never used such tools, I consider them an annoyance: If there's a mistake in my writing, the human reader will make a better job of correcting it from context.

                                      raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #35

                                      @kbm0 @tante
                                      Spelling checkers need a curated dictionary related to a style guide as only one valid variant spelling should be used by an author, novel series or organisation.
                                      Grammar checkers seem tuned to particular kinds of document, which certainly wouldn't include novels or blog posts.
                                      Certain kinds of punctuation errors can be found. You don't need an LLM for that! Even some Regex can supplement a basic Grammar checker.
                                      A lack of closing quote isn't always an error, nor a repeated word.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS simonzerafa@infosec.exchange

                                        @pluralistic @tante

                                        Of course, I am speaking in generalities.

                                        Encouraging the use of LLM's is counterproductive in so many ways, as I highlighted.

                                        Pop a power meter on that LLM adorned PC and let us all know what the power usage looks like with and without your chosen LLM running on a typical task 🙂

                                        That's power that generated somewhere, even if it's with renewable energy.

                                        The main issue with LLM's is that they don't encourage critical thinking, in a world which is already suffering from a massive shortage.

                                        pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        pluralistic@mamot.fr
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #36

                                        @simonzerafa @tante

                                        As I wrote (and it seems you haven't read what I wrote, which is weird, because that seems like a good first step if you're going to criticize my conduct), I'm running Ollama on a laptop that doesn't even have a GPU.

                                        Its power consumption is comparable to, say, watching a Youtube video.

                                        I know this because my laptop is running free software that lets me accurately monitor its activity, and because the model is also free software.

                                        pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                                          @simonzerafa @tante

                                          As I wrote (and it seems you haven't read what I wrote, which is weird, because that seems like a good first step if you're going to criticize my conduct), I'm running Ollama on a laptop that doesn't even have a GPU.

                                          Its power consumption is comparable to, say, watching a Youtube video.

                                          I know this because my laptop is running free software that lets me accurately monitor its activity, and because the model is also free software.

                                          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                          pluralistic@mamot.fr
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #37

                                          @simonzerafa @tante

                                          Checking for punctuation errors is does not discourage critical thinking. It's weird to laud "critical thinking" and also make this claim.

                                          tante@tldr.nettime.orgT 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups