Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture".

Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture".

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
163 Posts 63 Posters 50 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

    Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture". I think his argument is a strawman, doesn't align with his own actions and delegitimizes important political actions we need to make in order to build a better cyberphysical world.

    Link Preview Image
    Acting ethically in an imperfect world

    Life is complicated. Regardless of what your beliefs or politics or ethics are, the way that we set up our society and economy will often force you to act against them: You might not want to fly somewhere but your employer will not accept another mode of transportation, you want to eat vegan but are […]

    favicon

    Smashing Frames (tante.cc)

    sibrosan@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
    sibrosan@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
    sibrosan@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #11

    @tante Using LLM's for various tasks may be convenient, but it may also put you at a disadvantage because you lose the ability to do those things by yourself.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • tofticles@helvede.netT tofticles@helvede.net

      @tante I, for one, enjoyed the write-up.

      As you, I do plenty of things that I either cannot morally or ethically defend or simply am ignorant of the harms of.

      For other technology, I am either pressured to use it (by government or similar institutions) or I can at least use it 'for good' (facilitating some other good - in current case, student administration) and also make a living.

      For LLMs, I fail to see the redeeming qualities that make the compromise 'worth it'. It's all nett negatives.

      tofticles@helvede.netT This user is from outside of this forum
      tofticles@helvede.netT This user is from outside of this forum
      tofticles@helvede.net
      wrote last edited by
      #12

      @tante My point is that LLMs 'try' (and very often fail) to solve the wrong problem.

      Writing all the boilerplate -> should be solved by better frameworks.
      Spell check -> I think this is already invented.
      Summarize long texts -> Executive summaries.
      Produce (verbose) text -> Writing in my view is as much thinking as it is writing - skipping the thinking part is counter-productive.

      perigee@rage.loveP 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

        Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture". I think his argument is a strawman, doesn't align with his own actions and delegitimizes important political actions we need to make in order to build a better cyberphysical world.

        Link Preview Image
        Acting ethically in an imperfect world

        Life is complicated. Regardless of what your beliefs or politics or ethics are, the way that we set up our society and economy will often force you to act against them: You might not want to fly somewhere but your employer will not accept another mode of transportation, you want to eat vegan but are […]

        favicon

        Smashing Frames (tante.cc)

        dingemansemark@scholar.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
        dingemansemark@scholar.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
        dingemansemark@scholar.social
        wrote last edited by
        #13

        @tante chef's kiss: "This also shines through in Cory arguing that we need to “liberate” technology. What a strange idea: Technology doesn’t need liberation, people do."

        Thank you for writing this cogent piece.

        kbm0@mastodon.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

          Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture". I think his argument is a strawman, doesn't align with his own actions and delegitimizes important political actions we need to make in order to build a better cyberphysical world.

          Link Preview Image
          Acting ethically in an imperfect world

          Life is complicated. Regardless of what your beliefs or politics or ethics are, the way that we set up our society and economy will often force you to act against them: You might not want to fly somewhere but your employer will not accept another mode of transportation, you want to eat vegan but are […]

          favicon

          Smashing Frames (tante.cc)

          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
          pluralistic@mamot.fr
          wrote last edited by
          #14

          @tante Dunno where you got the idea that I have a "libertarian" background. I was raised by Trotskyists, am a member of the DSA, am advising and have endorsed Avi Lewis, and joined the UK Greens to back Polanski.

          herrlorenz@chaos.socialH giacomo@snac.tesio.itG jorismeys@mstdn.socialJ 3 Replies Last reply
          0
          • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

            Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture". I think his argument is a strawman, doesn't align with his own actions and delegitimizes important political actions we need to make in order to build a better cyberphysical world.

            Link Preview Image
            Acting ethically in an imperfect world

            Life is complicated. Regardless of what your beliefs or politics or ethics are, the way that we set up our society and economy will often force you to act against them: You might not want to fly somewhere but your employer will not accept another mode of transportation, you want to eat vegan but are […]

            favicon

            Smashing Frames (tante.cc)

            cora@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
            cora@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
            cora@hachyderm.io
            wrote last edited by
            #15

            @tante There must be something in the air; I think this is something that has been on many folks' minds for a while... not criticisms of Cory, but rather the general cognitive difficulty of reconciling survival in a world far less under our control than we thought it was when our character and values accreted and congealed.

            It's a nuanced phenomenon especially for a limited-attention-span world. It's good to see people taking up the challenge. Thanks for this.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • dingemansemark@scholar.socialD dingemansemark@scholar.social

              @tante chef's kiss: "This also shines through in Cory arguing that we need to “liberate” technology. What a strange idea: Technology doesn’t need liberation, people do."

              Thank you for writing this cogent piece.

              kbm0@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
              kbm0@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
              kbm0@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #16

              @dingemansemark @tante To be fair I assume that was meant in the open source spirit: Technology liberated from corporate control as a vehicle contributing to the liberation of its users and developers.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                @tante Dunno where you got the idea that I have a "libertarian" background. I was raised by Trotskyists, am a member of the DSA, am advising and have endorsed Avi Lewis, and joined the UK Greens to back Polanski.

                herrlorenz@chaos.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                herrlorenz@chaos.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                herrlorenz@chaos.social
                wrote last edited by
                #17

                @pluralistic @tante My impression was, Tante meant this specific argument and the way it is structured, and the way it functions. I hold the both of you in high esteem, and I don't have the impression that he'd somehow characterize anything beyond that argument he discusses.

                pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                  Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture". I think his argument is a strawman, doesn't align with his own actions and delegitimizes important political actions we need to make in order to build a better cyberphysical world.

                  Link Preview Image
                  Acting ethically in an imperfect world

                  Life is complicated. Regardless of what your beliefs or politics or ethics are, the way that we set up our society and economy will often force you to act against them: You might not want to fly somewhere but your employer will not accept another mode of transportation, you want to eat vegan but are […]

                  favicon

                  Smashing Frames (tante.cc)

                  simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                  simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                  simonzerafa@infosec.exchange
                  wrote last edited by
                  #18

                  @tante

                  That doesn't seem to be the best idea @pluralistic

                  AI and LLM output is 90% bullshit, and most people don't have the time nor the patience to work out which 10% might actually be useful.

                  That's completely ignoring the environmental and human impacts of the AI bubble.

                  Try buying DDR memory, a GPU or an SSD / HDD at the moment.

                  pluralistic@mamot.frP raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR 2 Replies Last reply
                  1
                  0
                  • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                  • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                    Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture". I think his argument is a strawman, doesn't align with his own actions and delegitimizes important political actions we need to make in order to build a better cyberphysical world.

                    Link Preview Image
                    Acting ethically in an imperfect world

                    Life is complicated. Regardless of what your beliefs or politics or ethics are, the way that we set up our society and economy will often force you to act against them: You might not want to fly somewhere but your employer will not accept another mode of transportation, you want to eat vegan but are […]

                    favicon

                    Smashing Frames (tante.cc)

                    janet@weirder.earthJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    janet@weirder.earthJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    janet@weirder.earth
                    wrote last edited by
                    #19

                    @tante “Technology doesn’t need liberation, people do.“ It seems so crystal clear to me.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • tofticles@helvede.netT tofticles@helvede.net

                      @tante My point is that LLMs 'try' (and very often fail) to solve the wrong problem.

                      Writing all the boilerplate -> should be solved by better frameworks.
                      Spell check -> I think this is already invented.
                      Summarize long texts -> Executive summaries.
                      Produce (verbose) text -> Writing in my view is as much thinking as it is writing - skipping the thinking part is counter-productive.

                      perigee@rage.loveP This user is from outside of this forum
                      perigee@rage.loveP This user is from outside of this forum
                      perigee@rage.love
                      wrote last edited by
                      #20

                      @tofticles @tante @onepict it's a bitter pill to be forced to use a spell checker that until very recently didn't even know how many rs are in "strawberry " (or ls in "blackball").

                      onepict@chaos.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS simonzerafa@infosec.exchange

                        @tante

                        That doesn't seem to be the best idea @pluralistic

                        AI and LLM output is 90% bullshit, and most people don't have the time nor the patience to work out which 10% might actually be useful.

                        That's completely ignoring the environmental and human impacts of the AI bubble.

                        Try buying DDR memory, a GPU or an SSD / HDD at the moment.

                        pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                        pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                        pluralistic@mamot.fr
                        wrote last edited by
                        #21

                        @simonzerafa @tante

                        What is the incremental environmental damage created by running an existing LLM locally on your own laptop?

                        As to "90% bullshit" - as I wrote, the false positive rate for punctuation errors and typos from Ollama/Llama2 is about 50%, which is substantially better than, say, Google Docs' grammar checker.

                        simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR clintruin@mastodon.socialC 3 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • herrlorenz@chaos.socialH herrlorenz@chaos.social

                          @pluralistic @tante My impression was, Tante meant this specific argument and the way it is structured, and the way it functions. I hold the both of you in high esteem, and I don't have the impression that he'd somehow characterize anything beyond that argument he discusses.

                          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                          pluralistic@mamot.fr
                          wrote last edited by
                          #22

                          @herrLorenz @tante

                          > Cory shows his libertarian leanings here...

                          > Many people criticizing LLMs come from a somewhat leftist (in contrast to Cory’s libertarian) background.

                          pluralistic@mamot.frP cjpaloma@mstdn.socialC 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                            @herrLorenz @tante

                            > Cory shows his libertarian leanings here...

                            > Many people criticizing LLMs come from a somewhat leftist (in contrast to Cory’s libertarian) background.

                            pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                            pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                            pluralistic@mamot.fr
                            wrote last edited by
                            #23

                            @herrLorenz @tante

                            This falls into the "you are entitled to your own opinions, but not your own facts" territory.

                            herrlorenz@chaos.socialH 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                              Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture". I think his argument is a strawman, doesn't align with his own actions and delegitimizes important political actions we need to make in order to build a better cyberphysical world.

                              Link Preview Image
                              Acting ethically in an imperfect world

                              Life is complicated. Regardless of what your beliefs or politics or ethics are, the way that we set up our society and economy will often force you to act against them: You might not want to fly somewhere but your employer will not accept another mode of transportation, you want to eat vegan but are […]

                              favicon

                              Smashing Frames (tante.cc)

                              perigee@rage.loveP This user is from outside of this forum
                              perigee@rage.loveP This user is from outside of this forum
                              perigee@rage.love
                              wrote last edited by
                              #24

                              @tante Wow, it's weird to me that Doctorow pipes his own writing through a plagiarism machine.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                                Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture". I think his argument is a strawman, doesn't align with his own actions and delegitimizes important political actions we need to make in order to build a better cyberphysical world.

                                Link Preview Image
                                Acting ethically in an imperfect world

                                Life is complicated. Regardless of what your beliefs or politics or ethics are, the way that we set up our society and economy will often force you to act against them: You might not want to fly somewhere but your employer will not accept another mode of transportation, you want to eat vegan but are […]

                                favicon

                                Smashing Frames (tante.cc)

                                charlesdelavalleepoussin@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                charlesdelavalleepoussin@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                charlesdelavalleepoussin@mastodon.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #25

                                @tante

                                I think you're right on this.

                                Thanks for putting it into words.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • perigee@rage.loveP perigee@rage.love

                                  @tofticles @tante @onepict it's a bitter pill to be forced to use a spell checker that until very recently didn't even know how many rs are in "strawberry " (or ls in "blackball").

                                  onepict@chaos.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                                  onepict@chaos.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                                  onepict@chaos.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #26

                                  @perigee @tofticles I think @tante captured the difficulties existing and surviving in this world.

                                  I'm still disappointed with Doctorow, especially since he felt the need to get his defence in first.

                                  His choice of wording there was saddening to me. He outsourced his feelings of guilt and judgement on the rest of us.

                                  Whenever I hear or read someone using the term purity anything I feel a mild disappointment. Because I do expect better of our leaders who take the public stage.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                                    Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture". I think his argument is a strawman, doesn't align with his own actions and delegitimizes important political actions we need to make in order to build a better cyberphysical world.

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    Acting ethically in an imperfect world

                                    Life is complicated. Regardless of what your beliefs or politics or ethics are, the way that we set up our society and economy will often force you to act against them: You might not want to fly somewhere but your employer will not accept another mode of transportation, you want to eat vegan but are […]

                                    favicon

                                    Smashing Frames (tante.cc)

                                    heymarkreeves@mstdn.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                                    heymarkreeves@mstdn.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                                    heymarkreeves@mstdn.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #27

                                    @tante Thanks for putting this into words. Struck me the same way.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                                      @simonzerafa @tante

                                      What is the incremental environmental damage created by running an existing LLM locally on your own laptop?

                                      As to "90% bullshit" - as I wrote, the false positive rate for punctuation errors and typos from Ollama/Llama2 is about 50%, which is substantially better than, say, Google Docs' grammar checker.

                                      simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      simonzerafa@infosec.exchange
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #28

                                      @pluralistic @tante

                                      Of course, I am speaking in generalities.

                                      Encouraging the use of LLM's is counterproductive in so many ways, as I highlighted.

                                      Pop a power meter on that LLM adorned PC and let us all know what the power usage looks like with and without your chosen LLM running on a typical task 🙂

                                      That's power that generated somewhere, even if it's with renewable energy.

                                      The main issue with LLM's is that they don't encourage critical thinking, in a world which is already suffering from a massive shortage.

                                      pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS simonzerafa@infosec.exchange

                                        @tante

                                        That doesn't seem to be the best idea @pluralistic

                                        AI and LLM output is 90% bullshit, and most people don't have the time nor the patience to work out which 10% might actually be useful.

                                        That's completely ignoring the environmental and human impacts of the AI bubble.

                                        Try buying DDR memory, a GPU or an SSD / HDD at the moment.

                                        raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #29

                                        @simonzerafa @tante @pluralistic
                                        At best 40% junk, but unless you are so expert you don't need it, you can't know which is plausible rubbish.
                                        Would you play Russian Roulette every day for hours?

                                        pluralistic@mamot.frP simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                                          @simonzerafa @tante

                                          What is the incremental environmental damage created by running an existing LLM locally on your own laptop?

                                          As to "90% bullshit" - as I wrote, the false positive rate for punctuation errors and typos from Ollama/Llama2 is about 50%, which is substantially better than, say, Google Docs' grammar checker.

                                          raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
                                          raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
                                          raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #30

                                          @pluralistic @simonzerafa @tante
                                          But Google Docs anything is rubbish.

                                          pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups