Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture".

Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture".

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
163 Posts 63 Posters 50 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

    Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture". I think his argument is a strawman, doesn't align with his own actions and delegitimizes important political actions we need to make in order to build a better cyberphysical world.

    Link Preview Image
    Acting ethically in an imperfect world

    Life is complicated. Regardless of what your beliefs or politics or ethics are, the way that we set up our society and economy will often force you to act against them: You might not want to fly somewhere but your employer will not accept another mode of transportation, you want to eat vegan but are […]

    favicon

    Smashing Frames (tante.cc)

    cora@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
    cora@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
    cora@hachyderm.io
    wrote last edited by
    #15

    @tante There must be something in the air; I think this is something that has been on many folks' minds for a while... not criticisms of Cory, but rather the general cognitive difficulty of reconciling survival in a world far less under our control than we thought it was when our character and values accreted and congealed.

    It's a nuanced phenomenon especially for a limited-attention-span world. It's good to see people taking up the challenge. Thanks for this.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • dingemansemark@scholar.socialD dingemansemark@scholar.social

      @tante chef's kiss: "This also shines through in Cory arguing that we need to “liberate” technology. What a strange idea: Technology doesn’t need liberation, people do."

      Thank you for writing this cogent piece.

      kbm0@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
      kbm0@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
      kbm0@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #16

      @dingemansemark @tante To be fair I assume that was meant in the open source spirit: Technology liberated from corporate control as a vehicle contributing to the liberation of its users and developers.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

        @tante Dunno where you got the idea that I have a "libertarian" background. I was raised by Trotskyists, am a member of the DSA, am advising and have endorsed Avi Lewis, and joined the UK Greens to back Polanski.

        herrlorenz@chaos.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
        herrlorenz@chaos.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
        herrlorenz@chaos.social
        wrote last edited by
        #17

        @pluralistic @tante My impression was, Tante meant this specific argument and the way it is structured, and the way it functions. I hold the both of you in high esteem, and I don't have the impression that he'd somehow characterize anything beyond that argument he discusses.

        pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

          Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture". I think his argument is a strawman, doesn't align with his own actions and delegitimizes important political actions we need to make in order to build a better cyberphysical world.

          Link Preview Image
          Acting ethically in an imperfect world

          Life is complicated. Regardless of what your beliefs or politics or ethics are, the way that we set up our society and economy will often force you to act against them: You might not want to fly somewhere but your employer will not accept another mode of transportation, you want to eat vegan but are […]

          favicon

          Smashing Frames (tante.cc)

          simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
          simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
          simonzerafa@infosec.exchange
          wrote last edited by
          #18

          @tante

          That doesn't seem to be the best idea @pluralistic

          AI and LLM output is 90% bullshit, and most people don't have the time nor the patience to work out which 10% might actually be useful.

          That's completely ignoring the environmental and human impacts of the AI bubble.

          Try buying DDR memory, a GPU or an SSD / HDD at the moment.

          pluralistic@mamot.frP raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR 2 Replies Last reply
          1
          0
          • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
          • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

            Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture". I think his argument is a strawman, doesn't align with his own actions and delegitimizes important political actions we need to make in order to build a better cyberphysical world.

            Link Preview Image
            Acting ethically in an imperfect world

            Life is complicated. Regardless of what your beliefs or politics or ethics are, the way that we set up our society and economy will often force you to act against them: You might not want to fly somewhere but your employer will not accept another mode of transportation, you want to eat vegan but are […]

            favicon

            Smashing Frames (tante.cc)

            janet@weirder.earthJ This user is from outside of this forum
            janet@weirder.earthJ This user is from outside of this forum
            janet@weirder.earth
            wrote last edited by
            #19

            @tante “Technology doesn’t need liberation, people do.“ It seems so crystal clear to me.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • tofticles@helvede.netT tofticles@helvede.net

              @tante My point is that LLMs 'try' (and very often fail) to solve the wrong problem.

              Writing all the boilerplate -> should be solved by better frameworks.
              Spell check -> I think this is already invented.
              Summarize long texts -> Executive summaries.
              Produce (verbose) text -> Writing in my view is as much thinking as it is writing - skipping the thinking part is counter-productive.

              perigee@rage.loveP This user is from outside of this forum
              perigee@rage.loveP This user is from outside of this forum
              perigee@rage.love
              wrote last edited by
              #20

              @tofticles @tante @onepict it's a bitter pill to be forced to use a spell checker that until very recently didn't even know how many rs are in "strawberry " (or ls in "blackball").

              onepict@chaos.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS simonzerafa@infosec.exchange

                @tante

                That doesn't seem to be the best idea @pluralistic

                AI and LLM output is 90% bullshit, and most people don't have the time nor the patience to work out which 10% might actually be useful.

                That's completely ignoring the environmental and human impacts of the AI bubble.

                Try buying DDR memory, a GPU or an SSD / HDD at the moment.

                pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                pluralistic@mamot.fr
                wrote last edited by
                #21

                @simonzerafa @tante

                What is the incremental environmental damage created by running an existing LLM locally on your own laptop?

                As to "90% bullshit" - as I wrote, the false positive rate for punctuation errors and typos from Ollama/Llama2 is about 50%, which is substantially better than, say, Google Docs' grammar checker.

                simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR clintruin@mastodon.socialC 3 Replies Last reply
                0
                • herrlorenz@chaos.socialH herrlorenz@chaos.social

                  @pluralistic @tante My impression was, Tante meant this specific argument and the way it is structured, and the way it functions. I hold the both of you in high esteem, and I don't have the impression that he'd somehow characterize anything beyond that argument he discusses.

                  pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                  pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                  pluralistic@mamot.fr
                  wrote last edited by
                  #22

                  @herrLorenz @tante

                  > Cory shows his libertarian leanings here...

                  > Many people criticizing LLMs come from a somewhat leftist (in contrast to Cory’s libertarian) background.

                  pluralistic@mamot.frP cjpaloma@mstdn.socialC 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                    @herrLorenz @tante

                    > Cory shows his libertarian leanings here...

                    > Many people criticizing LLMs come from a somewhat leftist (in contrast to Cory’s libertarian) background.

                    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                    pluralistic@mamot.fr
                    wrote last edited by
                    #23

                    @herrLorenz @tante

                    This falls into the "you are entitled to your own opinions, but not your own facts" territory.

                    herrlorenz@chaos.socialH 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                      Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture". I think his argument is a strawman, doesn't align with his own actions and delegitimizes important political actions we need to make in order to build a better cyberphysical world.

                      Link Preview Image
                      Acting ethically in an imperfect world

                      Life is complicated. Regardless of what your beliefs or politics or ethics are, the way that we set up our society and economy will often force you to act against them: You might not want to fly somewhere but your employer will not accept another mode of transportation, you want to eat vegan but are […]

                      favicon

                      Smashing Frames (tante.cc)

                      perigee@rage.loveP This user is from outside of this forum
                      perigee@rage.loveP This user is from outside of this forum
                      perigee@rage.love
                      wrote last edited by
                      #24

                      @tante Wow, it's weird to me that Doctorow pipes his own writing through a plagiarism machine.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                        Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture". I think his argument is a strawman, doesn't align with his own actions and delegitimizes important political actions we need to make in order to build a better cyberphysical world.

                        Link Preview Image
                        Acting ethically in an imperfect world

                        Life is complicated. Regardless of what your beliefs or politics or ethics are, the way that we set up our society and economy will often force you to act against them: You might not want to fly somewhere but your employer will not accept another mode of transportation, you want to eat vegan but are […]

                        favicon

                        Smashing Frames (tante.cc)

                        charlesdelavalleepoussin@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                        charlesdelavalleepoussin@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                        charlesdelavalleepoussin@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #25

                        @tante

                        I think you're right on this.

                        Thanks for putting it into words.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • perigee@rage.loveP perigee@rage.love

                          @tofticles @tante @onepict it's a bitter pill to be forced to use a spell checker that until very recently didn't even know how many rs are in "strawberry " (or ls in "blackball").

                          onepict@chaos.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                          onepict@chaos.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                          onepict@chaos.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #26

                          @perigee @tofticles I think @tante captured the difficulties existing and surviving in this world.

                          I'm still disappointed with Doctorow, especially since he felt the need to get his defence in first.

                          His choice of wording there was saddening to me. He outsourced his feelings of guilt and judgement on the rest of us.

                          Whenever I hear or read someone using the term purity anything I feel a mild disappointment. Because I do expect better of our leaders who take the public stage.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                            Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture". I think his argument is a strawman, doesn't align with his own actions and delegitimizes important political actions we need to make in order to build a better cyberphysical world.

                            Link Preview Image
                            Acting ethically in an imperfect world

                            Life is complicated. Regardless of what your beliefs or politics or ethics are, the way that we set up our society and economy will often force you to act against them: You might not want to fly somewhere but your employer will not accept another mode of transportation, you want to eat vegan but are […]

                            favicon

                            Smashing Frames (tante.cc)

                            heymarkreeves@mstdn.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                            heymarkreeves@mstdn.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                            heymarkreeves@mstdn.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #27

                            @tante Thanks for putting this into words. Struck me the same way.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                              @simonzerafa @tante

                              What is the incremental environmental damage created by running an existing LLM locally on your own laptop?

                              As to "90% bullshit" - as I wrote, the false positive rate for punctuation errors and typos from Ollama/Llama2 is about 50%, which is substantially better than, say, Google Docs' grammar checker.

                              simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                              simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                              simonzerafa@infosec.exchange
                              wrote last edited by
                              #28

                              @pluralistic @tante

                              Of course, I am speaking in generalities.

                              Encouraging the use of LLM's is counterproductive in so many ways, as I highlighted.

                              Pop a power meter on that LLM adorned PC and let us all know what the power usage looks like with and without your chosen LLM running on a typical task 🙂

                              That's power that generated somewhere, even if it's with renewable energy.

                              The main issue with LLM's is that they don't encourage critical thinking, in a world which is already suffering from a massive shortage.

                              pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS simonzerafa@infosec.exchange

                                @tante

                                That doesn't seem to be the best idea @pluralistic

                                AI and LLM output is 90% bullshit, and most people don't have the time nor the patience to work out which 10% might actually be useful.

                                That's completely ignoring the environmental and human impacts of the AI bubble.

                                Try buying DDR memory, a GPU or an SSD / HDD at the moment.

                                raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
                                raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
                                raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie
                                wrote last edited by
                                #29

                                @simonzerafa @tante @pluralistic
                                At best 40% junk, but unless you are so expert you don't need it, you can't know which is plausible rubbish.
                                Would you play Russian Roulette every day for hours?

                                pluralistic@mamot.frP simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                                  @simonzerafa @tante

                                  What is the incremental environmental damage created by running an existing LLM locally on your own laptop?

                                  As to "90% bullshit" - as I wrote, the false positive rate for punctuation errors and typos from Ollama/Llama2 is about 50%, which is substantially better than, say, Google Docs' grammar checker.

                                  raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #30

                                  @pluralistic @simonzerafa @tante
                                  But Google Docs anything is rubbish.

                                  pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                                    Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture". I think his argument is a strawman, doesn't align with his own actions and delegitimizes important political actions we need to make in order to build a better cyberphysical world.

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    Acting ethically in an imperfect world

                                    Life is complicated. Regardless of what your beliefs or politics or ethics are, the way that we set up our society and economy will often force you to act against them: You might not want to fly somewhere but your employer will not accept another mode of transportation, you want to eat vegan but are […]

                                    favicon

                                    Smashing Frames (tante.cc)

                                    vy@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                                    vy@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                                    vy@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #31

                                    @tante Use of the word "neoliberal" in earnest in an essay is an almost infallible sign of nonsense. Certainly it works here.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      pluralistic@mamot.fr
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #32

                                      @FediThing @tante

                                      Which parts of running a model on your own laptop are implicated in "destroying the planet?" How is checking punctuation "stealing labor?" Or, for that matter "giving power over knowledge to LLM owners?"

                                      skyfaller@jawns.clubS lupinoarts@mstdn.socialL 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie

                                        @simonzerafa @tante @pluralistic
                                        At best 40% junk, but unless you are so expert you don't need it, you can't know which is plausible rubbish.
                                        Would you play Russian Roulette every day for hours?

                                        pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        pluralistic@mamot.fr
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #33

                                        @raymaccarthy @simonzerafa @tante

                                        Again, what does checking the punctuation on a single essay per day have to do with "play[ing] Russian Roulette every day for hours?"

                                        shiri@foggyminds.comS 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie

                                          @pluralistic @simonzerafa @tante
                                          But Google Docs anything is rubbish.

                                          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                          pluralistic@mamot.fr
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #34

                                          @raymaccarthy @simonzerafa @tante

                                          I see. And do you have moral opinions about whether people should use Google Docs? Do you seek out strangers to tell them that it's dangerous to use Google Docs?

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups