Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”.

The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
1 Cross-posts 61 Posts 48 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • nuwagaba2@mastodon.socialN nuwagaba2@mastodon.social

    @mullvadnet
    How can the people in U.K escape being victims of such a policy that's slowly taking away their freedom?

    sundew@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
    sundew@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
    sundew@beige.party
    wrote last edited by
    #32

    @nuwagaba2 @mullvadnet Both join, and vote for, the Green party.

    nuwagaba2@mastodon.socialN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • kierkegaanks@beige.partyK kierkegaanks@beige.party

      @mullvadnet jesus fucking mosley

      0daytux@infosec.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
      0daytux@infosec.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
      0daytux@infosec.exchange
      wrote last edited by
      #33

      @Kierkegaanks @mullvadnet if only mosley could see this he’d be so proud he’d shed a tear

      zbrown@floss.socialZ 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mullvadnet@mastodon.onlineM mullvadnet@mastodon.online

        The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”. The correct term, however, is not age verification but identity verification.

        A law like this would require everyone to identify themselves in order to use a VPN. This would pose a risk to whistleblowers, violate human rights, and represent yet another step toward an authoritarian society.

        pglpm@c.imP This user is from outside of this forum
        pglpm@c.imP This user is from outside of this forum
        pglpm@c.im
        wrote last edited by
        #34

        @mullvadnet The people don't do anything about this, which means the people are OK with it.

        In any case, Russia won. No need to invade: UK and the rest of Europe are slowly becoming Russia.

        #democracy #ukpol #eupol

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mullvadnet@mastodon.onlineM mullvadnet@mastodon.online

          The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”. The correct term, however, is not age verification but identity verification.

          A law like this would require everyone to identify themselves in order to use a VPN. This would pose a risk to whistleblowers, violate human rights, and represent yet another step toward an authoritarian society.

          admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.comA This user is from outside of this forum
          admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.comA This user is from outside of this forum
          admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com
          wrote last edited by
          #35

          @mullvadnet Me: "I mean generally you pay with a credit card anyway so they already know who you are, unless you're using..."
          *looks at who posted this*
          Oh. Yeah that's who I was thinking of. xD

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • mullvadnet@mastodon.onlineM mullvadnet@mastodon.online

            The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”. The correct term, however, is not age verification but identity verification.

            A law like this would require everyone to identify themselves in order to use a VPN. This would pose a risk to whistleblowers, violate human rights, and represent yet another step toward an authoritarian society.

            gregalotl@c.imG This user is from outside of this forum
            gregalotl@c.imG This user is from outside of this forum
            gregalotl@c.im
            wrote last edited by
            #36

            @mullvadnet
            Onion router, anyone?

            adamsaidsomething@mastodon.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mullvadnet@mastodon.onlineM mullvadnet@mastodon.online

              The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”. The correct term, however, is not age verification but identity verification.

              A law like this would require everyone to identify themselves in order to use a VPN. This would pose a risk to whistleblowers, violate human rights, and represent yet another step toward an authoritarian society.

              wod0bow@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
              wod0bow@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
              wod0bow@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #37

              @mullvadnet They are so close to total control. They already have govs, banks, bigtech, media and They want absolutne power. They can cancel your choice (like elections) They can do terrible things like on the E-Island and They can even kill other nations without consequences.
              There are not enough people who can notice that. And there are even less ones, who want to react.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • greatlaketrout@noc.socialG greatlaketrout@noc.social

                @mullvadnet

                Requiring every VPN user to verify their age to stop a few bad actors is like requiring everyone to show government ID to buy a hammer because a few people used hammers to commit crimes.

                2something@transfem.social2 This user is from outside of this forum
                2something@transfem.social2 This user is from outside of this forum
                2something@transfem.social
                wrote last edited by
                #38

                @greatlaketrout@noc.social @mullvadnet@mastodon.online

                But you can actually kill someone with a hammer, much more easily than you can kill someone with a VPN. The UK Government is more afraid of words and communication than they are of
                deadly weapons.

                greatlaketrout@noc.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • rhizomancer@todon.euR rhizomancer@todon.eu

                  @mullvadnet Look what's going on in Spain as well: https://www.techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-security/la-liga-wins-court-order-requiring-nordvpn-and-proton-vpn-to-block-illegal-football-streams-in-spain-but-vpn-firms-say-they-have-not-been-notified

                  adamsaidsomething@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                  adamsaidsomething@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                  adamsaidsomething@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #39

                  @rhizomancer @mullvadnet

                  And there's no precision with those blocks either. Whole chunks of the internet go down in Spain when the soccer is playing, not just streaming sites

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • gregalotl@c.imG gregalotl@c.im

                    @mullvadnet
                    Onion router, anyone?

                    adamsaidsomething@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                    adamsaidsomething@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                    adamsaidsomething@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #40

                    @gregalotl @mullvadnet

                    And it won't be long before folks in the U.K. will need to use secret bridges for that too

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • sloanlance@mastodon.socialS sloanlance@mastodon.social

                      @mullvadnet

                      Age verification for VPN doesn't make sense. Why shouldn't children use VPNs?

                      E This user is from outside of this forum
                      E This user is from outside of this forum
                      equity7804@hostux.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #41

                      @sloanlance @mullvadnet It was never actually to protect the children, and always to enable mass surveillance & expand censorship

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • mullvadnet@mastodon.onlineM mullvadnet@mastodon.online

                        The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”. The correct term, however, is not age verification but identity verification.

                        A law like this would require everyone to identify themselves in order to use a VPN. This would pose a risk to whistleblowers, violate human rights, and represent yet another step toward an authoritarian society.

                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                        agaxprex@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #42

                        @mullvadnet We gotta band together and undermine the authority of the ISPs and the oligarchies that control them. Thank you for fighting back Mullvad 🫡

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • mullvadnet@mastodon.onlineM mullvadnet@mastodon.online

                          The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”. The correct term, however, is not age verification but identity verification.

                          A law like this would require everyone to identify themselves in order to use a VPN. This would pose a risk to whistleblowers, violate human rights, and represent yet another step toward an authoritarian society.

                          accordionbruce@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                          accordionbruce@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                          accordionbruce@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #43

                          @mullvadnet @paul_ipv6
                          I can’t say I understand this technology very well but as far as I do, it seems like people would just use a VPN in order to avoid being punished for using a VPN wouldn’t they?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • 2something@transfem.social2 2something@transfem.social

                            @greatlaketrout@noc.social @mullvadnet@mastodon.online

                            But you can actually kill someone with a hammer, much more easily than you can kill someone with a VPN. The UK Government is more afraid of words and communication than they are of
                            deadly weapons.

                            greatlaketrout@noc.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                            greatlaketrout@noc.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                            greatlaketrout@noc.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #44

                            @2something @mullvadnet

                            They are acting with extreme duplicity. Day one thing ( we support online privacy and the right of the individual to control their data) oh but by the way the laws we pass are going to destroy online privacy and the right for people to control their own data.

                            Asshats one and all.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • 0daytux@infosec.exchange0 0daytux@infosec.exchange

                              @Kierkegaanks @mullvadnet if only mosley could see this he’d be so proud he’d shed a tear

                              zbrown@floss.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
                              zbrown@floss.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
                              zbrown@floss.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #45

                              @0dayTux @Kierkegaanks @mullvadnet don't worry Mosley is getting plenty rich of this.

                              Or rather his grandson is.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • project1enigma@chaos.socialP project1enigma@chaos.social

                                @alexanderdyas @hypolite @mullvadnet

                                It's not just IT specific. It's human rights/freedoms issues. But then the UK doesn't have much of a constitution that would be protected from simple parliament majorities IIRC?

                                zbrown@floss.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                zbrown@floss.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                zbrown@floss.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #46

                                @project1enigma @alexanderdyas @hypolite @mullvadnet the ECHR is relatively enshrined in so much as, yes, a simple majority could abandon it, but doing so would unravel a lot of other things and generally blow up relations with basically all of Europe except maybe Russia, so your have to be utterly off your rocker to try that.

                                The three largest parties by polling all want to either tear up or substantially undermine the ECHR.

                                Don't think any constitutional setup would protect us at this point…

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • zbrown@floss.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  zbrown@floss.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  zbrown@floss.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #47

                                  @petealexharris @GlasWolf @mullvadnet yeah it's important to remember that, whilst yes trending-down-from-30% polling figures are kinda terrifying, it really doesn't translate to 30% seats at all, especially when unlike the LibDems they don't ‘know how to play the game’.

                                  It's still plausible enough they end up the largest seat bloc, or close to, but in practise an outright majority is unlikely — so it all come down to some sorta deal with the Tories most probably.

                                  zbrown@floss.socialZ 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • zbrown@floss.socialZ zbrown@floss.social

                                    @petealexharris @GlasWolf @mullvadnet yeah it's important to remember that, whilst yes trending-down-from-30% polling figures are kinda terrifying, it really doesn't translate to 30% seats at all, especially when unlike the LibDems they don't ‘know how to play the game’.

                                    It's still plausible enough they end up the largest seat bloc, or close to, but in practise an outright majority is unlikely — so it all come down to some sorta deal with the Tories most probably.

                                    zbrown@floss.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    zbrown@floss.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    zbrown@floss.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #48

                                    @petealexharris @GlasWolf @mullvadnet and yeah, one can only hope people will be sensible enough before or after the election to come together as a democratic alliance and beat them to the Palace.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • alexanderdyas@mindly.socialA alexanderdyas@mindly.social

                                      @mullvadnet How on earth is this even enforceable?

                                      michaelgemar@mstdn.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      michaelgemar@mstdn.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      michaelgemar@mstdn.ca
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #49

                                      @alexanderdyas @mullvadnet Yeah, I don’t get it. How is the government going to prevent people from downloading VPN software?

                                      alexanderdyas@mindly.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • mullvadnet@mastodon.onlineM mullvadnet@mastodon.online

                                        The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”. The correct term, however, is not age verification but identity verification.

                                        A law like this would require everyone to identify themselves in order to use a VPN. This would pose a risk to whistleblowers, violate human rights, and represent yet another step toward an authoritarian society.

                                        wsa@rebel.arW This user is from outside of this forum
                                        wsa@rebel.arW This user is from outside of this forum
                                        wsa@rebel.ar
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #50

                                        @mullvadnet I challenge all of you to do something about it, you may thing that posting stuff online is enough, but you should be coordinated enough to rise against your own government in case v for vendetta fascism levels are present or some sort of pre-1984 fascism stages are met.

                                        We have mesh networks, ESP8266, several IoT devices, vpns, yggdrasil protocol, E2EE, what is stoping you from coordinate and start social movements, are you all waiting to be on your knees with a boot?

                                        I recommend reading books on subjectivity colonization.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • sundew@beige.partyS sundew@beige.party

                                          @nuwagaba2 @mullvadnet Both join, and vote for, the Green party.

                                          nuwagaba2@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                          nuwagaba2@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                          nuwagaba2@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #51

                                          @sundew
                                          That's great. But are people over there aware that they're being enslaved?

                                          fishidwardrobe@mastodon.me.ukF 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups