Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture".

Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture".

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
163 Posts 63 Posters 50 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • vitor@hachyderm.ioV vitor@hachyderm.io

    @tante I think you have a typo in the first word. Should be “Life” or “Living”.

    tante@tldr.nettime.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
    tante@tldr.nettime.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
    tante@tldr.nettime.org
    wrote last edited by
    #6

    @vitor thanks. Of course it's in the first word 😉

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
    • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

      Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture". I think his argument is a strawman, doesn't align with his own actions and delegitimizes important political actions we need to make in order to build a better cyberphysical world.

      Link Preview Image
      Acting ethically in an imperfect world

      Life is complicated. Regardless of what your beliefs or politics or ethics are, the way that we set up our society and economy will often force you to act against them: You might not want to fly somewhere but your employer will not accept another mode of transportation, you want to eat vegan but are […]

      favicon

      Smashing Frames (tante.cc)

      slowenough@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      slowenough@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      slowenough@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #7

      @tante One thing I'd love to hear more about from you, and @pluralistic, @simon and others is which of these models are doing the best, most interesting things to mitigate harms? Some are being trained with thought about & limits on the inputs, and the public interest in mind in general. To at least some degree. (e.g., Apertus)

      Who's reviewing, comparing models with that lens? If someone understands most companies are part of the problem and asks for alternatives, what do you offer them?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

        Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture". I think his argument is a strawman, doesn't align with his own actions and delegitimizes important political actions we need to make in order to build a better cyberphysical world.

        Link Preview Image
        Acting ethically in an imperfect world

        Life is complicated. Regardless of what your beliefs or politics or ethics are, the way that we set up our society and economy will often force you to act against them: You might not want to fly somewhere but your employer will not accept another mode of transportation, you want to eat vegan but are […]

        favicon

        Smashing Frames (tante.cc)

        susiarnott@mastodon.greenS This user is from outside of this forum
        susiarnott@mastodon.greenS This user is from outside of this forum
        susiarnott@mastodon.green
        wrote last edited by
        #8

        @tante At Tuesday night's #Faradayprize presentation from Mike Woodbridge, more than one of the slides about #LLMs brought #Trump to mind

        Link Preview Image
        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

          Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture". I think his argument is a strawman, doesn't align with his own actions and delegitimizes important political actions we need to make in order to build a better cyberphysical world.

          Link Preview Image
          Acting ethically in an imperfect world

          Life is complicated. Regardless of what your beliefs or politics or ethics are, the way that we set up our society and economy will often force you to act against them: You might not want to fly somewhere but your employer will not accept another mode of transportation, you want to eat vegan but are […]

          favicon

          Smashing Frames (tante.cc)

          tofticles@helvede.netT This user is from outside of this forum
          tofticles@helvede.netT This user is from outside of this forum
          tofticles@helvede.net
          wrote last edited by
          #9

          @tante I, for one, enjoyed the write-up.

          As you, I do plenty of things that I either cannot morally or ethically defend or simply am ignorant of the harms of.

          For other technology, I am either pressured to use it (by government or similar institutions) or I can at least use it 'for good' (facilitating some other good - in current case, student administration) and also make a living.

          For LLMs, I fail to see the redeeming qualities that make the compromise 'worth it'. It's all nett negatives.

          tofticles@helvede.netT 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

            Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture". I think his argument is a strawman, doesn't align with his own actions and delegitimizes important political actions we need to make in order to build a better cyberphysical world.

            Link Preview Image
            Acting ethically in an imperfect world

            Life is complicated. Regardless of what your beliefs or politics or ethics are, the way that we set up our society and economy will often force you to act against them: You might not want to fly somewhere but your employer will not accept another mode of transportation, you want to eat vegan but are […]

            favicon

            Smashing Frames (tante.cc)

            life_is@no-pony.farmL This user is from outside of this forum
            life_is@no-pony.farmL This user is from outside of this forum
            life_is@no-pony.farm
            wrote last edited by
            #10
            @tante@tldr.nettime.org That's not the only thing where the actions and words of Doctorow do not match.
            colman@mastodon.ieC 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

              Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture". I think his argument is a strawman, doesn't align with his own actions and delegitimizes important political actions we need to make in order to build a better cyberphysical world.

              Link Preview Image
              Acting ethically in an imperfect world

              Life is complicated. Regardless of what your beliefs or politics or ethics are, the way that we set up our society and economy will often force you to act against them: You might not want to fly somewhere but your employer will not accept another mode of transportation, you want to eat vegan but are […]

              favicon

              Smashing Frames (tante.cc)

              sibrosan@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
              sibrosan@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
              sibrosan@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #11

              @tante Using LLM's for various tasks may be convenient, but it may also put you at a disadvantage because you lose the ability to do those things by yourself.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • tofticles@helvede.netT tofticles@helvede.net

                @tante I, for one, enjoyed the write-up.

                As you, I do plenty of things that I either cannot morally or ethically defend or simply am ignorant of the harms of.

                For other technology, I am either pressured to use it (by government or similar institutions) or I can at least use it 'for good' (facilitating some other good - in current case, student administration) and also make a living.

                For LLMs, I fail to see the redeeming qualities that make the compromise 'worth it'. It's all nett negatives.

                tofticles@helvede.netT This user is from outside of this forum
                tofticles@helvede.netT This user is from outside of this forum
                tofticles@helvede.net
                wrote last edited by
                #12

                @tante My point is that LLMs 'try' (and very often fail) to solve the wrong problem.

                Writing all the boilerplate -> should be solved by better frameworks.
                Spell check -> I think this is already invented.
                Summarize long texts -> Executive summaries.
                Produce (verbose) text -> Writing in my view is as much thinking as it is writing - skipping the thinking part is counter-productive.

                perigee@rage.loveP 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                  Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture". I think his argument is a strawman, doesn't align with his own actions and delegitimizes important political actions we need to make in order to build a better cyberphysical world.

                  Link Preview Image
                  Acting ethically in an imperfect world

                  Life is complicated. Regardless of what your beliefs or politics or ethics are, the way that we set up our society and economy will often force you to act against them: You might not want to fly somewhere but your employer will not accept another mode of transportation, you want to eat vegan but are […]

                  favicon

                  Smashing Frames (tante.cc)

                  dingemansemark@scholar.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                  dingemansemark@scholar.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                  dingemansemark@scholar.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #13

                  @tante chef's kiss: "This also shines through in Cory arguing that we need to “liberate” technology. What a strange idea: Technology doesn’t need liberation, people do."

                  Thank you for writing this cogent piece.

                  kbm0@mastodon.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                    Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture". I think his argument is a strawman, doesn't align with his own actions and delegitimizes important political actions we need to make in order to build a better cyberphysical world.

                    Link Preview Image
                    Acting ethically in an imperfect world

                    Life is complicated. Regardless of what your beliefs or politics or ethics are, the way that we set up our society and economy will often force you to act against them: You might not want to fly somewhere but your employer will not accept another mode of transportation, you want to eat vegan but are […]

                    favicon

                    Smashing Frames (tante.cc)

                    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                    pluralistic@mamot.fr
                    wrote last edited by
                    #14

                    @tante Dunno where you got the idea that I have a "libertarian" background. I was raised by Trotskyists, am a member of the DSA, am advising and have endorsed Avi Lewis, and joined the UK Greens to back Polanski.

                    herrlorenz@chaos.socialH giacomo@snac.tesio.itG jorismeys@mstdn.socialJ 3 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                      Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture". I think his argument is a strawman, doesn't align with his own actions and delegitimizes important political actions we need to make in order to build a better cyberphysical world.

                      Link Preview Image
                      Acting ethically in an imperfect world

                      Life is complicated. Regardless of what your beliefs or politics or ethics are, the way that we set up our society and economy will often force you to act against them: You might not want to fly somewhere but your employer will not accept another mode of transportation, you want to eat vegan but are […]

                      favicon

                      Smashing Frames (tante.cc)

                      cora@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                      cora@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                      cora@hachyderm.io
                      wrote last edited by
                      #15

                      @tante There must be something in the air; I think this is something that has been on many folks' minds for a while... not criticisms of Cory, but rather the general cognitive difficulty of reconciling survival in a world far less under our control than we thought it was when our character and values accreted and congealed.

                      It's a nuanced phenomenon especially for a limited-attention-span world. It's good to see people taking up the challenge. Thanks for this.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • dingemansemark@scholar.socialD dingemansemark@scholar.social

                        @tante chef's kiss: "This also shines through in Cory arguing that we need to “liberate” technology. What a strange idea: Technology doesn’t need liberation, people do."

                        Thank you for writing this cogent piece.

                        kbm0@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                        kbm0@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                        kbm0@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #16

                        @dingemansemark @tante To be fair I assume that was meant in the open source spirit: Technology liberated from corporate control as a vehicle contributing to the liberation of its users and developers.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                          @tante Dunno where you got the idea that I have a "libertarian" background. I was raised by Trotskyists, am a member of the DSA, am advising and have endorsed Avi Lewis, and joined the UK Greens to back Polanski.

                          herrlorenz@chaos.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                          herrlorenz@chaos.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                          herrlorenz@chaos.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #17

                          @pluralistic @tante My impression was, Tante meant this specific argument and the way it is structured, and the way it functions. I hold the both of you in high esteem, and I don't have the impression that he'd somehow characterize anything beyond that argument he discusses.

                          pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                            Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture". I think his argument is a strawman, doesn't align with his own actions and delegitimizes important political actions we need to make in order to build a better cyberphysical world.

                            Link Preview Image
                            Acting ethically in an imperfect world

                            Life is complicated. Regardless of what your beliefs or politics or ethics are, the way that we set up our society and economy will often force you to act against them: You might not want to fly somewhere but your employer will not accept another mode of transportation, you want to eat vegan but are […]

                            favicon

                            Smashing Frames (tante.cc)

                            simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                            simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                            simonzerafa@infosec.exchange
                            wrote last edited by
                            #18

                            @tante

                            That doesn't seem to be the best idea @pluralistic

                            AI and LLM output is 90% bullshit, and most people don't have the time nor the patience to work out which 10% might actually be useful.

                            That's completely ignoring the environmental and human impacts of the AI bubble.

                            Try buying DDR memory, a GPU or an SSD / HDD at the moment.

                            pluralistic@mamot.frP raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR 2 Replies Last reply
                            1
                            0
                            • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                            • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                              Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture". I think his argument is a strawman, doesn't align with his own actions and delegitimizes important political actions we need to make in order to build a better cyberphysical world.

                              Link Preview Image
                              Acting ethically in an imperfect world

                              Life is complicated. Regardless of what your beliefs or politics or ethics are, the way that we set up our society and economy will often force you to act against them: You might not want to fly somewhere but your employer will not accept another mode of transportation, you want to eat vegan but are […]

                              favicon

                              Smashing Frames (tante.cc)

                              janet@weirder.earthJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              janet@weirder.earthJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              janet@weirder.earth
                              wrote last edited by
                              #19

                              @tante “Technology doesn’t need liberation, people do.“ It seems so crystal clear to me.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • tofticles@helvede.netT tofticles@helvede.net

                                @tante My point is that LLMs 'try' (and very often fail) to solve the wrong problem.

                                Writing all the boilerplate -> should be solved by better frameworks.
                                Spell check -> I think this is already invented.
                                Summarize long texts -> Executive summaries.
                                Produce (verbose) text -> Writing in my view is as much thinking as it is writing - skipping the thinking part is counter-productive.

                                perigee@rage.loveP This user is from outside of this forum
                                perigee@rage.loveP This user is from outside of this forum
                                perigee@rage.love
                                wrote last edited by
                                #20

                                @tofticles @tante @onepict it's a bitter pill to be forced to use a spell checker that until very recently didn't even know how many rs are in "strawberry " (or ls in "blackball").

                                onepict@chaos.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS simonzerafa@infosec.exchange

                                  @tante

                                  That doesn't seem to be the best idea @pluralistic

                                  AI and LLM output is 90% bullshit, and most people don't have the time nor the patience to work out which 10% might actually be useful.

                                  That's completely ignoring the environmental and human impacts of the AI bubble.

                                  Try buying DDR memory, a GPU or an SSD / HDD at the moment.

                                  pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  pluralistic@mamot.fr
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #21

                                  @simonzerafa @tante

                                  What is the incremental environmental damage created by running an existing LLM locally on your own laptop?

                                  As to "90% bullshit" - as I wrote, the false positive rate for punctuation errors and typos from Ollama/Llama2 is about 50%, which is substantially better than, say, Google Docs' grammar checker.

                                  simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR clintruin@mastodon.socialC 3 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • herrlorenz@chaos.socialH herrlorenz@chaos.social

                                    @pluralistic @tante My impression was, Tante meant this specific argument and the way it is structured, and the way it functions. I hold the both of you in high esteem, and I don't have the impression that he'd somehow characterize anything beyond that argument he discusses.

                                    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    pluralistic@mamot.fr
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #22

                                    @herrLorenz @tante

                                    > Cory shows his libertarian leanings here...

                                    > Many people criticizing LLMs come from a somewhat leftist (in contrast to Cory’s libertarian) background.

                                    pluralistic@mamot.frP cjpaloma@mstdn.socialC 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                                      @herrLorenz @tante

                                      > Cory shows his libertarian leanings here...

                                      > Many people criticizing LLMs come from a somewhat leftist (in contrast to Cory’s libertarian) background.

                                      pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      pluralistic@mamot.fr
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #23

                                      @herrLorenz @tante

                                      This falls into the "you are entitled to your own opinions, but not your own facts" territory.

                                      herrlorenz@chaos.socialH 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                                        Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture". I think his argument is a strawman, doesn't align with his own actions and delegitimizes important political actions we need to make in order to build a better cyberphysical world.

                                        Link Preview Image
                                        Acting ethically in an imperfect world

                                        Life is complicated. Regardless of what your beliefs or politics or ethics are, the way that we set up our society and economy will often force you to act against them: You might not want to fly somewhere but your employer will not accept another mode of transportation, you want to eat vegan but are […]

                                        favicon

                                        Smashing Frames (tante.cc)

                                        perigee@rage.loveP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        perigee@rage.loveP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        perigee@rage.love
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #24

                                        @tante Wow, it's weird to me that Doctorow pipes his own writing through a plagiarism machine.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                                          Yesterday Cory Doctorow argued that refusal to use LLMs was mere "neoliberal purity culture". I think his argument is a strawman, doesn't align with his own actions and delegitimizes important political actions we need to make in order to build a better cyberphysical world.

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          Acting ethically in an imperfect world

                                          Life is complicated. Regardless of what your beliefs or politics or ethics are, the way that we set up our society and economy will often force you to act against them: You might not want to fly somewhere but your employer will not accept another mode of transportation, you want to eat vegan but are […]

                                          favicon

                                          Smashing Frames (tante.cc)

                                          charlesdelavalleepoussin@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          charlesdelavalleepoussin@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          charlesdelavalleepoussin@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #25

                                          @tante

                                          I think you're right on this.

                                          Thanks for putting it into words.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups